Area Deprivation Index as a proxy for socioeconomic status in outpatient orthopaedic surgery patients - A prospective registry cross sectional study.

Background: We aimed to determine if Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is associated with self-reported metrics socioeconomic status (SES), and to assess the relationship between ADI and preoperative score on common patient reported outcome scores (PROS). Methods: Patients presenting for outpatient orthopaedic surgery completed Patient-Reported Outcome Metric Information System (PROMIS) and joint-specific PROS. ADI was determined from geocoded home address. Sociodemographic data was collected from self-reported survey. Tests of association were used to describe the relationship between ADI and sociodemographic factors as well as the correlation between ADI and PROS. Extreme group analysis was used to examine which PROS may be subject to clinically meaningful variation. Results: ADI was associated with self-reported SES. ADI was correlated with score on all baseline PROS. Extreme group analysis showed that low SES was associated with clinically meaningful differences in some, but not all, PROS. Conclusion: ADI is associated with self-reported measures of SES in an orthopaedic outpatient surgical population. Lower SES correlates with worse function to a clinically significant degree for some PROS. SES should be considered in the context of preoperative symptom severity in outpatient orthopaedic surgery patients. ADI may be a useful adjunct to self-reported measures of SES for this purpose.

Preoperative predictors of two-year satisfaction in hand and wrist surgery patients.

Purpose: As stakeholders seek to improve patient outcomes while maintaining cost-effectiveness in an increasingly expensive healthcare system, metrics such as patient satisfaction are becoming more important. This present study sought to identify factors associated with and independently predictive of better surgical satisfaction two years following hand and wrist surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing hand and wrist surgery at an urban outpatient institution were enrolled preoperatively into a surgical registry and assessed two years postoperatively. Patient satisfaction with surgery was measured at two years postoperatively with the Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8). Bivariate analysis determined associations between postoperative satisfaction and patient demographics, injury specifiers, medical history, and multiple patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Multivariable analysis determined independent predictors of two-year postoperative satisfaction following hand and wrist surgery. Results: Better surgical satisfaction was associated with having never smoked, no preoperative opioid use, lack of an accompanying legal claim, lack of a workers compensation claim, no clinical history of depression/anxiety, less comorbidities, and higher preoperative expectations.Various PROs relating to function, pain, activity, and general health at both baseline and two years demonstrated associations with postoperative satisfaction. Multivariable analysis confirmed that never smoking, lack of a legal claim, and better preoperative Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire scores were independently predictive of better surgical satisfaction two years following hand and wrist surgery. Conclusion: At two years following hand and wrist surgery, better patient satisfaction was best predicted by never smoking, no related legal claim, and better baseline Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire scores. Level of evidence: III.

Preoperative opioid use is associated with worse two-year patient-reported outcomes after hand surgery: A retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: Opioid overprescribing has caused a substantial increase in opioid related deaths and billions of dollars in additional healthcare costs. Orthopaedic surgeons commonly prescribe opioids in the perioperative period; however, research has shown preoperative opioid use may be associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Despite this body of evidence, there are few studies investigating the association between preoperative opioid use and two-year outcomes after hand surgery. Materials and methods: This study evaluated two-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes in patients who used opioids prior to hand surgery, and those who did not. Patients completed pre and postoperative questionnaires including Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains, the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (BMHQ), and other questionnaires related to pain, function, and satisfaction. 342 patients undergoing upper-extremity surgery were enrolled into a prospective orthopaedic surgery outcome registry, and 69.9% completed the follow-up surveys. Preoperative opioid use and its association to patient outcome scores was analyzed through bivariate analysis. Significant associations were further tested by multivariable analysis to determine independent predictors. Results: Preoperative opioid use was associated with worse two-year PROMIS Fatigue (p â€‹< â€‹.01), PROMIS Anxiety (p â€‹< â€‹.01), PROMIS Depression (p â€‹< â€‹.01), SSQ-8 (p â€‹= â€‹.01), BMHQ (p â€‹= â€‹.01), NPS Hand (p â€‹< â€‹.01) and MODEMS met expectations (p â€‹= â€‹.03). No significant differences were observed in patient-reported outcome change scores. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that preoperative opioid use was predictive of worse two-year PROMIS Fatigue (p â€‹< â€‹.01), PROMIS Anxiety (p â€‹< â€‹.01), PROMIS Depression (p â€‹= â€‹.02), BMHQ (p â€‹= â€‹.01), SSQ-8 (p â€‹< â€‹.01), NPS Hand (p â€‹= â€‹.02) and MODEMS met expectations (p â€‹< â€‹.01). Conclusion: Preoperative opioid use was associated with worse patient-reported outcomes two years after elective hand surgery. There was no significant difference in the improvement from baseline between the two groups. Clinically significant differences were observed in follow-up PROMIS Anxiety, BMHQ and NPS - Hand scores. Clinically significant change scores were noted in both groups for PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, PROMIS SS, BMHQ, and NPS - Hand.

Preoperative Factors Associated With Worse PROMIS Pain Interference 2 Years After Hand and Wrist Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with worse postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) scores 2 years after hand and wrist surgery. We hypothesized that older age, more comorbidities, increased substance use, and lower socioeconomic status would correlate with worse 2-year PROMIS PI scores. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of prospectively acquired data on 253 patients. Surveys were administered within 1 week of surgery and 2 years postoperatively. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify significant predictors of worse 2-year PROMIS PI scores and change in PROMIS PI scores. RESULTS: Older age, higher body mass index, more comorbidities, lower preoperative expectations, more prior surgeries, unemployment, smoking, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and multiple other socio-demographic factors were correlated with worse 2-year PROMIS PI scores (P ≤ .018). Similar factors were also correlated with less improvement in 2-year PROMIS PI scores (P ≤ .048). Worse scores on all preoperative patient-reported outcome measures correlated with worse 2-year PROMIS PI scores (P ≤ .007). Multivariable analysis identified smoking history, less frequent alcohol consumption, worse preoperative PROMIS social satisfaction and Numeric Pain Scale whole body scores, and higher ASA scores as independent predictors of worse 2-year PROMIS PI. The same factors in addition to better baseline PROMIS PI were predictive of less improvement in 2-year PROMIS PI. CONCLUSION: Numerous preoperative factors were predictive of worse postoperative 2-year PROMIS PI and less improvement in 2-year PROMIS PI for patients undergoing hand and wrist surgery.

Iatrogenic thrombosis of the deep inferior epigastric artery during diagnostic angiography-a rare complicating factor during rectus free flap harvest.

We describe a 28-year-old man who sustained an open IIIB left ankle fracture dislocation with heel pad avulsion. The patient underwent formal angiography of the left lower extremity, followed by free tissue transfer of a rectus abdominis flap several days later. Intraoperatively, a thrombus was identified in the deep inferior epigastric artery above the femoral artery access site requiring thrombectomy. Histologic analysis estimated the thrombus age at 12 to 72 hours, raising concern that the thrombus was induced during angiogram instrumentation. Donor and recipient site-specific risks of arterial instrumentation (including invasive diagnostics) should be considered when planning free tissue transfer.

Association of Radial Head Fracture Treatment With Long-Term Function.

BACKGROUND: Radial head fractures are often associated with poor outcomes. Both open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and radial head arthroplasty (RHA) might be considered in operative cases. This study aimed to compare long-term patient-reported functional outcomes among patients with operatively treated radial head fractures. METHODS: A cross sectional study conducted at a Level I trauma center was used to identify patients with a radial head fracture who underwent ORIF or RHA between 2006 and 2018, and agreed to complete a survey in 2020. The primary outcome measure was the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients participated in the study. No significant differences in outcomes were observed between groups. QuickDASH scores were similar for both groups (ORIF: mean = 15.7, SD = 18.4; RHA: mean = 22.8, SD = 18.6; mean difference = 0.2 [-9.0 to 9.3], P = .97). Nineteen (37%) ORIF patients and 12 (48%) RHA patients reported a need for pain medication (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.8 [0.3-2.4], P = .70). Thirteen (25%) ORIF patients and 6 (24%) RHA patients required additional surgery (adjusted OR = 1.7 [0.5-6.2], P = .39). A subgroup analysis of multi-fragmentary fractures revealed similar findings. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported outcomes, which included a subgroup analysis of multi-fragmentary fractures, were similar between ORIF and RHA groups at an average of 7.5 years from surgery. Reconstructing the radial head might not result in worse outcomes than RHA when both options are employed according to the best judgment of the operating surgeon.

Implementing stakeholder engagement to explore alternative models of consent: An example from the PREP-IT trials.

INTRODUCTION: Cluster randomized crossover trials are often faced with a dilemma when selecting an optimal model of consent, as the traditional model of obtaining informed consent from participant's before initiating any trial related activities may not be suitable. We describe our experience of engaging patient advisors to identify an optimal model of consent for the PREP-IT trials. This paper also examines surrogate measures of success for the selected model of consent. METHODS: The PREP-IT program consists of two multi-center cluster randomized crossover trials that engaged patient advisors to determine an optimal model of consent. Patient advisors and stakeholders met regularly and reached consensus on decisions related to the trial design including the model for consent. Patient advisors provided valuable insight on how key decisions on trial design and conduct would be received by participants and the impact these decisions will have. RESULTS: Patient advisors, together with stakeholders, reviewed the pros and cons and the requirements for the traditional model of consent, deferred consent, and waiver of consent. Collectively, they agreed upon a deferred consent model, in which patients may be approached for consent after their fracture surgery and prior to data collection. The consent rate in PREP-IT is 80.7%, and 0.67% of participants have withdrawn consent for participation. DISCUSSION: Involvement of patient advisors in the development of an optimal model of consent has been successful. Engagement of patient advisors is recommended for other large trials where the traditional model of consent may not be optimal.

The Serially-Operated Essex-Lopresti Injury: Long-Term Outcomes in a Retrospective Cohort.

Objective The main aim of this article is to report 10-year outcomes after Essex-Lopresti injury (ELI). Study Design Retrospective case series. Two level I trauma centers and one associated community hospital from 2003 to 2016. Patients Sixteen patients who sustained an ELI and were treated at one of our three regional hospitals. Intervention Initially, 4 patients (25%) were treated nonoperatively by immobilization and 12 patients (75%) were treated operatively. Proximal surgery included radial head open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), radial head arthroplasty, radial head excision and forearm ORIF, and wound debridement. Ten patients (63%) were acutely identified with longitudinal forearm instability. Of these, four patients had the distal radioulnar joint pinned. In the other six patients, the forearm was immobilized. Overall, 16 patients underwent a total of 32 revision surgeries. Main Outcome Measure Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS UE) Physical score, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score for pain-severity, and NRS score for satisfaction of overall outcome. Results Follow-up for outcome evaluation was available for 10 patients, at a median of 10 (interquartile range [IQR]: 8.0-12) years after date of injury. The median PROMIS UE Physical score was 36 (IQR: 33-38). Median NRS score for pain-severity on average was 5 (IQR: 0-6). The median NRS score for satisfaction of overall outcome was 7 (IQR: 5-8). Conclusion Patients who sustain an ELI generally have substantial deficits of upper extremity function as measured by PROMIS UE. Early radial head arthroplasty may be beneficial, but further study in a larger cohort is needed. Outcomes of nonoperative treatment and operative treatment were similar and suggest that current surgical treatments are incomplete.

Nerve Diameter in the Hand: A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: Nerve injuries in the hand are common and often pose a challenge for the upper extremity surgeon. A range of reconstructive options exist for nerve repair, but proper matching of nerve diameter is important for many of these techniques. The purposes of this study were to (1) describe the nerve diameters of the hand and their relative differences and (2) investigate whether there is a relationship between nerve diameter and external hand dimensions or body mass index. METHODS: We utilized 18 freshly frozen cadaveric hands from adult donors aged 20-86 of both sexes for this study. Two independent observers measured each nerve diameter to the nearest 0.1 mm using a digital caliper. RESULTS: Using the flexor zones as boundaries, a total of 33 nerve measurements were performed for each cadaveric hand. Nerve diameter increased from the distal to the proximal flexor zones. The internal common digital nerves in flexor zone 3 were larger than the external digital nerves. The median nerve was found to be nearly 2 times larger than the ulnar nerve at 2 locations within the wrist. There was a positive correlation between body mass index, hand span, hand width, and nerve diameter at several measured locations. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides reference values for nerve diameters of the hand and wrist and describes their relative differences. It is important for surgeons to be aware of these differences and to consider this information as we advance our efforts to reconstruct the hand and develop technologies for nerve repair.