Lateral-type posterior fossa ependymomas in pediatric patients: a national collaborative study.

PURPOSE: To review a multicentric series of lateral-type posterior fossa ependymomas operated in the last ten years and to analyze the factors related to clinical evolution and tumor survival. METHODS: Descriptive, retrospective study. Active members of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Neurosurgery were invited to participate in this multicentric study. Clinical and radiological data were incorporated to an open database. The role of histologic grade, grade of resection, postoperative morbidities, and clinical follow-up was evaluated through bivariate associations (chi-square), Kaplan-Meier's curves (log-rank test), and multivariate analysis (binary logistic regression). RESULTS: Fourteen centers entered the study, and 25 cases with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. There were 13 boys and 12 girls with a mean age close to 3 years. Mean tumor volume at diagnosis was over 60 cc. A complete resection was achieved in 8 patients and a near-total resection in 5 cases. Fifteen tumors were diagnosed as ependymoma grade 2 and ten as ependymoma grade 3. Major morbidity occurred postoperatively in 14 patients but was resolved in twelve within 6 months. There were six cases of death and 11 cases of tumor progression along the observation period. Mean follow-up was 44.8 months. Major morbidity was significantly associated with histologic grade but not with the degree of resection. Overall and progression-free survival were significantly associated with complete surgical resection. At the last follow-up, 16 patients carried a normal life, and three displayed a mild restriction according to Lansky's scale. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral-type posterior fossa ependymomas constitute a specific pathologic and clinical tumor subtype with bad prognosis. Gross total resection is the goal of surgical treatment, for it significantly improves prognosis with no additional morbidity. Neurological deficits associated to lower cranial nerve dysfunction are common, but most are transient. Deeper genetic characterization of these tumors may identify risk factors that guide new treatments and stratification of adjuvant therapies.

How to Choose a Shunt for Patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Short Guide to Selecting the Best Shunt Assembly.

Most patients with hydrocephalus are still managed with the implantation of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt in which the CSF flow is regulated by a differential-pressure valve (DPV). Our aim in this review is to discuss some basic concepts in fluid mechanics that are frequently ignored but that should be understood by neurosurgeons to enable them to choose the most adequate shunt for each patient. We will present data, some of which is not provided by manufacturers, which may help neurosurgeons in selecting the most appropriate shunt. To do so, we focused on the management of patients with idiopathic "normal-pressure hydrocephalus" (iNPH), as one of the most challenging scenarios, in which the combination of optimal technology, patient characteristics, and knowledge of fluid mechanics can significantly modify the surgical results. For a better understanding of the available hardware and its evolution over time, we will have a second look at the design of the first DPV and the reasons why additional devices were incorporated to control for shunt overdrainage and its related complications. We try to persuade the reader that a clear understanding of the physical concepts of the CSF and shunt dynamics is key to understand the pathophysiology of iNPH and to improve its treatment.