Real-life validation of a sample pooling strategy for screening of hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVES: To test a real-life sample pooling screening strategy which contributes to increasing the diagnostic capacity of clinical laboratories and expanding access to massive screening of hepatitis C. METHODS: After evaluating the sensitivity of the pooling strategy for seven different commercial assays which are used to determine the concentration of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA in the plasma or serum, consecutive samples submitted for HCV diagnosis during the first 3 weeks of November 2021 were tested for HCV antibodies and, in parallel and in a blinded way, were pooled into 100 samples and tested for HCV-RNA. When the result was positive, a strategy to un-mask the positive(s) pool(s), which needed up to 15 total HCV-RNA tests, was used. RESULTS: All platforms were able to detect the presence of HCV-RNA in a single sample from a patient with viremic HCV present in pools of up to at least 10 000 HCV-RNA-free samples. A total of 1700 samples (17 pools) were analysed, with an overall prevalence of anti-HCV and HCV-RNA of 0.24%. After pooling, we could detect all samples previously detected using standard diagnosis tests (reflex testing) with a specificity and sensitivity of 100% (CI, 99.78-100%). Given the median current prices of anti-HCV and HCV-RNA on the market in Spain as well as personnel costs, testing using the pooling strategy would have resulted in a save of 3320€. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we demonstrated that by improving cost effectiveness, with no loss of sensitivity and specificity, the strategy of pooling samples may serve as an appropriate tool for use in large-scale screening of HCV.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole helps to decrease the percentage of patients with off-target trough serum levels.

We monitored trough voriconazole serum concentrations from 107 patients (n = 258 samples) at 6 hospitals in Madrid. Most of the patients were male (67%) and had the following underlying conditions: hematological cancer (42%), solid organ transplantation (15%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (14%), human immunodeficiency virus infection (8.4%), solid cancer (5.6%), and other (29%). The indication for voriconazole administration was aspergillosis treatment (74.6%) and prophylaxis (14%). The main reasons for voriconazole trough drug monitoring were initiation of treatment/prophylaxis (33%), patient monitoring (47%), and suspected toxicity (3.5%). Levels (µg/ml) were subtherapeutic (<1; 18.2%), on-target (1-5.5; 71.3%), and high (>5.5; 10.5%). The samples percentage with on-target levels was significantly lower for the first sample than for subsequent samples (62.6% vs. 77.5%). "Subsequent samples," "admission in nonpediatric wards," "voriconazole used for treatment of invasive aspergillosis," and "use of proton pump inhibitors" were predictors of voriconazole therapeutic levels (≥1 µg/ml).