Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in neurodegenerative diseases: A systematic review.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent in patients with neurodegenerative diseases and is associated with worse outcomes. Positive airway pressure therapy has the potential to benefit these patients but can be challenging in this population. Our primary aim was to describe positive pressure therapy adherence. Secondarily, we aimed at identifying identify predictors of adherence to treatment in adults with neurodegenerative diseases and OSA, and report the effect of PAP adherence on outcomes such as cognitive function, quality of life and patient/caregiver satisfaction. We performed a systematic review of the literature and identified seventeen studies, eight reporting on adults with obstructive sleep apnea and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or Alzheimer's disease (AD), 6 with Parkinson's disease (PD), and 3 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). Meta-analyses were not performed due to lack of systematic and standardized reporting of the primary outcome. Study duration ranged from 6 weeks to an average of 3.3 years. PAP adherence definition was widely variable between studies. Attrition rates ranged from 12% to 75%. In MCI/AD, adherence rates ranged from 28% to 61% (study duration range: 3 weeks to 3.3 years). Younger age, race (white) and better CPAP confidence scores at 1 week were associated with more CPAP use while APOE4 positive and unmarried individuals were more likely to abandon CPAP. In most studies, adherent patients had improvement in excessive daytime sleepiness, depressive symptoms, sleep quality, ability to manage daily activities and certain aspects of cognition (composite score or global cognition, psychomotor speed, executive function), as well as less cognitive decline over time. Caregiver satisfaction was also better in PAP adherent patients in one study. In PD, 15-25% of individuals refused treatment with PAP upfront, and attrition ranged from 8 to 75%. Adherent patients used their device for an average of 3h27 to 5h12 per night (study duration range: 6 weeks to 12 months). Longer disease duration, worse motor symptoms or sleep quality and lower % of REM sleep were identified as predictors of lower PAP adherence in a preliminary study, while race (non-white) and sex (women) were linked to lower adherence in a large retrospective study. In the study reporting the highest attrition rate (75%), individuals had lower educational levels. PAP adherence improved daytime sleepiness, anxiety symptoms, sleep architecture and quality and global non-motor symptoms. However, in one short-term (3 weeks) study, there was no improvement in neuropsychological testing composite score. Three studies on MSA patients suffering from sleep-disordered breathing showed that most patients are accepting of PAP (69-72%) with an average nightly use of 4h42 to 6h18. Floppy epiglottis was more frequently seen in patients discontinuing PAP in one study. In one study, four adults with MSA and long-term PAP use reported better sleep and improved vigilance. Survival time was no different between treated and untreated individuals. In conclusion, PAP therapy is challenging in patients with OSA and NDD, as evidenced by the considerable attrition and low adherence rates reported in this systematic review. There is emerging evidence proposing OSA a treatable target to prevent clinical and functional deterioration in patients with neurodegenerative diseases and addressing potential barriers to PAP adherence is paramount to maximize adherence. Our systematic review outlines several of these potential barriers, underscoring the need for future studies to standardize the definition of and explore long-term adherence to PAP therapy and assess interventions that can optimize adherence in this patient population.

Feasibility of remote neurocognitive assessment: pandemic adaptations for a clinical trial, the Cognition and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Parkinson's Disease, Effect of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy (COPE-PAP) study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic poses challenges for timely outcome assessment in randomized clinical trials (RCT). Our aim was to describe our remote neurocognitive testing (NCT) protocol administered by telephone in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: We studied PD patients with OSA and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≤ 27 participating in a RCT assessing OSA treatment impact on cognition. Trial outcomes included change in MoCA and specific cognitive domains from baseline to 3 and 6 months. With COVID19 pandemic-related restrictions, 3-month visits were converted from in-person to telephone administration with materials mailed to participants for compatible tests and retrieved by courier the same day. In exploratory analyses, we compared baseline vs. 3-month results in the control arm, which were not expected to change significantly (test-re-test), using a paired t-test and assessed agreement with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Seven participants were approached and agreed to remote NCT at 3-month follow-up. Compared to the in-person NCT control arm group, they were younger (60.6 versus 70.6 years) and had a shorter disease course (3.9 versus 9.2 years). Remote NCT data were complete. The mean test-retest difference in MoCA was similar for in-person and remote NCT control-arm groups (between group difference - 0.69; 95%CI - 3.67, 2.29). Agreement was good for MOCA and varied for specific neurocognitive tests. CONCLUSION: Telephone administration of the MoCA and a modified neurocognitive battery is feasible in patients with PD and OSA. Further validation will require a larger sample size.

Impact of continuous positive airway pressure mode on adherence to treatment in obstructive sleep apnea patients awaiting bariatric surgery.

Obstructive sleep apnea is prevalent in the bariatric population, and is associated with various complications. Despite increasing popularity, automatic positive airway pressure has not yet been studied in this population. The objective was to compare treatment adherence between automatic positive airway pressure and fixed positive airway pressure (continuous positive airway pressure) in obstructive sleep apnea patients awaiting bariatric surgery. This randomized controlled trial involved obese patients newly diagnosed with severe obstructive sleep apnea and awaiting bariatric surgery. The primary outcome was the difference in adherence between automatic positive airway pressure and continuous positive airway pressure pre-operatively. Secondary outcomes included positive airway pressure efficacy, adherence at 1 month, adverse effects, quality of life and peri-operative complications. Analyses were conducted using a modified intention-to-treat methodology. Fifty patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics and duration of positive airway pressure therapy were comparable between groups. At the time of surgery, the percentage of overall nights positive airway pressure used was 96.9% [95% confidence interval: 93.5-100] and 86.0% [95% confidence interval: 66.9-100] in the automatic positive airway pressure and continuous positive airway pressure groups, respectively (p = .047). Average use was 6.3 hr per night [95% confidence interval: 5.1-7.2] and 5.9 hr per night [95% confidence interval: 3.0-8.8], with a difference of 0.4 hr favouring automatic positive airway pressure (p = .75). Nightly use ≥ 4 hr per night was 86.4% and 74.0% in the automatic positive airway pressure and fixed continuous positive airway pressure groups, respectively (p = .22). There were no statistically significant differences regarding adherence at 1 month, efficacy parameters, adverse effects, quality of life and peri-operative complications. With no difference on the safety profile and efficiency parameters, treatment adherence is not improved with automatic positive airway pressure compared with fixed continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea patients awaiting bariatric surgery.