Brain-responsive neurostimulation in patients with medically intractable seizures arising from eloquent and other neocortical areas.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the seizure-reduction response and safety of brain-responsive stimulation in adults with medically intractable partial-onset seizures of neocortical origin. METHODS: Patients with partial seizures of neocortical origin were identified from prospective clinical trials of a brain-responsive neurostimulator (RNS System, NeuroPace). The seizure reduction over years 2-6 postimplantation was calculated by assessing the seizure frequency compared to a preimplantation baseline. Safety was assessed based on reported adverse events. Additional analyses considered safety and seizure reduction according to lobe and functional area (e.g., eloquent cortex) of seizure onset. RESULTS: There were 126 patients with seizures of neocortical onset. The average follow-up was 6.1 implant years. The median percent seizure reduction was 70% in patients with frontal and parietal seizure onsets, 58% in those with temporal neocortical onsets, and 51% in those with multilobar onsets (last observation carried forward [LOCF] analysis). Twenty-six percent of patients experienced at least one seizure-free period of 6 months or longer and 14% experienced at least one seizure-free period of 1 year or longer. Patients with lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 77% reduction, LOCF) and those with normal MRI findings (45% reduction, LOCF) benefitted, although the treatment response was more robust in patients with an MRI lesion (p = 0.02, generalized estimating equation [GEE]). There were no differences in the seizure reduction in patients with and without prior epilepsy surgery or vagus nerve stimulation. Stimulation parameters used for treatment did not cause acute or chronic neurologic deficits, even in eloquent cortical areas. The rates of infection (0.017 per patient implant year) and perioperative hemorrhage (0.8%) were not greater than with other neurostimulation devices. SIGNIFICANCE: Brain-responsive stimulation represents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with medically intractable epilepsy, including adults with seizures of neocortical onset, and those with onsets from eloquent cortex.

Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation as a treatment for medically intractable epilepsy in brain tumor patients. A case-controlled study using the VNS therapy Patient Outcome Registry.

PURPOSE: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy is a procedure to control seizure frequency in patients with medically intractable epilepsy. However, there is no data on efficacy in the subset of these patients with brain tumors. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of VNS therapy in patients with brain tumor-associated medically intractable epilepsy. METHODS: Data from the VNS therapy Patient Outcome Registry, maintained by the manufacturer of the device, Cyberonics Inc. (Houston, TX, USA), was queried to characterize the response of patients in whom a brain tumor was listed as the etiology of epilepsy. A case-control analysis was implemented and patient outcome was measured by Engel classification, median seizure response and responder rate (≥50% seizure reduction) using t-tests and chi-squared tests. RESULTS: In 107 patients with an epilepsy etiology related to a brain tumor, seizure reduction was 45% at 3 months and 79% at 24 months with a responder rate of 48% at 3 months and 79% at 24 months. There was no statistical difference in seizure reduction compared with 326 case-control patients from the registry without brain tumors. There was no significant difference in anti-epileptic drug (AED) usage from baseline to 24 months post implant in either group. CONCLUSIONS: VNS therapy is equally effective in patients who suffer seizures secondary to brain tumors as in patients without history of a brain tumor. VNS therapy is a viable treatment option for patients with brain tumor associated medically intractable epilepsy, assuming cytoreductive and other adjuvant therapies have been fully explored.

Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in brain tumor-associated intractable epilepsy and the importance of tumor stability.

OBJECT: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a viable option for patients with medically intractable epilepsy. However, there are no studies examining its effect on individuals with brain tumor-associated intractable epilepsy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of VNS in patients with brain tumor-associated medically intractable epilepsy. METHODS: Epilepsy surgery databases at 2 separate epilepsy centers were reviewed to identify patients in whom a VNS device was placed for tumor-related intractable epilepsy between January 1999 and December 2011. Preoperative and postoperative seizure frequency and type as well as antiepileptic drug (AED) regimens and degree of tumor progression were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using odds ratios and t-tests to examine efficacy. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in the study. Eight patients (50%) had an improved outcome (Engel Class I, II, or III) with an average follow-up of 39.6 months. The mean reduction in seizure frequency was 41.7% (p = 0.002). There was no significant change in AED regimens. Seizure frequency decreased by 10.9% in patients with progressing tumors and by 65.6% in patients with stable tumors (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Vagus nerve stimulation therapy in individuals with brain tumor-associated medically intractable epilepsy was shown to be comparably effective in regard to seizure reduction and response rates to the general population of VNS therapy patients. Outcomes were better in patients with stable as opposed to progressing tumors. The authors' findings support the recommendation of VNS therapy in patients with brain tumor-associated intractable epilepsy, especially in cases in which imminent tumor progression is not expected. Vagus nerve stimulation may not be indicated in more malignant tumors.

Bilateral intracranial electrodes for lateralizing intractable epilepsy: efficacy, risk, and outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Medically refractory epilepsy is amenable to neurosurgical intervention if the epileptogenic focus is accurately localized. If the scalp video-electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetic resonance imaging are nonlateralizing, yet a single focus is suspected, video-EEG monitoring with bilateral intracranial electrode placement is helpful to lateralize the ictal onset zone. We describe the indications, risks, and utility of such bilateral surveys at our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients with medically refractory seizures who were treated over a 5-year period and underwent bilateral placement of intracranial electrodes. Subdural strips were used in all cases, and additional stereotactic implantation of depth electrodes into mesial temporal lobes occurred in 50%. The mean patient age was 37.7 years, and 65.4% of patients were male. RESULTS: The most common indication for bilateral invasive monitoring was bilateral ictal onsets on surface video-EEG (76.9%), followed by frequent interictal spikes contralateral to a single ictal focus (7.7%). Intracranial monitoring lasted an average of 8.2 days, with ictal events recorded in all cases. Ten patients (38.5%) subsequently underwent more extensive unilateral monitoring via implantation of subdural and depth electrodes through a craniotomy. A therapeutic procedure was performed in 17 patients (65.4%), whereas 1 patient underwent a palliative corpus callosotomy (3.8%). Nine patients underwent a resection without unilateral invasive mapping. Reasons for no therapeutic surgery (n = 8) included multifocal onsets, failing the Wada test, refusal of further treatment, and negative intraoperative electrocorticogram. There was 1 surgical complication, involving a retained electrode fragment that was removed in a separate minor procedure. Of the 26 patients, 15 (57.7%) are now seizure-free or have seizure disorders that have substantially improved (modified Engel classes I and II). Of the 17 patients who underwent a potentially curative surgery, 13 (76.5%) were Engel classes I and II. CONCLUSION: Bilateral placement of subdural strip and depth electrodes for epilepsy monitoring in patients with nonlateralizing scalp EEG and/or discordant imaging studies but clinical suspicion for focal seizure origin is both safe and effective. Given the safety and efficacy of this procedure, epileptologists should have a low threshold to consider bilateral implants for suitable patients.

Frameless stereotactic placement of depth electrodes in epilepsy surgery.

OBJECT: Depth electrodes are useful in the identification of deep epileptogenic foci. Computerized tomography-magnetic resonance (CT/MR)- and angiography-guided frame-based techniques are safe and accurate but require four-point skull fixation that limits cranial access for the placement of additional grids and strips. The authors investigated the viability and accuracy of placing depth electrodes by using a commercially available frameless system. METHODS: A slotted, custom-designed adapter was built to interface with the StealthStation Guide Frame-DT and 960-525 StealthFighter. The Cranial Navigation software was used to plan the trajectory and entry site based on preoperative spoiled gradient MR imaging studies. Forty-one depth electrodes were placed in 51 targets in 20 patients. Thirty-one of these electrodes were inserted through the temporal neocortex following craniotomy and placement of subdural grids, whereas 10 were placed through burr holes. All electrodes had contact either within (71%) or touching (29%) the target, 50 of which (98%) provided adequate recordings. Although the mean distance of the distal electrode contact from the intended target was 3.1 +/- 0.5 mm, the mean distance to the edge of the anatomical structure was 0.4 +/- 0.9 mm. Placement via the laterotemporal approach was significantly (p < 0.001) more accurate than that via the occipitotemporal approach. No complication occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Depth electrodes can be placed safely and accurately by using a commercially available frameless stereotactic navigation system and a custom-made adapter. Depth electrode placement to record ictal onsets during epilepsy surgery only requires the contacts to touch rather than to reside within the intended structure. The laterotemporal approach is a more accurate method of placing electrodes than is the occipitotemporal one, likely due to the increased distance from the entry point to the target.

Neurostimulation therapy for epilepsy.

Neurostimulation therapy for epilepsy is growing in popularity. By appropriate targeting of applied electrical activation at selected nervous system sites, antiseizure effects may be achieved without the common sedative side effects of antiepileptic medications. Risks of neurostimulation therapy are those associated with the device implantation surgical procedures. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) reduces seizures by 45% and has been employed in over 13,000 patients worldwide. New reports suggest VNS is particularly beneficial for patients with Lennox-Gastuat syndome. VNS also reduces sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. New publications describing small, uncontrolled case series also suggest deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation may develop into effective antiepileptic therapies in the future.