Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 112(4): 299-308, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32193937

RESUMO

Within the project "Quality Indicators in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy," under the leadership of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), our goal is to propose the procedures and the structure, process, and outcome indicators required for the application and assessment of quality in enteroscopy. To this end a search was performed for quality indicators in enteroscopy. Quality of evidence was measured by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system, and classified as high, moderate, low, and very low. A total of 10 process indicators (one preprocedure, eight procedure, one postprocedure) were identified for enteroscopy, with appropriate indication and choice of most efficient route being most significant.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Humanos
2.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 111(9): 699-709, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31190549

RESUMO

Within the project "Quality indicators in digestive endoscopy", pioneered by the Spanish Society for Digestive Diseases (SEPD), the objective of this research is to suggest the structure, process, and results procedures and indicators necessary to implement and assess quality in the gastroscopy setting. First, a chart was designed with the steps to be followed during a gastroscopy procedure. Secondly, a team of experts in care quality and/or endoscopy performed a qualitative review of the literature searching for quality indicators for endoscopic procedures, including gastroscopies. Finally, using a paired analysis approach, a selection of the literature obtained was undertaken. For gastroscopy, a total of nine process indicators were identified (one preprocedure, eight intraprocedure). Evidence quality was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) classification scale.


Assuntos
Duodenoscopia/normas , Gastroscopia/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Duodenoscopia/métodos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/normas , Esofagoscopia/métodos , Esofagoscopia/normas , Gastroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade
3.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 109(6): 435-450, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28553719

RESUMO

The general goal of the project wherein this paper is framed is the proposal of useful quality and safety procedures and indicators to facilitate quality improvement in digestive endoscopy units. This initial offspring sets forth procedures and indicators common to all digestive endoscopy procedures. First, a diagram of pre- and post-digestive endoscopy steps was developed. A group of health care quality and/or endoscopy experts under the auspices of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (Spanish Society of Digestive Diseases) carried out a qualitative review of the literature regarding the search for quality indicators in endoscopic procedures. Then, a paired analysis was used for the selection of literature references and their subsequent review. Twenty indicators were identified, including seven for structure, eleven for process (five pre-procedure, three intra-procedure, three post-procedure), and two for outcome. Quality of evidence was analyzed for each indicator using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) classification.


Assuntos
Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/normas , Doenças do Sistema Digestório/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA