Utilizing quantitative measures of visceral adiposity in evaluating trauma patient outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Body mass index (BMI) has commonly been used as a parameter to assess obesity in trauma patients. However, the variability of height and weight data in trauma patients limits the use of BMI as an accurate assessment tool in the trauma population. Quantitative radiologic measurements of visceral adiposity is an accurate method for assessing obesity in patients but requires further analysis before it can be accepted as a measurement tool for trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of trauma cases with pre-operative CT scan from 2008 to 2015 produced 57 patients for evaluation. Preoperative BMI was calculated using measured height (m2) and weight (kg). Radiologic measurements of adiposity were obtained from preoperative CT scans using OsiriX DICOM viewer software. Visceral fat areas (VFA) and subcutaneous fat areas (SFA) were measured from a single axial slice at the level of L4-L5 intervertebral space. RESULTS: No statistically significant results were found relating visceral fat:subcutaneous fat ratios to length of stay or post-operative complications. Initial clinical observations noting an increased incidence of complications among patients with a V/S ≥ 0.4 demonstrates a possible link between obesity and poor outcomes in trauma patients. A statistically significant correlation was noted between length of stay, peri-nephric fat and injury severity score. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our pilot study should be viewed as the foundation for a larger prospective study, utilizing quantitative measurements of visceral adiposity to assess outcomes in trauma patients.

The association of circulating angiogenic factors and HbA1c with the risk of preeclampsia in women with preexisting diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether glycemic control, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) were associated with the development of preeclampsia (PE) or gestational hypertension (GHTN) in women with preexisting diabetes. METHODS: Maternal circulating angiogenic factors (sFlt1 and PlGF) measured on automated platform were studied at four time points during pregnancy in women with diabetes (N = 159) and reported as multiples of the median (MOM) of sFlt1/PlGF ratio (median, 25th-75th percentile) noted in non-diabetic non-hypertensive control pregnant population (N = 139). Diagnosis of PE or GHTN was determined by review of de-identified clinical data. RESULTS: PE developed in 12% (N = 19) and GHTN developed in 23% (N = 37) of the women with diabetes. Among diabetic women without PE or GHTN, median sFlt1/PlGF levels at 35-40 weeks was threefold higher than in non-diabetic controls [MOM 3.21(1.19-7.24), p = 0.0001]. Diabetic women who subsequently developed PE had even greater alterations in sFlt1/PlGF ratio during the third trimester [MOM for PE at 27-34 weeks 15.18 (2.37-26.86), at 35-40 weeks 8.61(1.20-18.27), p ≤ 0.01 for both windows compared to non-diabetic controls]. Women with diabetes who subsequently developed GHTN also had significant alterations in angiogenic factors during third trimester; however, these findings were less striking. Among women with diabetes, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) during the first trimester was higher in subjects who subsequently developed PE (7.7 vs 6.7%, p = 0.0001 for diabetic PE vs diabetic non-PE). CONCLUSIONS: Women with diabetes had a markedly altered anti-angiogenic state late in pregnancy that was further exacerbated in subjects who developed PE. Altered angiogenic factors may be one mechanism for the increased risk of PE in this population. Increased HbA1c in the first trimester of pregnancies in women with diabetes was strongly associated with subsequent PE.

Vascularized composite allotransplantation and tissue engineering.

For many living with the devastating aftermath of disfiguring facial injuries, extremity amputations, and other composite tissues defects, conventional reconstruction offers limited relief. Full restoration of the face or extremities with anatomic equivalents recently became possible with decades of advancements in transplantation and regenerative medicine. Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is the transfer of anatomic equivalents from immunologically and aesthetically compatible donors to recipients with severe defects. The transplanted tissues are "composite" because they include multiple types essential for function, for example, skin, muscle, nerves, and blood vessels. More than 100 patients worldwide have benefited from VCA, the majority receiving hand or face transplants. Despite its demonstrated results, the clinical practice of VCA is limited by center experience, public awareness, donor shortage, and the risks of lifelong immune suppression. Tissue engineering (TE) is the generation of customized tissues in the laboratory using cells, biomaterials and bioreactors. Tissue engineering may eventually supersede VCA in the clinic, because it bypasses donor shortage and immune suppression challenges. Billions of dollars have been invested in TE research and development, which are expected to result in a myriad of clinical products within the mid- to long-term. First, tissue engineers must address challenges such as vascularization of engineered tissues and maintenance of phenotype in culture. If these hurdles can be overcome, it is to be hoped that the lessons learned through decades of research in both VCA and TE will act synergistically to generate off-the-shelf composite tissues that can thrive after implantation and in the absence of immune suppression.