[ISO 9001 certification of innovation and clinical research departments: Extending the scope of health assessment]. / Certification ISO 9001 des Directions de la recherche clinique et de l'innovation : vers une extension du périmètre aux évaluations économiques.

BACKGROUND: The International organization for standardization (ISO) is the world leader in providing industrial and commercial standards and certifications. Beyond medical devices, four French clinical research and innovation departments have received an ISO 9001 certification (the standard for quality management). Simultaneously, medico-economic studies have become increasingly important in the public decision process. Using the clinical research and innovation department from the Léon-Bérard Cancer Center as an example, the purpose of this article is to show how the scope of the ISO 9001 certification has been extended to cover medico-economic studies. METHOD: All of the processes, procedures, operating modes, documents, and indicators used by the clinical research and innovation department of the Léon-Bérard center were investigated. Literature searches were conducted using Medline keywords. The recommendations from the French national authority for health and other organizations, such as the International society for pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research (ISPOR), were also considered, as well as the recommendations of the General inspectorate of social affairs. RESULTS: In accordance with the national and international recommendations, two procedures were created and four procedures were revised at this center. Five indicators of quality and an evaluation chart were developed. CONCLUSION: By adopting the ISO 9001 certification into its medico-economic studies, the clinical research and innovation department of the Léon-Bérard center has used an innovative approach in the context of the growing importance of economic studies in decision-making.

Healthy sibling donor anxiety and pain during bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell harvesting for allogeneic transplantation: results of a randomised study.

This study reports the first comparison of healthy donor subjective well-being during two alternative procedures of hematopoietic stem cells harvesting for allogeneic transplantation. Among the 105 donors included between September 1996 and October 1998 in the SFGM French randomised trial aiming to compare allogeneic bone marrow (BM) transplantation and blood cell (BC) transplantation, 64 donors (33 in BC and 31 in BM groups) were relevant for the analysis. They had received a set of self-administered questionnaires to complete during the collection process, aiming to measure anxiety (assessed using the Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) and pain induced by the procedure (evaluated using a visual analogical scale). Results showed that no harvest procedure is free from pain even if none was more painful than the other. Levels of anxiety before the collection procedure were high in both groups and significantly so for BC donors. Although BC collection induces at least similar levels of pain and anxiety as does BM collection, they were of a different kind, and the short-term impact of G-CSF stimulation on the well-being of BC donors has to be taken into account in improving quality of care in the allogeneic setting.

Optimization of peripheral blood stem cell collection by leukopheresis. Interaction between economic and clinical assessment of an innovation.

Using the example of substitution of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection to bone marrow harvest for autologous transplantation in cancer patients, our study attempts to illustrate how economic assessment, starting at an early stage of medical innovation, can influence the development and diffusion process of a new technological procedure whose optimal design has not yet been established. Two cost minimization studies comparing costs for obtaining a clinically reinfusable graft using bone marrow harvest or alternatively various protocols of PBSC collection contributed to a change in the French clinical standard for this procedure.

Clinical and economic comparison of lenograstim-primed blood cells (BC) and bone marrow (BM) allogeneic transplantation.

The study presented is a clinical and economic comparison of bone marrow (BM) and blood cells (BC) allogeneic transplantation. We performed a case-control study to compare 17 patients receiving allogeneic BC transplant in a pilot study to an historical group of 17 patients allografted with BM. We evaluated the clinical outcomes and the direct medical costs of transplantation from conditioning regimen until day 100 by detailed observation of patients' medical records. Patients in the BC group received a median of 8 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells (1.58-29.1) and 266 x 10(6)/kg CD3+ cells (128-469). All patients had neutrophil engraftment with a median of 14 days in the BC group vs 19 days in the BM group (P < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier estimation of the median number of days to a platelet count of > 25 x 10(9)/l, independent of platelet transfusion, was significantly shorter in the BC group (15 (9-74)) compared with the BM group (25 (15-45)). Acute graft-versus-host disease (AGVHD) of grade > or = 2 was not significantly different between the two groups. Patients treated with BC presented a US$16,134 decrease in the cost of the first 100 days (29%, P = 0.006). Our comparison suggested that platelet reconstitution and total costs were in favor of the BC group.

The economic evaluation of hematopoietic growth factors in high-dose chemotherapy.

Hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) such as granulocyte colony stimulating factor or granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor have been shown to accelerate engraftment after transplantation and facilitate peripheral blood stem cells mobilization. Besides efficacy and safety, the economic impact of these expensive new drugs produced via biotechnological methods is of major concern. The use of HGFs in high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) therefore requires that economic evaluation starts as early as possible throughout the R&D. This can participate in the innovation development process and help predict subsequent diffusion of the technology over time, and potential evolution in expected clinical utilization and costs. Although some issues about the economic consequences of their use have been determined by 'piggyback' studies (economic evaluation alongside randomized controlled trials), several questions remain unanswered regarding the costs involved in therapeutic innovations permitted by the use of HGFs in HDC.

Autologous peripheral blood progenitor-cell transplantation versus autologous bone marrow transplantation for adults and children with non-leukaemic malignant disease. A randomised economic study.

A prospective economic analysis of autologous peripheral blood progenitor-cell transplantation (PBPCT) versus autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) was performed as part of a randomised clinical trial in 129 patient (adults and children) receiving high-dosage antineoplastic therapy for non-leukaemic malignant disease. The clinical assessment criteria of the study were the duration of thrombocytopenia (< 30 x 10(9)/L and < 50 x 10(9)/L) and of granulocytopenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L). The cost of medical resources used was the primary economic end-point. We also calculated the cost of reaching 2 specified haematological end-points: platelet recovery (> or = 30 x 10(9)/L) and granulocyte recovery (> or = 0.5 x 10(9)/L). Economic analysis was based on the French hospital perspective. Haematological recovery was significantly quicker in the PBPCT groups (adults and children) compared with the BMT groups. Economic study revealed that the PBPCT groups were clearly less expensive with regard to costs up to discharge (17% decrease of the average cost for adults and 29% for children) and those associated with specified haematological end-points. The global costs of PBPCT were lower than those of BMT for these adult and paediatric populations. Economic arguments can clearly be added to clinical ones in favour of substitution of autologous PBPCT for autologous BMT. International comparisons of diffusion of PBPCT could be of great interest for further economic research into medical innovation.

Peripheral blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation for solid tumors and lymphomas: hematologic recovery and costs. A randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation has an advantage over autologous bone marrow transplantation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the hematologic recovery and costs associated with PBSC transplantation with those associated with autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy for solid tumors or lymphomas. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: French Federation of Cancer Centers, located in cancer facilities or public hospitals with transplantation units. PATIENTS: Children and adults with solid tumors or lymphomas who were candidates for high-dose chemotherapy. INTERVENTIONS: Bone marrow or filgrastim-mobilized PBSCs. MEASUREMENT: The major and point was the duration of thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50 x 10(9)/L). An economic evaluation of both types of transplantation was done prospectively to measure costs and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: 129 patients entered the trial; 64 had PBSC transplantation, and 65 had bone marrow transplantation. The median duration of thrombocytopenia was 16 days in the PBSC group and 35 days in the bone marrow group (P < 0.001). All of the other clinical end points studied (time to last platelet transfusion, duration of granulocytopenia, number of transfusion episodes, and duration of hospitalization) favored PBSC transplantation. A cost analysis showed that total cost was decreased by 17% in adults and 29% in children with PBSC transplantation; thus, PBSC transplantation was clearly more cost-effective than bone marrow transplantation for both platelet and granulocyte recovery. CONCLUSION: Transplantation of PBSCs is associated with more rapid hematologic recovery than is bone marrow transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy for solid tumors or lymphomas. Furthermore, global costs are lower and cost-effectiveness ratios are better with PBSC transplantation.

Autologous transplantation of blood stem cells mobilized with filgrastim alone in 93 patients with malignancies: the number of CD34+ cells reinfused is the only factor predicting both granulocyte and platelet recovery.

High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) supported by autologous transplantation of blood stem cells (BSC) is used increasingly for patients with poor-risk malignancies. We report our experience with 93 consecutive patients who were mobilized with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) alone. They received a fixed dose of G-CSF for 5 or 6 days, and BSC were collected by leukapheresis. Aphereses were evaluated for MNC, CD34+ cells, and CFU-GM counts and cryopreserved. All patients received a conditioning regimen without TBI. Engraftment was assessed as the first of 2 consecutive days on which patients achieved 0.5 and 1 x 10(9)/L neutrophils and an unsupported platelet count of 25 x 10(9)/L. Multivariate analysis was performed to study patients and graft characteristics that could influence reconstitution. The G-CSF priming regimen was well tolerated and allowed collection of BSC for all patients, 66% of them achieving >3 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells, and 86% achieving >10 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg. The numbers of collected CD34 and CFU-GM cells were highly correlated. The number of courses of chemotherapy prior to collection, a diagnosis of breast cancer, the use of rhG-CSF posttransplant, and the numbers of CFU-GM and CD34+ cells reinfused were correlated with hematologic recovery. In a multivariate analysis, however, the number of CD34+ cells was the only factor independently influencing both granulocyte and platelet recovery. Patients who received at least 3 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells achieved granulocyte reconstitution on day 11 after reinfusion (range 8-15) and an unsupported platelet count of 25 x 10(9)/l on day 14 (range 12-180), significantly earlier than patients who received fewer cells (p < 0.001). In addition, G-CSF administration postreinfusion independently enhanced granulocyte reconstitution but not platelet recovery. In conclusion, CD34+ cell number appears to be the only factor predicting both granulocyte and platelet reconstitution. Based on this study, the collection of a minimal number of 3 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells appears desirable.

[Comparative study of the costs for two hematopoietic cell specimen collections: cytapheresis and bone marrow collection]. / Etude comparative des coûts de deux procédures de recueil des cellules souches hématopoïétiques : la cytaphérèse et le prélèvement de moelle osseuse.

The aim of this study, carried out at the Institut Paoli-Calmettes (Marseille-France), was to compare, in terms of monetary and non monetary costs, alternate procedures for hematopoietic stem cells collection i.e. peripheral blood stem cells collection (PBSCC) and bone marrow collection (BMC) used in cancer therapies. Monetary costs have been evaluated by calculating the direct costs of the two types of procedures and non monetary costs by comparing anxiety, discomfort and pain of cancer patients submitted to PBSCC or BMC. Patients, randomized (7/1993-2/1994), in view of autologous transplantation, to receive the first procedure or the second one received three self-administered questionnaires to complete before, during and after the procedure. Pain was assessed using visual analogical scale and McGill Pain questionnaire. Anxiety was evaluated by means of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Results showed that, under some conditions, presently realized in the current practice, direct costs of PBSCC (10,140 to 13,780 FF) were lower than BMC ones (16,509 FF) and that anxiety and pain experienced by patients submitted to PBSCC, with or without femoral catheter, were significantly less severe than in other group patients (State anxiety, before procedure : p < 0.01 ; pain related to the procedure assessed on VAS : p < 0.001 and total McGill score : p < 0.00001). These findings justify the substitution of bone marrow transplantation by peripheral blood stem cells transplantation, provided there is a demonstration of similar medical efficacy for cancer therapy.

Administration of G-CSF can be delayed after transplantation of autologous G-CSF-primed blood stem cells: a randomized study.

Hematopoietic growth factors like G-CSF or GM-CSF have been shown to shorten the period of severe neutropenia after HD chemotherapy and autologous BMT, and are now widely used to mobilize hemopoietic stem cells into peripheral blood. In order to evaluate the possibility of delaying G-CSF administration after transplantation of G-CSF mobilized blood stem cells (BSC), we randomized 35 cancer patients to receive CSF at day 1 (group 1, n = 19) or at day 6 (group 2, n = 16) after transplantation and here we present their hematological reconstitution. BSC collection was performed by apheresis after G-CSF priming for 5 or 6 days (600 micrograms daily subcutaneously). Hematological recovery is comparable between the two groups: a median of 10 (range 7-16) vs 11 (range 9-18) days to reach an ANC > 0.5 x 10(9)/1 in group 1 (G-CSF day 1 after transplant) vs group 2 (G-CSF day 6 after transplant, P = NS). Median time to reach an unsupported platelet count of 25 x 10(9)/1 was 14 days in the two groups (range 8-110 and 10-40 respectively, P = NS); patients received less G-CSF after transplantation in group 2. No difference appeared in terms of transfusion support, number of days of fever of i.v. antibiotic treatment. Patients' hospital stay was the same in the two groups. Our data suggest that delaying G-CSF administration after infusion of mobilized blood cells is not detrimental to hematological recovery, while it lowers the overall cost of the procedure.

[Comparison of anxiety and pain in two procedures of hematopoietic stem cell collection: cytapheresis and bone marrow collection]. / Comparaison de l'anxiété et de la douleur au cours de deux procédures de recueil des cellules-souches hématopoïétiques: la cytaphérèse et le prélèvement de moelle osseuse.

The aim of this study was to compare anxiety, pain and discomfort of cancer patients submitted to two procedures of hematopoietic stem cells collection: peripheral blood stem cells collection (PBSCC) or bone marrow collection (BMC). Patients, randomized (July 1993-February 1994), in view of autograft, to receive the first procedure or the second one, completed self-administered questionnaires before, during and after the procedure. Anxiety was evaluated by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Pain was assessed using visual analogical scale (VAS) and McGill Pain questionnaire. Before the procedure, in comparison with PBSCC patients (n = 40), BMC patients (n = 25) experienced more State-anxiety due to the procedure approach (p < 0.01) and more trouble or inconvenience for having to come and stay at the hospital (p < 0.0001). During the procedure, pain related to BMC, as assessed by VAS, is significatively higher than pain induced by PBSCC, whichever the access used (p < 0.001). The McGill total score is twice as high for BMC patients than for patients submitted to PBSCC with femoral catheter (n = 19). The latter patients significatively reported more pain than patients without femoral catheter (n = 21). At the discharge from hospital, 32% of BMC patients judged the procedure quite difficult vs 5% of PBSCC patients (p < 0.05). These results explain a higher acceptability of the peripheral blood stem cells collection.

Comparison of G-CSF-primed peripheral blood progenitor cells and bone marrow auto transplantation: clinical assessment and cost-effectiveness.

The introduction of hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) offers new opportunities for autologous transplantation by facilitating and enriching collection of circulating progenitor cells from peripheral blood as a source of stem cell rescue. Substitution of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) from bone marrow in autologous transplantation for therapy in advanced cancers requires clinical and economic assessment. We carried out the first clinical and cost-effectiveness study in an experimental group of 16 patients autografted with PBPC primed by G-CSF alone and with G-CSF stimulation post-transplantation, comparing these with two other groups of 17 and 21 patients who received autologous bone marrow transplantation with and without G-CSF stimulation, respectively, post-transplantation. We confirmed the ability of primed PBPC to achieve durable engraftment in a shorter time than classical BMT (median number of days to reach 0.5 x 10(9)/l neutrophils = 10.5 versus 12 and 16, respectively) to improve overall hematological recovery (median number of days to recover a platelet count > or = 25 x 10(9)/l, independent of platelet transfusion = 14.5 vs 23 and 20) and to shorten length of hospitalization. Total costs of PBPC autografting remain lower than those of autologous BMT either with or without G-CSF, and cost-effectiveness ratios using hematological recovery end points are in favour of PBPC. Finally, PBPC is a safe and effective way of performing dose-intensification in cancer patients, although further improvements are required to optimize the procedure and so further decrease the costs.

Delayed administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after autologous bone marrow transplantation: effect on granulocyte recovery.

Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) has been shown to hasten granulocyte recovery after autologous BMT. In current protocols, rhG-CSF treatment starts 1 day after BM reinfusion. Our study retrospectively examined the effects on haematological recovery of a day 6 delayed administration. Seventy-eight patients receiving autologous BMT for malignant lymphoma (21 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and 9 Hodgkin's disease) or solid tumors (33 breast carcinoma and 5 ovarian carcinoma) were split up into three study groups. Two groups receiving a 5 micrograms/kg/day of rhG-CSF starting either 1 day (day +1 group, n = 25 patients) or 6 days (day +6 group, n = 24 patients) after BM reinfusion were compared with 29 historical control patients. Granulocyte recovery to 0.5 x 10(9)/l was 12 days in day +6 and day +1 groups versus 16 days in control group (p < 0.005) without any difference in other hematological parameters, infectious complications or length of hospitalisation between the three groups. The day +6 administration allows elimination of a median of 7 days rhG-CSF. It has been concluded that the day +6 administration gives the same clinical benefit as day +1 administration with consequent cost reductions.