Spinal Cord Stimulator Inequities Within the US Military Health System.

OBJECTIVES: Although studies have described inequities in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) receipt, there is a lack of information to inform system-level changes to support health care equity. This study evaluated whether Black patients exhaust more treatment options than do White patients, before receiving SCS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included claims data of Black and non-Latinx White patients who were active-duty service members or military retirees who received a persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) diagnosis associated with back surgery within the US Military Health System, January 2017 to January 2020 (N = 8753). A generalized linear model examined predictors of SCS receipt within two years of diagnosis, including the interaction between race and number of pain-treatment types received. RESULTS: In the generalized linear model, Black patients (10.3% [8.7%, 12.0%]) were less likely to receive SCS than were White patients (13.6% [12.7%, 14.6%]) The interaction term was significant; White patients who received zero to three different types of treatments were more likely to receive SCS than were Black patients who received zero to three treatments, whereas Black and White patients who received >three treatments had similar likelihoods of receiving a SCS. CONCLUSIONS: In a health care system with intended universal access, White patients diagnosed with PSPS tried fewer treatment types before receiving SCS, whereas the number of treatment types tried was not significantly related to SCS receipt in Black patients. Overall, Black patients received SCS less often than did White patients. Findings indicate the need for structured referral pathways, provider evaluation on equity metrics, and top-down support.

Post-lumbar surgery prescription variation and opioid-related outcomes in a large US healthcare system: an observational study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal decompression and fusion procedures are one of the most common procedures performed in the United States (US) and remain associated with high postsurgical opioid burden. Despite guidelines emphasizing nonopioid pharmacotherapy strategies for postsurgical pain management, prescribing practices are likely variable and guideline-incongruent. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize patient-, care-, and system-level factors associated with opioid, nonopioid pain medication, and benzodiazepine prescribing variation in the US Military Health System (MHS). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective study analyzing medical records from the US MHS Data Repository. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients (N=6,625) undergoing lumbar decompression and spinal fusion procedures from 2016 to 2021 in the MHS enrolled in TRICARE at least a year prior to their procedure and had at least one encounter beyond the 90-day postprocedure period, without recent trauma, malignancy, cauda equina syndrome, and co-occurring procedures. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-, care-, and system-level factors influencing outcomes of discharge morphine equivalent dose (MED), 30-day opioid refill, and persistent opioid use (POU). POU was defined as dispensing of opioid prescriptions monthly for the first 3 months after surgery and then at least once between 90 and 180 days after surgery. METHODS: (Generalized) linear mixed models evaluated multilevel factors associated with discharge MED, opioid refill, and POU. RESULTS: The median discharge MED was 375 mg (IQR 225, 580) and days' supply was 7 days (IQR 4, 10); 36% received an opioid refill and 5%, overall, met criteria for POU. Discharge MED was associated with fusion procedures (+151-198 mg), multilevel procedures (+26 mg), policy release (-184 mg), opioid naïvty (-31 mg), race (Black -21 mg, another race and ethnicity -47 mg), benzodiazepine receipt (+100 mg), opioid-only medications (+86 mg), gabapentinoid receipt (-20 mg), and nonopioid pain medications receipt (-60 mg). Longer symptom duration, fusion procedures, beneficiary category, mental healthcare, nicotine dependence, benzodiazepine receipt, and opioid naivety were associated with both opioid refill and POU. Multilevel procedures, elevated comorbidity score, policy period, antidepressant receipt, and gabapentinoid receipt, and presurgical physical therapy were also associated with opioid refill. POU increased with increasing discharge MED. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation in discharge prescribing practices require systems-level, evidence-based intervention.

Return to Duty Rates in Active Duty Service Members After Elective Surgery of the Lumbar Spine.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to define the percentage of military service members returned to active duty following elective lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: We reviewed 331 elective lumbar spine procedures performed on active duty service members over a 5-year period. All patients underwent a decompressive lumbar procedure with or without fusion. Return to duty (RTD) was our primary outcome, defined as no referral to a Medical Evaluation Board by the 12-month postoperative follow-up visit. All subject's final disposition was recorded as a binomial distribution and stratified by demographic parameters. Subgroup analysis comparing the return rates for specific procedures was performed. RESULTS: 232 patients met our study inclusion criteria. 136 underwent isolated decompressive procedures and 96 patients underwent fusion procedures. The overall RTD rate following elective lumbar spine surgery was 64% (n = 149) (95% confidence interval, CI [58, 70]). The RTD rate for isolated decompressive procedures was 63% (n = 86) (95% CI [55, 71]), and 66% (n = 63) (95% CI [56, 75]) after decompression with lumbar fusion. CONCLUSIONS: The RTD rate following elective lumbar spine surgery is 64%. When stratified by procedure type, isolated decompression procedures (63% RTD rate) and fusion procedures (66% RTD rate) displayed similar results.

Risk factors for posttraumatic heterotopic ossification of the elbow: case-control study.

PURPOSE: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is well-known after surgical repair of elbow fractures, but little is known about risk factors for its development in these patients. The purpose of this study was to define factors associated with development of HO. METHODS: We used a prospective fracture registry collected in 2 Level I trauma centers and medical chart review to examine all elbow fractures treated surgically between 2002 and 2009. We determined which of these patients developed HO with an impact on range of motion (Hastings class II and III). We conducted a matched case-control study to examine factors associated with risk of HO. We used conditional logistic regression to compare occurrences of risk factors between cases and controls, matched by fracture type, age, and sex. RESULTS: Our database contained 786 elbow fractures treated surgically. Of these, 55 developed clinically relevant HO. The risk of HO varied among types of elbow fractures, with combined olecranon and radial head fractures having no HO and floating elbows (fractures on both sides of the elbow joint) having the highest incidence of HO at 36%. In multiple conditional logistic regression, risk factors for the development of HO were days to surgery, with subjects waiting 8 or more days having 12 times the odds of HO than subjects having surgery within a day of injury, and time to postoperative mobilization, with subjects who had at least 15 days to mobilization having greater odds of HO than those who had less than 7 days to mobilization. CONCLUSIONS: Heterotopic ossification of the elbow occurs frequently after surgical repair of elbow fractures, with an incidence of 7% in this registry. In the case-control sample, conditions associated with development of HO included longer time to surgery and longer time to mobilization after surgery.