Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cutan Pathol ; 49(1): 34-41, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34292611

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As more people become vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, reports of delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions are beginning to emerge. METHODS: In this IRB-approved retrospective case series, biopsy specimens of potential cutaneous adverse reactions from the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna mRNA vaccine were identified and reviewed. Clinical information was obtained through the requisition form, referring clinician, or medical chart review. RESULTS: Twelve cases were included. Histopathological features from two injection-site reactions showed a mixed-cell infiltrate with eosinophils and a spongiotic dermatitis with eosinophils. Three biopsy specimens came from generalized eruptions that showed interface changes consistent with an exanthematous drug reaction. Three biopsy specimens revealed a predominantly spongiotic pattern, consistent with eczematous dermatitis. Small-vessel vascular injury was seen in two specimens, which were diagnosed as urticarial vasculitis and leukocytoclastic vasculitis, respectively. There were two cases of new-onset bullous pemphigoid supported by histopathological examination and direct immunofluorescence studies. Eosinophils were seen in 10 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatopathologists should be aware of potential cutaneous adverse reactions to mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. Histopathological patterns include mixed-cell infiltrates, epidermal spongiosis, and interface changes. Eosinophils are a common finding but are not always present. Direct immunofluorescence studies may be helpful for immune-mediated cutaneous presentations such as vasculitis or bullous pemphigoid.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Hipersensibilidade Tardia/patologia , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Vacina BNT162/efeitos adversos , Biópsia/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/virologia , Dermatite/etiologia , Dermatite/patologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Eosinófilos/patologia , Feminino , Técnica Direta de Fluorescência para Anticorpo/métodos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Tardia/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Penfigoide Bolhoso/diagnóstico , Penfigoide Bolhoso/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Pele/patologia , Vasculite/induzido quimicamente , Vasculite/patologia
2.
Medicines (Basel) ; 6(4)2019 Oct 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31590346

RESUMO

Background: Pruritus is a well-recognized paraneoplastic phenomenon. Previous studies have examined the association of itch with a variety of malignancies in adults. However, no large study has examined this association in a pediatric population. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of patients age 18 or less seen at Johns Hopkins Health System between 2012 and 2019. Results: A pediatric hospital population of 1,042,976 patients was reviewed. Pruritus was observed in 3836 pediatric patients of whom 130 also had cancer. Pediatric patients with pruritus were significantly more likely to have concomitant malignancy compared to pediatric patients without pruritus (OR 12.84; 95% CI 10.73-15.35, p < 0.001). Malignancies most strongly associated with pruritus included neoplasms of the blood (OR 14.38; 95% CI 11.30-18.29, p < 0.001), bone (OR 29.02, 95% CI 18.28-46.06, p < 0.001) and skin (OR 22.76, 95% CI 9.14-56.72, p < 0.001. Conclusions: Pruritus is significantly associated with malignancy in the pediatric hospital population. Clinicians should also be aware of the high burden of itch in pediatric malignancies and the variation in pruritus across malignancies.

4.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 80(4): 931-937, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30217520

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pruritus has been associated with cancer. However, limited data are available on the types of underlying malignancies associated with pruritus. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the association between pruritus and different cancer types, as well as variations by racial group. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of patients ≥18 years of age seen at the Johns Hopkins Health System during 2013-2017. Patients with pruritus were compared with patients without pruritus. Analyses were stratified by race. RESULTS: Patients with pruritus were more likely to have concomitant malignancy than those without pruritus (odds ratio 5.76, 95% confidence interval 5.53-6.00). Most strongly associated were cancers of the liver, gallbladder and biliary tract, hematopoietic system, and skin. Compared with white patients, black patients more frequently had soft tissue, dermatologic, and hematologic malignancies and less frequently had liver, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and gynecologic malignancies. LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional design precludes analysis of the temporal association between pruritus and malignancy. The study is limited to a single tertiary care center. CONCLUSION: Pruritus is most strongly associated with cancers of the liver, skin, and hematopoietic system. Black patients with pruritus have a higher likelihood of skin, soft tissue, and hematologic malignancies than white patients, while whites have higher likelihoods of liver, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and gynecologic malignancies.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/complicações , Prurido/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/etnologia , Prurido/etnologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , População Branca , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA