Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 15(11): e0238545, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33156858

RESUMO

Extracellular vesicles (EV) have attracted much attention as potential biomarkers due to their protein, RNA and other nucleic acid content. The most common method used for EV isolation is differential ultracentrifugation (DU), however given the DU technical difficulties, other more practical methods have surged, such as membrane-affinity column commercial kits. Here, we assessed one commercial kit in terms of EV recovery and EV-derived RNA yield and compared it with a DU protocol. Our data shows that the commercial kit preparation results in a lower count of EV-like structures and a reduced expression of EV markers when compared to DU samples. Thus, apparently suggesting that the commercial kit had a lower EV yield. However, these findings did not reflect on RNA yield, which was greater with the commercial kit, even after an enzymatic treatment with proteinase K and RNAse A. We conclude that the kit has a higher EV-derived RNA yield in comparison to our DU protocol, suggesting that it may be the method of choice for RNA sequencing purposes.


Assuntos
Vesículas Extracelulares/genética , Membranas/metabolismo , RNA/genética , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Vesículas Extracelulares/metabolismo , Humanos , Ultracentrifugação/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA