RESUMO
Purpose: Although surgical decompression is the gold standard for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) from solid tumors, not all patients are candidates or undergo successful surgical Bilsky downgrading. We report oncologic and functional outcomes for patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to high-grade MESCC. Methods and Materials: Patients with Bilsky grade 2 to 3 MESCC from solid tumor metastases treated with SBRT at a single institution from 2009 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received upfront surgery before SBRT were included only if postsurgical Bilsky grade remained ≥2. Neurologic examinations, magnetic resonance imaging, pain assessments, and analgesic usage were assessed every 3 to 4 months post-SBRT. Cumulative incidence of local recurrence was calculated with death as a competing risk, and overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier. Results: One hundred forty-three patients were included. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 5.1%, 7.5%, and 14.1% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. At first post-SBRT imaging, 16.2% of patients with initial Bilsky grade 2 improved to grade 1, and 53.8% of patients were stable. Five of 13 patients (38.4%) with initial Bilsky grade 3 improved to grade 1 to 2. Pain response at 3 and 6 months post-SBRT was complete in 45.4% and 55.7%, partial in 26.9% and 13.1%, stable in 24.1% and 27.9%, and worse in 3.7% and 3.3% of patients, respectively. At 3 and 6 months after SBRT, 17.8% and 25.0% of patients had improved ambulatory status and 79.7% and 72.4% had stable status. Conclusions: We report the largest series to date of patients with high-grade MESCC treated with SBRT. The excellent local control and functional outcomes suggest SBRT is a reasonable approach in inoperable patients or cases unable to be successfully surgically downgraded.
RESUMO
Purpose: We hypothesized that there may be a gender disparity in the receipt of the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) Educator of the Year Award and sought to elucidate factors that contribute to differences in award receipt. Methods and Materials: Using a database provided by the American Society for Radiation Oncology, award recipients were identified from 2010 to 2022. Publicly available websites were accessed to obtain data regarding gender, years since residency graduation, percentage of female faculty, size of residency program, and program director designation. A 1-sample Z-test was used to assess whether the proportion of female ARRO award winners, defined as the proportion of female radiation oncology faculty members in the nominating universities that year, was significantly less than the population average. Secondary analyses used univariable binary logistic regression to identify global associations between gender, year since gradation, or program size. Results: The lowest proportion of female awardees occurred in 2013 (14.3%) and the greatest proportion in 2022 (30.6%). Compared with the proportion of female faculty members in nominating programs for the respective year, there were significantly fewer female awardees in 2010 (18% female awardees vs 32% female faculty members; P = .02) and 2013 (14% female awardees vs 31% female faculty members; P = .01). There was a statistically significant increase in female awardees during the study period (P < .01). On logistic regression analysis, large program size (≥10 residents) (odds ratio [OR], 6.86; 95% CI, 2.71-23.1; P < .001) and medium program size (5-9 residents) (OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.60-13.7; P < .001) were associated with a greater proportion of female awardees compared with small program size (1-4 residents). There was no association between awardee gender and years since graduation. Conclusions: A gender disparity was present in the receipt of ARRO Educator Awards. Residency chiefs, program directors, and chairs should work to ensure that a diverse slate of faculty is considered annually for the ARRO Educator Award.