Effect modification of cancer on the association between dysphagia and mortality in early idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVE: The interplay between dysphagia, cancer, and mortality in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) has not been carefully studied. The aim of this study was to investigate possible effect modification of cancer on the association between dysphagia and mortality in early IIM. METHODS: A multi-center cohort of 230 adult IIM patients with dysphagia assessment within 6 months of disease onset was assembled. Crude mortality rates in IIM patients exposed or not to dysphagia were estimated for the 5-year period following cohort entry. To explore possible effect modification of cancer on the association between dysphagia and mortality, adjusted Cox models stratified on cancer status were performed as well as an interaction model. RESULTS: Mortality rates per 100 person-years for IIM patients exposed to dysphagia were 2.3 (95 %CI 1.0 to 4.5) in those without cancer compared to 33.3 (95 %CI 16.6 to 59.5) in those with cancer. In stratified Cox models, the main effect of dysphagia was HR 0.5 (95 %CI 0.2 to 1.5) in non-cancer and 3.1 (95 %CI 1.0 to 10.2) in cancer patients. In the interaction model, the combination of dysphagia and cancer yielded a HR of 6.4 (1.2 to 35.1). CONCLUSION: In this IIM cohort, dysphagia in non-cancer patients was not associated with increased mortality, while it was in presence of cancer, supporting effect modification of cancer on the association between dysphagia and mortality. This suggests that IIM patients with and without cancer differ and separate analyses for the two groups should be conducted when the outcome of interest is mortality.

Epidemiology of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a heterogeneous group of systemic autoimmune diseases that affect the skeletal muscles and can also involve the skin, joints, lungs and heart. The epidemiology of IIM is obscured by changing classification criteria and the inherent shortcomings of case identification using healthcare record diagnostic coding. The incidence of IIM is estimated to range from 0.2 to 2 per 100,000 person-years, with prevalence from 2 to 25 per 100,000 people. Although the effects of age and gender on incidence are known, there is only sparse understanding of ethnic differences, particularly in indigenous populations. The incidence of IIM has reportedly increased in the twenty-first century, but whether this is a genuine increase is not yet known. Understanding of the genetic risk factors for different IIM subtypes has advanced considerably. Infections, medications, malignancy and geography are also commonly identified risk factors. Potentially, the COVID-19 pandemic has altered IIM incidence, although evidence of this occurrence is limited to case reports and small case series. Consideration of the current understanding of the epidemiology of IIM can highlight important areas of interest for future research into these rare diseases.

Myositis with prominent B cell aggregates may meet classification criteria for sporadic inclusion body myositis.

The objective of this study was to report the clinical, serological and pathological features of patients with autoimmune myositis other than dermatomyositis, who displayed both muscle weakness on physical examination and prominent B cell aggregates on muscle pathology, defined as ≥ 30 CD20+ cells/aggregate. Specifically, the presence of a brachio-cervical inflammatory myopathies or a sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) phenotype was recorded. Over a three-year period, eight patients were identified from two university neuropathology referral centers. Seven of 8 (88%) patients had an associated connective tissue disease (CTD): rheumatoid arthritis (n=3), systemic sclerosis (n=2), Sjögren's syndrome (n=1) and systemic lupus erythematosus (n=1), while one patient died on initial presentation without a complete serological and cancer investigation. A brachio-cervical phenotype, i.e. neck weakness, proximal weakness more than distal and shoulder abduction weakness greater than hip flexors, was seen in two patients (25%), while one patient had both proximal and diaphragmatic weakness. In contrast, an IBM-like clinical phenotype was seen in the last five patients (63%), who either had finger flexor weakness and/or quadriceps weakness ≤ 4 on the manual muscle testing MRC-5 scale. Although these 5 patients met at least one set of classification criteria for sIBM, an integrated clinico-sero-pathological approach argued against a diagnosis of sIBM. In summary, in a weak patient with myositis plus an associated CTD and lymphoid aggregates at muscle pathology, B cell predominant aggregates may represent a morphological biomarker against a diagnosis of sIBM.

Capillary pathology with prominent basement membrane reduplication is the hallmark histopathological feature of scleromyositis.

AIMS: We aim to perform ultrastructural and histopathological analysis of muscle biopsies from a large group of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients, including some with early/mild SSc features, and examine whether capillary pathology differentiates 'scleromyositis' (SM) from other auto-immune myositis (AIM) subsets. METHODS: Muscle biopsies from a total of 60 SM patients and 43 AIM controls from two independent cohorts were examined by electron microscopy, collagen-4 immunofluorescence (Col4IF) and routine light microscopy. RESULTS: Ultrastructural examination revealed prominent capillary basement membrane (BM) reduplication (4+ layers in >50% of capillaries) in 65% of SM vs 0% of AIM controls (p < 0.001). In SM cases without prominent BM reduplication, capillary dilation was the most distinctive feature, present in 8% of capillaries in SM vs 2% in controls (p = 0.001). Accumulation of ensheathed pericyte processes was another characteristic feature of SM and closely correlated with the degree of BM reduplication (r = 0.833, p < 0.001). On light microscopy, BM marker Col4IF revealed more frequent capillary enlargement in SM than in controls (84% vs 21%, p < 0.001). SM cases were classified as non-inflammatory myopathy (36%), non-specific myositis (33%) or immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (31%), but despite this histopathological heterogeneity, prominent BM reduplication remained a constant finding. In the 16 SM patients with early/mild SSc features, 63% showed prominent BM reduplication. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that capillary pathology, and in particular prominent capillary BM reduplication, is the hallmark histopathological feature of SM even in patients with early/mild SSc and support the concept of SM as an organ manifestation of SSc and a distinct subset of AIM.

Myositis with prominent B-cell aggregates causing shrinking lung syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Shrinking lung syndrome (SLS) is a rare manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) characterized by decreased lung volumes and diaphragmatic weakness in a dyspneic patient. Chest wall dysfunction secondary to pleuritis is the most commonly proposed cause. In this case report, we highlight a new potential mechanism of SLS in SLE, namely diaphragmatic weakness associated with myositis with CD20 positive B-cell aggregates. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old Caucasian woman was diagnosed with SLE and secondary Sjögren's syndrome based on a history of pleuritis, constrictive pericarditis, polyarthritis, photosensitivity, alopecia, oral ulcers, xerophthalmia and xerostomia. Serologies were significant for positive antinuclear antibodies, anti-SSA, lupus anticoagulant and anti-cardiolopin. Blood work revealed a low C3 and C4, lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia. She was treated with with low-dose prednisone and remained in remission with oral hydroxychloroquine. Seven years later, she developed mild proximal muscle weakness and exertional dyspnea. Pulmonary function testing revealed a restrictive pattern with small lung volumes. Pulmonary imaging showed elevation of the right hemidiaphragm without evidence of interstitial lung disease. Diaphragmatic ultrasound was suggestive of profound diaphragmatic weakness and dysfunction. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of SLS was made. Her proximal muscle weakness was investigated, and creatine kinase (CK) levels were normal. Electromyography revealed fibrillation potentials in the biceps, iliopsoas, cervical and thoracic paraspinal muscles, and complex repetitive discharges in cervical paraspinal muscles. Biceps muscle biopsy revealed dense endomysial lymphocytic aggregates rich in CD20 positive B cells, perimysial fragmentation with plasma cell-rich perivascular infiltrates, diffuse sarcolemmal upregulation of class I MHC, perifascicular upregulation of class II MHC, and focal sarcolemmal deposition of C5b-9. Treatment with prednisone 15 mg/day and oral mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day was initiated. Shortness of breath and proximal muscle weakness improved significantly. CONCLUSION: Diaphragmatic weakness was the inaugural manifestation of myositis in this patient with SLE. The spectrum of myologic manifestations of myositis with prominent CD20 positive B-cell aggregates in SLE now includes normal CK levels and diaphragmatic involvement, in association with SLS.

Scleromyositis: A distinct novel entity within the systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis spectrum. Implications for care and pathogenesis.

Systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis are both associated with decreased quality of life and increased mortality. Their prognosis and management largely depend on the disease subgroups. Indeed, systemic sclerosis is a heterogeneous disease, the two predominant forms of the disease being limited and diffuse scleroderma. Autoimmune myositis is also a heterogeneous group of myopathies that classically encompass necrotizing myopathy, antisynthetase syndrome, dermatomyositis and inclusion body myositis. Recent data revealed that an additional disease subset, denominated "scleromyositis", should be recognized within both the systemic sclerosis and the autoimmune myositis spectrum. We performed an in-depth review of the literature with the aim of better delineating scleromyositis. Our review highlights that this concept is supported by recent clinical, serological and histopathological findings that have important implications for patient management and understanding of the disease pathophysiology. As compared with other subsets of systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis, scleromyositis patients can present with a characteristic pattern of muscle involvement (i.e. distribution of muscle weakness) along with multisystemic involvement, and some of these extra-muscular complications are associated with poor prognosis. Several autoantibodies have been specifically associated with scleromyositis, but they are not currently integrated in diagnostic and classification criteria for systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis. Finally, striking vasculopathic lesions at muscle biopsy have been shown to be hallmarks of scleromyositis, providing a strong anatomopathological substratum for the concept of scleromyositis. These findings bring new insights into the pathogenesis of scleromyositis and help to diagnose this condition, in patients with subtle SSc features and/or no autoantibodies (i.e. "seronegative" scleromyositis). No guidelines are available for the management of these patients, but recent data are showing the way towards a new therapeutic approach dedicated to these patients.

Autoantibody profiles delineate distinct subsets of scleromyositis.

OBJECTIVE: Scleromyositis remains incompletely characterized owing in part to its heterogeneity. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of autoantibody profiles to define subsets of scleromyositis. METHODS: Subjects with scleromyositis from a prospective cohort were divided into three groups based on autoantibody profiles: subjects with SSc-specific autoantibodies (anti-centromere, -topoisomerase 1, -RNA polymerase III, -Th/To, -fibrillarin), subjects with SSc-overlap autoantibodies (anti-PM/Scl, -U1RNP, -Ku) and subjects without SSc-related autoantibodies. Clinical features, laboratory tests and histopathological findings were retrieved and compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 42 scleromyositis subjects (79% female, mean age at diagnosis 55 years, mean disease duration 3.5 years), 8 (19%) subjects had SSc-specific autoantibodies, 14 (33%) SSc-overlap autoantibodies and 20 (48%) had no SSc-related autoantibodies. One-third had no skin involvement, a finding more frequent in the SSc-overlap subjects and those without SSc-related autoantibodies. Proximal and distal weakness was common and head drop/bent spine was found in 50% of the SSc-specific and 35% of the subjects without SSc-related autoantibodies. Of note, the group without SSc-related autoantibodies had the only cases of severe cardiac systolic dysfunction (n = 1) and scleroderma renal crisis (n = 1), as well as three out of the four cancers and three out of the four deaths. CONCLUSION: In this carefully phenotyped series of scleromyositis subjects, absence of SSc-related autoantibodies was common and associated with distinct features and poor prognosis. Future studies are needed to validate these results and possibly identify novel autoantibodies or other biomarkers associated with scleromyositis.

Distribution and trajectory of direct and indirect costs of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the annual direct and indirect costs associated with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIM) over time, including the pre-diagnostic period. METHODS: A cohort of incident adult IIM patients (n = 673) was identified from the Swedish National Patient Register from 2010 to 2016 and matched with general population comparators (n = 3343). Follow-up started at IIM diagnosis and corresponding date in the general population. International Classification of Diseases codes (ICD-10) were used for IIM case definition. Costs were calculated using national register data. RESULTS: The costs related to IIM started to increase 2 years before diagnosis. In the year following diagnosis, the mean annual IIM cost was €21 639 compared to €4816 in the general population. Five years after diagnosis, the mean annual cost in the IIM cohort was €12 796. Outpatient visits, hospitalizations and productivity loss were the components driving the increment in overall annual disease-related expenditures. Indirect costs accounted for a significant portion of IIM long-term societal costs. The highest costs were found in individuals of working age with cancer-associated IIM. CONCLUSIONS: The mean annual costs in IIM were 3 to 5 times higher than in the general population in the 5-year period following diagnosis. These costs started to increase long before diagnosis, were at their peak in the year post-diagnosis and remained elevated thereafter. Indirect costs contributed to a substantial portion of this increment. Early in the IIM disease course, clinicians and allied health professionals should aim to improve function, reduce damage and address barriers to return-to-work to mitigate these costs.