Alberta dairy farmers' and veterinarians' opinion about bovine leukemia virus control measures.

A high herd and within-herd prevalence of Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV) infections in the dairy herds of North America and the negative effects thereof caused the Alberta dairy industry to initiate the development of an on farm BLV control program. Because BLV control is dependent on the commitment of the farmer, potential barriers were identified and farmers' and veterinarians' points of view toward different control options were investigated to inform how the control program might be adjusted. Conversations with these stakeholders were sought and four focus groups with farmers and eleven interviews with veterinarians were conducted. Testing for BLV, the most common BLV control strategies (testing/culling/segregation/management), as well as on farm best management practices (BMP) to prevent the transmission of BLV, were discussed. The thematic analysis of these conversations resulted in the following findings: Testing of animals was considered important for BLV control, but the financial investment was prohibitive for farmers. Test and cull as well as test and segregation approaches of test positive animals were considered efficient BLV control measures, but impractical and not feasible due to the supply managed Alberta dairy industry (i.e. milk is produced based on demand), with a high prevalence. The management of test positive animals with BMP to prevent new infections and thereby decreasing the within-herd prevalence was considered the only realistic BLV control strategy. The most important barriers for suggested BMP were the cost for some BMP, the inconvenience of performing other BMP, as well as difficulties in performing some BMP consistently and well. Additionally, a lack of knowledge about BLV and its control were identified as an important barrier. On the contrary, farmers indicated being inclined to implement BMP they considered feasible or that were considered a standard within the industry. Further, if BMP increased convenience on farm, they were considered easy to implement. Farmers and veterinarians agreed in many, but not all cases. For example, the single use of examination sleeves was met with differing opinions (i.e. considered doable by farmers while veterinarians assumed it to be too costly). In conclusion, stakeholders' awareness and communication amongst each other (e.g. veterinarians and farmers) about BLV and its control has to be highlighted in order to manage BLV infection successfully. In addition, by communicating and understanding barriers and motivators for specific BMP, important barriers could be identified (e.g. difficulties while changing needles), and solutions found (e.g. tool belt for needles), thereby improving BLV control efforts on farm.

The relationship between depression risk perception and self-help behaviours in high risk Canadians: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Self-help may reduce the risk of depression, and risk perception of depression may influence initiating self-help. It is unknown how risk perception is associated with self-help behaviours. The objectives of this study are to (1) describe the self-help strategies used by high-risk Canadians in relation to the accuracy of perceived depression risk, by sex, and (2) identify demographic and clinical factors associated with self-help behaviours. METHODS: Baseline data from a randomized controlled trial including 358 men and 356 women at high-risk of developing depression were used. Following methods used in cancer research, risk perception accuracy was determined by comparing the participant's self-perceived and objective risk of developing depression and classifying as accurate, over-estimation and under-estimation based on a ± 10% threshold. The participant's objective depression risk was assessed using sex-specific multivariable risk predictive algorithms. Frequency of using 14 self-help strategies was assessed. One-way ANOVA testing was used to detect if differences in risk perception accuracy groups existed, stratified by sex. Linear regression was used to investigate the clinical and demographic factors associated with self-help behaviours, also stratified. RESULTS: Compared to accurate-estimators, male over-estimators were less likely to "leave the house daily," and "participate in activities they enjoy." Male under-estimators were also less likely to "participate in activities they enjoy." Both male 'inaccurate' perception groups were more likely to 'create lists of strategies which have worked for feelings of depression in the past and use them'. There were no significant differences between self-help behaviours and risk perception accuracy in women. Regression modeling showed negative relationships between self-rated health and self-help scores, irrespective of sex. In women, self-help score was positively associated with age and educational attainment, and negatively associated with perceived risk. In men, a positive relationship with unemployment was also seen. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences exist in the factors associated with self-help. Risk perception accuracy, work status, and self-rated health is associated with self-help behaviours in high-risk men. In women, factors related to self-help included age, education, self-rated health status, and perceived risk. More research is needed to replicate findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02943876) as of 10/21/16.