Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ; 31(1): 34-41, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37792597

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Prophylactic antibiotics administration before percutaneous biliary intervention (PBI) is currently recommended, but the underlying evidence is mostly extrapolated from prophylactic antibiotics before surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of prophylactic antibiotics administration timing on the incidence of suspected systemic infection after PBI. METHODS: The incidence of suspected systemic infection after PBI was compared in patients who received prophylactic antibiotics at four different time intervals between antibiotics administration and skin puncture for PBI. Suspected post-intervention systemic infection was assessed according to predetermined clinical criteria. RESULTS: There were 98 (21.6%) suspected systemic infections after 454 PBIs in 404 patients. There were significant differences among the four groups in the incidence of suspected systemic infection after the intervention (p = .020). Fever was the most common sign of suspected systemic infection. Administration of prophylactic antibiotics more than an hour before PBI was identified as an independent risk factor of suspected systemic infection after adjusting for other relevant factors (adjusted odds ratio = 10.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-78.86). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of suspected systemic infection after the PBI was significantly lower when prophylactic antibiotics were administered within an hour before the intervention.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
2.
Korean J Anesthesiol ; 76(2): 99-106, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35822315

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) commonly occurs after spinal anesthesia; however, its incidence rate and predictors have been scarcely studied. Therefore, we aimed to investigate its incidence rate and potential predictors. METHODS: The electronic medical records of 6,610 consecutive patients undergoing orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia were reviewed between January 2016 and December 2020. The primary outcome was PONV incidence within 24 h after spinal anesthesia. Along with its incidence rate, we investigated its predictors using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 5,691 patients included in the analysis, 1,298 (22.8%) experienced PONV within 24 h after spinal anesthesia. Female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 3.23, 95% CI [2.72, 3.83], P < 0.001), nonsmoker (OR: 2.12, 95% CI [1.46, 3.07], P < 0.001), history of PONV (OR: 1.52, 95% CI [1.26, 1.82], P < 0.001), prophylactic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist use (OR: 0.35, 95% CI [0.24, 0.50], P < 0.001), prophylactic steroid use (OR: 0.53, 95% CI [0.44, 0.62], P < 0.001), baseline heart rate ≥ 60 beats/min (OR: 1.38, 95% CI [1.10, 1.72], P = 0.005), and postoperative opioid use (OR: 2.57, 95% CI [1.80, 3.67], P < 0.001), were significant predictors of the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed the common incidence of PONV after spinal anesthesia and its significant predictors. A better understanding of its predictors may provide important information for its management.


Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Antieméticos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Humanos , Feminino , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/epidemiologia , Incidência , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA