Rationale and design of the granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor in peripheral arterial disease (GPAD-3) study.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a public health problem and many patients with PAD experience claudication despite adequate medical and/or surgical management. Mobilization of endogenous progenitor cells using Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) is a novel therapeutic option that has shown promising results in experimental models and phase I/IIA clinical trials. The GPAD-3 trial will study the effect of two successive administrations of GM-CSF at 3-month interval for improving claudication among patients with lower extremity PAD. METHODS: We plan to recruit 176 patients in this ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase IIB trial. After screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria, eligible subjects undergo a 4-week screening phase where they perform subcutaneous placebo injections thrice weekly and walk at least three times a day until they develop claudication. After the screening phase, eligible subjects undergo baseline testing and are randomized 2:1 to receive 500 µg/day of GM-CSF subcutaneously thrice weekly for three weeks or placebo injections. After 3 months, follow-up endpoint testing is performed and subjects in the GM-CSF group receive the second administration of the drug for three weeks while subjects in placebo group receive matching placebo injections. All participants undergo endpoint testing at six-month and nine-month follow-up. The primary endpoint is change in 6-min walk distance between baseline and 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: GPAD-3 explores a novel approach to address the need for alternative therapies that can alleviate symptoms among patients with lower extremity PAD. If successful, this study will pave the way for a pivotal Phase III trial.

Distal splenorenal shunt versus transjugular intrahepatic portal systematic shunt for variceal bleeding: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Variceal bleeding refractory to medical treatment with beta-blockers and endoscopic therapy can be managed by variceal decompression with either surgical shunts or transjugular intrahepatic portal systemic shunts (TIPS). This prospective randomized trial tested the hypothesis that patients receiving distal splenorenal shunts (DSRS) would have significantly lower rebleeding and encephalopathy rates than TIPS in management of refractory variceal bleeding. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial at 5 centers was conducted. One hundred forty patients with Child-Pugh class A and B cirrhosis and refractory variceal bleeding were randomized to DSRS or TIPS. Protocol and event follow-up for 2-8 years (mean, 46 +/- 26 months) for primary end points of variceal bleeding and encephalopathy and secondary end points of death, ascites, thrombosis and stenosis, liver function, need for transplant, quality of life, and cost were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in rebleeding (DSRS, 5.5%; TIPS, 10.5%; P = .29) or first encephalopathy event (DSRS, 50%; TIPS, 50%). Survival at 2 and 5 years (DSRS, 81% and 62%; TIPS, 88% and 61%, respectively) were not significantly different (P = .87). Thrombosis, stenosis, and reintervention rates (DSRS, 11%; TIPS, 82%) were significantly (P < .001) higher in the TIPS group. Ascites, need for transplant, quality of life, and costs were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: DSRS and TIPS are similarly efficacious in the control of refractory variceal bleeding in Child-Pugh class A and B patients. Reintervention is significantly greater for TIPS compared with DSRS. Because both procedures have equivalent outcomes, the choice is dependent on available expertise and ability to monitor the shunt and reintervene when needed.

Changes in nocturia from medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: secondary analysis of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Trial.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the efficacy of medical therapy on nocturia in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from the VA Cooperative Study Program Trial in which 1,229 men with BPH 45 to 80 years old were randomly assigned to receive terazosin, finasteride, combination or placebo. RESULTS: The 1,078 men who completed 12 months of the trial are included in this study. Of those men 1,040 (96.5%) had at least 1 episode of nocturia at baseline and 38 (3.5%) had less than 1 episode (baseline nocturia is an average of 2 measures). Of those 1,040 men 788 (75.8%) had 2 or more nocturia episodes. Overall, nocturia decreased from a baseline mean of 2.5 to 1.8, 2.1, 2.0 and 2.1 episodes in the terazosin, finasteride, combination and placebo groups, respectively. Of men with 2 or more episodes of nocturia 50% reduction in nocturia was seen in 39%, 25%, 32% and 22% in the terazosin, finasteride, combination and placebo groups, respectively. Changes in nocturia were correlated with changes in reported bother from nocturia (Pearson correlation 0.48), BPH impact index (0.32) and overall satisfaction with urinary symptoms (0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Terazosin and combination therapy reduced nocturia in men with BPH, yet the net advantage of terazosin over placebo was a net reduction of 0.3 nocturia episode. For a person to reach a 50% or greater reduction in nocturia, the advantage of terazosin over placebo was 17 percentage points. Changes in nocturia had a moderate impact on symptom specific quality of life measures.