Pseudoprogression following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for lung squamous cell carcinoma mimicking pulmonary metastatic disease on computed tomography: A case report and review of the literature.

Pseudoprogression of malignancy in patients treated with systemic immunotherapy is a well- recognised phenomenon and has also been seen in patients treated with combined chemoimmunotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy prior to surgery is a relatively new treatment strategy for the management of many malignancies. We report the case of a patient who was suspected to have primary lung squamous cell carcinoma progression following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Tissue histopathology from biopsies demonstrated granulomatous sarcoid-like inflammation rather than progression or metastatic disease. The patient proceeded to have successful surgical clearance of residual tumour. Significantly, failure to suspect granulomatous reactions and pseudoprogression has profound influence on the trajectory of patient care, such as, the potential for patients to miss out on curative surgery. In this case report and review of the literature, we evaluate the role of pseudoprogression and the need for radiologists to be aware of this phenomenon so that they do not mistakenly report new metastases and derail the treatment paradigm for patients with curable malignant conditions.

Applications of natural language processing tools in the surgical journey.

Background: Natural language processing tools are becoming increasingly adopted in multiple industries worldwide. They have shown promising results however their use in the field of surgery is under-recognised. Many trials have assessed these benefits in small settings with promising results before large scale adoption can be considered in surgery. This study aims to review the current research and insights into the potential for implementation of natural language processing tools into surgery. Methods: A narrative review was conducted following a computer-assisted literature search on Medline, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases. Papers related to natural language processing tools and consideration into their use for surgery were considered. Results: Current applications of natural language processing tools within surgery are limited. From the literature, there is evidence of potential improvement in surgical capability and service delivery, such as through the use of these technologies to streamline processes including surgical triaging, data collection and auditing, surgical communication and documentation. Additionally, there is potential to extend these capabilities to surgical academia to improve processes in surgical research and allow innovation in the development of educational resources. Despite these outcomes, the evidence to support these findings are challenged by small sample sizes with limited applicability to broader settings. Conclusion: With the increasing adoption of natural language processing technology, such as in popular forms like ChatGPT, there has been increasing research in the use of these tools within surgery to improve surgical workflow and efficiency. This review highlights multifaceted applications of natural language processing within surgery, albeit with clear limitations due to the infancy of the infrastructure available to leverage these technologies. There remains room for more rigorous research into broader capability of natural language processing technology within the field of surgery and the need for cross-sectoral collaboration to understand the ways in which these algorithms can best be integrated.

The impact of stapled compared to handsewn repair on anastomotic outcomes in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Approach to enteric anastomotic technique has been a subject of debate, with no clear consensus as to whether handsewn or stapled techniques are superior in trauma settings, which are influenced by unique perturbances to important processes such as immune function, coagulation, wound healing and response to infection. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the risk of anastomotic complications in trauma patients with gastrointestinal injury requiring restoration of continuity with handsewn versus staples approaches. METHODS: A comprehensive computer assisted search of electronic databases Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central was performed. Comparative studies evaluating stapled versus handsewn gastrointestinal anastomoses in trauma patients were included in this review. All anastomoses involving small intestine to small intestine, small to large intestine, and large intestine to large intestine were eligible. Anastomosis to the rectum was excluded. Outcomes evaluated were (1) anastomotic leak (AL) (2) a composite anastomotic complication (CAC) end point consisting of AL, enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) and deep abdominal abscess. RESULTS: Eight studies involving 931 patients were included and of these patients, data from 790 patients were available for analysis. There was no significant difference identified for anastomotic leak between the two groups (OR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.24-2.45; P = 0.66). There was no significant improvement in composite anastomotic complication; defined as a composite of anastomotic leak, deep intra-abdominal abscess and intra-abdominal fistula, in the stapled anastomosis group (OR = 1.05; 95% CI 0.53-2.09; P = 0.90). Overall, there was limited evidence to suggest superiority with handsewn or stapled anastomosis for improving AL or CAC, however this was based on studies of moderate to high risk of bias with poor control for confounders. DISCUSSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates no superiority improvement in anastomotic outcomes with handsewn or stapled repair. These findings may represent no effect in anastomotic outcome by technique for all situations. However, considering the paucity of information on potential confounders, perhaps there is a difference in outcome with overall technique or for specific subgroups that have not been described due to limited sample size and data on confounders. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend an anastomotic technique in trauma.

Intravenous methadone in the management of acute postoperative pain in a chronic cancer pain patient: A case report and review of the literature.

Key Clinical Message: The current landscape of literature highlights that there is insufficient well-powered and robust evidence to support the integration of intravenous methadone into current guidelines and frameworks in supporting the pain management of cancer patient with complex pain syndromes. However, there is preliminary evidence, both from the literature as well as this case study that highlights intravenous methadone may be efficaciously and safety used for the management of postoperative pain in cancer patients with chronic pain undergoing operative management. Further research is required to fully elucidate key considerations of integrating this medication into clinical practice including consideration into dosing, opioid conversion, tolerance, and safety. Abstract: Methadone is a broad-spectrum analgesic with long duration of effect. Its multimodal mechanism of action, such as through effects on mu-opioid receptor and presynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, has led to its current use in the management of opioid dependence in the community and in palliative care. These properties however make methadone appealing in the management of postoperative pain, particularly for patients with complex analgesic requirements. We report on an interesting case whereby intravenous methadone was effectively used for postoperative analgesia in a 56-year-old female with complex chronic pain secondary to a mucinous pelvic neoplasm of unclear primary who underwent palliative resection. Further, we review the literature surrounding usage of methadone in this setting to understand current challenges and barriers to implementation of methadone as an analgesia option for chronic pain patients following surgery. To do this, a case report and literature review was conducted in accordance to the CARE case report guidelines. The patient provided written consent for the de-identification and use of their medical information and data for the generation and publication of this case report. Our case report and literature review demonstrate there remains significant heterogeneity, unfamiliarity, and scarce use of intravenous methadone in the perioperative and postoperative space in the management of patients with complex pain regimens such as chronic cancer pain patients. Despite this, our case report and literature review highlight as a broad analgesic, intravenous methadone warrants consideration following more rigorous research and development of safe use guidelines into its use for this purpose.

Immune mediated colitis: a surgical perspective.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to review and summarize the current up to date literature that explore the current treatment approaches to immune mediated colitis and the role of surgical specialties in the landscape of management. METHODS: A narrative review of papers was performed following a literature search through Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central databases pertaining to immune mediated colitis as an adverse event of cancer immunotherapy. RESULTS: Current guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of immune mediated colitis mirror the approach to the workup of inflammatory bowel disease and guided by treating oncology and gastroenterology specialties. Immune mediated colitis however relies on surgical specific skills as a consequence of obtaining a diagnosis as well as in the management of complications that may arise. CONCLUSION: Immune mediate colitis management has largely been under the purview of medical specialties. This review explores the current landscape of managing immune mediated colitis from a surgical perspective and highlights key areas in which surgeons can engage in the multidisciplinary care of this condition. To facilitate prompt diagnosis and management of immune-mediated colitis, there is an increasing necessity for surgeons to become familiar with the latest multidisciplinary approaches and recommendations.