Value of perilesional biopsies in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: results of a prospective, non-randomized, surgeon-blinded study.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to address if detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) can be increased by additional perilesional biopsies (PB) in magnetic resonance (MR)/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized, surgeon-blinded study was conducted between February 2020 and July 2022. Patients were included with PSA levels < 20 ng/ml and ≥ one PI-RADS lesion (grades 3-5) per prostate lobe. Prostate biopsy was performed by two urologists. The first performed the MR-fusion biopsy with 3-5 targeted biopsies (TB) and 6 PB in a standardized pattern. The second performed the systematic (12-fold) biopsy (SB) without knowledge of the MR images. Primary outcome of this study is absence or presence of csPCa (≥ ISUP grade 2) comparing TB, PB and SB, using McNemar test. RESULTS: Analyses were performed for each PI-RADS lesion (n = 218). There was a statistically significant difference in csPC detection rate of TB + SB between PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions (18.0% vs. 42.5% vs. 82.6%, p < 0.001) and TB + PB (19.7% vs. 29.1% vs. 78.3%). Comparing only maximum ISUP grade per lesion, even SB plus TB plus PB did not detect more csPCa compared to SB plus TB (41.3% vs. 39.9%, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We present prospective study data investigating the role of perilesional biopsy in detection of prostate cancer. We detected no statistically significant difference in the detection of csPCa by the addition of PB. Therefore, we recommend continuing 12-fold bilateral SB in addition to TB.

Comparative assessment of multiple-tract vs single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the efficacy and safety of multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) against the benchmark of the single-tract approach. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 391 consecutive PNL procedures was conducted in our tertiary referral center between April 2016 and March 2020. Clinical outcome parameters such as stone-free rate, operation time, postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo, length of hospital stay and time to ipsilateral recurrence resulting in active treatment were assessed. RESULTS: Multi-tract PNL and single-tract PNL were performed in 37 (9%) and 354 (91%) cases respectively. At baseline, compared to single-tract PNL, multi-tract PNL cases were characterized by significantly larger stone burden (2.62 vs 0.97 cm3 , P < .00), lower Hounsfield units (HU) (751 vs 1017 HU, P < .01), a more complex S.T.O.N.E. (size, tract length, obstruction, number of calyces, essence) score (P < .00) and a higher rate of high-risk stone formers (59 vs 19%, P < .00). Analysis of outcome revealed shorter operation time and length of hospital stay for single-tract PNL compared to multi-tract PNL (P < .01). However, the difference in terms of stone-free rates (92% vs 88%), complication rates (43% vs 28%) and time to active retreatment due to ipsilateral recurrence was not statistically significant (P > .05). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective single-center analysis, a multi-tract PNL has been proved to be an efficient and safe expansion of single-tract PNL for large stone burden and complex kidney stone disease. Future prospective research should focus on the procedure's potential effectiveness in reducing the number of interventions until stone-free status in patients with massive stone disease.

The timing of initial imaging in testicular cancer: impact on radiological findings and clinical decision making.

BACKGROUND: In testicular cancer determination of clinical stage and recommendation of therapeutic strategy after inguinal orchiectomy are based on primary imaging by CT-scan of the chest and CT- or MRI-abdomen. It has not been investigated so far whether the imaging should be performed before or after primary testicular surgery. Staging before surgery means exposing all patients to CT radiation irrespective of ensured histologic malignancy while postoperative staging could pose a risk in biased clinical decision making by increased presence of unspecific lymph node enlargement caused by postsurgical effects. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between the timing of initial staging and occurrence of unspecific lymph node enlargement and adjuvant therapies after inguinal orchiectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated clinical and radiological data from 236 patients who had undergone inguinal orchiectomy for testicular cancer at our department. Statistical analysis was performed to determine whether the occurrence of unspecific lymph node enlargement or the rate of adjuvant therapies were influenced by timing of initial staging (preoperative vs. postoperative). RESULTS: The postoperative imaging cohort showed significant more inguinal, pelvic and retroperitoneal unspecific lymph node enlargement than the preoperative imaging cohort. Simultaneous occurrence of inguinal or pelvic lymph node enlargement together with retroperitoneal enlargements could only be found in the postoperative imaging cohort. No difference regarding adjuvant therapies could be found. CONCLUSIONS: Timing of imaging affects the detection rate of unspecific lymph node enlargements but does not show a significant effect on the rate of adjuvant therapies.

The AdVance and AdVanceXP male sling in urinary incontinence: is there a difference?

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and perioperative complications of the AdVanceXP with the original AdVance male sling. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 109 patients with an AdVance and 185 patients with an AdVanceXP male sling. The baseline characteristics and complication rates were analyzed retrospectively. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated prospectively by standardized, validated questionnaires. The Chi2-test for categorical and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables were performed to identify heterogeneity between the groups. RESULTS: Regarding operation time, there was no significant difference between the slings (p = 0.146). The complication rates were comparable in both groups except for postoperative urinary retention. This occurred significantly more often in patients with the AdVanceXP (p = 0.042). During follow-up, no differences could be identified regarding ICIQ-SF, PGI or I-QoL or number of pad usage. CONCLUSIONS: The AdVance and AdVanceXP are safe and effective treatment options for male stress urinary incontinence. However, the innovations of the AdVanceXP sling did not demonstrate a superiority over the original AdVance sling regarding functional outcome.

The TiLOOP® Male Sling: Did We Forejudge.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TiLOOP® male sling (pfm medical, Cologne, Germany) used in the treatment for male stress urinary incontinence (SUI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a total of 34 patients with a TiLOOP® male sling. Perioperative complication rates were assessed and validated questionnaires were prospectively evaluated to assess quality of life and satisfaction rate. Outcome and complication rates were analysed by using descriptive statistics. Correlation of continence outcome and risk factors was performed with the chi-square test. A p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The majority of patients (70.6%) were diagnosed with mild or moderate male SUI. During surgery, one instance (2.9%) of intraoperative urethral injury was observed. There were no immediate postoperative complications. The mean follow-up time was 44.6 months. An improvement of male SUI was reported by 61.9% of the patients and 38.1% reported no change according the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The mean perineal pain score was 0.5 according to the international index of pain. CONCLUSIONS: The TiLOOP® is a safe treatment option for male SUI in our cohort with a low complication rate. However, the functional outcome of the TiLOOP® was inferior when compared to the outcome of the AdVance® male sling.

Risk Factors for Failure of Male Slings and Artificial Urinary Sphincters: Results from a Large Middle European Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: We analysed the impact of predefined risk factors: age, diabetes, history of pelvic irradiation, prior surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), prior urethral stricture, additional procedure during SUI surgery, duration of incontinence, ASA-classification and cause for incontinence on failure and complications in male SUI surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 506 patients with an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and 513 patients with a male sling (MS) in a multicenter cohort study. Complication rates were correlated to the risk factors in univariate analysis. Subsequently, a multivariate logistic regression adjusted to the risk factors was performed. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A history of pelvic irradiation was an independent risk factor for explantation in AUS (p < 0.001) and MS (p = 0.018). Moreover, prior urethral stricture (p = 0.036) and higher ASA-classification (p = 0.039) were positively correlated with explantation in univariate analysis for AUS. Urethral erosion was correlated with prior urethral stricture (p < 0.001) and a history of pelvic irradiation (p < 0.001) in AUS. Furthermore, infection was correlated with additional procedures during SUI surgery in univariate analysis (p = 0.037) in MS. CONCLUSIONS: We first identified the correlation of higher ASA-classification and explantation in AUS. Nevertheless, only a few novel risk factors had a significant influence on the failure of MS or AUS.

R.E.N.A.L. Score Outperforms PADUA Score, C-Index and DAP Score for Outcome Prediction of Nephron Sparing Surgery in a Selected Cohort.

PURPOSE: Several nephrometry scores have been proposed to predict perioperative outcomes in renal surgery. We evaluated which nephrometry score correlates best with the MIC (margin, ischemia and complications) score and quantitative perioperative outcomes in nephron sparing surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 188 patients undergoing nephron sparing surgery were retrospectively investigated for patient, operative and tumor characteristics. Nephrometry scores, including R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, hilar tumor touching the main renal artery or vein and location relative to polar lines), PADUA (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical), C-index (concordance index) and DAP (diameter-axial-polar), were measured on preoperative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and coded continuously and categorically. Parameters pertaining to tumor margin, ischemia and complications were recorded as binary scores and classified as MIC achievement. Operative time, estimated blood loss, warm ischemia time and hospital stay were recorded as quantitative perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: The R.E.N.A.L. score correlated best with MIC and quantitative perioperative outcomes. The continuously coded R.E.N.A.L. score was predictive of MIC on univariate analysis (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97, p = 0.03) and it had the best predictive value on multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.18-0.82, p = 0.03). The C-index but not the PADUA or the DAP score was predictive of MIC on univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. MIC achievement rates were significantly higher for low than for high complexity tumors as assessed by categorically coded R.E.N.A.L. score, C-index and DAP scores. Continuously coded R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA scores positively correlated with operative time, warm ischemia time and hospital stay. The C-index and the DAP score correlated with warm ischemia time. CONCLUSIONS: Of 4 nephrometry scores the R.E.N.A.L. score correlated best with MIC achievement and quantitative perioperative outcomes of nephron sparing surgery.

Feasibility, complications and oncologic results of a limited inguinal lymph node dissection in the management of penile cancer.

PURPOSE: In patients with penile cancer (PeCa) and increased risk of inguinal lymphatic dissemination, inguinal lymphadenectomy offers a direct histological staging as the most reliable tool for assessment of the nodal metastasic status and a definitive oncologic treatment simultaneously. However, peri- and/or postoperative mutilating sequalae often occurn. We report on clinical outcome and complications of a limited inguinal lymph node (LN) dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and histopathological data of all patients with PeCa who underwent limited inguinal lymphadenectomy (LIL) at our institution between 1986 and 2012 were comprehensively analyzed. Perioperative results were presented in relation to one-sided procedures, if appropriate, which were assessed without cross comparison with contralateral LILs. RESULTS: 29 consecutive patients with PeCa aged 60±10.3 years were included in the current study with 57 one-sided LIL performed. Mean operative time for one-sided LIL was 89.0±37.3 minutes with 8.1±3.7 LNs removed. A complication rate of 54.4% (n=31), including 16 minor and 15 major complications was found in a total of 57 procedures with leg oedema being the most prevalent morbidity (15.8%). 4 patients with clinically positive LNs developed inguinal lymphatic recurrence within 9 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our technique of limited inguinal LN dissection provided an acceptable complication rate without aggravating morbidity. We experienced no recurrences in clinically LN negative patients, so that the approach might be a reasonable option in this scenario. In patients with enlarged LNs, radical inguinal lymphadenectomy still appears to represent the gold standard.

Feasibility, complications and oncologic results of a limited inguinal lymph node dissection in the management of penile cancer

In patients with penile cancer (PeCa) and increased risk of inguinal lymphatic dissemination, inguinal lymphadenectomy offers a direct histological staging as the most reliable tool for assessment of the nodal metastasic status and a definitive oncologic treatment simultaneously. However, peri- and/or postoperative mutilating sequalae often occurn. We report on clinical outcome and complications of a limited inguinal lymph node (LN) dissection.

The cdk1-cyclin B complex is involved in everolimus triggered resistance in the PC3 prostate cancer cell line.

The growth potential of PC3 prostate cancer cells, sensible (PC3(par)) or resistant (PC3(res)) to the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) was investigated. Cell growth and proliferation of PC3(res) was similar to that of PC3(par), and late apoptosis increased in PC3(par) but decreased in PC3(res) following treatment with low dosed everolimus. PC3(res) accumulated in the G2/M-phase, accompanied by cdk1, cdk2 and cyclin B elevation. Knocking down cdk1 or cyclin B distinctly blocked the growth activity of PC3(res). One reason for everolimus resistance may be up-regulation of the cdk1-cyclin B complex in prostate cancer cells, leading to enhanced progression towards G2/M.

Chemokines involved in tumor promotion and dissemination in patients with renal cell cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemokines play a critical role in tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis and have been associated with poor prognosis in diverse malignancies. The prognostic impact of chemokines for renal cell cancer (RCC) remains to be defined. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with RCC and operated between 07/07 and 05/11 were differentially assessed for expression profiles of a series of chemokines and their receptors by RT-qPCR and Western Blot analysis (tumor and adjacent normal tissue, n=37) and by Luminex for corresponding serum expression levels. Results were statistically correlated with clinicopathologic parameters. RESULTS: Gene expression of CCL2, CCR7, CXCL12, CXCR3, CXCR5 and CX3CL1 chemokines was significantly down-regulated in tumor compared to normal tissue. The gene profile for CCR6 was positively correlated with tumor size and stage. A positive linear correlation was found between CXCL12 and tumor stage as well as between CX3CR1 and C-reactive protein. In contrast to clear cell RCCs those of a chromophobe type showed a significantly down-regulated gene expression for CCR6, CCL20, and CXCL12. The CXCR7 serum level was significantly increased in patients with tumor-related mortality during postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Chemokines may serve as novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for RCC. Studies on larger collectives are required for further assessment of potential clinical application.

Prognostic factors influencing long-term survival of patients undergoing nephron-sparing surgery for nonmetastatic renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) with imperative indications.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the effect of T stage, Fuhrman's grade, multifocality, bilaterality, positive surgical margins, and synchronism of bilateral tumors on cancer-specific survival of patients with nonmetastatic renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing nephron-sparing surgery for imperative indications. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 168 patients who underwent nephron-sparing surgery for imperative RCC indications between 1974 and 2002. A total of 85 patients had bilateral RCCs; in 27 patients, the tumors were multifocal. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to assess the features associated with cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 99 months (range, 2-326 months). Patients were followed until January 2008. A total of 52 patients died of their cancer during follow-up. Multivariate analyses of the total group only revealed Fuhrman's grade 3 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.94) and bilateral occurrence of RCC (HR 1.82) as independent prognostic factors. In a subgroup analysis of patients with bilateral occurrence of RCC, we observed a tendency toward positive surgical margins (HR 2.89, P = 0.08) being another negative prognostic factor. There was no difference in cancer-specific survival between patients with synchronous and metachronous bilateral RCC presence (HR 1.08). CONCLUSIONS: Fuhrman's grade 3 and bilateral occurrence of RCC were the only statistically significant prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing nephron-sparing surgery for imperative indications for nonmetastatic RCC. The presence of sporadic multifocal tumors and the synchronous occurrence of bilateral tumors have no influence on cancer-specific survival, while positive surgical margins may have an impact in the subset of patients with bilateral RCC.