Retrieval Analysis of Titanium Nitride Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants.

BACKGROUND: The first generation of titanium nitride (TiN) coatings for orthopaedic implants was clinically introduced in the 1990s because of their promising biocompatibility, wear resistance, and corrosion resistance. This study evaluated the in vivo performance of early TiN-coated knee and hip implants, focusing on the bearing surfaces and mechanisms of in vivo damage. METHODS: There were 13 TiN-coated implants (5 knee and 8 hip) retrieved from 8 patients as part of a multi-institutional implant retrieval program. The average implantation time was 4.25 years for knees and 17.5 years for hips. Implant revisions occurred for various reasons, including polyethylene wear, loosening, pain, infection, and instability. Components were examined using a semiquantitative scoring method, and surface roughness measurements were performed using white-light interferometry. Surface morphology, chemistry, and particle characterization were also assessed by scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: For hips, mild corrosion was found on femoral head tapers, along with severe scratching on certain femoral heads. Knee implants exhibited low burnishing and scratching for both mechanisms. Roughness measurements (Sa) were 37.3 nm (interquartile range = 22.0 to 62.4) for hips and 85.3 nm (interquartile range = 66.3 to 110) for knees. The observed scratch depth in both hip and knee implants due to third-body particles ranged from 0.3 to 1.3 µm. The coating coverage remained intact in the majority of the implants, with 2 cases of small, localized cohesive chipping and substrate exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm the potential in vivo durability of early TiN coatings and will be useful in benchmarking wear tests for modern TiN-coated orthopaedic implants.

Femoral Head Penetration Rates and Oxidation of Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Hip Liners Implanted More Than 10 Years.

BACKGROUND: Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) was introduced to improve wear in total hip arthroplasty, with manufacturers implementing different thermal treatments to reduce oxidation. It is important to understand how long-term time in vivo affects the wear of these materials. The purpose of this study was to investigate the wear and oxidative performance of first-generation HXLPE hip inserts implanted for greater than 10 years and compare annealed and remelted HXLPE formulations. METHODS: There were 49 total hip arthroplasty liners retrieved during routine revision surgery as part of an institutional review board-approved implant retrieval program. Penetration rates for the liners were calculated as the difference between the thickness of the unloaded and loaded regions divided by implantation time. Oxidation indices for the rim, locking mechanism, articulating surface, and backside regions were measured using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy according to American Society for Testing and Materials 2102. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to determine the statistical difference between annealed and remelted components. RESULTS: The cohort had an average implantation time of 13.1 ± 2.6 years for annealed and 12.1 ± 1.7 years for remelted components. The components were revised most often for polyethylene wear, instability, and loosening. The penetration rate averaged 0.0177 ± 0.014 mm/year for annealed components and 0.015 ± 0.022 mm/year for remelted components. Penetration rates did not differ between the remelted and annealed cohorts (P = .28). Oxidation indices were found to be significantly higher in the annealed cohort for all regions of interest (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Oxidation was found to be higher in the annealed HXLPE; however, this does not seem to be associated with greater wear as we found the average penetration rates for the cohorts were low, and the penetration rates were similar between the annealed and remelted cohorts.

Proposal for a classification system of radiographic bone changes after cervical disc replacement.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study is to propose a classification system with a common nomenclature for radiographic observations of periprosthetic bone changes following cTDR. METHODS: Aided by serial plain radiographs from recent cTDR cases (34 patients; 44 devices), a panel of experts assembled for the purpose of creating a classification system to aid in reproducibly and accurately identifying bony changes and assessing cTDR radiographic appearance. Subdividing the superior and inferior vertebral bodies into 3 equal sections, observed bone loss such as endplate rounding, cystic erosion adjacent to the endplate, and cystic erosion not adjacent to the endplate, is recorded. Determining if bone loss is progressive, based on serial radiographs, and estimating severity of bone loss (measured by the percentage of end plate involved) is recorded. Additional relevant bony changes and device observations include radiolucent lines, heterotopic ossification, vertebral body olisthesis, loss of core implant height, and presence of device migration, and subsidence. RESULTS: Serial radiographs from 19 patients (25 devices) implanted with a variety of cTDR designs were assessed by 6 investigators including clinicians and scientists experienced in cTDR or appendicular skeleton joint replacement. The overall agreement of assessments ranged from 49.9% (95% bootstrap confidence interval 45.1-73.1%) to 94.7% (95% CI 86.9-100.0%). There was reasonable agreement on the presence or absence of bone loss or radiolucencies (range: 58.4% (95% CI 51.5-82.7%) to 94.7% (95% CI 86.9-100.0%), as well as in the progression of radiolucent lines (82.9% (95% CI 74.4-96.5%)). CONCLUSIONS: The novel classification system proposed demonstrated good concordance among experienced investigators in this field and represents a useful advancement for improving reporting in cTDR studies.