Penile Transplantation in Gender Affirmation Surgery: A Theoretical Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: It can be argued that individuals in the transgender and gender nonbinary (TGNB) community suffer from a similar impact on quality of life in the face of gender dysphoria, with psychosocial and physical consequences. Indications for penile allotransplantation for patients wishing to undergo gender affirmation surgery have yet to be elucidated, but technical lessons for feasibility can be gleaned from penis transplants that have already been performed on cisgender males to date. METHODS: This study investigates the theoretical feasibility for penile-to-clitoral transplantation, prior penile transplants, and current multidisciplinary gender affirmation health care modalities. RESULTS: Penile allotransplantation offers a potential solution for individuals in the TGNB community for a more aesthetic penis, improved erectile function without the need of a prosthesis, optimal somatic sensation, and improved urethral outcomes. CONCLUSION: Questions remain about ethics, patient eligibility, and immunosuppressive sequelae. Before these issues are addressed, feasibility of this procedure must be established.

Skull and Scalp En-Bloc Harvest Protects Calvarial Perfusion: A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: Calvarial defects are severe injuries that can result from a wide array of etiologies. Reconstructive modalities for these clinical challenges include autologous bone grafting or cranioplasty with biocompatible alloplastic materials. Unfortunately, both approaches are limited by factors such as donor site morbidly, tissue availability, and infection. Calvarial transplantation offers the potential opportunity to address skull defect form and functional needs by replacing "like-with-like" tissue but remains poorly investigated. METHODS: Three adult human cadavers underwent circumferential dissection and osteotomy to raise the entire scalp and skull en-bloc. The vascular pedicles of the scalp were assessed for patency and perfused with color dye, iohexol contrast agent for computed tomography (CT) angiography, and indocyanine green for SPY-Portable Handheld Imager assessment of perfusion to the skull. RESULTS: Gross changes were appreciated to the scalp with color dye, but not to bone. CT angiography and SPY-Portable Handheld Imager assessment confirmed perfusion from the vessels of the scalp to the skull beyond midline. CONCLUSION: Calvarial transplantation may be a technically viable option for skull defect reconstruction that requires vascularized composite tissues (bone and soft tissue) for optimal outcomes.

Treatment Delays in Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis: A 30-Year Retrospective Case-Control Analysis of the Impact of Socioeconomic and Family Status on Access to Care.

BACKGROUND: Patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSC) generally undergo corrective surgery before 1 year of age to the mitigate morbidities and risks of delayed repair. The cohort of patients who receive primary corrective surgery after 1 year and factors associated with their gaps to care is poorly characterized in literature. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted for NSC patients who underwent primary corrective surgery at our institution and affiliates between 1992 and 2022. Patients whose surgery occurred after 1 year of age were identified and matched 1:1 by surgical date to standard-care control subjects. Chart review was conducted to gather patient data regarding care timeline and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Odds of surgery after 1 year of age were increased in Black patients (odds ratio, 3.94; P < 0.001) and those insured by Medicaid (2.57, P = 0.018), with single caregivers (4.96, P = 0.002), and from lower-income areas (+1% per $1000 income decrease, P = 0.001). Delays associated with socioeconomic status primarily impacted timely access to a craniofacial provider, whereas caregiver status was associated with subspecialty level delays. These disparities were exacerbated in patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis, respectively. Patients with multisuture synostosis were susceptible to significant delays related to familial strain (foster status, insurer, and English proficiency). CONCLUSIONS: Patients from socioeconomically strained households face systemic barriers to accessing optimal NSC care; disparities may be exacerbated by the diagnostic/treatment complexities of specific types of craniosynostosis. Interventions at primary care and craniofacial specialist levels can decrease health care gaps and optimize outcomes for vulnerable patients.

Mentorship is Critical: An Analysis of the 2022 Plastic Surgery Match.

BACKGROUND: As the second cycle impacted by COVID-19, the 2022 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) Match maintained virtual interviews while offering a modest lift of subinternship restrictions. The residency application process continues to evolve, with changes such as pass/fail United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 reporting prompting programs to reconsider metrics of applicant success. It is critical to address the impact of board scores, mentorship, and resource availability on a diverse applicant population in the PRS Match. METHODS: A survey was electronically administered to students applying to a single institutional PRS residency program. The survey inquired about demographics, application statistics, mentorship experience, and match outcomes. Logistic regressions were modeled to assess for odds of matching into plastic surgery. RESULTS: In total, 151 responses were analyzed, a 49.7% response rate. Most participants were female (52.3%), White (68.9%), and not Hispanic/Latino (84.8%). The largest percentage of respondents had a faculty mentor only from their home institution (55.0%) and a resident mentor from only their home institution (32.3%). Participants with a faculty mentor from both a home and outside institution had 7.4 times the odds of matching into PRS ( P = 0.02) than students with no faculty mentorship. Students with dual-institution resident mentorship had 18.5 times higher the odds of matching compared with students with no resident mentorship ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Subjective metrics, rather than objective scores, had the most influence on successfully matching into plastic surgery. As the PRS Match continues to become increasingly competitive, it behooves programs to provide equitable access to resources such as mentorship.

The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on the 2022 Plastic Surgery Match.

BACKGROUND: In 2022, the plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) match faced unprecedented system-wide transitions that have redefined conventional measures of applicant success. This challenges the equitable assessment of student competitiveness and diversity in the field. METHODS: A survey of demography, application content, and 2022 match outcomes was distributed to applicants to a single PRS residency program. Comparative statistics and regression models were performed to assess the predictive value of factors in match success and quality. RESULTS: A total of 151 respondents (response rate 49.7%) were analyzed. Although step 1 and step 2 CK scores were significantly higher among matched applicants, neither examination predicted match success. Most respondents (52.3%) were women, although gender was also not significantly associated with match success. Underrepresented in medicine applicants made up 19.2% of responses and 16.7% of matches, and the plurality of respondents (22.5%) were raised with a household income ≥$300,000. Both Black race and household income ≤$100,000 were associated with lower odds of scoring above a 240 on either step 1 or step 2 CK (Black: OR, 0.03 and 0.06; P < 0.05 and P < 0.001; income: OR, 0.07-0.47 and 0.1 to 0.8, among income subgroups), receiving interview offers (OR, -9.4; P < 0.05; OR, -11.0 to -5.4), and matching into PRS (OR, 0.2; P < 0.05; OR, 0.2 to 0.5), compared with White and high-income applicants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic inequities in the match process disadvantage underrepresented in medicine candidates and those from lower household incomes. As the residency match continues to evolve, programs must understand and mitigate the impacts of bias in various application components.

Evaluation of Complications and Outcomes in Craniosynostosis by Age of Operation: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric.

Considerable controversy exists around the optimal age on which to operate for craniosynostosis. This study aims to use data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric to assess the impact of operative age on hospital stay and outcomes. After excluding patients who underwent endoscopic cranial vault remodeling, a total of 3292 patients met inclusion criteria in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric between 2012 and 2019. Median age at surgery was 300 days (interquartile range: 204-494). Patients between 0 and 6 months underwent the highest proportion of complex cranial vault remodeling, Current Procedural Terminology 61,558 ( n =44, 7.7%) and Current Procedural Terminology 61,559 ( n =317, 55.1%). White blood cell counts peaked in the 12 to 18 months group, and were lowest in the 24± months group. Hematocrit was lowest in the 0 to 6 months group and rose steadily to the 24± months group; the inverse pattern was found in platelet concentration, which was highest in the youngest patients and lowest in the oldest. Prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and partial thromboplastin time were relatively consistent across all age groups. Younger patients had significantly shorter operating room times, which increased with patient age ( P <0.001). Younger patients also had significantly shorter length of stay ( P =0.009), though length of stay peaked between 12 and 18 months. There was a significantly lower rate of surgical site infection in younger patients, which occurred in 0.7% of patients 0 to 12 months and 1.0 to 3.0% in patients over 12 to 24± months. There was no significant difference in the average number of transfusions required in any age group ( P =0.961).

USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail is Here: Are Plastic Surgery Applicants Really Better Off?

OBJECTIVE: As of January 26, 2022, the United States Medical Licensing Examination(USMLE) Step 1 score reporting will be changed from a numeric scoring system to pass/fail. Although the new scoring policy is expected to benefit medical students, there is concern that it will also amplify preexisting disadvantages and worsen disparities for students applying in the already-competitive plastic surgery match. Whether the reporting change will tangibly benefit applicants to plastic surgery has yet to be elucidated. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to medical students and graduates via social media platforms. Data were analyzed using Student t test and Chi-squared statistic, with an alpha level set at 0.05. SETTING: Data collection and analysis was performed at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: This study included a sample of 120 American Medical Trainees (AMTs) and International Medical Trainees (IMTs) who are interested in plastic surgery. RESULTS: The plurality of respondents were against the new Step 1 score reporting (AMT: 40.7%; IMT: 44.3%), but differences existed between AMTs when compared to IMTs, especially regarding opinions about the reporting change on stress levels and competitiveness of highly competitive specialties. Regardless of training status, respondents felt that the pass/fail scoring system would increase their likelihood to engage with more research, dual apply, prioritize studying for Step 2 CK, and consider a dedicated research year. CONCLUSIONS: While a pass/fail reporting system for Step 1 may alleviate some stress for medical trainees, other issues arise that may perpetuate disparities and bias against students with little resources in the field of plastic surgery. Residency programs should offer anticipatory guidance regarding prioritization of aspects of application to ease this psychosocial and financial pressure, as well as help students reorganize their constrained time.

Vascularized composite allotransplantation of the penis: current status and future perspectives.

Given the multifunctional role of the penis in daily life, penile loss can be a physically and emotionally devastating injury. Options to restore penile loss have traditionally relied on autogenous free flap, local flaps, and skin grafts. These techniques provide satisfactory outcomes but carry high rates of urologic and prosthesis-related complications. Vascularized composite allotransplantation may offer a novel solution for these patients through reconstruction with true penile tissue. Still, penile transplants pose ethical, logistical, and psychosocial challenges. These obstacles are made more complex by the limited cases detailed in published literature. A review of the literature was conducted to assay current practices for penile reconstruction. Most modern complex penile reconstructions utilize autogenous pedicled or free tissue flaps, which may be harvested from a variety of donor sites. A total of five penile transplants have been described in the literature. Of these, four report satisfactory outcomes. The advent of genital allotransplantation has recently broadened the landscape of treatment for penile loss. Reconstruction using true penile tissue through vascularized penile allotransplantation has the possibility to engender increased penile function, sensation, and overall quality of life.

Comparing Load-Sharing Miniplate and Load-Bearing Plate Fixation in Atrophic Edentulous Mandibular Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To critically examine reported data to compare patient outcomes between load-sharing and load-bearing plate fixation for edentulous mandibular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were designed to test the null hypothesis of no difference in postoperative outcomes between load-sharing and load-bearing plate fixation in atrophic, edentulous mandibular fractures. The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Elsevier text mining tool database, and clinicaltrials.gov trial registries were queried up until July 2016. The quality of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. RESULTS: A total of 1212 studies were screened for inclusion of which we included 1 high-quality Cochrane review, 6 narrative reviews, and 21 publications of case reports and case series. Overall, the quality of evidence was low. No difference was found between load-bearing and load-sharing fixation in functional recovery, nonunion, or infection. An uncontrolled case series portrayed complete functional and morphological restoration in 96.9% of patients (83.2-99.5; 95% confidence interval) in load-bearing osteosynthesis while another demonstrated the same outcome in only 40.0% of patients (17.5-65.0; 95% confidence interval). CONCLUSIONS: The authors did not find a statistically significant difference between load-bearing and load-sharing plate fixation in edentulous atrophic mandibular fracture patients; although this finding may be influenced by type 2 statistical error. Surgeons should continue to use their best clinical judgment in deciding on treatment approach for these challenging fractures. Future studies with higher level evidence are necessary to guide optimal fracture management.

Noninvasive Management of Pediatric Isolated, Condylar Fractures: Less Is More?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine injury patterns in pediatric mandibular condylar fractures and to propose and evaluate the validity of an institutional treatment algorithm for such fractures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on pediatric patients who presented to the authors' institution with isolated mandibular condylar fractures between 1990 and 2016. Patients were categorized by dentition, and information regarding demographics, injury characteristics, management, and complications was compiled. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with 50 mandibular condylar fractures were identified. Twelve patients (27.9 percent) had deciduous dentition, 15 (34.9 percent) had mixed dentition, and 16 (37.2 percent) had permanent dentition. The most common fracture pattern in all groups was diacapitular [n = 30 (60 percent)]; however, older groups showed higher rates of condylar base fractures and bilateral fractures (p = 0.029 and p = 0.011, respectively). Thirty-one patients (72.1 percent) were treated with nonoperative management, 10 (23.2 percent) with closed treatment and mandibulomaxillary fixation, and two (4.7 percent) with open treatment and mandibulomaxillary fixation; nonoperative treatment was more common in younger patients (p = 0.008). Management for 10 patients (23.2 percent) was nonadherent to the treatment algorithm. Eight patients had complications (18.6 percent). Common complications included temporomandibular joint ankylosis (n = 2) and malocclusion (n = 2). Although complications were seen in all groups, adherence to the algorithm was associated with an 81.8 percent reduction in odds of complications (p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Nonoperative management has a low complication rate in deciduous children. Children with permanent/mixed dentition may undergo closed treatment and mandibulomaxillary fixation if they have malocclusion/contralateral open bite, significant condylar dislocation, and ramus height loss greater than 2 mm. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.