Switching from onabotulinum toxin A to abobotulinum toxin A for treating detrusor overactivity in spinal cord injured patient, does it really work?

AIM: To assess the efficacy of switching to Abobotulinumtoxin A (ATA) intradetrusor injections (IDI) after failure of Onabotulinumtoxin A (OTA) IDI for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-centre retrospective chart review study. All SCI patients who started OTA IDI after 2011 and had an ATA IDI switch were included. The primary outcome was the clinical and urodynamic efficacy of the switch to ATA IIDs at the last follow-up. Secondary outcomes were initial efficacy, duration of ATA treatment, and patient outcome including the occurrence of augmentation enterocystoplasty at last follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included. Eighteen patients (28.9%) were initially responders to ATA IDI. Nine patients (14.5%) remained responders at last follow-up after a median of 17 months (AE 8.8-29). Thirty-two patients (51.6%) had had or were awaiting augmentation enterocystoplasty with a follow-up time of 18.5 months (IQR 8-27). Eleven patients (17.7%) were on ATA IDI with low efficacy. Seven patients (11.3%) were switched back to OTA and 3 patients (4.8%) changed their voiding pattern. CONCLUSION: Switching from OTA to ATA toxin for IDI in the treatment of detrusor overactivity after spinal cord injury have long-term efficacy for a limited number of patients but may delay the need for surgery.

Sepsis of the hip due to pressure sore in spinal cord injured patients: advocacy for a one-stage surgical procedure.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study reporting characteristics and management of septic arthritis of the hip due to pressure sores in spinal cord-injured patients. OBJECTIVES: To describe clinical and biological data of septic arthritis of the hip and its treating management. SETTING: The database of the regional SCI referral center, Nantes, France. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 33 cases of septic arthritis of the hip in the medical files of 26 patients. RESULTS: We analyzed 33 cases of septic arthritis of the hip treated in one French referent center for spinal cord-injured patients from January 1988 to December 2009. Most patients had a thoracic complete paraplegia and nearly two-third (17 out of 26) had no systematic follow-up. In 25 out of 33 cases, the septic arthritis of the hip was due to a trochanteric pressure sore. The causal pressure sore was most frequently associated with a persistent drainage. The standard radiological examination led to the diagnosis in 30 cases and, in 7 questionable cases, magnetic resonance imaging was more contributory. Surgery always consisted of a wide carcinological-like excision and of a subtrochanteric proximal femoral resection including both greater and lesser trochanters. A musculocutaneous flap was realized for all cases and the choice of the muscle depended on the localization of the causal pressure sore but also of the remaining choices, as most of the patients had already undergone a prior surgery. An antibiotic treatment was adapted to multiple samples during surgery. CONCLUSION: We do advocate for a one-stage procedure including a subtrochanteric proximal femoral resection and a musculocutaneous flap.