ESGO-ESMO-ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease.

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Olaparib plus bevacizumab first-line maintenance in ovarian cancer: final overall survival results from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 primary analysis, maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer patients in clinical response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, irrespective of surgical status. Prespecified, exploratory analyses by molecular biomarker status showed substantial benefit in patients with a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD; BRCAm and/or genomic instability). We report the prespecified final overall survival (OS) analysis, including analyses by HRD status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to olaparib (300 mg twice daily; up to 24 months) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks; 15 months total) or placebo plus bevacizumab. Analysis of OS, a key secondary endpoint in hierarchical testing, was planned for ∼60% maturity or 3 years after the primary analysis. RESULTS: After median follow-up of 61.7 and 61.9 months in the olaparib and placebo arms, respectively, median OS was 56.5 versus 51.6 months in the intention-to-treat population [hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.12; P = 0.4118]. Subsequent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy was received by 105 (19.6%) olaparib patients versus 123 (45.7%) placebo patients. In the HRD-positive population, OS was longer with olaparib plus bevacizumab (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.85; 5-year OS rate, 65.5% versus 48.4%); at 5 years, updated PFS also showed a higher proportion of olaparib plus bevacizumab patients without relapse (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.32-0.54; 5-year PFS rate, 46.1% versus 19.2%). Myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia, aplastic anemia, and new primary malignancy incidence remained low and balanced between arms. CONCLUSIONS: Olaparib plus bevacizumab provided clinically meaningful OS improvement for first-line patients with HRD-positive ovarian cancer. These prespecified exploratory analyses demonstrated improvement despite a high proportion of patients in the placebo arm receiving poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors after progression, confirming the combination as one of the standards of care in this setting with the potential to enhance cure.

Oncologic results of fertility sparing surgery of cervical cancer: An updated systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Several techniques can be proposed as fertility sparing surgery in young patients treated for cervical cancer but uncertaincies remain concerning their outcomes. Analysis of oncological issues is then the first aim of this review in order to evaluate the best strategy. RESULTS: Data were identified from searches of MEDLINE, Current Contents, PubMed and from references in relevant articles from January 1987 to 15th of September 2021. We carry out an updated systematic review involving 5862 patients initially selected for fertility-sparing surgery in 275 series. FINDINGS: In patients having a stage IB1 disease, recurrence rate/RR in patients undergoing simple conisation/trachelectomy, radical trachelectomy/RT by laparoscopico-vaginal approach, laparotomic or laparoscopic approaches are respectively: 4.1%, 4.7%, 2.4% and 5.2%. In patients having a stage IB2 disease, RR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or RT by laparotomy are respectively 13.2% and 4.8% (p = .0035). After neoadjuvant treatment a simple cone/trachelectomy was carried out in 91 (30%) patients and a radical one in 210 (70%) cases. But the lowest pregnancy rate is observed in patients undergoing RT by laparotomy (36%). CONCLUSIONS: The choice between these treatments should be based above all, on objective oncological data that strike a balance for each procedure between the best chances for cure and the fertility results. In patients having a stage IB1 disease, oncological results are quite similar according to the procedure used. In patients having a stage IB2 disease, RT by open approach has the lowest RR. Anyway the lowest pregnancy rate is observed in patients undergoing RT by laparotomy.

Early phase trials in soft-tissue sarcomas: clinical benefit of inclusion in early lines of treatment, molecular screening, and histology-driven trials.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) remains dismal, and systemic therapeutic options are limited. Early phase trials are becoming increasingly safe and effective. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all STS patients participating in early phase trials at Gustave Roussy and Léon Bérard between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020. RESULTS: Overall, 199 patients accounted for 214 inclusions in advanced STS. The most frequent histotypes were well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcomas (n = 55), leiomyosarcomas (n = 53), synovial sarcomas (n = 22), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (n = 15), angiosarcomas (n = 12), and myxoid liposarcomas (n = 10). The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval 2.7-4.1 months). The median PFS in the first, second, and later lines was 8.3, 5.4, and 2.6 months, respectively (P = 0.00015). The median PFS was 2.8 months in case of molecular screening, 4.1 months in case of histology-driven screening, and 1.6 months (P = 0.00014) in the absence of either screening modalities. In univariate analysis, histotype (P = 0.026), complex genomics (P = 0.008), number of prior lines (P < 0.001), prior anthracyclines (P < 0.001), number of metastatic sites (P = 0.003), liver metastasis (P < 0.001), lung metastasis (P < 0.001), absence of molecular or histology-driven screening (P < 0.001), first-in-human trials (P < 0.001), dose-escalation cohorts (P = 0.011), and Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score >1 (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with shorter PFS. In multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS were myxoid liposarcoma (P = 0.031), ≥2 prior lines of treatment (P = 0.033), liver metastasis (P = 0.007), and RMH score >2 (P = 0.006). Factors associated with improved PFS were leiomyosarcomas (P = 0.010), molecular screening (P = 0.025), and histology-driven screening (P = 0.010). The median overall survival rates were 36.3, 12.6, and 9.2 months in the first, second, and later lines, respectively (P = 0.0067). The grade 3-4 toxicity rate was 36%. CONCLUSIONS: Early phase trials provide an active therapeutic option for STS, even in first-line settings. Molecular screening and histology-driven trials further improve the clinical benefit.

Increasing global accessibility to high-level treatments for cervical cancers.

Human papillomaviruses (HPV)-related gynecological cancers are a major health care issue, and a leading cause of cancer death in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). In 2020, the World Health Organization launched a program aimed at cervical cancer elimination, by screening and vaccination strategies. Offering the best possible care to women diagnosed with invasive cancer is a complementary objective. Treatment of cervical cancer as per modern standards is complex and multimodal, mainly relying on surgery, external-beam radiotherapy (+/-chemotherapy) and brachytherapy. In parallel with the pivotal role of multidisciplinary discussion, international societies provide guidance to define the most effective and least toxic anti-cancer strategy, homogenize treatment protocols and provide benchmark quality indicators as a basis for accreditation processes. The challenge is to offer the appropriate diagnostic workup and treatment upfront and to avoid non- evidence-based treatment that consumes resources, impairs quality of life (QoL), and compromises oncological outcome. Various strategies may be applied for improving treatment quality: development of surgical mentorship, companion-training programs and international cooperation. The lack of radiotherapy/brachytherapy facilities is a major concern in LMIC. Reinforcing international support in terms of education, training, research and development and technical cooperation with national projects is required to increase access to minimum requirements but also introduce modern techniques, upgrade radiotherapy/brachytherapy services, and expand access to modern systemic treatments. In countries with robust economies, compliance to standards should also be increased. Integrative cancer care and multidisciplinary approaches are needed to tackle the dual challenge of increasing cure rates while minimizing QoL impairment. Appropriate dimensioning of the resources to avoid harmful treatment delays and access to expert referral centers is also a priority.

[Fertility preservation in cervical cancer, analysis of 30 years of practice and immersion in future developments]. / La préservation de fertilité en cas de cancer du col, analyse de 30 ans de pratique et immersion dans les évolutions à venir.

OBJECTIVES: The strategy of fertility preservation (FP) in cervical cancer has been challenged for several years and a therapeutic de-escalation seems to be necessary. In this context, we evaluated the oncological, fertility and obstetric outcomes of surgical techniques performed in our centre for FP. METHODS: This retrospective uni centric trial included 75 patients, managed at the Gustave Roussy Institute between 1995 and 2020, for cervical cancer (stage IB1 FIGO 2018) and having conducted a fertility preservation project after a complete pre-therapy work-up. The objective of this study was to understand our results on fertility and obstetrical outcomes and to correlate them with oncological data and finally to evaluate the evolution of our surgical practices. RESULTS: 54 patients benefited from an extended trachelectomy and no lymph node involvement was found. 1 patient received a complementary treatment postoperatively which did not allow to preserve her fertility. The recurrence rate was 4.8% (4/75) with one death described. 31 pregnancies were obtained, representing a pregnancy rate of 50%. 74% of pregnancies were obtained spontaneously and 60% of pregnancies were carried to term. CONCLUSION: Our results are similar to those in the literature. Despite a fertility preservation project, only half of the patients were able to achieve a pregnancy.

[Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A retrospective study on 34 complete cytoreductive surgeries]. / Carcinome séreux de bas grade ovarien à un stade avancé : étude rétrospective sur 34 patientes en résection complète.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer is a distinct, slow-growing entity that affects mainly young women. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characterisitics and survival outcomes of a population of patients suffering from advanced stage CSBG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out in patients with advanced stage ovarian CSBG (FIGO IIIb-IV) who had complete macroscopic cytoreductive surgery, at Gustave Roussy Institut, Villejuif, between 2004 and 2017. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included, who were mainly young women (mean age 41.3 years), diagnosed at FIGO stage IIIC (91 %). The median follow-up was 41 months. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 16 patients (47.1 %), and complete response never occurred. Upper abdominal surgical procedures were necessary in 90 % of cases and a bowel resection was performed in more than 80 % of cases. Over 90 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy followed by maintenance treatment with bevacizumab in over 40 % of cases. During follow-up, 9 (26 %) deaths occurred. Five-year overall survival was 70 % and disease-free survival was 20 %. CONCLUSION: CSBG of the ovary has a low chemosensitivity and requires maximum surgical management, which should be performed in expert centers.

Evaluation of adjuvant vaginal vault brachytherapy in early stage cervical cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was shown to decrease pelvic relapses in patients with an early stage cervical cancer and intermediate-risk histopathological prognostic factors, at the cost of increased bowel morbidity. We examined the feasibility and results of adjuvant brachytherapy alone as an alternative to EBRT in this situation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of consecutive patients receiving adjuvant brachytherapy between 1991 and 2018 for an early stage cervical cancer were examined. Patients were included if they presented a pT1a2N0 or pT1b1N0 disease following radical colpohysterectomy. Adjuvant vaginal wall brachytherapy (without EBRT) was indicated because of a tumor size≥2cm and/or presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Patients received 60Gy to 5mm of the vaginal wall, through low-dose or pulse-dose rate technique. Patients' outcome was examined for disease control, toxicities and prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included. Eight patients (20%) had LVSI, 26 patients (65%) had a tumor size≥2cm. With median follow-up time of 42.0 months, 90% of patients were in complete remission and four patients (10%) experienced tumor relapse, all in the peritoneal cavity, and associated with synchronous pelvic lymph node failure in 2/4 patients. No vaginal or isolated pelvic nodal failure was reported. At 5 year, overall survival was 83.6% (CI95%: 67.8-100%) and disease-free survival was 85.1% (CI95%: 72.6-99.9%). In univariate analysis, probability of relapse correlated with tumor size≥3cm (P=0.004). No acute or late toxicity grade more than 2 was reported. CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy alone was a well-tolerated adjuvant treatment for selected patients with intermediate risk factors. The risk of relapse in patients with tumor size≥3cm was however high, suggesting that EBRT is more appropriate in this situation.

ESMO recommendations on predictive biomarker testing for homologous recombination deficiency and PARP inhibitor benefit in ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) is a frequent feature of high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma (HGSC) and is associated with sensitivity to PARP inhibitor (PARPi) therapy. HRD testing provides an opportunity to optimise PARPi use in HGSC but methodologies are diverse and clinical application remains controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To define best practice for HRD testing in HGSC the ESMO Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group launched a collaborative project that incorporated a systematic review approach. The main aims were to (i) define the term 'HRD test'; (ii) provide an overview of the biological rationale and the level of evidence supporting currently available HRD tests; (iii) provide recommendations on the clinical utility of HRD tests in clinical management of HGSC. RESULTS: A broad range of repair genes, genomic scars, mutational signatures and functional assays are associated with a history of HRD. Currently, the clinical validity of HRD tests in ovarian cancer is best assessed, not in terms of biological HRD status per se, but in terms of PARPi benefit. Clinical trials evidence supports the use of BRCA mutation testing and two commercially available assays that also incorporate genomic instability for identifying subgroups of HGSCs that derive different magnitudes of benefit from PARPi therapy, albeit with some variation by clinical scenario. These tests can be used to inform treatment selection and scheduling but their use is limited by a failure to consistently identify a subgroup of patients who derive no benefit from PARPis in most studies. Existing tests lack negative predictive value and inadequately address the complex and dynamic nature of the HRD phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available HRD tests are useful for predicting likely magnitude of benefit from PARPis but better biomarkers are urgently needed to better identify current homologous recombination proficiency status and stratify HGSC management.

Implementation of image-guided brachytherapy as part of non-surgical treatment in inoperable endometrial cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed outcomes of inoperable endometrial cancer (IEC) patients treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by a 3D image-guided brachytherapy boost. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with EBRT followed by 3D image-guided brachytherapy for IEC were retrospectively included. EBRT delivered a dose of 45Gy. Then, patients had an uterovaginal brachytherapy guided by 3D imaging. Clinical target volume (CTVBT) included the whole uterus and the initial disease extent. Gross tumour volume (GTVres) included the residual disease at time of brachytherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified. Causes of inoperability were comorbidities (37%) or tumour loco regional extent (63%). Including EBRT and brachytherapy, the median D90 (minimal dose delivered to 90% of the volume) was 60.7 GyEQD2 (IQR = 56.4-64.2) for the CTVBT, and was 73.6 GyEQD2 (IQR = 64.1-83.7) for the GTVres. The median overall treatment time was 50 days (IQR = 46-54). The mean follow-up was 36.5 months (SD = 30.2). The cumulative incidence of local, pelvic and distant failures was 19% (n = 5), 7% (n = 2) and 26% (n = 7), respectively. Five-year overall survival was 63% (95% CI = 43-91). Late urinary and gastro intestinal toxicities ≥ grade 2 were reported in four (15%) and two patients (7%) respectively. No vaginal toxicity ≥ grade 2 was reported. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT followed by intracavitary brachytherapy seems to be an effective option for IEC. The implementation of 3D concepts at time of brachytherapy may contribute to high local control probability and low toxicity profile. Large scale retrospective or prospective data are needed to confirm these early data.

Comprehensive analysis of patient outcome after local recurrence of locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiation and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Since dose escalation allowed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), local relapses have become a rare event. Only scarce data are available on the outcome of patients experiencing a local relapse after IGABT. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2016, all consecutive patients treated at Gustave Roussy Institute for LACC and receiving concomitant chemoradiation and IGABT were analysed. Clinical and treatment-related prognostic factors for survival after local relapse were searched, in order to potentially identify patients requiring salvage treatment. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were treated during this period. With a median follow-up of 4.1 years, 10.8% (n = 28) had a local relapse. Among these patients, 53.6% had synchronous lymph nodes or distant metastatic relapse and only 13 patients (5% of all patients) had isolated local relapse. After local relapse, median survival was 47 months and three patients were alive at last follow-up. Only three patients with local relapse could receive salvage surgery (10.7%). Metastases occurrence and pelvic wall involvement were the main contraindications (67.9%) for salvage surgery. Among the three patients treated with surgery, two are still alive at last follow-up without significant complication. Improved survival was observed among the two patients who could have surgery (p = .02). Local progression led to serious symptoms in 75% of patients. Only the time interval between brachytherapy and relapse (<1 year) was prognostic for 2-year overall survival (p = .005). CONCLUSION: Salvage surgery is feasible in a very low number of highly selected patients with local relapse following IGABT. Local failure is a major cause of severe local symptoms, confirming that every effort should be done to achieve long-term local control through dose escalation.

Management of epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, primary peritoneum. Long text of the joint French clinical practice guidelines issued by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY, endorsed by INCa. (Part 2: systemic, intraperitoneal treatment, elderly patients, fertility preservation, follow-up).

Adjuvant chemotherapy by carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended for all high-grade ovarian and tubal cancers (FIGO stages I-IIA) (grade A). After primary surgery is complete, 6 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (grade A) are recommended, or a discussion with the patient about intraperitoneal chemotherapy, according to her risk-benefit ratio. After complete interval surgery for FIGO stage III, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed, in accordance with the modalities of the OV-HIPEC trial (grade B). In cases of postoperative tumor residue or in FIGO stage IV tumors, chemotherapy associated with bevacizumab is recommended (grade A).

Management of epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneum. Long text of the Joint French Clinical Practice Guidelines issued by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, and GINECO-ARCAGY, and endorsed by INCa. Part 1: Diagnostic exploration and staging, surgery, perioperative care, and pathology.

An MRI is recommended for an ovarian mass that is indeterminate on ultrasound. The ROMA score (combining CA125 and HE4) can also be calculated (grade A). In presumed early-stage ovarian or tubal cancers, the following procedures should be performed: an omentectomy (at a minimum, infracolic), an appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, peritoneal cytology (grade C), and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomies (grade B) for all histologic types, except the expansile mucinous subtypes, for which lymphadenectomies can be omitted (grade C). Minimally invasive surgery is recommended for early-stage ovarian cancer, when there is no risk of tumor rupture (grade B). For FIGO stages III or IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancers, a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax/abdomen/pelvis is recommended (grade B), as well as laparoscopic exploration to take multiple biopsies (grade A) and a carcinomatosis score (Fagotti score at a minimum) (grade C) to assess the possibility of complete surgery (i.e., leaving no macroscopic tumor residue). Complete surgery by a midline laparotomy is recommended for advanced ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer (grade B). For advanced cancers, para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomies are recommended when metastatic adenopathy is clinically or radiologically suspected (grade B). When adenopathy is not suspected and when complete peritoneal surgery is performed as the initial surgery for advanced cancer, the lymphadenectomies can be omitted because they do not modify either the medical treatment or overall survival (grade B). Primary surgery (before other treatment) is recommended whenever it appears possible to leave no tumor residue (grade B).

Management of epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneum. Short text of the French Clinical Practice Guidelines issued by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, and GINECO-ARCAGY, and endorsed by INCa.

An MRI is recommended for an ovarian mass that is indeterminate on ultrasound. The ROMA score (combining CA125 and HE4) can also be calculated (Grade A). In presumed early-stage ovarian or tubal cancers, the following procedures should be performed: an omentectomy (at a minimum, infracolic), an appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, peritoneal cytology (grade C), and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomies (Grade B) for all histologic types, except the expansile mucinous subtypes, for which lymphadenectomies can be omitted (grade C). Minimally invasive surgery is recommended for early-stage ovarian cancer, when there is no risk of tumor rupture (grade B). Adjuvant chemotherapy by carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended for all high-grade ovarian and tubal cancers (FIGO stages I-IIA) (grade A). For FIGO stage III or IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancers, a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax/abdomen/pelvis is recommended (Grade B), as well as laparoscopic exploration to take multiple biopsies (grade A) and a carcinomatosis score (Fagotti score at a minimum) (grade C) to assess the possibility of complete surgery (i.e., leaving no macroscopic tumor residue). Complete surgery by a midline laparotomy is recommended for advanced ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancers (grade B). For advanced cancers, para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomies are recommended when metastatic adenopathy is clinically or radiologically suspected (grade B). When adenopathy is not suspected and when complete peritoneal surgery is performed as the initial surgery for advanced cancer, the lymphadenectomies can be omitted because they do not modify either the medical treatment or overall survival (grade B). Primary surgery (before other treatment) is recommended whenever it appears possible to leave no tumor residue (grade B). After primary surgery is complete, 6 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (grade A) are recommended, or a discussion with the patient about intraperitoneal chemotherapy, according to her risk-benefit ratio. After complete interval surgery for FIGO stage III disease, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed, in accordance with the modalities of the OV-HIPEC trial (grade B). In cases of postoperative tumor residue or in FIGO stage IV tumors, chemotherapy associated with bevacizumab is recommended (grade A).

[Part II drafted from the short text of the French guidelines entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY and endorsed by INCa. (Systemic and intraperitoneal treatment, elderly, fertility preservation, follow-up)]. / Partie 2 rédigée à partir de la synthèse de la recommandation nationale de bonnes pratiques cliniques intitulée « Conduites à tenir initiales devant des patientes atteintes d'un cancer épithélial de l'ovaire ¼ élaborée par FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY et labélisée par l'INCa. (Traitement systémique et intrapéritonéal, personnes âgées, préservation de la fertilité et suivi).

Adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended for all high-grade ovarian or Fallopian tube cancers, stage FIGO I-IIA (grade A). After a complete first surgery, it is recommended to deliver 6 cycles of intravenous (grade A) or to propose intraperitoneal (grade B) chemotherapy, to be discussed with patient, according to the benefit/risk ratio. After a complete interval surgery for a FIGO III stage, the hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed in the same conditions of the OV-HIPEC trial (grade B). In case of tumor residue after surgery or FIGO stage IV, chemotherapy associated with bevacizumab is recommended (grade A). For BRCA mutated patient, Olaparib is recommended (grade B).

[Part I drafted from the short text of the French Guidelines entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY and endorsed by INCa. (Diagnosis management, surgery, perioperative care, and pathological analysis)]. / Partie 1 rédigée sur la base de la recommandation nationale de bonnes pratiques cliniques en cancérologie intitulée « Conduites à tenir initiales devant des patientes atteintes d'un cancer épithélial de l'ovaire ¼ élaborée par FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY et labélisée par l'INCa. (Explorations diagnostiques et bilan d'extension, chirurgie, soins périopératoires et anatomopathologie).

Faced to an undetermined ovarian mass on ultrasound, an MRI is recommended and the ROMA score (combining CA125 and HE4) can be proposed (grade A). In case of suspected early stage ovarian or fallopian tube cancer, omentectomy (at least infracolonic), appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, peritoneal cytology (grade C) and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy are recommended (grade B) for all histological types, except for the expansive mucinous subtype where lymphadenectomy may be omitted (grade C). Minimally invasive surgery is recommended for early stage ovarian cancer, if there is no risk of tumor rupture (grade B). Laparoscopic exploration for multiple biopsies (grade A) and to evaluate carcinomatosis score (at least using the Fagotti score) (grade C) are recommended to estimate the possibility of a complete surgery (i.e. no macroscopic residue). Complete medial laparotomy surgery is recommended for advanced cancers (grade B). It is recommended in advanced cancers to perform para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in case of clinical or radiological suspicion of metastatic lymph node (grade B). In the absence of clinical or radiological lymphadenopathy and in case of complete peritoneal surgery during an initial surgery for advanced cancer, it is possible not to perform a lymphadenectomy because it does not modify the medical treatment and the overall survival (grade B). Primary surgery is recommended when no tumor residue is possible (grade B).

[Biopathology of ovarian carcinomas early and advanced-stages: Article drafted from the French guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa]. / Biopathologie des carcinomes ovariens des stades précoces et avancés. Article rédigé sur la base de la recommandation nationale de bonnes pratiques cliniques en cancérologie intitulée « Conduites à tenir initiales devant des patientes atteintes d'un cancer épithélial de l'ovaire ¼ élaborée par FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY sous l'égide du CNGOF et labellisée par l'INCa.

OBJECTIVES: Ovarian carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of lesions with specific therapeutic management for each histological subtype. Thus, the correct histological diagnosis is mandatory. MATERIAL AND METHODS: References were searched by PubMed from January 2000 to January 2018 and original articles in French and English literature were selected. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In case of ovarian mass suspicious for cancer, a frozen section analysis may be proposed, if it could impact the surgical management. A positive histological diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma (type and grade) has to be rendered on histological (and not cytological) material before any chemotherapy with multiples and large sized biopsies. In case of needle biopsy, at least three fragments with needles>16G are needed. Histological biopsies need to be formalin-fixed (4% formaldehyde) less than 1h after resection and at least 6hours fixation is mandatory for small size biopsies. Tissue transfer to pathological labs up to 48hours under vacuum and at +4°C (in case of large surgical specimens) may be an alternative. Gross examination should include the description of all specimens and their integrity, the site of the tumor and the dimension of all specimens and nodules. Multiples sampling is needed, including the capsule, the solid areas, at least 1 to 2 blocks per cm of tumor for mucinous lesions, the Fallopian tube in toto, at least 3 blocks on grossly normal omentum and one block on the largest omental nodule. WHO classification should be used to classify the carcinoma (type and grade), with the use of a panel of immunohistochemical markers. High-grade ovarian carcinomas (serous and endometrioid) should be tested for BRCA mutation and in case of a detectable tumor mutation, the patient should be referred to an oncogenetic consultation.