Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
1.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 132(2): 124-176, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38108678

RESUMO

This practice parameter update focuses on 7 areas in which there are new evidence and new recommendations. Diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis have been revised, and patterns of anaphylaxis are defined. Measurement of serum tryptase is important for diagnosis of anaphylaxis and to identify underlying mast cell disorders. In infants and toddlers, age-specific symptoms may differ from older children and adults, patient age is not correlated with reaction severity, and anaphylaxis is unlikely to be the initial reaction to an allergen on first exposure. Different community settings for anaphylaxis require specific measures for prevention and treatment of anaphylaxis. Optimal prescribing and use of epinephrine autoinjector devices require specific counseling and training of patients and caregivers, including when and how to administer the epinephrine autoinjector and whether and when to call 911. If epinephrine is used promptly, immediate activation of emergency medical services may not be required if the patient experiences a prompt, complete, and durable response. For most medical indications, the risk of stopping or changing beta-blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor medication may exceed the risk of more severe anaphylaxis if the medication is continued, especially in patients with insect sting anaphylaxis. Evaluation for mastocytosis, including a bone marrow biopsy, should be considered for adult patients with severe insect sting anaphylaxis or recurrent idiopathic anaphylaxis. After perioperative anaphylaxis, repeat anesthesia may proceed in the context of shared decision-making and based on the history and results of diagnostic evaluation with skin tests or in vitro tests when available, and supervised challenge when necessary.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos , Mastocitose , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/tratamento farmacológico , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Mastocitose/diagnóstico , Alérgenos
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 151(2): 386-398, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36370881

RESUMO

These evidence-based guidelines support patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders in decisions about the use of intranasal corticosteroids (INCS), biologics, and aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD) for the management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). It is important to note that the current evidence on surgery for CRSwNP was not assessed for this guideline nor were management options other than INCS, biologics, and ATAD. The Allergy-Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to include the views of multiple stakeholders and to minimize potential biases. Systematic reviews for each management option informed the guideline. The guideline panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to inform and develop recommendations. The guideline panel reached consensus on the following statements: (1) In people with CRSwNP, the guideline panel suggests INCS rather than no INCS (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence). (2) In people with CRSwNP, the guideline panel suggests biologics rather than no biologics (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence). (3) In people with aspirin (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug)-exacerbated respiratory disease, the guideline panel suggests ATAD rather than no ATAD (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence). The conditions for each recommendation are discussed in the guideline.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Pólipos Nasais , Rinite , Sinusite , Humanos , Sinusite/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Administração Intranasal , Pólipos Nasais/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Crônica , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Rinite/tratamento farmacológico
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 150(6): 1447-1459, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35970310

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is associated with a significant disease burden. The optimal use of and administration route for intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) when managing CRSwNP are unclear. OBJECTIVE: We systematically synthesized the evidence addressing INCS for CRSwNP. METHODS: We searched studies archived in Medline, Embase, and Central from database inception until September 1, 2021, for randomized controlled trials comparing INCS using any delivery method to placebo or other INCS administration types. Paired reviewers screened records, abstracted data, and rated risk of bias (CLARITY revision of Cochrane Risk of Bias version 1 tool) independently and in duplicate. We synthesized the evidence for each outcome using random effects network meta-analyses. We critically appraised the evidence following the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: We analyzed 61 randomized controlled trials (7176 participants, 8 interventions). Sinusitis-related quality of life might improve with INCS rinse (mean difference [MD] -6.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] -11.94 to -1.71) and exhalation delivery system (EDS) (MD -7.86, 95% CI -14.64 to -1.08) compared to placebo (both low certainty evidence). Nasal obstruction symptoms are likely improved when receiving INCS via stent/dressing (MD -0.31, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.08), spray (MD -0.51, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.41), and EDS (MD -0.35, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.18) (all moderate to high certainty) compared to placebo. We found no important differences in adverse effects among interventions (moderate certainty for INCS spray, very low to low certainty for others). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple delivery forms of INCS are viable therapeutic options for CRSwNP, resulting in improvement of patient-important outcomes. INCS via stent, spray, and EDS appear to be beneficial across the widest range of considered outcomes.


Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Metanálise em Rede
4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 9(10): 3546-3567, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34153517

RESUMO

Concerns for anaphylaxis may hamper severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunization efforts. We convened a multidisciplinary group of international experts in anaphylaxis composed of allergy, infectious disease, emergency medicine, and front-line clinicians to systematically develop recommendations regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccine immediate allergic reactions. Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, the World Health Organizstion (WHO) global coronavirus database, and the gray literature (inception, March 19, 2021) were systematically searched. Paired reviewers independently selected studies addressing anaphylaxis after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and polysorbate allergy, and accuracy of allergy testing for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allergy. Random effects models synthesized the data to inform recommendations based on the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, agreed upon using a modified Delphi panel. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine anaphylaxis is 7.91 cases per million (n = 41,000,000 vaccinations; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 4.02-15.59; 26 studies, moderate certainty), the incidence of 0.15 cases per million patient-years (95% CI 0.11-0.2), and the sensitivity for PEG skin testing is poor, although specificity is high (15 studies, very low certainty). We recommend vaccination over either no vaccination or performing SARS-CoV-2 vaccine/excipient screening allergy testing for individuals without history of a severe allergic reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine/excipient, and a shared decision-making paradigm in consultation with an allergy specialist for individuals with a history of a severe allergic reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine/excipient. We recommend further research to clarify SARS-CoV-2 vaccine/vaccine excipient testing utility in individuals potentially allergic to SARS-CoV2 vaccines or their excipients.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , COVID-19 , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Consenso , Abordagem GRADE , Humanos , RNA Viral , SARS-CoV-2
5.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 8(5): 1559-1564, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32142965

RESUMO

Chronic rhinosinusitis, historically, has been considered to be caused by upper airway anatomical abnormalities. However, today that concept has changed, for it is now recognized as an inflammatory disorder of the nasal and sinus mucosa. Acute rhinosinusitis is usually caused by a viral infection, whereas chronic rhinosinusitis is a persistent and heterogeneous inflammatory disorder with increased expression of type 1, 2, or 17 cytokines in the nasal and sinus mucosa, similar to that which occurs in asthma. Exacerbations are caused by aeroallergens in the allergic individual and irritants, pollutants, and viral/bacterial infections in all subjects. It may be categorized by phenotypes, examples of which include chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps or chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps. Defined endotypes are based on underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Knowledge of chronic rhinosinusitis endotypes will optimize management by employing targeted medical therapies. Understanding that rhinosinusitis is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease has led to the identification of a variety of different predisposing conditions, new medical treatment options, and the concept that rhinosinusitis is primarily a medical problem.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade , Pólipos Nasais , Rinite , Sinusite , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Pólipos Nasais/terapia , Rinite/tratamento farmacológico , Sinusite/tratamento farmacológico
7.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 19(1): 28, 2019 Feb 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30744559

RESUMO

An elevation of serum inflammatory biomarkers in achalasia patients compared with controls recently was demonstrated. It has not been determined whether the elevation of inflammatory cytokines is unique to achalasia or occurs with other diseases involving the esophagus. The primary aim of our study was to compare the differences in plasma immunological profiles (TNF- α receptor, IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-17, IL-22, and IL-23) of patients with achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A secondary aim of this study was to classify these same plasma cytokine profiles in the three achalasia subtypes. METHODS: Plasma from 53 patients with achalasia, 22 with EoE, and 20 with GERD (symptoms plus esophagitis or + reflux study) were analyzed. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: malignancy, autoimmune condition, immunodeficiency disorder, and treatment with steroids/immune modulating drugs. Cytokine levels were assayed via multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Our key finding revealed significant elevations in IL- 6 (p = 0.0158) in achalasia patients compared with EoE patients. Overall, plasma inflammatory biomarker patterns were not different in the three subtypes of achalasia. CONCLUSION: There were no differences between the cytokine levels of any of the measured biomarkers between the achalasia and GERD groups suggesting that luminal stasis does increase biomarker levels for any of the cytokines examined in our study. While these results are an early first step towards clarifying some aspects of the pathogenesis of achalasia, they bring about many more questions that require further investigation and expansion. Further investigation with a larger cohort and a broader panel of biomarkers is needed.


Assuntos
Citocinas/sangue , Esofagite Eosinofílica/imunologia , Acalasia Esofágica/imunologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/imunologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Acalasia Esofágica/classificação , Feminino , Humanos , Interferon gama/sangue , Interleucina-12/sangue , Interleucina-17/sangue , Interleucina-23/sangue , Interleucina-6/sangue , Interleucinas/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/sangue , Interleucina 22
9.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 121(3): 320-327, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29567355

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis B (HBV) is a viral illness that chronically infects 240 million people worldwide, leads to liver disease, and increases risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. The HBV vaccine has decreased HBV infection, and it and the human papilloma virus vaccine are the only vaccines that prevent cancer. Despite the effectiveness of the HBV vaccine, some populations do not develop protective responses. The risk groups for poor response include those with immunosuppression or dialysis-dependent, end-stage renal disease. Five percent of normal people do not have a response. These subjects are deemed HBV "nonresponders." Multiple strategies to improve the immunogenicity of the HBV vaccine are currently being pursued, including vaccine adjuvants, recombinant vaccines, and immune enhancement via up-regulation of dendritic cells. DATA SOURCES: PubMed was searched for peer-reviewed publications published from January 1980 to September 2017. STUDY SELECTIONS: Studies retrieved for inclusion summarized potential mechanisms behind HBV vaccine nonresponsiveness and potential solutions. RESULTS: The mechanisms behind HBV vaccine nonresponsiveness vary between each subject population. Many current and future strategies may provide protective immunity against HBV in each of these populations. CONCLUSION: This review provides a background on the immunology of HBV infection, the possible immunologic mechanisms to explain HBV vaccine nonresponsiveness, current research aimed at improving vaccine effectiveness, and possible future approaches for providing nonresponders protection from HBV.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Hepatite B/imunologia , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Hepáticas/prevenção & controle , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/imunologia , Doença Celíaca/imunologia , Diabetes Mellitus/imunologia , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Hepatite B/imunologia , Hepatite C/imunologia , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/imunologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/virologia , Contagem de Linfócitos , Potência de Vacina
11.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 4(4): 590-8, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27393773

RESUMO

Aspirin (ASA)-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is characterized by upper airway congestion due to eosinophilic inflammation of the nasal and sinus membranes and nasal polyposis, associated with increased leukotriene production that is further accentuated by ASA or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ingestion. It occurs in 5% to 10% of subjects with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and in 15% to 40% of those with nasal polyposis. Although AERD with CRS is usually associated with asthma, this is not always the case. The eosinophilic airway inflammation and symptoms precede clinical reactions to ASA or other NSAIDs, but ultimately affected subjects experience worsening of symptoms with ingestion of ASA/NSAIDs. The endotypic mechanism for this worsening is related to a chronic increase in leukotriene and a decrease in prostaglandin production, particularly prostaglandin E2, that is further aggravated by the inhibition of cycloxgenase I. IgE does not likely play a role in the pathogenesis of the disease although nasal and sinus staphylococcal infection increases local IgE level and may increase total IgE and specific IgE levels. Genetic studies suggest that multiple genes may be involved, but the genetic abnormalities may differ in affected subjects from different ethnicities and candidate genes have not been confirmed in multiple studies. Genome-wide association studies have not been revealing. The phenotype is recognized by the mucosal inflammation and worsening of symptoms acutely with ASA/NSAID. There is clinical improvement with ASA desensitization followed by regular ingestion of ASA or other NSAIDs. Further understanding of this unique phenotype and endotype of CRS will likely improve the understanding of other eosinophilic airway diseases.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Rinite/etiologia , Sinusite/etiologia , Animais , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Humanos , Rinite/epidemiologia , Rinite/fisiopatologia , Rinite/terapia , Sinusite/epidemiologia , Sinusite/fisiopatologia , Sinusite/terapia
16.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 2(6): 653-7, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25439353

RESUMO

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is an asthma phenotype with a prevalence that ranges from 2% to 25% of the asthma population. The 2% prevalence applies to patients with mild and 25% to severe, persistent asthma. COX-1-inhibiting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including aspirin, aggravate the preexisting upper and lower respiratory disease, sometimes in a life-threatening manner. The upper airway disease is characterized by an eosinophilic, hyperplastic rhinosinusitis with polyps. Eosinophilia, both peripheral and in the airways with Th2 inflammation, characterizes this disease. The role of allergic sensitivity in AERD is unclear, even though more than 30% of affected patients produce specific IgE to environmental allergens. Clinically, the respiratory symptoms are not usually associated with allergen exposure. The mechanism responsible for this phenotype is likely related to leukotriene (LT) metabolism because patients who are affected compared with patients who were aspirin tolerant, produce greater amounts of cysteinyl LTs. The synthesis of cysteinyl LTs is further increased after aspirin challenge and symptom exacerbation. Eosinophilia as well as a variety of other biologic markers, for example, Th2 cytokines, peripheral blood periostin, and LT enzymes and receptors, are associated with AERD both in the blood and in respiratory mucosa. These markers may help identify patients with AERD, but aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs challenge is the primary means to confirm the diagnosis. A variety of single nucleotide polymorphisms and genes are associated with AERD, but the studies to date are limited to select populations and have not conclusively demonstrated a uniform genetic pattern in subjects with this disease. Treatment of AERD can be challenging because the nasal symptoms, including polyposis, are often refractory to both surgery and medical treatment, and the asthma can be difficult to control. Aspirin desensitization, followed by daily aspirin administration, can improve both upper and lower respiratory tract symptoms in up to 60% of individuals.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Asma Induzida por Aspirina , Pulmão/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/imunologia , Aspirina/imunologia , Asma Induzida por Aspirina/diagnóstico , Asma Induzida por Aspirina/epidemiologia , Asma Induzida por Aspirina/genética , Asma Induzida por Aspirina/imunologia , Asma Induzida por Aspirina/fisiopatologia , Asma Induzida por Aspirina/terapia , Comorbidade , Citocinas/sangue , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Progressão da Doença , Marcadores Genéticos , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Mediadores da Inflamação/sangue , Pulmão/imunologia , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Fenótipo , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 131(6): 1479-90, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23587334

RESUMO

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a complex disease consisting of several disease variants with different underlying pathophysiologies. Limited knowledge of the mechanisms of these disease subgroups is possibly the greatest obstacle in understanding the causes of CRS and improving treatment. It is generally agreed that there are clinically relevant CRS phenotypes defined by an observable characteristic or trait, such as the presence or absence of nasal polyps. Defining the phenotype of the patient is useful in making therapeutic decisions. However, clinical phenotypes do not provide full insight into all underlying cellular and molecular pathophysiologic mechanisms of CRS. Recognition of the heterogeneity of CRS has promoted the concept that CRS consists of multiple groups of biological subtypes, or "endotypes," which are defined by distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms that might be identified by corresponding biomarkers. Different CRS endotypes can be characterized by differences in responsiveness to different treatments, including topical intranasal corticosteroids and biological agents, such as anti-IL-5 and anti-IgE mAb, and can be based on different biomarkers that are linked to underlying mechanisms. CRS has been regarded as a single disease entity in clinical and genetic studies in the past, which can explain the failure to identify consistent genetic and environmental correlations. In addition, better identification of endotypes might permit individualization of therapy that can be targeted against the pathophysiologic processes of a patient's endotype, with potential for more effective treatment and better patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Fenótipo , Rinite/diagnóstico , Rinite/etiologia , Sinusite/diagnóstico , Sinusite/etiologia , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Rinite/epidemiologia , Rinite/terapia , Fatores de Risco , Sinusite/epidemiologia , Sinusite/terapia
19.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 98(5): 490-2, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17521035

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Opportunistic infections commonly occur in immunocompromised patients; however, it is unusual for an adult to present with a combined cellular and humoral immunodeficiency. Cryptococcal meningitis is a fatal condition if untreated and is usually found in patients with cellular immunodeficiency. OBJECTIVE: To report the case of an adult patient with cryptococcal meningitis secondary to intestinal lymphangiectasia. METHODS: A 59-year-old man was admitted to the hospital for disseminated cryptococcal meningitis and osteomyelitis. Laboratory evaluation, computed tomography, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and biopsy were performed. RESULTS: Laboratory evaluation revealed a lymphopenia, hypoalbuminemia, hypogammaglobulinemia, and negative human immunodeficiency virus test results by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction. The complete blood cell count, urinalysis, serum and urine protein electrophoresis, and functional antibody responses to protein and polysaccharide antigens were normal. Results of computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis were unremarkable. Multiple lymphangiectasias were visualized with esophagogastroduodenoscopy and confirmed by biopsy. The patient was treated with intravenous amphotericin B and flucytosine, and the meningitis resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a computerized search of the medical literature, this is the first description of cryptococcal meningitis secondary to intestinal lymphangiectasias. The combination of lymphopenia, hypogammaglobulinemia, and hypoalbuminemia should alert the clinician to the possibility of intestinal lymphangiectasias and the potential for immune dysfunction.


Assuntos
Linfangiectasia Intestinal/complicações , Meningite Criptocócica/etiologia , Humanos , Linfangiectasia Intestinal/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
20.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 28(2): 230-5, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17479610

RESUMO

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) is both a clinical and a diagnostic challenge. Furthermore, an FUO case with isolated marrow noncaseating granuloma can further confound diagnosis. However, these two findings together may help narrow down the pathological possibilities. This article presents a case report of FUO and lymphopenia for 2 months. Multiple studies to evaluate infectious etiology were unremarkable. Bone marrow biopsy revealed isolated bone marrow granuloma, suggestive of sarcoid. The patient responded well to glucocorticosteroids with resolution of lymphopenia. Sarcoid should enter the differential of lymphopenia and FUO even without lymphadenopathy or abnormal chest radiography. This article provides a of review of CD4 lymphopenia, noncaseating granuloma of the marrow, and sarcoidosis.


Assuntos
Doenças da Medula Óssea/diagnóstico , Febre de Causa Desconhecida/etiologia , Granuloma/diagnóstico , Sarcoidose/diagnóstico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Doenças da Medula Óssea/complicações , Doenças da Medula Óssea/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças da Medula Óssea/patologia , Exame de Medula Óssea , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Febre de Causa Desconhecida/tratamento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Granuloma/complicações , Granuloma/tratamento farmacológico , Granuloma/patologia , Humanos , Linfopenia/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Sarcoidose/complicações , Sarcoidose/tratamento farmacológico , Sarcoidose/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA