CpG Oligonucleotide and Interleukin 2 stimulation enables higher cytogenetic abnormality detection rates than 12-o-tetradecanolyphorbol-13-acetate in Asian patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL).

The present study was designed to compare abnormality detection rates using DSP30 + IL2 and 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) in Asian patients with B-CLL. Hematological specimens from 47 patients (29 newly diagnosed, 18 relapsed) were established as 72 h-DSP30 + IL2 and TPA cultures. Standard methods were employed to identify clonal aberrations by conventional cytogenetics (CC). The B-CLL fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panel comprised ATM, CEP12, D13S25, and TP53 probes. DSP30 + IL2 cultures had a higher chromosomal abnormality detection rate (67 %) compared to TPA (44 %, p < 0.001). The mean number of analyzable metaphases and abnormal metaphases per slide was also higher (p < 0.005, p < 0.001, respectively). Culture success rate, percentage of complex karyotype, and percentage of non-clonal abnormal cell were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Thirteen cases with abnormalities were found exclusively in DSP30 + IL2 cultures compared to one found solely in TPA cultures. DSP30 + IL2 cultures were comparable to the FISH panel in detecting 11q-, +12 and 17p- but not 13q-. It also has a predilection for 11q- bearing leukemic cells compared to TPA. FISH had a higher abnormality detection rate (84.1 %) compared to CC (66.0 %) with borderline significance (p = 0.051), albeit limited by its coverage. In conclusion, DSP30 + IL2 showed a higher abnormality detection rate. However, FISH is indispensable to circumvent low mitotic indices and detect subtle abnormalities.

Bone marrow cytogenetics workup: Application of lean management system to determine if additional cell workup is helpful and necessary to analysis.

INTRODUCTION: High workload volumes in a Cytogenetics laboratory can lead to long result turn-around times (TAT). This study aimed to improve laboratory efficiency by adopting Lean Management System initiatives to increase productivity through the elimination of wastes. This study examined if the prerequisite 20-cell analysis was sufficient for a conclusive result or if additional cell workup was necessary to ascertain the presence of a previous chromosome abnormality among cases on follow-up, or when a single abnormal cell was encountered during the analysis to determine the presence of a clone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The karyotype results of cases that had additional workup were retrieved from among 8040 bone marrow cases of various haematological disorders performed between June 2003 and June 2008. RESULTS: Of 8040 cases analysed, 2915 cases (36.3%) had additional cell workup. Only 49 cases (1.7%) led to the establishment of a clone. The majority of these cases could have been resolved without the additional workup, especially if fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays had been utilised. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the additional workup procedure is redundant. The time saved by discontinuing the workup procedure can be used to analyse other cases, leading to increased laboratory efficiency and a faster TAT without compromise to patient care. The practice of additional workup over and above the 20- cell analysis should be dispensed with as little benefit was derived for the amount of additional manpower expended. FISH or PCR-based assays should be utilised to elucidate a case further.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia with PML-RARA fusion on i(17q) and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia.

We describe a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and the karyotype 46,XX,i(17)(q10) with PML-RARA fusion gene detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). FISH using dual-color translocation probes for PML (promyelocytic leukemia) and RARA (retinoic acid receptor-alpha) showed fusion signal for PML-RARA on both arms of i(17q). The patient attained complete remission (CR) with all-trans retinoic acid treatment and became PML-RARA negative. One year later, while PML-RARA negative on FISH and RT-PCR, the patient presented with thrombocytopenia. Bone marrow examination suggested an acute monoblastic leukemia (AML-M5a) including the karyotype 46,XX,t(8;16) (p11.2;p13.3),inv(11)(p15q22 approximately q23)[11]/47,idem,+i(8)(q10)[9]. She is currently in CR. The occurrence of therapy related acute leukemia after successful therapy for APL is an emerging problem.