Nephron sparing surgery in tumours greater than 7cm.

INTRODUCTION: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard treatment for renal cell carcinomas under 4cm. No robust data exists to recommend PN for tumours>7cm (cT2). The objective of this work is to evaluate the results of PN for cT2 tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent PN or radical nephrectomy (RN) for cT2 tumours between 2000 and 2013 at our institution have been included. Patient demographics, postoperative data including renal function, morbidity, mortality and oncologic outcomes were reviewed retrospectively and compared using χ2 test, Mann-Whitney test, Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. RESULTS: We included 130 patients, 49 (38%) in the PN group and 81 (62%) in the RN group, with a median follow-up of 42 months [19-69]. Variation of postoperative renal function at day 5 and last recorded value was significantly different between the groups (P=0.03 and P<0.001). The PN group had a significantly higher complication rate as compared with RN group (37% versus 14%, P=0.002). There were no significant differences between the two groups for overall, recurrence free and specific survival (P=0.55, P=0.55, P=0.24, respectively). In univariate analysis, the type of surgery (PN versus RN) was not associated with a significant difference of oncologic outcome (margins, survival). CONCLUSION: PN can be offered for cT2 tumours with oncological outcomes similar to RN. Despite an increased morbidity, it remains acceptable with the demonstrated advantage of preservation of renal function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Comparison of operative and oncologic results between partial nephrectomy and radiofrequency ablation for treatment of renal tumors in patients older than 75]. / Comparaison des résultats opératoires et oncologiques de la néphrectomie partielle et de l'ablation par radiofréquence pour traitement des tumeurs rénales chez les patients de plus de 75 ans.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients represent a growing part of our society for who treatment strategy for localized renal tumors has to be chosen knowing iatrogen effects and renal function morbidity. The aim was to analyze oncological and functional results of nephron sparing surgery (PN) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients aged more than 75 treated by partial nephrectomy or radiofrequency ablation between 2007 and 2014 in our centre were included. Patient and tumors data were compared and these criteria were analyzed: survival (overall and without recurrence) and loss of renal function (pre- and postoperative MDRD). RESULTS: In total, 100 patients were included (26 partial nephrectomies, group 1 and 74 radiofrequency ablation, group 2) with a 32-months medium follow-up. Medium age and tumor size were significantly different (respectively, 78 versus 81 years old, P=0.001, 38mm versus 29mm, P=0.003). Perioperative results showed no differences in complications. Transfusion rate and duration of hospital stay were significantly higher in the PN group. Median overall survival were 45 vs. 27 months (P=0.23) for PN and RFA and median recurrence-free survival were 28 vs. 10 months (P=0.34). On a multivariate analysis, operative technique (PN or RFA) were not significantly linked to survival (HR 2.37 [95% CI: 0.66-8.5]), P=0.19. Loss of renal function were 1.5±14mL/min/1.73m2 for PN and 3±14mL/min/1.73m2 for RFA (P=0.69). CONCLUSION: Our study showed better perioperative results for RFA than for PN, without significant different survival. Loss of renal function were little and similar. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Cancer genetic screening for patient with multiple renal tumors: What is the current practice for what results?]. / Dépistage oncogénétique des patients atteints de tumeurs rénales multiples : quelle pratique pour quels résultats ?

AIM: To evaluate in a high volume center the practice and the performance of cancer genetic screening for patients with multiple renal tumors without a predisposition to kidney tumors known at the time of surgery. METHOD: All patients treated for multiple renal tumors from January 2000 to December 2013 in our center were included. Patients with a family history of renal cell carcinoma, a kidney disease or a genetic predisposition to renal cancer known at the time of surgery were excluded from the analysis. Our list of patients was retrospectively compared to the records from PREDIR (PREDisposition to Kidney Tumors) center of Île-de-France, which regionally centralizes the care of patients with kidney tumors associated with a genetic predisposition. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six patients were included. Twenty-six patients of 136 (19%) were referred to PREDIR center: 23 followed the screening and 3 did not show up in consultation. Of the 23 patients screened, three genetic predispositions to kidney tumors were identified (13%). Of the 95 patients with synchronous tumors, 48% with more than 3 tumors benefited from cancer genetics investigation against 13% of those presenting only two tumors. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that cancer genetic investigations are not routinely offered to patients with multiple kidney tumors, conversely to existing guidelines. Urologists must be aware of this screening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Testicular mass in a teenager: a case report of embryonic carcinoma discovered late]. / Masse testiculaire de l'adolescent : à propos d'un cas de carcinome embryonnaire de découverte tardive.

Testicular cancer is a rare disease in adolescents but is the leading cause of solid cancer in 15- to 30-year-old men. We report a clinical case of a 16-year-old who presented to the pediatric emergency unit with a testicular mass that had been enlarging for several months and the diagnosis turned out to be multimetastatic testicular cancer. However, early diagnosis largely determines the prognosis of this disease. A literature review enabled us to update the prognostic factors, the reasons for diagnostic delay, and current screening practices for this disease. There are currently no formal guidelines in France.