Prognosis of acute coronary syndrome stratified by cancer type and status - a nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To investigated the prognosis of the most prevalent cancers (breast-, gastrointestinal-, and lung cancer), according to cancer status (i.e., active-, non-active-, history of-, and no cancer), following first-time of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Danish nationwide registers were used to identify patients with first-time ACS from 2000-2018. Patients were stratified according to cancer type and status. Hazard ratios (HR) estimated by adjusted Cox regression models for 1year all-cause mortality reported. Further absolute risks of 1year cardiovascular versus non-cardiovascular death and 30-day cumulative incidence of coronary angiograms (CAG) was estimated, using the Aalen-Johansen non-parametric method, with competing risk of death. RESULTS: We identified 150,478 (95.7%) with no cancer, 2,370 (1.5%) with history of cancer, 2,712 (1.7%) with non-active cancer and 1,704 (1.1%) with active cancer. Cancer patients were older with more comorbidities than patients with no cancer. When compared with no cancer, we found HRs (95% confidence intervals) of 1.71 (1.44-2.02), 2.47 (2.23-2.73) and 4.22 (3.87-4.60) correspondingly for active breast-, gastrointestinal-, and lung cancer. Increased HRs were also found for non-active cancers, but not for history of cancer. Cardiovascular disease was the leading cause of death in all patients. Among patients with active breast-, gastrointestinal-, and lung cancer 43%, 43%, and 31% underwent CAG, correspondingly, compared with 77% of patients without cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Active- and non-active cancers were associated with an increased 1-year all-cause mortality compared with patients with history of cancer and no cancer. Cardiovascular disease was the leading cause of death; notably CAG was less frequently performed in cancer patients.

"No one told me anything about it and I cannot explain it": Illness perception in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with cancer-associated thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with cancer, have reported cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), a distressing event in their overall illness. However, whether the clinical presentation of CAT; symptomatic versus asymptomatic, impacts illness perception is poorly elucidated. The aim of this study was to explore illness perception in patients with CAT, stratified by the clinical presentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a qualitative design, we conducted a three-step workshop. Patients were included from a specialised cardiology care unit for oncology patients. Data analysis was performed using framework analysis. The analytic framework was based on the five components of illness perception: (1) identity of illness, (2) causal beliefs, (3) timeline beliefs, (4) beliefs about control/cure and (5) consequences. RESULTS: Elleven patients with CAT participated in the workshop; five symptomatic and six asymptomatic. Whitin each category of illness perception following notions emerged (1) the identity of CAT was only tangible for symptomatic participants, (2) the aetiology was considered important information for symptomatic participants, which was in contrast to asymptomatic participants, (3) asymptomatic participant did not consider recurrent CAT a threat towards their health, (4) asymptomatic participants were prone to information overload, whilst information was imperative to the sense of control in symptomatic participants, (5) low molecular weight heparin treatment was accepted in symptomatic participants due to remission of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical presentation of CAT (asymptomatic/symptomatic) proved essential to illness perception. These findings indicate that information level and communication within the medical consultation, should actively consider the clinical presentation of CAT in order to optimize management and compliance.