Compartment syndrome as a novel complication of extended spectrum beta lactamase Escherichia coli necrotising soft tissue infection - A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Necrotising soft tissue infections (NSTI) encompass a group of destructive soft tissue disease processes which can involve skin, subcutaneous tissue, fascia and or muscle, associated with rapid spread along tissue planes and mortality. Clinical presentations include progressive pain, suppuration/necrosis and systemic toxicity with haemodynamic instability. While diagnosis is based on clinical findings it can be augmented with imaging. Treatment is typically in the form of resuscitation, immediate administration of broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics and urgent source control through radical surgical debridement. CASE PRESENTATION: An 82-year-old man presented with left forearm/hand pain and fevers in the context of immunocompromise. Examination found tense swelling of the left volar and dorsal forearm and hand, absent distal pulses with pain and paraesthesia over both surfaces. He underwent surgical debridement with fasciotomy and remained in intensive care with blood cultures revealing ESBL E. coli. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Compartment syndrome is a rare complication of NSTI and its clinical presentation can obscure early diagnosis. ESBL E. coli is an uncommon pathogen to cause monomicrobial infection and must be accounted for when considering broad spectrum empirical antibiotic cover. CONCLUSION: Review of this case and the literature show a rare presentation of NSTI and highlights the importance of early diagnosis based on even a small index of suspicion. It also shows the key significance rationalisation of antibiotics as soon as practicable, given that even broad spectrum empirical cover can be inappropriate in the context of novel microorganisms, particularly in high risk patients.

A systematic review of quantitative burn wound microbiology in the management of burns patients.

BACKGROUND: The early diagnosis of infection or sepsis in burns are important for patient care. Globally, a large number of burn centres advocate quantitative cultures of wound biopsies for patient management, since there is assumed to be a direct link between the bioburden of a burn wound and the risk of microbial invasion. Given the conflicting study findings in this area, a systematic review was warranted. METHODS: Bibliographic databases were searched with no language restrictions to August 2015. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate using pre-defined criteria. Substantial heterogeneity precluded quantitative synthesis, and findings were described narratively, sub-grouped by clinical question. RESULTS: Twenty six laboratory and/or clinical studies were included. Substantial heterogeneity hampered comparisons across studies and interpretation of findings. Limited evidence suggests that (i) more than one quantitative microbiology sample is required to obtain reliable estimates of bacterial load; (ii) biopsies are more sensitive than swabs in diagnosing or predicting sepsis; (iii) high bacterial loads may predict worse clinical outcomes, and (iv) both quantitative and semi-quantitative culture reports need to be interpreted with caution and in the context of other clinical risk factors. CONCLUSION: The evidence base for the utility and reliability of quantitative microbiology for diagnosing or predicting clinical outcomes in burns patients is limited and often poorly reported. Consequently future research is warranted.