Light-driven Na(+) pump from Gillisia limnaea: a high-affinity Na(+) binding site is formed transiently in the photocycle.

A group of microbial retinal proteins most closely related to the proton pump xanthorhodopsin has a novel sequence motif and a novel function. Instead of, or in addition to, proton transport, they perform light-driven sodium ion transport, as reported for one representative of this group (KR2) from Krokinobacter. In this paper, we examine a similar protein, GLR from Gillisia limnaea, expressed in Escherichia coli, which shares some properties with KR2 but transports only Na(+). The absorption spectrum of GLR is insensitive to Na(+) at concentrations of ≤3 M. However, very low concentrations of Na(+) cause profound differences in the decay and rise time of photocycle intermediates, consistent with a switch from a "Na(+)-independent" to a "Na(+)-dependent" photocycle (or photocycle branch) at ∼60 µM Na(+). The rates of photocycle steps in the latter, but not the former, are linearly dependent on Na(+) concentration. This suggests that a high-affinity Na(+) binding site is created transiently after photoexcitation, and entry of Na(+) from the bulk to this site redirects the course of events in the remainder of the cycle. A greater concentration of Na(+) is needed for switching the reaction path at lower pH. The data suggest therefore competition between H(+) and Na(+) to determine the two alternative pathways. The idea that a Na(+) binding site can be created at the Schiff base counterion is supported by the finding that upon perturbation of this region in the D251E mutant, Na(+) binds without photoexcitation. Binding of Na(+) to the mutant shifts the chromophore maximum to the red like that of H(+), which occurs in the photocycle of the wild type.

Structural changes in bacteriorhodopsin during in vitro refolding from a partially denatured state.

We report on the formation of the secondary and tertiary structure of bacteriorhodopsin during its in vitro refolding from an SDS-denatured state. We used the mobility of single spin labels in seven samples, attached at various locations to six of the seven helical segments to engineered cysteine residues, to follow coil-to-helix formation. Distance measurements obtained by spin dipolar quenching in six samples labeled at either the cytoplasmic or extracellular ends of pairs of helices revealed the time dependence of the recovery of the transmembrane helical bundle. The secondary structure in the majority of the helical segments refolds with a time constant of <100-140 ms. Recovery of the tertiary structure is achieved by sequential association of the helices and occurs in at least three distinct steps with time constants of 1), well below 1 s; 2), 3-4 s; and 3), 60-130 s (the latter depending on the helical pair). The slowest of these processes occurs in concert with recovery of the retinal chromophore.

Conformational change of the E-F interhelical loop in the M photointermediate of bacteriorhodopsin.

The conformation of the structured EF interhelical loop of bacteriorhodopsin and its change in the M photointermediate were assessed by measuring the rate of reaction of 16 single engineered cysteine residues along the loop with water-soluble sulfhydryl reagents. The exposure to the bulk in the unilluminated state determined with the cysteine reaction correlated well with the degree of access to water calculated from the crystallographic structure of the loop. The EF-loop should be affected by the well-known outward tilt of helix F in the M and N intermediates of the photocycle. A second mutation in each cysteine mutant, the D96N residue replacement, allowed full conversion to the M state by illumination. The reaction rates measured under these conditions indicated that buried residues tend to become more exposed, and exposed residues become more buried in M. This is to be expected from tilt of helix F. However, the observation of increased exposure of four residues near the middle of the loop, where steric effects are only from other loop residues, indicate that the conformation of the EF-loop itself is changed. Thus, the motion of the loop in M is more complex than expected from simple tilt of helix F, and may include rotation that unwinds its twist.