Electronic Patient Portal Use After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Online patient portals have become a core component of patient-centered care. Limited research exists on such portal use in patients after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to examine preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors associated with post-transplantation portal use. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included all patients who underwent kidney transplantation from April 2016 to May 2019 at the University of Toledo Medical Center. Exclusion criteria included international travel for transplantation and those without available postoperative lab or follow-up records. Data were collected for 2 y post-transplantation. Univariable and multivariable linear regression was performed to determine associations with portal use. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-seven kidney transplant recipients were included in the study; 35.6% (n = 88) used the portal versus 64.4% (n = 159) did not. Preoperative factors associated with increased use included income >$40,000 (odds ratio [OR], 2.95; P = 0.006) and cancer history (OR, 2.46; P = 0.007), whereas diabetes history had reduced use (OR, 0.51; P = 0.021). The Black race had the least use. Perioperatively, reduced use was associated with dialysis before transplant (OR, 0.25; P < 0.001) and hospital stay ≥4 d (OR, 0.49; P = 0.009). Postoperatively, associations with increased use included average eGFR >30 (P = 0.04) and hospital readmissions (n = 102), whereas those with ER (n = 138) visits had decreased use. Multivariable analysis revealed increased use with income >$40,000 (OR, 2.51; P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: There was no observed difference in clinical outcomes for portal users and nonusers undergoing kidney transplantation, although portal use may decrease the likelihood of ER visits. Socioeconomic status and ethnicity may play a role on who utilizes the patient portals.

Patient-reported disruptions to cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the extent and associations with patient-reported disruptions to cancer treatment and cancer-related care during the COVID-19 pandemic utilizing nationally representative data. METHODS: This analysis uses data from the 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), an annual, cross-sectional survey of US adults. Adults (age >18) who reported requiring current cancer treatment or other cancer-related medical care in the second half of 2020 were included. Estimated proportions of patients with self-reported changes, delays, or cancelations to cancer treatment or other cancer care due to the COVID-19 pandemic were calculated using sampling weights and associations with sociodemographic and other health-related variables were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 574 (sample-weighted estimate of 2,867,326) adults reported requiring cancer treatment and/or other cancer care since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. An estimated 32.1% reported any change, delay, or cancelation. On sample-weighted univariable analysis, patients who were younger, female, had one or fewer comorbidities, and uninsured were significantly more likely to report disruptions. On sample-weighted, multivariable analysis, patients who were younger and female remained significant predictors. Nearly 90% of patients included in the study reported virtual appointment use. Patients reporting disruptions were also significantly more likely to report feelings of anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: An estimated 1/3 of patients experienced disruptions to cancer care due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients experiencing disruptions in care were more likely to be female or younger which may reflect risk stratification strategies in the early stages of the pandemic, and also had higher rates of anxiety. The longitudinal impact of these disruptions on outcomes merits further study.