Treatment of morbid obesity by intraparietogastric administration of botulinum toxin: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: The stomach is the main target organ for bariatric surgery, but no medical treatment has been developed to increase satiety and decrease food intake via gastric pathways. The aim of our study was to investigate whether or not the intraparietogastric administration of botulinum toxin A (BTX), able to modify the motility patterns of the stomach, could be useful for treatment of obesity. DESIGN: Double blind controlled study. SUBJECTS: Twenty-four morbidly obese patients (mean weight (s.e.m.) 116.1+/-4.89 kg, mean body mass index (BMI) 43.6+/-1.09 kg/m(2)) were blindly randomized to receive 200 IU BTX or placebo into the antrum and fundus of the stomach by intraparietal endoscopic administration. MEASUREMENTS: We evaluated weight loss, BMI changes, satiety score, the maximal gastric capacity for liquids and the gastric emptying time (octanoic acid breath test). RESULTS: The two groups were homogeneous for anthropometric characteristics. Eight weeks after treatment, BTX patients had significantly higher weight loss (11+/-1.09 vs 5.7+/-1.1 kg, P<0.001) and BMI reduction (4+/-0.36 vs 2+/-0.58 kg/m(2), P<0.001) and a higher satiety score on a visual analogic scale (7.63+/-0.38 vs 4.72+/-0.44, P<0.001) than controls. Furthermore, BTX patients showed a significantly greater reduction in maximal gastric capacity for liquids (266.6+/-48 vs 139+/-31, P<0.001) and a greater prolongation in gastric emptying time (+18.93+/-8 vs -2.2+/-6.9 min, P<0.05). No significant side effects or neurophysiologic changes were found. CONCLUSIONS: Topical intragastric BTX was effective in reducing food intake and body weight in morbidly obese patients.

Preparation, premedication, and surveillance.

In the year since the last review, continuing pressure on endoscopy suites to improve efficiency and reduce costs without compromising patient care has led to growing interest in alternatives to pharmacological sedation and in the use of short-acting sedatives. Relaxation music, acupuncture, and the use of small-caliber endoscopes for unsedated peroral gastroscopy have therefore been suggested as ways of increasing tolerance and reducing discomfort. With regard to ultrathin and superthin endoscopes, the results are interesting, but further data from controlled trials and in studies including larger numbers of patients are still needed. The form of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy that has attracted greatest interest over the last year is the use by nonanesthetists of intravenous propofol, administered either alone at standard doses to achieve deep sedation, or at lower doses combined with benzodiazepines and opioids to achieve moderate sedation/analgesia. In comparison with benzodiazepines/opioids, the results were in favor of propofol: the mean time to sedation was shorter and the depth of sedation was greater. In addition, patients receiving propofol reached full recovery earlier and were discharged sooner. However, in the survey of patient satisfaction at discharge, it was found that the sedation methods did not have a significant impact on overall patient satisfaction. Some important issues concerning the narrow therapeutic range of propofol and the need for adequate training of endoscopists to deal with any problems related to deep sedation are still open - despite the growing amount of data suggesting that the drug is safe even when administered by registered nurses, an approach that is possibly more cost-effective than delivery by gastroenterologists or anesthetists. The morbidity and mortality associated with cardiopulmonary complications continue to be a significant concern during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Professional societies and national expert peer groups have issued practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia that call for continuous monitoring of the patient's hemodynamic and ventilatory status and consciousness. Direct observation is facilitated by electronic devices (pulse oximetry, capnography), directly indicating the patient's ventilatory status and the depth of sedation. Recently, it has been proposed that the bispectral index (BIS), an electroencephalography-based technique, can be used to monitor the depth of sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, the results of a recent study cast some doubt on the usefulness of the BIS, in its current version, for titrating boluses of propofol to an adequate level of sedation. Further data therefore appear to be needed to assess whether or not BIS values can help avoid unnecessary propofol dosage and can replace continuous assessment of the ventilatory effort.

Preparation, premedication and surveillance.

The main end points for sedation during endoscopy are patients' satisfaction, short duration of the procedure, and safety. During the last year, attention has focused on attempting to identify the "ideal" candidate for moderate sedation/analgesia and on the importance of providing the patient with appropriate information before the procedure. The increasing pressure to perform more procedures, reduce costs, and achieve shorter patient turnaround times has affected recent approaches to sedation during endoscopy, focusing attention on alternatives to pharmacological sedation such as providing relaxing music, using small-caliber endoscopes for unsedated peroral gastroscopy, and using magnetic endoscopic imaging to increase tolerance and reduce discomfort during colonoscopy. The results, however, have not been convincing. The role of benzodiazepines was discussed in some studies, highlighting the well-known effect of midazolam on postprocedural amnesia, its pharmacological profile and tolerability after intranasal spraying in healthy volunteers, and the efficacy and safety of this route of administration as an alternative to intravenous administration in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The form of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy that has attracted great interest over the last year is the use of intravenous propofol, either alone or with concomitant benzodiazepines or opioids. As expected in view of the drug's known pharmacological properties, the quality of sedation was better and recovery time was shorter in patients treated with propofol. However, important questions involving the narrow therapeutic range and the mode of administration of propofol (by endoscopists or nurses, or by anesthesiologists) remain open. One important aspect of sedation procedures is prevention of cardiopulmonary complications. The use of electronic monitoring techniques, with a pulse oximeter, has been recommended as a standard procedure during digestive endoscopy; however, pulse oximetry no longer reflects the normal ventilatory functions and does not detect episodes of severe CO2 retention. CO2 monitoring by transcutaneous measurement - or better, by capnography - appears to be useful, as an alternative to pulse oximetry, as a measure of hypoventilation, and for detecting potentially important abnormalities in respiratory activity in patients undergoing sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. With regard to preparation for endoscopic procedures, several "ideal" formulas for bowel preparation have been presented. These include the use of sodium phosphate compounds as an alternative to polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solutions (PEG-ELS); however, the results so far have been conflicting. The best and most cost-effective bowel cleansing procedure for colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy has yet to be established.

Upper GI bleeding in healthy full-term infants: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case-control study was to evaluate the frequency and the type of mucosal lesions in newborn babies with upper GI bleeding (UGIB), the diagnostic role and safety of upper GI endoscopy, and the recognition of risk factors associated with the hemorrhagic event. METHODS: A population of 5180 infants born from June, 1988 to May, 1997 was examined. A case was defined as any patient who had UGIB within 4 days of delivery. The diagnosis was made by endoscopic examination in an endoscopy room. The following parameters were determined: amniotic fluid features, funicular blood pH, Apgar index at 5 min, neonatal weight, body length, gestational age, and the presence of other pathologies. Biochemical profiles were also evaluated. Clinical and demographic data of the mothers of the newborn babies were analyzed. Sera of cases and the respective parents were tested for gastrin and pepsinogen. As a control group, 53 full-term healthy infants matched for sex and age were randomly selected from the population of infants born in our pediatric department. RESULTS: Sixty-four of 5180 newborn babies (1.23%) suffered from UGIB within 26.5 +/- 20 h of life. In 53 of 64 cases (mean age = 24.2 +/- 25.5 h) it was possible to carry out an endoscopic examination. In one case, endoscopy was limited to the esophagus because of the presence of multiple mucosal ulcers and substenosis of the viscus. Esophageal damage was observed in 24/53 patients. The esophageal lesions were isolated in nine cases, and occurred jointly with gastric or duodenal damage in 14 cases and one, respectively. Gastric and duodenal lesions were seen in 43/52 and 1/52 patients, respectively. There were 17 cases of gastric ulcers and one case of duodenal ulcer. Blood clots were observed in 14 gastric ulcer patients; in one case there was evidence of active bleeding at the margins of a gastric ulcer. There was no significant difference with regard to the demographic and clinical characteristics of the cases and controls. Median values of serum gastrin of the cases and controls were similar. Median serum pepsinogen was significantly higher in the case group. CONCLUSIONS: UGIB in the newborn babies is often associated with clinically relevant mucosal lesions of the upper GI tract. The evolution, after treatment with antisecretory drugs, is generally rapid and favorable, with clinical recovery usually obtained within 24-48 h. The higher serum pepsinogen levels may only represent a significant risk factor of mucosal lesions and complications.

Preparation, premedication, and surveillance.

The endoscopic literature published during the past year has once again confirmed that there is significant variation from country to country regarding whether or not patients wish to receive conscious sedation during endoscopy (and particularly colonoscopy) - and there may even be variation from one endoscopic unit to another within the same country. Particular attention has been given to attempts to identify "ideal" candidates for conscious sedation, and to the importance of providing patients with information before the procedure. It has been shown that patients who receive detailed information about a medical procedure beforehand are able to benefit from this. The role of benzodiazepines, particularly midazolam, was investigated in studies emphasizing that the dosage should be kept to the minimum that is compatible with patient comfort and successful performance of the procedure. There have been few publications comparing propofol with midazolam. As expected, in view of the known pharmacological properties of the two drugs, the quality of sedation was better and the recovery time was shorter in patients who were treated with propofol. However, important questions are still open regarding the narrow therapeutic range of propofol and the methods by which it is administered (by endoscopists or by anesthesiologists). An important aspect of sedation procedures is the prevention of hypoxia and cardiopulmonary complications. Recent endoscopic reports have added little further information concerning the well-known risk of oxygen desaturation during conscious sedation. Performing endoscopy in unsedated patients reduces, but does not eliminate, the risk of hypoxia. Among the various risk factors, it has been found that chronic respiratory failure and coronary heart disease are factors predictive of severe desaturation and relevant electrocardiographic changes. The use of electronic monitoring techniques with pulse oximetry is recommended as a standard procedure during digestive endoscopy; however, it has been observed that when supplemental oxygen is administered, pulse oximetry no longer reflects normal ventilatory function and does not detect episodes of severe CO2 retention. Transcutaneous measurement of PCO2 therefore seems more reliable as a means of assessing hypoventilation. Several papers have proposed "ideal formulas" for bowel preparation for endoscopic procedures. Various regimens have been proposed as alternatives to polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) and sodium phosphate compounds, with different results. On the whole, there is still little information regarding the best and most cost-effective method of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Efficacy of pantoprazole in the prevention of peptic ulcers, induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of pantoprazole in preventing gastrointestinal lesions in patients with rheumatic diseases receiving continuous, long-term treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. MATERIAL: This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind, unbalanced, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. Outpatients (n= 104, age range 22-80 years, mean age 59.5) with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, requiring chronic intake of NSAIDs (at least 8 weeks prior to the start of the study), were randomised and enrolled to receive either 40 mg pantoprazole (n=70) or placebo (n=34) once daily, for 12 weeks. Patients had endoscopically confirmed gastric and duodenal lesions grade 0, 1 or 2 (Lanza classification grade 0: normal to hyperaemic mucosa; grade 1: 1 to 3 erosions, submucosal haemorrhage or petechiae, grade 2: 4 to 10 erosions, submucosal haemorrhages or petechiae). Clinical and endoscopic evaluations were performed at baseline, after 4, and 12 weeks. The primary end-point of the study was the incidence of gastric or duodenal ulcers after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Patients (n=95) were evaluated: 65 in the pantoprazole group and 30 in the placebo group. When considering all patients (those with Lanza score grade 0, 1, 2 at baseline), the overall proportion of patients in remission was 82% and 77% after 4 weeks, and 72% and 59% after 12 weeks in pantoprazole and placebo groups, respectively (cumulative survival analysis according to Kaplan-Meier). The difference between the treatment groups was even more marked when only those patients with normal mucosa at baseline (grade 0) were considered. After 12 weeks, the proportion of patients in remission was 82% (95% confidence limits 70% - 94% in the pantoprazole and 55% (95% confidence limits 33% - 77%) in the placebo treatment group, p=O.036. Adverse events were reported in 4% and 6% of patients in pantoprazole and placebo treatment groups, respectively CONCLUSIONS: Pantoprazole 40 mg once daily was well tolerated and is more effective than placebo in the prevention of peptic ulcers in patients with rheumatic diseases who require continuous, long-term, treatment with NSAIDs.

Clinical and gastroscopic evaluation of amtolmetin guacyl versus diclofenac in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

AIM: Amtolmetin guacyl (2-[2[1-methyl-5-(4-methylbenzoyl) pyrrol-2-yl] acetamido] acetic acid 2-methoxyphenyl ester) is a recently developed drug which, in preliminary studies, has shown effective anti-inflammatory properties with improved gastrointestinal safety. Our study was designed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of amtolmetin guacyl 600 mg bid when compared to diclofenac 50 mg tid for 4 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 64 patients aged 18-80 years, suffering from rheumatoid arthritis for more than 6 months and American Rheumatism Association functional class I, II or III were randomized in a double blind manner to amtolmetin guacyl or diclofenac for 4 weeks. Clinical and endoscopic evaluation were performed at baseline and at the end of the treatment. The mucosa was graded by means of a rating system emphasizing mucosal erosions. Only patients with endoscopy grade 0-1 entered the trial. RESULTS: The median post-treatment endoscopy injury scores were 0 (range 0-4) in the amtolmetin guacyl-treated patients and 2 (range 0-4) in the diclofenac-treated patients (p = 0.005). There were nine gastric ulcers: 1/32 (3%) in the amtolmetin guacyl group and 8/32 (25%) in the diclofenac group (p < 0.05; 95% confidence interval, -30-5%). 16/32 (50%) patients in amtolmetin guacyl group and 8/32 (25%) in diclofenac group had normal gastroduodenal findings (score = 0) (p < 0.05; 95% confidence interval, 5-50%). In patients with a history of peptic ulcer, a recurrence of gastric damage (score 3-4) was observed in 18% in the amtolmetin guacyl and in 53% in the diclofenac group (p < 0.05). The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms did not differ in the two groups. Amtolmetin guacyl significantly reduced the number of swollen and painful joints, and the functional disability index; diclofenac significantly reduced the number of painful joints and the functional disability index score (p = ns). CONCLUSIONS: Amtolmetin guacyl effectively controlled the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, with very limited gastric toxicity. If these findings are confirmed on a wider scale, the drug might become a valid alternative to current therapies, especially for patients at risk, such as those with rheumatoid arthritis simultaneously requiring steroids and second-line drugs, or those with a history of peptic ulcer.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy: clinical results with antacids and sucralfate.

The efficacy of antacids in the short- and long-term treatment of peptic ulcers, has suggested a possible use in the prevention and in the treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug related gastroduodenal lesions. In short-term prevention studies, significant protection against ASA-related lesions was observed when antacids at high-dose were given before the administration of the offending drug. To the contrary, antacids at low dose did not prevent ASA-induced lesions of gastric and duodenal mucosa. As for long-term prophylaxis, no clinical effect was observed. In the treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related mucosal lesions in patients who were able to discontinue the offending drugs, antacids proved of some use, when compared with placebo, but were significantly less effective than H2 blockers, as cimetidine. Sucralfate is an effective antiulcer drug thought to provide cytoprotective action. Although initial studies utilizing sucralfate for protection against short-term aspirin administration were encouraging, longer term studies (more than 7 days) were generally disappointing. A comparative study with misoprostol demonstrated that the PGE1 analogue was far superior for the prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ulcers, and that ulceration rates in the sucralfate group were equivalent to rates in the placebo group. As far as the treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related mucosal lesions is concerned, sucralfate proved superior to placebo, similar to ranitidine, but significantly less effective than omeprazole.

Omeprazole and sucralfate in the treatment of NSAID-induced gastric and duodenal ulcer.

AIM: To establish the healing efficacy of two drugs, omeprazole and sucralfate, when given to patients who had developed gastric or duodenal ulcer while undergoing chronic treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with arthritis or arthrosis and NSAID-related gastric or duodenal ulcer were admitted to the endoscopic, single-blind study. They were randomized to receive either omeprazole 20 mg o.m. or sucralfate 2 g b.d. for 4-8 weeks. The patients continued to receive the same NSAID during the trial. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed at entry and after 4 or 8 weeks. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients completed the 4-week study, but only 81 were available for final analysis at 8 weeks. Omeprazole was significantly superior to sucralfate in inducing gastric ulcer healing after both 4 (87 vs. 52%, P = 0.007) and 8 weeks (100 vs. 82%, P = 0.04). No statistically significant difference in duodenal ulcer healing rates emerged between the two groups either at 4 (79 vs. 55%) or 8 weeks (95 vs. 73%). The healing rates in patients with combined gastric and duodenal ulcer were 67 vs. 33% after 4 weeks and 6 7 vs. 6 7% after 8 weeks of treatment. The percentages of asymptomatic patients were similar in the two treatment groups both at 4 (70 vs. 73%) and 8 weeks (70 vs. 75%). H. pylori infection did not influence healing rates, but significantly more H. pylori-positive patients healed with omeprazole. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that omeprazole is superior to sucralfate in healing NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcer in patients who continue to take anti-inflammatory drugs. The good results observed were unrelated to H. pylori status.

Prevention of gastroduodenal damage with omeprazole in patients receiving continuous NSAIDs treatment. A double blind placebo controlled study.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare omeprazole (20 mg once daily) with placebo in the long-term prevention of gastroduodenal lesions induced by indomethacin, diclofenac and ketoprofen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 114 patients with arthritic disorders and requiring indomethacin, diclofenac or ketoprofen were randomized in a double blind manner to receive omeprazole-20 mg once daily- or identical placebo for three weeks. The gastroduodenal mucosa damage was scored according to a 0-4 point endoscopic scale. RESULTS: Of the 114 patients, 103 (50 in the omeprazole group, 53 in the placebo group) were submitted to endoscopy, while 11 patients dropped out for non-medical reasons. At the final endoscopy, 26/57 (46%) of omeprazole group, and 20/57 (35%) of the placebo group had normal gastroduodenal mucosa (score = 0) (p ns; 95% IC -0.073 + 0.284). A gastric ulcer was observed in 7/57 (12%) patients, all in the placebo group (p < 0.01 vs omeprazole); 2 patients (1 in the omeprazole group and 1 in the placebo group) developed a duodenal ulcer. Dyspeptic symptoms developed in 10% of the patients treated with omeprazole and 29% of those receiving placebo (p ns). CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, provides effective prophylactic therapy in patients at risk of developing NSAID-associated gastric and duodenal ulcer.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastric histology, serum gastrin and pepsinogen I levels, and gastric emptying in patients with gastric ulcer.

OBJECTIVE: The evolution of gastritis and the behavior of basal and meal-stimulated gastrin release, pepsinogen levels, and gastric emptying of solids were studied in a series of consecutive patients with Helicobacter pylori-positive, uncomplicated, non-NSAID-related type I gastric ulcer over a follow-up period of 3 months after eradication therapy was begun. METHODS: Before starting treatment (consisting of omeprazole 40 mg a day for 1 month and amoxycillin 1 g three times daily for 14 days), and for 3 months after ulcer healing, 16 patients had a series of functional examinations, including basal and meal-stimulated serum gastrin concentration, serum pepsinogen I levels, evaluation of gastric emptying of solids by means of serial ultrasonographic measurement of the gastric antrum area, and histological assessment of antral and corpus gastritis. RESULTS: Double therapy resulted in the successful eradication of H. pylori in eight of 16 evaluable patients. In the group of H. pylori-eradicated patients, the mean scores of gastritis activity and inflammation in the antrum and corpus had fallen, 3 months after eradication. No significant changes in mean gastritis scores were observed in the case and control group with regard to intestinal metaplasia and atrophy in the antrum and corpus. In H. pylori-eradicated patients, the integrated gastrin response to meal, but not fasting gastrin concentration, fell significantly during follow-up, and serum pepsinogen I levels significantly decreased, compared with baseline. In contrast, the fasting and maximal antral area and the gastric emptying of solids remained unchanged over time. In the control group (but not the H. pylori-eradicated group), no significant modifications of any of the above-mentioned parameters were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that in non-NSAID-related type I gastric ulcers, the eradication of H. pylori significantly reduces gastritis activity and inflammatory scores, but not atrophy and intestinal metaplasia, and modifies gastrin and pepsinogen I release in a short follow-up period. In contrast, H.pylori eradication does not significantly affect gastric emptying of solids, at least within a period of 3 months from therapy.

Helicobacter pylori eradication in the healing and recurrence of benign gastric ulcer: a two-year, double-blind, placebo controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with idiopathic gastric ulcer in about 90% of the cases, but only a few controlled studies aimed at evaluating gastric ulcer healing and the natural history after Helicobacter pylori-eradication have been carried out. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of omeprazole coupled with amoxicillin in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and healing and prevention of gastric ulcer recurrence. PATIENTS: Fifty-nine patients with active gastric ulcer were randomized under double-blind conditions to receive either omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for four weeks plus amoxicillin 3 g daily during the first and second week (29 patients, Group A) or omeprazole .20 mg twice daily for 4 weeks plus placebo for two weeks (30 patients, Group B). METHODS: Endoscopic studies were carried out at the end of the 4 weeks treatment (or after 8 weeks in non-healed patients) as well as 2, 6 and 12 months later. A total of 3 biopsies in the antrum, 3 in the gastric body and at least seven at the edge of the crater were taken at each endoscopic control for exclusion, of malignancy, histological detection of Helicobacter pylori and for evaluation of gastric histology according to the Sydney system. RESULTS: With intention to treat analysis, the percentage of healing after 4 and 8 weeks was 86% and 100% in Group A patients and 86% and 93% in Group B, respectively. Two patients dropped out in Group B for non medical reasons. The percentage of eradication was 63% in Group A and 7% in Group B. During a 12-month follow-up gastric ulcer relapsed in 20/32 (63%) of the persistently Helicobacter pylori positive patients. Only two out 20 (10%) Helicobacter pylori cured patients showed a gastric ulcer relapse and Helicobacter pylori reinfection. Twenty out of 30 patients, still healed after 12 months, underwent endoscopic control after two years. A gastric ulcer relapse was observed in three out of nine (33%) patients with persisting infection after treatment. No gastric lesions, but one case of erosive oesophagitis were observed in the 11 Helicobacter pylori-eradicated patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, Helicobacter pylori eradication does not favour gastric ulcer healing but does positively influence the subsequent natural history.

Triple therapy with ranitidine or lansoprazole in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated duodenal ulcer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to verify the efficacy--in the cure of duodenal ulcer associated H. pylori infection--of ranitidine 300 mg taken late in the evening or lansoprazole 30 mg taken before breakfast, coupled with clarithromycin and metronidazole. METHODS: Eighty patients with endoscopically proven active duodenal ulcer were randomized to take ranitidine or lansoprazole for 4-8 wk, together with clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.id. for the first 2 wk. Endoscopic controls, as well as histological and urease tests for H. pylori, were performed at entry and after 4 and 8 wk. RESULTS: According to intent-to-treat analysis, ulcers were healed after 4 wk in 36/40 patients (90%) with ranitidine and in 38/40 (95%) with lansoprazole. After 8 wk, the healing percentage with ranitidine and lansoprazole was 97% (39/40) and 95% (38/40), respectively. H. pylori was eradicated in 85% of the patients taking ranitidine and in 90% of those taking lanzoprazole. Side effects were reported in 25% of the patients in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that the combination of ranitidine, clarithromycin, and metronidazole can be considered an alternative to proton pump inhibitors in terms of clinical efficacy and economy.

Double-blind, double-dummy endoscopic comparison of the mucosal protective effects of misoprostol versus ranitidine on naproxen-induced mucosal injury to the stomach and duodenum in rheumatic patients.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare two different dosages of misoprostol (200 microg two or three times daily: MISO TID or MISO BID groups) with ranitidine (150 mg twice daily: RAN group) in the short-term prevention of acute gastroduodenal lesions induced by naproxen (500 mg twice daily). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients (62 females, 8 males, mean age 54 yr) affected by rheumatoid arthritis (54 patients, 77%) or osteoarthritis (16 patients, 23%) with endoscopically normal mucosa were randomized to receive one of the three treatments for 2 wk. The gastroduodenal mucosa damage was scored according to a modified 0-5 endoscopic scale. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (21 of 23 patients in the MISO TID group, 22 of 23 patients in the MISO BID group, and 22 of 24 patients in the RAN group) underwent a final endoscopy, while five patients dropped out for nonmedical reasons. With intent-to-treat analysis, the percentages of significant gastric lesions was 13, 9, and 46%, respectively, for the MISO TID, MISO BID, and RAN groups (MISO TID vs RAN, p < 0.01; MISO BID vs RAN, p < 0.01). Nine patients developed an ulcer: two in the MISO TID group (one gastric ulcer and one duodenal ulcer); two in the MISO BID group (two gastric ulcers); and five in the RAN group (three gastric ulcers, one duodenal ulcer, and one patient had both gastric and duodenal ulcers). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that misoprostol at 400-600 microg daily is significantly more effective than ranitidine in the short-term prevention of naproxen-induced gastric lesions. The lower dose retained mucosal protective activity that was statistically indistinguishable from that of misoprostol at 200 microg t.i.d.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori and long-term outcome of functional dyspepsia. A clinical endoscopic study.

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS) and metronidazole on Helicobacter pylori eradication and on the course of symptoms due to functional dyspepsia. Forty-one patients with functional dyspepsia were entered into the study and randomized to treatment with CBS (120 mg four times a day) for four weeks combined with metronidazole (250 mg four times a day) for one week (group A, N = 21) or matching placebo (group B, N = 20). The severity of gastritis and of bacterial colonization and the symptom score was assessed by endoscopy and clinical evaluation at baseline and after four, eight, and 24 weeks from the start of the treatment. With intent-to-treat analysis eradication was achieved in 16/25 (64%) patients in group A and in 6/24 (25%) in group B. At eight and 24 weeks the gastritis score was significantly lower only in those patients with eradication. No change was seen in patients in whom the bacteria was not eradicated. The symptom score at eight weeks was considerably lower both in patients with eradication and in those with infection. However, at 24 weeks a gradual decrease in the symptom score in patients with eradication and a worsening of symptoms in controls was observed. No differences were observed between patients with ulcerlike and those with dysmotility-like dyspepsia. The study confirms the need for a long observation period after antibacterial treatment in patients with functional dyspepsia and suggests that Helicobacter pylori-eradicating treatment improves the course of this functional syndrome.

Adult Hirschsprung's disease mimicking Crohn's disease.

Although Hirschsprung's disease is diagnosed most commonly during infancy and childhood, some cases are seen in adults, when clinical features are usually similar to those described in younger patients. We report a case whose unusual clinical presentation led to an initial diagnosis and subsequent treatment of colonic Crohn's disease. The correct diagnosis was made only after motility measurements suggested the possibility of adult Hirschsprung's disease and prompted the histological examination of the myoenteric plexus, which led to the establishment of the correct diagnosis.

Efficacy of omeprazole combined with antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the efficacy of omeprazole combined with two antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer relapse. PATIENTS: Thirty-seven patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection. METHODS: Treatment consisted of 20 mg omeprazole daily for 4 weeks with the addition, during the second and third weeks, of amoxycillin (1 g three times daily) and metronidazole (1 g daily) (group A) or placebo (group B). Endoscopy and biopsy to assess ulcer recurrence and H. pylori status were performed at entry to the study, after 4 weeks of therapy, and 1 and 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: Duodenal ulcers healed in all patients. H. pylori infection was eradicated in 15 (79%) out of 19 patients in group A and one (6%) out of 16 patients in group B (P < 0.01). One patient in each of the groups was lost to follow-up after 6 weeks. During the 6 month follow-up period, duodenal ulcers recurred in three of the 16 patients with H. pylori eradication, compared with 16 of the 19 patients with persistent H. pylori infection (19 versus 84%; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The combination of omeprazole with amoxycillin and metronidazole is effective in H. pylori eradication. This triple therapy, which eradicates H. pylori, also significantly reduced duodenal ulcer relapse.

Effects of eradication of Helicobacter pylori on gastritis in duodenal ulcer patients.

The incidence and mean score of Helicobacter pylori-related, active antroduodenitis, lesions of superficial antral epithelium and duodenal gastric-type metaplasia were higher in endoscopic biopsies from a large series of patients with duodenal ulcer, when compared with asymptomatic patients or patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. In 65 out of 73 patients with duodenal ulcer who could be followed up, H. pylori was eradicated using a combination of amoxycillin, 3 g daily, metronidazole, 1 g daily, and omeprazole, 20 mg daily. Rapid and permanent (6-month follow-up) abolition of both gastroduodenitis activity and lesions of the gastric surface epithelium was observed in these 65 patients. There was also a progressive decrease in total immune-inflammatory cells but without a substantial change in duodenal gastric-type metaplasia. Similar, but transient and quantitatively less prominent, improvements were observed in the antroduodenal mucosa, which had been temporarily cleared of H. pylori by treatment with omeprazole alone. Conversely, increased gastritis activity, epithelial lesions and immune-inflammatory cell scores were found in the short term in the corpus mucosa, which was not cleared of H. pylori after omeprazole treatment. It is concluded that, of the various H. pylori-related mucosal changes, antroduodenitis activity and antral epithelial lesions most closely reflect the severity of mucosal damage and are probably the most important factors in duodenal ulcerogenesis. Their complete and rapid suppression after bacterial eradication may be a key factor in preventing ulcer relapse.