Haemodynamic effects of remifentanil during induction of general anaesthesia with propofol. A randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil may have a dose-dependent haemodynamic effect during the induction of general anaesthesia combined with propofol. Our objective was to investigate whether systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) was reduced to a greater extent when the remifentanil dose was increased. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, dose-controlled study was conducted at the Day Surgery Unit of Haugesund Hospital, Norway. Ninety-nine healthy women scheduled for gynaecological surgery were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive remifentanil induction with a low, medium or high dose corresponding to maximum effect-site concentrations (Ce) of 2, 4 and 8 ng/mL. The induction dose of propofol was 1.8 mg/kg, with a Ce of 2.9 µg/mL. Anaesthesia was induced using target-controlled infusion. After 150 s of sedation, a bolus of remifentanil and propofol was administered. Baseline was defined as 55-5 s before the bolus dose, and the total observation time was 450 s. We used beat-to-beat haemodynamic monitoring with LiDCOplus. The primary outcome variable was the maximum decrease in SAP within 5 min after bolus administration of remifentanil and propofol. Absolute and relative changes from baseline to minimal values and the area under the curve (AUC) were used as effect measures. Comparisons of groups were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Median remifentanil doses were 0.75, 1.5 and 3.0 µg/kg in the low-, medium- and high-dose groups, respectively. The absolute changes (mean ± standard deviation) in SAP in the low-, medium- and high-dose groups of remifentanil were -39 ± 9.6 versus -43 ± 9.1, and -41 ± 10 mmHg, respectively. No difference (95% confidence interval) in the absolute change in SAP was observed between the groups (ANOVA, p = .29); medium versus low dose 3.7 (-2.0, 9.4) mmHg, and high versus medium dose -2.2 (-8.0; 3.5) mmHg. The relative changes from baseline to minimum SAP values were -30% versus -32% versus -32% (p = .52). The between-group differences in the AUC were not statistically significant. Relative changes in heart rate (-20% vs. -21% vs. -21%), stroke volume (-19% vs. -16% vs. -16%), cardiac output (-32% vs. -32% vs. -32%), systemic vascular resistance (-24% vs. -27% vs. -28%), and AUC were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated major haemodynamic changes during the induction of anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol. However, we did not observe any statistically significant differences between low, medium or high doses of remifentanil when using continuous invasive high-accuracy beat-to-beat monitoring.

Hemodynamic effects of a low versus a high dose of propofol during induction of anesthesia. A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypotension is common after anesthesia induction with propofol and is associated with increased morbidity. It is important to examine the effects of the proposed interventions to limit preventable hypotension, as suggested by the reduction in the dose of propofol. Our objective was to investigate whether a high dose of propofol is inferior to a low dose with respect to changes in systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP). METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, dose-controlled, non-inferiority study included 68 healthy women scheduled for gynecological surgery at the Day Surgery Unit, Haugesund Hospital, Norway. The patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to a low or high dose (1.4 mg/kg total body weight (TBW) versus 2.7 mg/kg TBW of propofol corresponding to maximal effect site concentrations (Ce) of 2.0 µg/mL versus 4.0 µg/mL. The dose of remifentanil was 1.9-2.0 µg/kg TBW, with maximal Ce of 5.0 ng/mL. The patients were observed for 450 s from the start of the infusions. The first 150 s was the sedation period, after which a bolus of propofol and remifentanil was administered. Baseline was defined as 55-5 s before the bolus doses. LiDCOplus was used for invasive beat-to-beat hemodynamic monitoring of changes in SAP, heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). A difference of 10 mmHg in the change in SAP was considered to be clinically important. RESULTS: The SAP change difference for low versus high dose was -2.9 mmHg (95% CI -9.0-3.1). The relative changes for low versus high dose were SAP -31% versus -36%, (p < .01); HR -24% versus -20%, (p = .09); SVR -20% versus -31%, (p < .001); SV -16% versus -20%, (p = .04); and CO -35% versus -32%, (p = .33). CONCLUSION: A high dose of propofol was not inferior to a low dose, and a reduction in the dose of propofol did not result in clinically important attenuation of major hemodynamic changes during induction in healthy women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03861364, January 3, 2019.

Haemodynamic stability after paracervical block: A randomized, controlled, double-blind study comparing bupivacaine-adrenaline with bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND: Paracervical block is widely used in gynaecological interventions on cervix and uterus. Many surgeons add adrenaline 100 µg or pitressin 3-5 IU in a total volume of 10-20 mL to reduce total blood loss. We wanted to examine haemodynamic stability in healthy patients given bupivacaine with and without adrenaline. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blinded, controlled study, 30 healthy women scheduled for cervical conisation got a paracervical block using bupivacaine 50 mg with adrenaline 100 µg (BA-group, n = 14) or without adrenaline (B-group, n = 16) after induction of general anaesthesia. LiDCOplus was used for minimally invasive haemodynamic monitoring. Changes in cardiac output (CO) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were the primary outcome. Changes in heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were secondary outcome variables. Area under the curve (AUC) ratios and change from baseline to maximal values were used as effect measures comparing the two groups. RESULTS: The AUC-ratio for CO and SBP was 2.50 (P < 0.001) and 1.70 (P = 0.03), respectively. For HR, SV, and SVR the AUC-ratio was 1.59 (P < 0.01), 1.52 (P < 0.001), and 0.90 (P = 0.14), respectively. CO increased 68% (standard deviation (SD) 42%, P < 0.001), HR increased 41% (SD 26%, P < 0.001), and SV increased 26% (SD 17%, P < 0.001) from baseline to maximal values after 70-90 seconds in the BA-group. CONCLUSION: Paracervical block with bupivacaine 50 mg and adrenaline 100 µg may give haemodynamic instability in healthy females and is not recommended if haemodynamic side effects are to be avoided.