The DICA Endoscopic Classification for Diverticular Disease of the Colon Shows a Significant Interobserver Agreement among Community Endoscopists: an International Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Diverticular Inflammation and Complication Assessment (DICA) endoscopic classification of diverticulosis and diverticular disease (DD) is currently available. It scores severity of the disease as DICA 1, DICA 2 and DICA 3. Our aim was to assess the agreement on this classification in an international endoscopists community setting. METHODS: A total of 96 doctors (82.9% endoscopists) independently scored a set of DD endoscopic videos. The percentages of overall agreement on DICA score and a free-marginal multirater kappa (κ) coefficient were reported as statistical measures of interrater agreement. RESULTS: Overall agreement in using DICA was 91.8% with a free-marginal kappa of 88% (95% CI 80-95). The overall agreement levels were: DICA 1, 85.2%; DICA 2, 96.5%; DICA 3, 99.5%. The free marginal κ was: DICA 1 = 0.753, DICA 2 = 0.958, DICA 3 = 0.919. The agreement about the main endoscopic items was 83.4% (k 67%) for diverticular extension, 62.6% (k 65%) for number of diverticula for each district, 86.8% (k 82%) for presence of inflammation, and 98.5 (k 98%) for presence of complications. CONCLUSIONS: The overall interrater agreement in this study ranges from good to very good. DICA score is a simple and reproducible endoscopic scoring system for diverticulosis and DD.

Prevalence of Colonic Diverticulosis in Patients Affected by Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Diverticulosis of the colon is an acquired condition that results from herniation of the mucosa and submucosa through defects in the muscular layer. The true prevalence of colonic diverticulosis is difficult to measure because most individuals are asymptomatic. In particularly, in literature, there are few studies about the prevalence of colonic diverticulosis in patients affected by ulcerative colitis (UC). GOALS: To investigate the prevalence of colonic diverticulosis in UC and in adult patients referred in a single center. STUDY: Consecutive patients, referred to our institution to undergo a colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and/or for UC assessment, between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014, were studied. RESULTS: Six hundred five consecutive patients were studied: 438 (72.4%) due to colorectal cancer screening (group A) and 167 (27.6%) for UC assessment (group B). Prevalence of colonic diverticulosis was higher in group A than group B (27.8% vs. 10.8%, P<0.0001). Female gender in patients with colonic diverticulosis was higher in group A than group B (55.7% vs. 22.2%, P=0.0106). Sigma and left colon was mainly involved in group A than group B (97.6% vs. 66.7%, P=0.0001), whereas in group B the right colon was mainly involved in group B versus group A (22.2% vs. 0.8%, P=0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of colonic diverticulosis was significantly lower in patients with UC than in control group. UC may, therefore, be a protective factor for colonic diverticulosis occurrence.

Managing ambulatory ulcerative colitis patients with infliximab: a long term follow-up study in primary gastroenterology centers.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) is the key treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC) unresponsive to standard treatments. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of IFX in treating ambulatory UC patients in primary gastroenterology centers. METHODS: One hundred and eighteen patients (65 M, 63 F, median age 34 years, range 19-71 years), affected by UC, were treated with IFX. Clinical efficacy, safety, mucosal healing (MH), and histological healing (HH) were assessed at a scheduled follow-up of 42 months. RESULTS: Percentage of patients with clinical remission persistence at 42-month follow-up was 70.4%. Colectomy occurred in only 3 patients (2.7%). At 42-month follow-up percentage of patients with MH was 44.6%, and percentage of patients with HH was 24.3%. HH at 6-month follow-up occurred in 13 out of 34 patients (38.2%) with C-reactive protein (CRP) <3 and in 8 out of 76 patients (10.5%) with CRP ≥ 3 (p=0.002). Side effects were reported in 16 patients (13.6%): infusion reactions occurred in 7 patients, other severe side-effects occurred in 3 patients, and opportunistic infections occurred in 3 patients (2.5%). Finally, 3 cancers (2.5%) occurred during the follow-up period (1 breast, 1 kidney and 1 rectal cancer). Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed Hb <11.5 g/dL and HH at 6-month follow-up to be significantly associated with treatment failure during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IFX seems to be effective and safe in long-term treatment of outpatients affected by UC.

Effectiveness and safety of infliximab and adalimumab for ambulatory Crohn's disease patients in primary gastroenterology centres.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) are the key treatments for Crohn's Disease (CD), unresponsive to standard treatments. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of IFX and ADA in treating CD in clinical practice. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six patients (61 M, 65 F, mean age 36.2 years, range 19-67 years), affected by CD, were treated with infliximab (IFX, 59 patients) or adalimumab (ADA, 66 patients). Clinical efficacy, mucosal healing (MH), histological healing (HH), and safety were assessed. MH was defined complicated if healing of ulcers occurred with deformation of bowel profile and/or complete colonoscopy was impossible because of scars. RESULTS: Patients were followed-up for 36 months. No difference was found between IFX and ADA in maintaining long-term clinical remission, MH and HH. Complicated MH was present in 17 (28.8%) patients in IFX group and in 7 (10.6%) patients in ADA group (p=0.012). In 9 (15.2%) patients in IFX group and 2 (3.0%) patients in ADA group colonoscopy was incomplete without cecal intubation or terminal ileum exploration (p=0.024). Side effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both IFX and ADA seem to be effective and safe in long-term outpatient treatment of CD in clinical practice.

Screening for pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals: a call for endoscopic ultrasound.

Pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis, and early detection through screening is likely to be our best hope to improve survival. The relatively low incidence of pancreatic cancer and the insensitive screening techniques available currently render this approach prohibitively expensive and inefficient in the general population. Screening has begun, however, in the subset of patients at the highest risk of disease, such as those with inherited risk due to familial multiorgan cancer syndromes or in familial groupings of pancreatic cancer with yet unidentified genetic abnormalities, termed familial pancreatic cancer. Screening is currently done at several large centers in the world, each with a unique multidisciplinary approach and series of screening tests. Endoscopic ultrasound has emerged as the most promising imaging test given its high sensitivity and potential for tissue sampling. However, this potential to detect and cure early lesions should be carefully balanced with the risk of overtreatment, especially in view of the morbidity and mortality of pancreatic surgery. Additional experience to help determine the best screening strategy is greatly needed. Screening should therefore be done at experienced centers with multidisciplinary teams of specialists and in the context of research protocols.

Evaluation of hilar biliary strictures by using a newly developed forward-viewing therapeutic echoendoscope: preliminary results of an ongoing experience.

BACKGROUND: Obtaining a definitive tissue diagnosis in patients with hilar biliary strictures (HBS) is often difficult. OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience using a newly developed forward-viewing linear echoendoscope (FVL-EUS) with FNA as a primary diagnostic tool in patients with HBS. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: A tertiary care, academic medical center. PATIENTS: Four patients with HBS who underwent the procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Performance of FNA with the FVL-EUS. RESULTS: Visualization and puncture of the primary lesion with a definitive tissue diagnosis was obtained in all of the 4 cases performed. Metastatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma and recurrent neuroendocrine tumor were diagnosed in 2 patients and followed by placement of a self-expandable metal stent, when possible. In the other 2 patients, a diagnosis of resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of unclear origin without evidence of vascular involvement was made, and plastic stents were placed before surgery; the first patient was found to have peritoneal metastases, and resection was aborted, and in the second patient, a gallbladder tumor was diagnosed in the surgical specimen. LIMITATION: The small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that FVL-EUS used as a primary tool for the evaluation of patients with HBS may be of value and should be further explored in properly designed studies with a meaningful number of patients.