Asymptomatic Chronic Large Pericardial Effusions: To Drain or to Observe?

Pericardial effusions, especially large ones, have traditionally been regarded with concern by clinicians due to the sometimes unpredictable development of life-threatening cardiac tamponade. In the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on pericardial diseases, the simplified algorithm for pericardial effusion triage and management recommends pericardial drainage in cases of cardiac tamponade and/or suspicion of bacterial or neoplastic etiology. In the presence of acute pericarditis, empiric anti-inflammatory treatment should be given, while when a specific indication known to be associated with pericardial effusion is found, then treatment of the underlying cause is indicated. Notably, the most challenging subgroup of patients includes those with large, asymptomatic, C-reactive-protein-negative, idiopathic effusions. In the latter subjects, pericardial drainage is proposed in cases of chronic effusions (lasting more than three months). However, this recommendation is based on scant data stemming from small-sized non-randomized studies. Nevertheless, recent evidence in a larger cohort of patients pointed out that a watchful waiting strategy is a safe option in terms of complication-free survival. This review summarizes the contemporary evidence on this challenging topic and provides recommendations for tailoring individual patient treatments.

Inflammatory Mediators of Endothelial Dysfunction.

Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is characterized by imbalanced vasodilation and vasoconstriction, elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS), and inflammatory factors, as well as deficiency of nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. It has been reported that the maintenance of endothelial cell integrity serves a significant role in human health and disease due to the involvement of the endothelium in several processes, such as regulation of vascular tone, regulation of hemostasis and thrombosis, cell adhesion, smooth muscle cell proliferation, and vascular inflammation. Inflammatory modulators/biomarkers, such as IL-1α, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, and tumor necrosis factor α, or alternative anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, and adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1), involved in atherosclerosis progression have been shown to predict cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, several signaling pathways, such as NLRP3 inflammasome, that are associated with the inflammatory response and the disrupted H2S bioavailability are postulated to be new indicators for endothelial cell inflammation and its associated endothelial dysfunction. In this review, we summarize the knowledge of a plethora of reviews, research articles, and clinical trials concerning the key inflammatory modulators and signaling pathways in atherosclerosis due to endothelial dysfunction.

Cardiomyopathies in children: An overview.

Paediatric cardiomyopathies form a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by structural and electrical abnormalities of the heart muscle, commonly due to a gene variant of the myocardial cell structure. Mostly inherited as a dominant or occasionally recessive trait, they might be part of a syndromic disorder of underlying metabolic or neuromuscular defects or combine early developing extracardiac abnormalities (i.e., Naxos disease). The annual incidence of 1 per 100,000 children appears higher during the first two years of life. Dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy phenotypes share an incidence of 60% and 25%, respectively. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), restrictive cardiomyopathy, and left ventricular noncompaction are less commonly diagnosed. Adverse events such as severe heart failure, heart transplantation, or death usually appear early after the initial presentation. In ARVC patients, high-intensity aerobic exercise has been associated with worse clinical outcomes and increased penetrance in at-risk genotype-positive relatives. Acute myocarditis in children has an incidence of 1.4-2.1 cases/per 100,000 children per year, with a 6-14% mortality rate during the acute phase. A genetic defect is considered responsible for the progression to dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype. Similarly, a dilated or arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy phenotype might emerge with an episode of acute myocarditis in childhood or adolescence. This review provides an overview of childhood cardiomyopathies focusing on clinical presentation, outcome, and pathology.

Chronic Pericardial Effusion: Causes and Management.

Chronic pericardial effusion is a common pericardial syndrome whose approach has been well standardised in recent years. The main challenge associated with this condition is the progression (sometimes unheralded) to cardiac tamponade. Pericardial effusions may present either as an isolated finding or in the context of a specific etiology including autoimmune, neoplastic, or metabolic disease. Among investigations used during diagnostic work-up, echocardiography is of paramount importance for the diagnosis, sizing, and serial evaluation of the hemodynamic impact of effusions on heart diastolic function. In an individualised manner, advanced imaging including computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging should be performed, especially if baseline tests are inconclusive. Triage of these patients according to the most recent 2015 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases should take into account the presence of hemodynamic compromise as well as suspicion of malignant or purulent pericarditis as first step, C-reactive protein serum level measurement as second step, investigations for a specific condition known to be associated with pericardial effusion as third step, and finally the size and the duration of the effusion. Treatment depends on the evaluation of the above-mentioned parameters and should ideally be tailored to the individual patient. Prognosis of chronic pericardial effusions depends largely on the underlying etiology. According to novel data, the prognosis of individuals with idiopathic, chronic (> 3 months), large (> 2 cm), asymptomatic pericardial effusions is usually benign and a watchful waiting strategy seems more reasonable and cost-effective than routine drainage as previously recommended.

A case series of acute pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination in the context of recent reports from Europe and the United States.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccines were efficacious and safe in clinical trials. We report nine events of acute pericarditis (AP) in eight patients following COVID-19 vaccination with BNT162b2 (6/9), AZD1222 (2/9) and mRNA-1273 (1/9). METHODS: All patients were referred for AP temporally linked with COVID-19 vaccination. Chest pain was the most common clinical manifestation. Alternative etiologies were excluded upon thorough diagnostic work up. AP diagnosis was established according to ESC guidelines. FINDINGS: Five events occurred after the first vaccine dose and four after the second. The mean age in this cohort was 65.8 ± 10.2 years and the men/women ratio 3/5. All events resolved without sequelae; two events were complicated by cardiac tamponade requiring emergent pericardial decompression. Hospitalization was required in four cases. INTERPRETATION: Although causality cannot be firmly established, AP has emerged as a possible complication following COVID-19 vaccination. Further investigation is indispensable to fully characterize this new entity.

Contemporary management of pericardial effusion.

Pericardial effusion is a relatively common clinical condition with a variety of clinical manifestations ranging from incidentally discovered asymptomatic cases to life-threatening cardiac tamponade. The etiology encompasses idiopathic cases and forms secondary to different conditions, including autoimmune diseases, malignancies, metabolic disorders, etc. While medical therapy should be offered to patients with elevation of inflammatory markers, in specific forms treatment should be appropriate to the underlying disorder. In cases with hemodynamic compromise pericardial drainage either with pericardiocentesis or pericardial "window" is indicated for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. In the remainder, factors like comorbidities, size and location of the pericardial effusion will influence the clinical decision making. In asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic chronic large idiopathic pericardial effusions, according to recent evidence, a conservative approach with watchful waiting seems the most reasonable option. The prognosis of pericardial effusions largely depends on the underlying etiologies. Metastatic spread to the pericardium has an ominous prognosis whereas large to moderate effusions have been often associated with known or newly discovered specific underlying causes. Chronic small idiopathic effusions have an excellent prognosis and do not require specific monitoring. Large chronic idiopathic effusions in clinically stable patients require a 3 to 6-month assessment ideally in a specialized unit.