RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tobacco is a highly prevalent substance of abuse in patients with psychosis. Previous studies have reported an association between tobacco use and schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between tobacco use and first-episode psychosis (FEP), age at onset of psychosis, and specific diagnosis of psychosis. METHODS: The sample consisted of 1105 FEP patients and 1355 controls from the European Network of National Schizophrenia Networks Studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI) study. We assessed substance use with the Tobacco and Alcohol Questionnaire and performed a series of regression analyses using case-control status, age of onset of psychosis, and diagnosis as outcomes and tobacco use and frequency of tobacco use as predictors. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, alcohol, and cannabis use. RESULTS: After controlling for cannabis use, FEP patients were 2.6 times more likely to use tobacco [p ⩽ 0.001; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) [2.1-3.2]] and 1.7 times more likely to smoke 20 or more cigarettes a day (p = 0.003; AOR 1.7; 95% CI [1.2-2.4]) than controls. Tobacco use was associated with an earlier age at psychosis onset (ß = -2.3; p ⩽ 0.001; 95% CI [-3.7 to -0.9]) and was 1.3 times more frequent in FEP patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia than in other diagnoses of psychosis (AOR 1.3; 95% CI [1.0-1.8]); however, these results were no longer significant after controlling for cannabis use. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco and heavy-tobacco use are associated with increased odds of FEP. These findings further support the relevance of tobacco prevention in young populations.
Assuntos
Cannabis , Transtornos Psicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiologia , Cannabis/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many studies have reported that cannabis use increases the risk of a first episode of psychosis (FEP). However, only a few studies have investigated the nature of cannabis-related experiences in FEP patients, and none has examined whether these experiences are similar in FEP and general populations. The aim of this study was to explore differences in self-reported cannabis experiences between FEP and non-psychotic populations. METHOD: A total of 252 subjects, who met International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 criteria for FEP, and 217 controls who reported cannabis use were selected from the Genetics and Psychosis (GAP) study. The Medical Research Council Social Schedule and the Cannabis Experience Questionnaire were used to collect sociodemographic data and cannabis use information, respectively. RESULTS: Both 'bad' and 'enjoyable' experiences were more commonly reported by FEP subjects than controls. Principal components factor analysis identified four components which explained 62.3% of the variance. Linear regression analysis on the whole sample showed that the type of cannabis used and beliefs about the effect of cannabis on health all contributed to determining the intensity and frequency of experiences. Linear regression analysis on FEP subjects showed that the duration of cannabis use and amount of money spent on cannabis were strongly related to the intensity and frequency of enjoyable experiences in this population. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a higher sensitivity to cannabis effects among people who have suffered their first psychotic episode; this hypersensitivity results in them reporting both more 'bad' and 'enjoyable' experiences. The greater enjoyment experienced may provide an explanation of why FEP patients are more likely to use cannabis and to continue to use it despite experiencing an exacerbation of their psychotic symptoms.
Assuntos
Cannabis/efeitos adversos , Fumar Maconha/efeitos adversos , Fumar Maconha/epidemiologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Early diagnosis of PHC development in cirrhosis is sometimes difficult through common tests excluding invasive diagnostic procedures; liver biopsy as a routine periodical control during the course of the disease is not advisable and AFP monitoring as a diagnostic test is preferable. The present study shows the results of a screening for AFP levels in a series of 113 cirrhotic patients aged over 50. 11.5% of them presented increased levels of serum AFP, indicating development of PHC. AFP elevated values resulted in 76.5% of cases associated with a previous HBV infection, and the risk of PHC development resulted sixfold greater in anti-HBc positive male cirrhotic patients. In patients with elevated AFP levels the prevalence of complications of cirrhosis resulted up to tenfold greater than in AFP negative patients.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Hepatite B/imunologia , Cirrose Hepática/sangue , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , alfa-Fetoproteínas/análise , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Antígenos do Núcleo do Vírus da Hepatite B/análise , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/imunologia , Cirrose Hepática/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RiscoRESUMO
In 38.6% of 88 patients without anamnesis of alcoholism and/or chronic exposure to hepatotoxic drugs, selected among 120 cirrhotic subjects subsequently observed, the illness was HBV related. Markers indicating active viral replication (anti-HBc, HBsAg, HBeAg or anti-HBe) were detected in 48% of patients with active cirrhosis, and in 26% with inactive cirrhosis. It is suggested that high titers of CF antibodies anti-HSV and anti-CMV observed in several patients, indicate either reactivation of latent infections or over-infections. The absence of alcoholism and/or chronic exposure to hepatotoxic drugs, and the absence of viral markers, suggest in 61% of the 88 cirrhotic subjects either a nonA-nonB viruses etiology of the illness, or other etiological factors that escape available diagnostic and prophylactic procedures.