Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 33
Filtrar
1.
J Endourol ; 37(8): 863-867, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37294208

RESUMO

Introduction: Recent retrospective literature suggests that the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scoring tool is a potentially superior tool over use of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) surgery. Here we examine use of qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock within data series collected prospectively on PCNL patients as part of a greater study of infectious complications. Materials and Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of two prospective multicenter studies including PCNL patients across nine institutions. Clinical signs informing SIRS and qSOFA scores were collected no later than postoperative day 1. The primary outcome was sensitivity and specificity of SIRS and qSOFA (high-risk score of greater-or-equal to two points) in predicting admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for vasopressor support. Results: A total of 218 cases at 9 institutions were analyzed. One patient required vasopressor support in the ICU. The sensitivity/specificity was 100%/72.4% (McNemar's test p < 0.001) for SIRS and was 100%/90.8% (McNemar's test p < 0.001) for qSOFA. Conclusion: Although positive predictive value for both qSOFA and SIRS in prediction of post-PCNL septic shock is low, prospectively collected data demonstrate use of qSOFA may offer greater specificity than SIRS criteria when predicting post-PCNL septic shock.


Assuntos
Nefrolitotomia Percutânea , Sepse , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/etiologia , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Prognóstico , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/etiologia , Curva ROC
2.
J Endourol ; 37(7): 753-760, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37071154

RESUMO

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current availability of technology for urolithiasis treatment and ureteroscopy (URS). Perioperative practice patterns, availability of ureteroscopic technologies, pre- and poststenting practices, and methods to alleviate stent-related symptoms (SRS) were assessed via a survey of members of the Endourological Society. Methods: We distributed a 43-question survey online via the Qualtrics platform to members of the Endourological Society. The survey consisted of questions pertaining to the following topics: general (6), equipment (17), preoperative URS (9), intraoperative URS (2), and postoperative URS (9). Results: A total of 191 urologists responded to the survey and 126 completed all questions of the survey (66%). Fifty-one percent (65/127) of urologists were fellowship trained and dedicated an average of 58% of their practice to stone management. In terms of procedures, most urologists performed URS most commonly (68%), followed by percutaneous nephrolithotomy (23%) and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (11%). Ninety percent (120/133) of respondent urologists purchased a new ureteroscope within the last 5 years (16% single-use scopes, 53% reusable, and 31% purchased both). Fifty-three percent (70/132) of the respondents stated that they would be interested in a ureteroscope that can sense intrarenal pressure, with an additional 28% (37/132) stating they would be interested depending on the cost. Seventy-four percent (98/133) of responders purchased a new laser within the last 5 years, and 59% (57/97) changed their lasering technique due to the new laser. Urologists are performing primary ureteroscopy for obstructing stones in 70% of cases, and prefer prestenting patients for subsequent URS in 30% (on average after 21 days). Seventy-one percent (90/126) of responders insert a ureteral stent after uncomplicated URS, which is removed, on average, after 8 days in uncomplicated cases and 21 days after complicated URS. Most urologists give analgesics, alpha-blockers, and anticholinergics for SRS and <10% prescribe opioids. Conclusion: Our survey revealed urologists' eagerness for the early adoption of novel technologies and adherence to conservative practice patterns focused on patient safety.


Assuntos
Litotripsia , Ureter , Cálculos Ureterais , Humanos , Cálculos Ureterais/cirurgia , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ureteroscópios , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 5492, 2023 04 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37015949

RESUMO

To explore the pathways and mechanisms driving inflammation and fibrosis in stented ureters. In total, six healthy female pigs underwent cystoscopic unilateral ureteral stent insertion (6 Fr). After 14 days indwelling time, ureteral tissue was harvested in three pigs, while the remaining three pigs had their stents removed, and were recovered for 7 days. Three separate pigs served as controls. Tissue from stented and contralateral ureters was analysed histologically to evaluate tissue remodelling and classify the degree of inflammation and fibrosis, while genome, proteome and immunohistochemistry analysis was performed to assess changes at the transcriptional and translational levels. Finally, immunofluorescence was used to characterize the cell composition of the immune response and pathways involved in inflammation and fibrosis. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism and RStudio for Welch ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunnett's T3 multiple comparison test. Stents cause significant inflammation and fibrosis of ureters. Gene set enrichment analysis confirmed fibrotic changes and tissue proliferation and suggests that epithelial-mesenchymal transition is a driver of fibrosis. Moreover, IL-6/JAK/STAT and TNFα via NF-κB signalling might contribute to chronic inflammation promoting a profibrotic environment. Immunostaining confirmed epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the urothelium and NF-κB expression in ureters stented for 14 days. Tissue alterations do not fully recover after 7 days. Histological evaluation showed that contralateral, unstented ureters are affected by mild inflammation. Our study showed that stenting has a significant impact on the ureter. Chronic inflammation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition are drivers of fibrosis, potentially impairing ureteral functionality in the long term. Furthermore, we observed mild inflammation in contralateral, unstented ureters.


Assuntos
Ureter , Obstrução Ureteral , Suínos , Feminino , Animais , Ureter/patologia , Urotélio/patologia , NF-kappa B , Stents/efeitos adversos , Inflamação/patologia , Fibrose , Obstrução Ureteral/patologia
4.
BJU Int ; 131(3): 367-375, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36181708

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate global changes in ureters at the transcriptional, translational and functional levels, both while stents are indwelling and after removal and recovery, and to study the effects of targeting pathways that play a potential role. METHODS: Pig ureters were stented for varying amounts of time (48 h, 72 h, 14 days) and the impact on peristalsis, dilatation and hydronephrosis were assessed. RNAseq, proteomic, histological and smooth muscle (SM) function analyses were performed on ureteric and kidney tissues to assess changes induced by stenting and recovery. Pathway analysis was performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. To study the impact of possible interventions, the effects of erythropoeitin (EPO) and a Gli1 inhibitor were assessed. RESULTS: Stenting triggers massive ureteric dilatation, aperistalsis and moderate hydronephrosis within 48 h. Pathways associated with obstruction, fibrosis and kidney injury were upregulated by stenting. Increased expression of GLI1, clusterin-α (a kidney injury marker) and collagen 4A2 (a fibrosis marker) was found in stented vs contralateral unstented ureters. EPO did not improve peristalsis or contraction force but did decrease non-purposeful spasming seen exclusively in stented ureters. Tamsulosin administration increased contractility but not rate of peristalsis in stented ureters. CONCLUSIONS: Ureters respond to stents similarly to how they respond to an obstruction, that is, with activation of pathways associated with hydronephrosis, fibrosis and kidney injury. This is driven by significant dilatation and associated ureteric SM dysfunction. EPO and tamsulosin induced mild favourable changes in SM physiology, suggesting that targeting specific pathways has potential to address stent-induced complications.


Assuntos
Hidronefrose , Ureter , Obstrução Ureteral , Animais , Suínos , Proteína GLI1 em Dedos de Zinco , Proteômica , Tansulosina , Ureter/patologia , Hidronefrose/etiologia , Stents/efeitos adversos
5.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ; 14(34): 39577-39590, 2022 Aug 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35975924

RESUMO

Mussel-inspired surface chemistry based on polycatecholamines and polyphenols has been widely applied as a facile and universal method for modifying surfaces. Specifically, the catecholamine-assisted codeposition as a one-step strategy is a versatile strategy used to impart surface functionalities. Despite successful incorporation of numerous functional agents, very little understanding has emerged over the years regarding the mechanism behind their coassembly and codeposition. Here, we employed six different ultrahigh molecular weight hydrophilic polymers of diverse chemistry and architecture and three catecholamines and a polyphenol for investigating the coassembly and codeposition process. The chemistry of the polymers is found to influence the strength of the interaction between the polycatecholamine and the hydrophilic polymers, thus playing an important role in the aqueous self-assembly in solution to nanoaggregates, its formation kinetics, steric stabilization, and surface deposition. Additionally, the codeposition method was used as a platform for developing antifouling and antibiofilm coatings and evaluating their efficiency. Both the chemistry of hydrophilic polymers and the type of the catecholamine influence the antibiofilm properties of the coating. Our studies demonstrated that significant opportunities exist to further define the surface coating process and polycatecholamine self-assembly process by altering the polycatecholamine-hydrophilic polymer interactions.


Assuntos
Catecolaminas , Polímeros , Interações Hidrofóbicas e Hidrofílicas , Polímeros/química , Propriedades de Superfície
6.
WIREs Mech Dis ; 13(6): e1523, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34730288

RESUMO

The upper urinary tract (UUT) consists of kidneys and ureters, and is an integral part of the human urogenital system. Yet malfunctioning and complications of the UUT can happen at all stages of life, attributed to reasons such as congenital anomalies, urinary tract infections, urolithiasis and urothelial cancers, all of which require urological interventions and significantly compromise patients' quality of life. Therefore, many models have been developed to address the relevant scientific and clinical challenges of the UUT. Of all approaches, fluid mechanical modeling serves a pivotal role and various methods have been employed to develop physiologically meaningful models. In this article, we provide an overview on the historical evolution of fluid mechanical models of UUT that utilize theoretical, computational, and experimental approaches. Descriptions of the physiological functionality of each component are also given and the mechanical characterizations associated with the UUT are provided. As such, it is our aim to offer a brief summary of the current knowledge of the subject, and provide a comprehensive introduction for engineers, scientists, and clinicians who are interested in the field of fluid mechanical modeling of UUT. This article is categorized under: Cancer > Biomedical Engineering Infectious Diseases > Biomedical Engineering Reproductive System Diseases > Biomedical Engineering.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias Renais , Ureter , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida
8.
Turk J Urol ; 46(Supp. 1): S11-S18, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33052843

RESUMO

A ureteral stent is a commonly implanted urological device in patients with urinary tract obstruction. The main role of these stents is to allow adequate drainage of urine from the kidney into the bladder. Individuals with strictures, tumors, or obstructions from urinary stones do not have adequate urine flow and require ureteral stents as a part of their treatment to avoid potential hydronephrosis and renal failure. Although ureteral stents are highly effective in treating urinary tract obstructions, they have associated morbidities, such as biofilm formation and encrustation. Researchers have studied about how to diminish these negative outcomes by developing novel stent materials. Different coatings and biomaterials have been developed to reduce bacterial adhesion and crystal deposition onto the stent surfaces. Moreover, new investigation technologies, such as microfluidic platforms and encrustation sensors, have been utilized to better study the stents. Biofilms and encrustations can stem from bacterial origins; therefore, understanding the urinary microbiome will also provide insight into the solutions for treating them. There are still some gaps in our knowledge regarding the exact underlying mechanisms of stent-associated biofilms and encrustation. Future studies should include continuous testing of novel stent biomaterials for safety and efficacy, developing new technologies for identifying and extracting biofilms, enriching the assessment of stent encrustation, and diving deeper into understanding the urinary microbiome.

9.
Investig Clin Urol ; 61(5): 455-463, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32869562

RESUMO

The use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS) is common practice during routine flexible ureteroscopy procedures. However, debates and concerns continue amongst endourologists on routine UAS placement. UAS placement allows for multiple passages of the ureteroscope, decreases intrarenal pressure, and may improve stone-free rates. However, concerns for the UAS's effectiveness in these claimed benefits and complications related to UAS placement has been documented and investigated by many. In this review, we will discuss the controversies surrounding the placement of UAS during ureteroscopy.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Ureter , Ureteroscopia/efeitos adversos , Ureteroscopia/instrumentação
10.
Curr Opin Urol ; 30(2): 166-170, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31834083

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ureteral stents are necessary in the routine practice of an urologist. Choosing the correct stent and being aware of the options available will allow urologists to provide the best possible care for patients and value to the healthcare system. This review seeks to educate urologists regarding improvements in stent technology currently available or in development. RECENT FINDINGS: Research from around the world is underway to discover an ideal stent - one that is comfortable for patients, resists infection and encrustation and is affordable for hospital systems. Stent design alterations and stent coatings are revealing reductions in encrustation and bacterial colonization. Biodegradable stents and magnetic stents are being tested to prevent the discomfort of cystoscopic removal. Intraureteral stents are proving efficacious while eliminating an irritating coil from the bladder and the symptoms associated with it. SUMMARY: The studies highlighted in this review provide encouraging results in the pursuit of the ideal stent while opening discussion around new concepts and further areas of research.


Assuntos
Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Implantação de Prótese/normas , Stents/efeitos adversos , Stents/normas , Ureter/cirurgia , Ureteroscopia/efeitos adversos , Implantes Absorvíveis , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Constrição Patológica/prevenção & controle , Remoção de Dispositivo/instrumentação , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Remoção de Dispositivo/normas , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Humanos , Desenho de Prótese , Ureteroscopia/instrumentação , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
11.
J Endourol ; 32(1): 1-6, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29061070

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy is becoming the most commonly utilized treatment for patients with urinary calculi. The Holmium:YAG (yttrium aluminum garnet) laser is integral to the operation and is the preferred flexible intracorporeal lithotrite. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in examining the effect of varying the laser settings on the effectiveness of stone treatment. Herein, we review the two primary laser treatment approaches: dusting and fragmentation with extraction. METHODS: We reviewed PubMed and MEDLINE databases from January 1976 through January 2017. All authors participated in the development of consensus definitions of dusting and fragmentation with extraction. The review protocol adhered to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology. RESULTS: When the Holmium:YAG laser is used to treat stones, there are two parameters that can be adjusted: power (J) and frequency (Hz). In one treatment paradigm, which became termed "fragmentation with extraction," laser settings that relied on high energy and low frequency were used. Another paradigm, which became termed "dusting," utilized low energy and high frequency settings, which had the effect of breaking off exceedingly small fragments from the stone. CONCLUSIONS: Both dusting and fragmentation with extraction approaches to ureteroscopic stone treatment are effective. In fact, there is little evidence that one approach is better than the other. However, each does have relative advantages and disadvantages, which should be considered. Although dusting tends to be associated with shorter procedure times and a lower risk of ureteral damage, this approach may place the patient at increased risk for future stone events should all of the resultant debris not be expelled from the collecting system. The active removal associated with fragmentation with extraction, in contrast, may provide for a more complete initial stone clearance.


Assuntos
Litotripsia a Laser/métodos , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Cálculos Urinários/cirurgia , Humanos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Litotripsia a Laser/instrumentação , Ureteroscopia/instrumentação
12.
J Endourol ; 32(1): 28-32, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29037066

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The management of residual fragments (RFs) that persist after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been poorly studied. Fragments have the potential to grow or cause symptoms. The aim of this study was to follow patients with fragments after PCNL to identify predictors of stone-related events (re-interventions and complications) after PCNL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent surgery from 2008 to 2013 at our hospital. Patients with fragments of any size on postoperative day 1 computed tomography of the kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph (CT-KUB) were included, and patients with planned secondary interventions were excluded. Subgroup analysis was performed on subjects with CT-plain X-ray to determine fragment growth or passage. RESULTS: Of the 658 patients who received a postoperative CT-KUB on day 1, 299 patients (45%) had fragments that were 1 mm or larger. From this, 263 patients met the study criteria and were included. The size of fragments, using a 4 mm cutoff, did not predict the passage of fragments (p = 0.173) or growth (p = 0.572). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, previous history of renal stones and size of fragment were found to be predictive for stone-related events (p = 0.002 and 0.027, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis identified patients with fragments >4 mm having a shorter survival time before the occurrence of stone-related events (p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: The true stone-free rate was 55% after PCNL. However, 82.5% were stone free or had RFs 4 mm or less, which correlates with previous studies. Larger RFs had higher rates of stone-related events and shorter time to occurrence of stone-related events. The growth and spontaneous passage of RFs was independent of RF size, emphasizing the importance of obtaining a stone-free status after PCNL.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Cálculos Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Cálculos Renais/patologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto Jovem
13.
J Endourol ; 31(12): 1321-1325, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29048209

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Ureteral stent symptoms are experienced by the majority of patients with ureteral stents. No one stent or technology has shown a clear advantage. The Helical™ stent, a spirally cut stent made of proprietary Percuflex™ material, was designed to conform to the shape of the ureter and better accommodate patient movement. We prospectively sought to compare unscheduled visits, analgesic use, and pain scores in patients who received a Percuflex Helical ureteral stent following ureteroscopy compared to a historical control group. METHODS: Fifteen (n = 15) patients undergoing ureteroscopy for the treatment of kidney stones were consented for study. A Percuflex Helical ureteral stent was inserted after treating the urinary stone. The historical control group consisted of 30 patients, from a previous (ketorolac eluting) ureteral stent study utilizing the same protocol and clinical monitoring forms, who received a regular Percuflex ureteral stent. The control patients were matched by age and sex. The primary study outcome was to compare unscheduled visits. Secondary outcomes included comparison of Visual Pain Analog Scale (VPAS) scores and analgesic use between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in the gender, age, BMI, or stone characteristics between groups. Both groups underwent retrograde ureteroscopy using holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and stone fragmentation. There was a significant reduction in the amount of analgesics required in the Helical stent group (4.4 ± 7.99 mg morphine equivalents) compared to controls (16.75 ± 18.31 mg, p = 0.0035) to achieve similar VPAS scores. There was no difference in unscheduled visits (20%) or VPAS scores (13.84 ± 13.68 helical vs 14.29 ± 11.58 control, p = 0.7910) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received a Percuflex Helical ureteral stent required significantly fewer analgesics than those who received a Percuflex stent and both had equivalent pain scores.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Desenho de Equipamento , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Stents , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Stents Farmacológicos , Feminino , Estudo Historicamente Controlado , Humanos , Cetorolaco/administração & dosagem , Litotripsia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Ureter/cirurgia
14.
Urology ; 104: 242.e1-242.e8, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28188758

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the effects of double J stenting on ureteral physiology and function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 24 pigs were stented cystoscopically unilaterally for 48 hours, 1, 2, 4, and 7 weeks. Controls consisted of un-stented animals (n = 4) or the contralateral un-stented ureter in pigs. Ureters were harvested and tested in tissue baths to evaluate their contractility. Ureteral inflammation and expression of Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) and the transcriptional activator Gli1 (the downstream target of active Hedgehog signaling) were assessed histologically and by immunohistochemistry, respectively. RESULTS: Indwelling ureteral stents were found to abolish normal ureteral function in all animals. Specifically, ureteral smooth muscle (SM) activity was significantly diminished within 48 hours after stenting and persisted at the 1-week time point. Furthermore, ureteral SM dysfunction was associated with increasing ureteral dilation due to the indwelling stent. Simultaneously, we observed a loss of Gli1 expression in SM cells, with a concomitant increase in ureteral inflammation. Expression of Shh was restricted to the urothelium and was not different between controls, stented, and contralateral ureters. CONCLUSION: Stent-induced aperistalsis was associated with diminished SM contractility, increased tissue inflammation, and reduced Gli1 expression in ureteral SM cells, independent of Shh expression. The present study is the first to show that indwelling stents negatively affect ureteral SM activity and identify a role for specific molecular mechanisms involved.


Assuntos
Músculo Liso/metabolismo , Ureter/metabolismo , Proteína GLI1 em Dedos de Zinco/metabolismo , Animais , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Inflamação , Peristaltismo , Transdução de Sinais , Stents , Suínos , Fatores de Tempo , Obstrução Ureteral/patologia
15.
Biomaterials ; 116: 69-81, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27914268

RESUMO

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) represent one of the most common hospital acquired infections with significant economic consequences and increased patient morbidity. CAUTIs often start with pathogen adhesion and colonization on the catheter surface followed by biofilm formation. Current strategies to prevent CAUTIs are insufficiently effective and antimicrobial coatings based on antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) hold promise in curbing CAUTIs. Here we report an effective surface tethering strategy to prepare AMP coatings on polyurethane (PU), a common biomedical plastic used for catheter manufacture, by using an anti-adhesive hydrophilic polymer coating. An optimized surface active AMP, labeled with cysteine at the C-terminus (RRWRIVVIRVRRC), was used. The coated PU surface was characterized using ATR-FTIR, XPS and atomic force microscopy analyses. The tethered peptides on the PU catheter surface displayed broad spectrum antimicrobial activity and showed long term activity in vitro. The surface coating prevented bacterial adhesion by up to 99.9% for both Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, and inhibited planktonic bacterial growth by up to 70%. In vivo, the coating was tested in a mouse urinary catheter infection model; the AMP-coated PU catheter was able to prevent infection with high efficiency by reducing the bacteria adhesion on catheter surface by more than 4 logs (from 1.2 × 106 CFU/mL to 5 × 101 CFU/mL) compared to the uncoated catheter surface, and inhibit planktonic bacterial growth in the urine by nearly 3 logs (1.1 × 107 CFU/mL to 1.47 × 104 CFU/mL). The AMP-brush coating also showed good biocompatibility with bladder epithelial cells and fibroblast cells in cell culture. The new coating might find clinical applications in preventing CAUTIs.


Assuntos
Peptídeos Catiônicos Antimicrobianos/administração & dosagem , Aderência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/administração & dosagem , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Animais , Peptídeos Catiônicos Antimicrobianos/química , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/química , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Cateteres Urinários/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Urinários/microbiologia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia
16.
J Endourol ; 31(2): 191-197, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27863458

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Standardized bench testing of the new ShockPulse™ intracorporeal lithotripter was performed against three commercially available lithotripsy systems to determine differences and nuances in performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ShockPulse intracorporeal lithotripter was tested against the LUS-2™, CyberWand,™ and EMS LithoClast™ in a standardized bench setting using hard (Ultracal-30) and soft (plaster of Paris) stone phantoms. An in vitro kidney model was used to record the time needed to fragment stone samples into retrievable-sized pieces. The time needed to fully comminute and evacuate stone samples was also recorded. The efficacy of each device at various applied pressures was determined using a hands-free apparatus, which was used to apply 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 pounds of fixed force. RESULTS: For hard and soft stones, the time needed to create retrievable fragments was similar among all systems (p = 0.585). The ShockPulse was significantly faster than the LUS-2 and LithoClast at fully fragmenting and evacuating stone samples (p = 0.046), while the CyberWand was significantly slower than all three systems at this task (p = 0.001). When fixed forces were applied to a large stone phantom, the ShockPulse and CyberWand were significantly faster than the LUS-2 and LithoClast (p < 0.0001). When groups of smaller stones were tested, the ShockPulse was significantly faster at 1.0 pound (p < 0.001) and 1.5 pounds (p < 0.002) of force. At 2.0 pounds, no differences were observed (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The ShockPulse is equally as effective and, in some circumstances, more effective than the three commercially available devices against which it was tested in an in vitro setting.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/terapia , Litotripsia/instrumentação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Humanos , Litotripsia/normas , Nefrostomia Percutânea/normas , Duração da Cirurgia , Imagens de Fantasmas , Padrões de Referência
17.
Minerva Urol Nefrol ; 68(6): 592-597, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27759736

RESUMO

Open ureterolithotomy and pyelolithotomy used to be first line therapy for treating kidney and ureteral stones. With the advent of shockwave lithotripsy, open stone surgery became less prevalent, but once ureteroscopy became more prevalent, open stone surgery became all but extinct. Advances in smaller, more flexible endoscopes and improvements in intracorporeal lithotripters, ureteroscopy has become a mainstay of therapy for kidney stones. The holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser can be utilized through flexible instruments and fragments any stone no matter what it is composed of. Digital image ureteroscopes with chip-on-the-tip technology has improved our visualization during ureteroscopy. What is next? We examine potential directions from current research. Pharmacologic manipulation for ureteral dilation may obviate the need for pre-stenting or balloon dilation. Advances in ureteroscope technology will likely see the biggest advances. Different ureteroscopic platforms and the user interface with the surgeon will progress. Robotic manipulation of the endoscope is an eventual reality with improved ergonomics and improved performance to reach all areas of the kidney. Single-use ureteroscopes are already a reality and offer a digital image with full deflection with every use and without having to worry about sterilization and costly repairs. Lastly, advancements in nanotechnology and robotics will see the potential for miniaturized robots that could be administered intravesically to identify the stone and to disintegrate it. The only prediction that can be made about the future of ureteroscopy is that we do not know how it will look. The future of ureteroscopy is exciting and most definitely will be unrecognizable to the surgeons of today.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Ureteroscopia/tendências , Urolitíase/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/tendências , Equipamentos Descartáveis , Humanos , Robótica , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador , Ureteroscopia/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/instrumentação
18.
Curr Opin Urol ; 26(3): 277-82, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26840739

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ureteral stents are commonly used in urology, but there is no perfect ureteral stent. This review documents developing ureteral technologies and strategies over the past 2 years. This area has some progressive advances in the foreseeable future. RECENT FINDINGS: Publications from 2014 and 2015 from a PubMed search with the words 'ureter' and 'stent' in the title were reviewed. Topics that affected patient symptoms from stents include selecting the proper length of stent, patient education regarding stent symptoms, and how the stent is removed. Stent extraction strings have been studied and not increased the incidence of infection or pain. There have been several publications examining antirefluxing ureteral stents that reduced vesicoureteral reflux during micturition and infection of transplanted kidneys. Other novel methods of removing a stent include new biodegradable ureteral stents and metal beads attached to the stent used in tandem with a magnetic catheter. Several new metal and mesh stents were described for use in patients with malignant ureteral obstruction. Last, new stent coatings with antimicrobial peptides have also been described. SUMMARY: The search continues for the perfect stent and there has been promising progress over the past 2 years.


Assuntos
Desenho de Prótese , Stents , Ureter/cirurgia , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Implantes Absorvíveis , Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Stents/efeitos adversos , Stents/tendências , Obstrução Ureteral/etiologia , Refluxo Vesicoureteral/etiologia
19.
J Endourol ; 30(1): 63-8, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26413885

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: American Urology Association (AUA) Best Practice Guidelines for ureteroscopic stone treatment recommend antibiotic coverage for <24 hours following the procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the addition of postoperative antibiotics reduces urinary tract infections (UTIs) following ureteroscopic stone treatment beyond the recommended preoperative dose. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients at two institutions, University of British Columbia and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard. All patients received a single dose of antibiotics before ureteroscopic stone treatment. A subset of patients was also given postoperative antibiotics. The rate of UTI was compared in patients receiving only preoperative antibiotics (group 1) vs those who received pre- and postoperative antibiotics (group 2). RESULTS: Eighty-one patients underwent ureteroscopy for renal calculi. Mean time to follow up was 42 ± 88 days. Eight (9.9%) patients in total (two from group 1 and six from group 2, p = 0.1457) developed UTIs postoperatively. In group 1, both patients presented with pyelonephritis (n = 2); those patients with infections in group 2 presented with urosepsis (n = 2) and cystitis (n = 2) and two patients had asymptomatic bacteriuria. Risk factors such as preoperative stenting, nephrostomy tubes, and foley catheters neither differed between groups nor did they predispose patients to postoperative infections. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative UTI rate in this study (9.9%) is consistent with previous reports. Our data suggest that a single preoperative dose of antibiotics is sufficient, and additional postoperative antibiotics do not decrease infection rates after ureteroscopic stone treatment. Risk for selection bias is a potential limitation.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Sepse/prevenção & controle , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Stents , Adulto Jovem
20.
Asian J Urol ; 3(3): 142-149, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29264182

RESUMO

Malignant ureteral obstruction can result in renal dysfunction or urosepsis and can limit the physician's ability to treat the underlying cancer. There are multiple methods to deal with ureteral obstruction including regular polymeric double J stents (DJS), tandem DJS, nephrostomy tubes, and then more specialized products such as solid metal stents (e.g., Resonance Stent, Cook Medical) and polyurethane stents reinforced with nickel-titanium (e.g., UVENTA stents, TaeWoong Medical). In patients who require long-term stenting, a nephrostomy tube could be transformed subcutaneously into an extra-anatomic stent that is then inserted into the bladder subcutaneously. We outline the most recent developments published since 2012 and report on identifiable risk factors that predict for failure of urinary drainage. These failures are typically a sign of cancer progression and the natural history of the disease rather than the individual type of drainage device. Factors that were identified to predict drainage failure included low serum albumin, bilateral hydronephrosis, elevated C-reactive protein, and the presence of pleural effusion. Head-to-head studies show that metal stents are superior to polymeric DJS in terms of maintaining patency. Discussions with the patient should take into consideration the frequency that exchanges will be needed, the need for externalized hardware (with nephrostomy tubes), or severe urinary symptoms in the case of internal DJS. This review will highlight the current state of diversions in the setting of malignant ureteral obstruction.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA