Trends and characteristics associated with dietary triggers and psychological distress in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Diet, visceral sensitivity, and psychological distress play an important role in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). This study focused on the relation between IBS severity, foods, visceral sensitivity, and anxiety/depression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with IBS were investigated through (1) IBS-symptoms severity score (SSS), (2) self-reported food intolerance, (3) visceral sensitivity index (VSI), and (4) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Seventy-seven patients agreed to participate in the survey. Of them, 64 (83%) showed IBS according to Rome IV criteria and were included in the final analysis. Patients with IBS-D were 30 (47%), with IBS-C 27 (42%), and with IBS-M 7 (11%). RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (90%) considered at least one foodstuff as IBS trigger. Amine-rich foods represented a symptom trigger for 77% of patients, those with lectin for 70%, IACs by 48%, and capsaicin by 37%. Overweight was significantly associated with amine-rich foods (p=0.015), age >45 years (p=0.001) and non-smoking condition (p=0.033) with lectin-rich foods, male gender (p=0.005) and overweight (p=0.027) with capsaicin-containing foods. A positive VSI score was found in 59% of patients, and non-smoking condition was significantly associated (OR 10.03; p=0.009). No factors were associated with a positive HADS score, shown by 80% of patients. Severe IBS was shown by 63% of patients, being amine-rich foods (p=0.024), overweight (p=0.020), and female gender (p=0.029) independent risk factors while marriage/cohabiting a protective one (p=0.038). Amine-rich foods are an independent risk factor for severe IBS, along with overweight and female gender. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should pay more attention to self-reported food intolerance in IBS patients. A personalized therapy including dietary advice as part of treatment could be of great benefit.

Real-life efficacy and safety of Ustekinumab as second- or third-line therapy in Crohn's disease: results from a large Italian cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Ustekinumab (UST) is an anti-IL12/23 antibody for the treatment of Crohn's Disease (CD). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of UST in a large population-based cohort of CD patients who failed previous treatment with other biologics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 194 CD patients (108 males and 86 females, mean age 48 years (range 38-58 years) were retrospectively reviewed. 147 patients were already treated with anti-TNFα (75.8%), and 47 (24.2%) patients were already treated with anti-TNFα and vedolizumab. Concomitant treatment with steroids was present in 177 (91.2%) patients. RESULTS: At week 12, clinical remission was achieved in 146 (75.2%) patients. After a mean follow-up of 6 months, clinical remission was maintained in 135 (69.6%) patients; at that time, mucosal healing was assessed in 62 (31.9%) patients, and it was achieved in 33 (53.2) patients. Three (1.5%) patients were submitted to surgery. Steroid-free remission was achieved in 115 (59.3%) patients. Both serum C-Reactive Protein and Fecal Calprotectin (FC) levels were significantly reduced with respect to baseline levels during follow-up. A logistic regression, UST therapy as third-line therapy (after both anti-TNFα and vedolizumab), FC >200 µg/g, and HBI ≥8 were significantly associated with lack of remission. Adverse events occurred in 5 (2.6%) patients, and four of them required suspension of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: UST seemed to be really effective and safe in CD patients unresponsive to other biologic treatments, especially when used as second-line treatment.