Efficacy and safety of adenosine, rapid ventricular pacing and hypothermia in cerebral aneurysms clipping: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cerebral aneurysms in complex anatomical locations and intraoperative rupture can be challenging. Many methods to reduce blood flow can facilitate its exclusion from the circulation. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of using adenosine, rapid ventricular pacing, and hypothermia in cerebral aneurysm clipping. METHODS: Databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) were systematically searched for studies documenting the use of adenosine, rapid ventricular pacing, and hypothermia in cerebral aneurysm clipping and were included in this single-arm meta-analysis. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included neurological outcomes by mRs and GOS, and cardiac outcomes. We evaluated the risk of bias using ROBIN-I, a tool developed by the Cochrane Collaboration. OpenMetaAnalyst version 2.0 was used for statistical analysis and I2 measured data heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was defined as an I2 > 50%. RESULTS: Our systematic search yielded 10,100 results. After the removal of duplicates and exclusion by title and abstract, 64 studies were considered for full review, of which 29 were included. The overall risk of bias was moderate. The pooled proportions of the adenosine analysis for the different outcomes were: For the primary outcome: 11,9%; for perioperative arrhythmia: 0,19%; for postoperative arrhythmia: 0,56%; for myocardial infarction incidence: 0,01%; for follow-up good recovery (mRs 0-2): 88%; and for neurological deficit:14.1%. In the rapid ventricular pacing analysis, incidences were as follows: peri operative arrhythmia: 0,64%; postoperative arrhythmia: 0,3%; myocardial infarction: 0%. In the hypothermia analysis, the pooled proportion of 30-day mortality was 11,6%. The incidence of post-op neurological deficits was 35,4% and good recovery under neurological analysis by GOS was present in 69.2%. CONCLUSION: The use of the three methods is safe and the related complications were very low. Further studies are necessary, especially with comparative analysis, for extended knowledge.

Early ambulation versus prolonged bed rest for incidental durotomies in spine procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Incidental durotomies are frequent complications of spine surgery associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak-related symptoms. Management typically involves prolonged bed rest to reduce CSF pressure at the durotomy site. However, early ambulation may be a safer, effective alternative. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus were systematically searched for studies comparing early ambulation (bed rest ≤ 24 h) with prolonged bed rest (> 24 h) for patients with incidental durotomies in spine surgeries. The outcomes of interest were CSF leak, hypotensive headache, additional surgical repair, pseudomeningocele, and pulmonary complications. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis were performed following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We included a total of 704 patients from 6 studies. There was a significant reduction in the incidence of pulmonary complications (RR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08-0.67; p = 0.007) in the early mobilization group. The incidence of CSF leak (RR 1.34; 95% CI 0.83-2.14; p = 0.23), hypotensive headache (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.27-1.90; p = 0.50), additional repair surgery (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.76-2.2; p = 0.35), and pseudomeningocele (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.20-8.48; p = 0.79) did not differ significantly. In patients with incidental durotomy following spinal surgery, early mobilization was associated with a lower incidence of pulmonary complications as compared with prolonged bed rest. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of CSF leak, need for additional repair, pseudomeningocele, and hypotensive headache.

Efficacy and safety of cavernous sinus medial wall resection in pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and a single-arm meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Pituitary adenomas, benign tumors, can lower quality of life. Pituitary adenomas that invade the medial wall and cavernous sinus (CS) indicate tumor recurrence and partial surgical excision. Despite the cavernous sinus's complexity and risks, new research has improved the surgical procedure and made excision safer. This comprehensive review and single-arm meta-analysis evaluates endocrinological remission and resection rates in pituitary adenomas to determine the benefits and risks of MWCS resection. METHODS: Databases were systematically searched for studies documenting the resection of the medial wall of the cavernous sinus. The primary outcome was endocrinological remission in patients who underwent resection of the MWCS. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled proportion of endocrinological remission (ER) was 63.3%. The excision of MWCS pooled a gross total resection (GTR) proportion of 72.9%. Finally, ICA injury attained a pooled ratio of 0.5%, indicating minimal morbidity in the procedure. CONCLUSION: The cavernous sinus was ruled out, proving the MWCS excision is safe. Limiting population selection to Knosp 3A or lower enhanced GTR frequencies and lowered recurrence, according to subgroup analyses. This meta-analysis shows that MWCS resection can be a beneficial treatment option for pituitary tumors, when there is no macroscopic medial wall invasion and careful patient selection is done, especially for GH- and ACTH-producing tumors that can cause life-threatening metabolic changes.

Robot-assisted vs. manually guided stereoelectroencephalography for refractory epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Robotic assistance has improved electrode implantation precision in stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) for refractory epilepsy patients. We sought to assess the relative safety of the robotic-assisted (RA) procedure compared to the traditional hand-guided one. A systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane was performed for studies directly comparing robot-assisted vs. manually guided SEEG to treat refractory epilepsy. The primary outcomes included target point error (TPE), entry point error (EPE), time of implantation of each electrode, operative time, postoperative intracranial hemorrhage, infection, and neurologic deficit. We included 427 patients from 11 studies, of whom 232 (54.3%) underwent robot-assisted surgery and 196 (45.7%) underwent manually guided surgery. The primary endpoint, TPE, was not statistically significant (MD 0.04 mm; 95% CI - 0.21, - 0.29; p = 0.76). Nonetheless, EPE was significantly lower in the intervention group (MD - 0.57 mm; 95% CI - 1.08; - 0.06; p = 0.03). Total operative time was significantly lower in the RA group (MD - 23.66 min; 95% CI - 32.01, - 15.31; p < 0.00001), as well as the individual time of implantation of each electrode (MD - 3.35 min; 95% CI - 3.68, - 3.03; p < 0.00001). Postoperative intracranial hemorrhage did not differ between groups: robotic (9/145; 6.2%) vs. manual (8/139; 5.7%) (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.40-2.34; p = 0.94). There was no statistically relevant difference in infection (p = 0.4) and postoperative neurological deficit (p = 0.47) incidence between the two groups. In this analysis, there is a potential relevance in the RA procedure when comparing the traditional one, since operative time, time of implantation of each electrode, and EPE were significantly lower in the robotic group. More research is needed to corroborate the superiority of this novel technique.