Human-Centered Functional Task Design for Robotic Upper-Limb Rehabilitation.

Robotic rehabilitation has demonstrated slight positive effects compared to traditional care, but there is still a lack of targeted high-level control strategies in the current state-of-the-art for minimizing pathological motor behaviors. In this study, we analyzed upper-limb motion capture data from healthy subjects performing a pick-and-place task to identify task-specific variability in postural patterns. The results revealed consistent behaviors among subjects, presenting an opportunity to develop a novel extraction method for variable volume references based solely on observations from healthy individuals. These human-centered references were tested on a simulated 4 degrees-of-freedom upper-limb exoskeleton, showing its compliant adaptation to the path considering the variance in healthy subjects' motor behavior.

Comparative analysis of inverse kinematics methodologies to improve the controllability of rehabilitative robotic devices.

The solution of the inverse kinematics problem in multi-degrees of freedom robots has been tackled, through the last three decades, by several different approaches including analytical, geometrical, differential and numerical methods. All these techniques present their own advantages and drawbacks. However, a guideline on which approach is better to follow, depending on the kind of task to perform and the type of robotic device used, is still missing. In this work, a quantitative comparative analysis of three different inverse kinematics methodologies for the control of rehabilitative robotic devices is proposed, with aim of devising best practices and guidelines for the selection of the most suitable approach. The analyzed methodologies are implemented and numerically tested on two actual devices, specifically an upper-limb exoskeleton and an upper-limb prosthetic arm.

Survey of transfemoral amputee experience and priorities for the user-centered design of powered robotic transfemoral prostheses.

BACKGROUND: Transfemoral amputees experience a complex host of physical, psychological, and social challenges, compounded by the functional limitations of current transfemoral prostheses. However, the specific relationships between human factors and prosthesis design and performance characteristics have not yet been adequately investigated. The present study aims to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: A comprehensive single-cohort survey of 114 unilateral transfemoral amputees addressed a broad range of demographic and clinical characteristics, functional autonomy, satisfaction and attitudes towards their current prostheses, and design priorities for an ideal transfemoral prosthesis, including the possibility of active assistance from a robotic knee unit. The survey was custom-developed based on several standard questionnaires used to assess motor abilities and autonomy in activities of daily living, prosthesis satisfaction, and quality of life in lower-limb amputees. Survey data were analyzed to compare the experience (including autonomy and satisfaction) and design priorities of users of transfemoral prostheses with versus without microprocessor-controlled knee units (MPKs and NMPKs, respectively), with a subsequent analyses of cross-category correlation, principal component analysis (PCA), cost-sensitivity segmentation, and unsupervised K-means clustering applied within the most cost-sensitive participants, to identify functional groupings of users with respect to their design priorities. RESULTS: The cohort featured predominantly younger (< 50 years) traumatic male amputees with respect to the general transfemoral amputee population, with pronounced differences in age distribution and amputation etiology (traumatic vs. non-traumatic) between MPK and NMPK groups. These differences were further reflected in user experience, with MPK users reporting significantly greater overall functional autonomy, satisfaction, and sense of prosthesis ownership than those with NMPKs, in conjunction with a decreased incidence of instability and falls. Across all participants, the leading functional priorities for an ideal transfemoral prosthesis were overall stability, adaptability to variable walking velocity, and lifestyle-related functionality, while the highest-prioritized general characteristics were reliability, comfort, and weight, with highly variable prioritization of cost according to reimbursement status. PCA and user clustering analyses revealed the possibility for functionally relevant groupings of prosthesis features and users, based on their differential prioritization of these features-with implications towards prosthesis design tradeoffs. CONCLUSIONS: This study's findings support the understanding that when appropriately prescribed according to patient characteristics and needs in the context of a proactive rehabilitation program, advanced transfemoral prostheses promote patient mobility, autonomy, and overall health. Survey data indicate overall stability, modularity, and versatility as key design priorities for the continued development of transfemoral prosthesis technology. Finally, observed associations between prosthesis type, user experience, and attitudes concerning prosthesis ownership suggest both that prosthesis characteristics influence device acceptance and functional outcomes, and that psychosocial factors should be specifically and proactively addressed during the rehabilitation process.