RESUMO
PURPOSE: On the basis of the concept of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), SLNs should contain decisive information for clinical outcomes. In localized prostate cancer patients, this study assessed retrospectively clinical outcome after radical laparoscopic prostatectomy associated with SLNB and extensive pelvic lymph node dissection. METHODS: A total of 231 consecutive patients of intermediate to high risk were analyzed. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Various pathological parameters were analyzed using univariable and multivariable analyses through Cox regression analysis. The study was approved and registered under 2007-R41. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 7.1 years (95% confidence interval, 6.6-7.5). In total, 38/231 (16.5%) patients were pN1. Of these 38 patients, 27 had only SLN involvement (SLNI), 10 patients had both SLN and non-SLNI, and 1 patient had isolated non-SLNI, indicating a false-negative (FN). If the updated Briganti nomogram threshold set at >7% for recommending extensive pelvic lymph node dissection had been applied to these patients, we would have missed 44% (12/27) of patients with SLNI and 50% (5/10) of patients with SLNI and non-SLNI, as well as the FN patient. At the time of final follow-up, 84/231 (36.5%) patients had recurrence. In multivariable analysis, and regarding node status, the most significant prognostic factor was SLN with macrometastases and/or micrometastases, respectively, P = 10-3 and P < 10-3. No more information was obtained with non-SLN status. Probabilities of RFS between negative and positive SLN patients presented a major significant difference (P < 10-15) with a risk of event 8.75 times more frequent if SLN was involved than if it was metastasis-free. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB seems to contain decisive information for the clinical outcome of patients with localized intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients. The question raised is thus whether immediate additional postoperative treatment should be offered to patients with metastatic SLN.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Bladder cancer is a complex disease with a wide range of outcomes. Clinicopathological factors only partially explain the variability between patients in prognosis and treatment response. There is a need for large cohorts collecting extensive data and biological samples to: (1) investigate gene-environment interactions, pathological/molecular classification and biomarker discovery; and (2) describe treatment patterns, outcomes, resource use and quality of life in a real-world setting. PARTICIPANTS: COBLAnCE (COhort to study BLAdder CancEr) is a French national prospective cohort of patients with bladder cancer recruited between 2012 and 2018 and followed for 6 years. Data on patient and tumour characteristics, treatments, outcomes and biological samples are collected at enrolment and during the follow-up. FINDINGS TO DATE: We describe the cohort at enrolment according to baseline surgery and tumour type. In total, 1800 patients were included: 1114 patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and 76 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) had transurethral resection of a bladder tumour without cystectomy, and 610 patients with NMIBC or MIBC underwent cystectomy. Most patients had a solitary lesion (56.3%) without basement membrane invasion (71.7% of Ta and/or Tis). Half of the patients with cystectomy were stage ≤T2 and 60% had non-continent diversion. Surgery included local (n=298) or super-extended lymph node dissections (n=11) and prostate removal (n=492). Among women, 16.5% underwent cystectomy and 81.4% anterior pelvectomy. FUTURE PLANS: COBLAnCE will be used for long-term studies of bladder cancer with focus on clinicopathological factors and molecular markers. It will lead to a much-needed improvement in the understanding of the disease. The cohort provides valuable real-world data, enabling researchers to study various research questions, assess routine medical practices and guide medical decision-making.
Assuntos
Neoplasias não Músculo Invasivas da Bexiga , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , CistectomiaRESUMO
AIM: In intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients, to avoid extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND), the updated Briganti nomogram is recommended with the cost of missing 1.5 % of patients with lymph node invasion (LNI). Is it possible to reduce the percentage of unexpected LNI patients (nomogram false negative)? We used the isotopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique systematically associated with laparoscopic ePLND to assess the potential value of isotopic SLN method to adress this point. METHODS: Two hundred and two consecutive patients had procedures with isotopic SLN detection associated with laparoscopic ePLND for high or intermediate risk of PC. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to quantify the accuracy of different models as: the updated Briganti nomogram, the percentage of positive cores, and an equation of the best predictors of LNI. We tested the model cutoffs associated with an optimal negative predictive value (NPV) and the best cutoff associated with avoiding false negative SLN detection, in order to assist the clinician's decision of when to spare ePLND. RESULTS: LNI was detected in 35 patients (17.2 %). Based on preoperative primary Gleason grade and percentage of positive cores, a bivariate model was built to calculate a combined score reflecting the risk of LNI. For the Briganti nomogram, the 5 % probability cutoff avoided ePLND in 53 % (108/202) of patients, missing three LNI patients (8.6 %), but all were detected by the SLN technique. For our bivariate model, the best cutoff was <10, leaving no patient with LNI due to positive SLN detection (four patients = 11.4 %), and avoiding ePLND in 52 % (105/202) of patients. CONCLUSION: For patients with a low risk of LNI determined using the updated Briganti nomogram or bivariate model, SLN technique could be used alone for lymph node staging in intermediate- or high-risk PC patients.
Assuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfocintigrafia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Idoso , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Linfonodo Sentinela/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodo Sentinela/cirurgiaRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in prostate cancer (PC). The aim of this prospective study was to validate, through laparoscopic surgery, the accuracy of the isotopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique correlated with hyperextensive pelvic resection (extended pelvic lymphadenectomy dissection) in patients with localized PC, candidates for local curative treatment. METHODS: A transrectal ultrasound-guided injection of (99m)Tc-sulfur rhenium colloid (0.3 mL/100 MBq) in each prostatic lobe was performed the day before surgery. Detection was performed intraoperatively with a laparoscopic probe, followed by extensive resection. SLN counts were performed in vivo and confirmed ex vivo. Histologic analysis was performed by hematoxylin-phloxine-safran staining, followed by immunohistochemistry if the SLN was free of metastasis. RESULTS: Two hundred three patients with PC at intermediate or high risk of lymph node metastases were included. The intraoperative detection rate was 96% (195/203). Thirty-five patients had lymph node metastases, 19 only in the SLN. The false-negative rate was 8.5% (3/35). Unilateral surgical SLN detection did not validate bilateral pelvic lymph node status, and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy dissection was necessary on the opposite side of detection to minimize the false-negative rate (2.8% [1/35]). A significant metastatic sentinel invasion in the common iliac region existed (9.3%) but was always associated with other metastatic node areas. The internal iliac region was the primary metastatic site (40.7%). Finally, this series invalidated any justification for a standard or limited dissection, which would have missed 51.9% and 74.1% of lymph node metastases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The radioisotope SLN identification method up to the common iliac region is successful to identify sentinel nodes during laparoscopic surgery per hemipelvis to be acceptably considered as an isolated procedure and should be validated for intermediate- and high-risk patients.
Assuntos
Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Reações Falso-Negativas , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Linfocintigrafia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Tecnécio , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in prostate cancer (PC). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy by laparoscopy in staging locoregional patients with clinically localized PC. METHODS: A transrectal ultrasound-guided injection of 0.3 ml/100 MBq (99m)Tc-sulphur rhenium colloid in each prostatic lobe was performed the day before surgery. Detection was performed intraoperatively with a laparoscopic probe (Gamma Sup CLERAD) followed by extensive resection. SLN counts were performed in vivo and confirmed ex vivo. Histological analysis was performed by haematoxylin-phloxine-saffron staining, followed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) if the SLN was free of metastasis. RESULTS: The study included 93 patients with PC at intermediate or high risk of lymph node metastases. The intraoperative detection rate was 93.5% (87/93). Nineteen patients had lymph node metastases, nine only in SLN. The false-negative rate was 10.5% (2/19). The internal iliac region was the primary metastatic site (43.3%). Metastatic sentinel nodes in the common iliac region beyond the ureteral junction were present in 13.3%. Limited or standard lymph node resection would have ignored 73.2 and 56.6% of lymph node metastases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy is suitable for broad identification of SLN metastasis, and targeted resection of these lymph nodes significantly limits the risk of extended surgical resection whilst maintaining the accuracy of the information.