Primary and recurrent retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: prognostic factors affecting survival.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze treatment and survival in 34 patients (28 resected) with primary or recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). METHODS: Between July 1994 and January 2001, 34 patients (15M, 19F; mean age: 56 years, range: 25-77) were evaluated. Complete resection was defined as removal of gross tumor with histologically confirmed clear resection margins. RESULTS: Twenty-eight out of 34 patients (82%) (15 were affected by primary RPS, and 13 by recurrent RPS), underwent surgical exploration. Twenty-three patients had a grossly and microscopically complete resection, (3 having a grossly incomplete resection and 2 patients with a grossly complete resection having histologically involved resection margins). Twenty-one out of 28 patients (75%) underwent removal of contiguous intra-abdominal organs. Preoperative mortality was nil, and morbidity occurred in six cases only (21%). High tumor grade results a significant variable for a worse survival in all 28 patients (100% 5 years survival for low grade vs. 0% for high grade; P = 0.0004). Amongst completely resected patients, only histologic grade and peroperative blood transfusions affected disease-free survival (P = 0.04 and P = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An aggressive surgical approach in both primary and recurrent RPS is associated with long-term survival.

Pulsed dose-rate perioperative interstitial brachytherapy for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and skeletal muscles of the trunk.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the role of pulsed dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy (BRT), delivered alone or as a boost to external beam radiotherapy, as adjuvant therapy for the local control of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and skeletal muscles of the trunk that have undergone surgical treatment. METHODS: Between July 1998 and January 2002, 42 patients were treated with a combination of surgery and BRT alone (18 patients) or BRT/external beam radiotherapy (24 patients) for the treatment of primary (n = 32) and recurrent (n = 10) soft tissue sarcomas located in the proximal extremity (n = 17), distal extremity (n = 17), and trunk (n = 8). Tumor size was <5 cm in 20 cases and >5 cm in 22 cases, with histological grading of 1 (n = 7), 2 (n = 18), or 3 (n = 17). The median BRT dose delivered was 15 Gy, and the median external beam irradiation dose was 50 Gy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 34 months, the 36-month survival was 83.9% (SE, 6.1%), and the local control was 89%. CONCLUSIONS: PDR interstitial BRT for soft tissue sarcoma is an effective, well-tolerated adjuvant radiation treatment that offers several practical advantages, among which are low acute and late toxicity with maximum normal tissue and critical structure sparing and overall shorter radiotherapy and hospital stay.

The role of ultrasound of sentinel nodes in the pre- and post-operative evaluation of stage I melanoma patients.

We have investigated the role of high-resolution ultrasound (US) in the analysis of sentinel node(s) in melanoma patients in pre-operative staging and follow-up. One hundred and six lymph node basins in 88 melanoma patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy (SNB) were examined: 25 (23.6%) were US positive for metastases and 81 (76.4%) were negative. Subsequent histological analysis of the 81 negative lymph nodes confirmed the absence of metastases in 80 cases (98.8%), whereas, in the 25 US-positive lymph nodes, metastases were found in 16 cases (64%). The follow-up of all patients submitted to SNB in our unit included a US investigation of operated and contralateral nodal basins every 4 months for the first 3 years and then every 6 months. Of a total of 300 patients, four (1.6%) were found to have locoregional nodal disease during follow-up. In three of these four patients, US was crucial in indicating the presence of nodal metastases, which would have gone undetected on physical examination. The result of this study (negative predictive value of 98.7%) introduces the possibility of selecting patients who may avoid an SNB procedure based on the results of pre-operative US examination.