Trends in use of antipsychotics and psychoactive drugs in older patients after major surgery.

BACKGROUND: Professional society guidelines recommend limiting the use of antipsychotics in older patients with postoperative delirium. How these recommendations affected the use of antipsychotics and other psychoactive drugs in the postoperative period has not been studied. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients 65 years or older without psychiatric diagnoses who underwent major surgery in community hospitals (CHs) and academic medical centers (AMCs) in the United States. The outcome was the rate of hospital days exposed to antipsychotics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, benzodiazepines, hypnotics, and selective alpha-2 receptor agonist dexmedetomidine in the postoperative period by hospital type. RESULTS: The study included 4,098,431 surgical admissions from CHs (mean age 75.0 [standard deviation, 7.1] years; 50.8% female) during 2008-2018 and 2,310,529 surgical admissions from AMCs (75.0 [7.4] years; 49.4% female) during 2009-2018. In the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, the number of exposed days per 1000 hospital-days declined for haloperidol (CHs: 33-21 days [p < 0.01]; AMCs: 24-15 days [p < 0.01]) and benzodiazepines (CHs: 261-136 days [p < 0.01]; AMCs: 150-77 days [p < 0.01]). The use of atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, and dexmedetomidine increased, while hypnotic use varied by the hospital type. In the non-ICU setting, the rate declined for haloperidol in CHs but not in AMCs (CHs: 10-6 days [p < 0.01]; AMCs: 4-3 days [p = 0.52]) and for benzodiazepines in both settings (CHs: 126-56 days [p < 0.01]; AMCs: 30-27 days [p < 0.01]). The use of antiepileptics and antidepressants increased, while the use of atypical antipsychotics and hypnotics varied by the hospital type. CONCLUSIONS: The use of haloperidol and benzodiazepines in the postoperative period declined at both CHs and AMCs. These trends coincided with the increasing use of other psychoactive drugs.

Head and neck dermatitis is exacerbated by Malassezia furfur colonization, skin barrier disruption, and immune dysregulation.

Introduction & objectives: Head and neck dermatitis (HND) is a refractory phenotype of atopic dermatitis (AD) and can be a therapeutic challenge due to lack of responsiveness to conventional treatments. Previous studies have suggested that the microbiome and fungiome may play a role in inducing HND, but the underlying pathogenic mechanisms remain unknown. This study aimed to determine the link between HND and fungiome and to examine the contribution of Malassezia furfur. Materials and methods: To identify the effect of the sensitization status of M. furfur on HND, 312 patients diagnosed with AD were enrolled. To elucidate the mechanism underlying the effects of M. furfur, human keratinocytes and dermal endothelial cells were cultured with M. furfur and treated with Th2 cytokines. The downstream effects of various cytokines, including inflammation and angiogenesis, were investigated by real-time quantitative PCR. To identify the association between changes in lipid composition and M. furfur sensitization status, D-squame tape stripping was performed. Lipid composition was evaluated by focusing on ceramide species using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Results: Increased sensitization to M. furfur was observed in patients with HND. Additionally, sensitization to M. furfur was associated with increased disease severity in these patients. IL-4 treated human keratinocytes cultured with M. furfur produced significantly more VEGF, VEGFR, IL-31, and IL-33. IL-4/M. furfur co-cultured dermal endothelial cells exhibited significantly elevated VEGFR, TGF-ß, TNF-α, and IL-1ß levels. Stratum corneum lipid analysis revealed decreased levels of esterified omega-hydroxyacyl-sphingosine, indicating skin barrier dysfunction in HND. Finally, M. furfur growth was inhibited by the addition of these ceramides to culture media, while the growth of other microbiota, including Cutibacterium acnes, were not inhibited. Conclusions: Under decreased levels of ceramide in AD patients with HND, M. furfur would proliferate, which may enhance pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, angiogenesis, and tissue remodeling. Thus, it plays a central role in the pathogenesis of HND in AD.

Risk of malignant melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer in rheumatoid arthritis patients initiating methotrexate versus hydroxychloroquine: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To characterise the incidence rate of skin cancer associated with methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine in older adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: RA patients aged ≥65 years who initiated methotrexate or hydroxychloroquine as their first disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The primary outcome was new occurrence of any skin cancer (i.e. malignant melanoma or non-melanoma skin cancer; NMSC) based on validated algorithms (positive predictive value >83%). Secondary outcomes were malignant melanoma, NMSC, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We estimated the incidence rates (IRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) for each outcome in the 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine groups. RESULTS: We included 24,577 PS-matched pairs of methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine initiators. Compared with hydroxychloroquine (IR 25.20/1,000 person-years), methotrexate initiators (IR 26.21/1,000 person-years) had a similar risk of any skin cancer [HR 1.03 -(95%CI 0.92, 1.14)] over a mean follow-up of 388 days. The HR (95%CI) associated with methotrexate was 1.39 (0.87, 2.21) for malignant melanoma, 1.01(0.90, 1.12) for NMSC, 1.37 (1.13, 1.66) for BCC, and 0.79 (0.63, 0.99) for SCC compared with hydroxychloroquine. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of older RA patients initiating methotrexate or hydroxychloroquine as their first DMARD, we found no difference in the risk of skin cancer including malignant melanoma and NMSC. However, for specific components of NMSC, methotrexate initiators had higher risk of BCC but lower risk of SCC compared with hydroxychloroquine initiators.

Tofacitinib and Risk of Malignancy: Results From the Safety of Tofacitinib in Routine Care Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (STAR-RA) Study.

OBJECTIVES: Results of the ORAL Surveillance safety trial have indicated that there is an increased risk for the development of malignancies with tofacitinib therapy when compared to treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). This study was undertaken to further examine this safety concern in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: Using US insurance claims data from Optum Clinformatics (2012-2020), IBM MarketScan Research Databases (2012-2018), and Medicare (parts A, B, and D, 2012-2017), we created 2 cohorts of RA patients who had initiated treatment with tofacitinib or TNFi. The first cohort, designated the real-world evidence (RWE) cohort, included RA patients from routine care. For the second cohort, designated the randomized controlled trial (RCT)-duplicate cohort, we emulated the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were applied in the ORAL Surveillance trial of tofacitinib, which allowed us to assess the comparability of our results with the results of that trial. Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score fine-stratification weighting were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the risk of any malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer). Database-specific estimates were meta-analyzed using fixed-effects models with inverse-variance weighting. RESULTS: The RWE cohort consisted of 83,295 patients, including 10,504 patients (12.6%) who received treatment with tofacitinib. The pooled weighted HR for the primary outcome of any malignancy associated with tofacitinib treatment compared to any malignancy associated with TNFi therapy was 1.01 (95% CI 0.83, 1.22) in the RWE cohort and 1.17 (95% CI 0.85, 1.62) in the RCT-duplicate cohort (compared to the ORAL Surveillance trial HR of 1.48 [95% CI 1.04, 2.09]). CONCLUSION: We did not find evidence of an increased risk of malignancy development with tofacitinib therapy, in comparison with TNFi therapy, in RA patients treated in a real-world setting. However, our results cannot rule out the possibility of an increase in risk that may accrue with a longer duration of treatment with tofacitinib.

Tofacitinib and risk of cardiovascular outcomes: results from the Safety of TofAcitinib in Routine care patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (STAR-RA) study.

OBJECTIVES: Recent results from 'ORAL Surveillance' trial have raised concerns regarding the cardiovascular safety of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We further examined this safety concern in the real-world setting. METHODS: We created two cohorts of patients with RA initiating treatment with tofacitinib or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFI) using deidentified data from Optum Clinformatics (2012-2020), IBM MarketScan (2012-2018) and Medicare (parts A, B and D, 2012-2017) claims databases: (1) A 'real-world evidence (RWE) cohort' consisting of routine care patients and (2) A 'randomised controlled trial (RCT)-duplicate cohort' mimicking inclusion and exclusion criteria of the ORAL surveillance trial to calibrate results against the trial findings. Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score fine stratification weighting were used to estimate HR and 95% CIs for composite outcome of myocardial infarction and stroke and accounting for 76 potential confounders. Database-specific effect estimates were pooled using fixed effects models with inverse-variance weighting. RESULTS: In the RWE cohort, 102 263 patients were identified of whom 12 852 (12.6%) initiated tofacitinib. The pooled weighted HR (95% CI) comparing tofacitinib with TNFI was 1.01 (0.83 to 1.23) in RWE cohort and 1.24 (0.90 to 1.69) in RCT-duplicate cohort which aligned closely with ORAL-surveillance results (HR: 1.33, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.94). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence for an increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes with tofacitinib in patients with RA treated in the real-world setting; however, tofacitinib was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes, although statistically non-significant, in patients with RA with cardiovascular risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04772248.

Risk of Hospitalization for Serious Infection After Initiation of Ustekinumab or Other Biologics in Patients With Psoriasis or Psoriatic Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of serious infections requiring hospitalization in patients with psoriasis (PsO) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) initiating ustekinumab versus other biologics or apremilast. METHODS: In this multi-database cohort study, we identified patients with PsO/PsA who initiated therapy with adalimumab, apremilast, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, or ustekinumab between 2009 and 2018. The primary outcome measure was hospitalizations due to serious infections, which included bacterial, viral, or opportunistic infections. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) comparing each study drug to ustekinumab after applying propensity score fine stratification weights for confounding control in each database. Database-specific weighted HRs were combined by meta-analysis. RESULTS: We identified 123,383 patients with PsO/PsA who initiated one of the study drugs. During a total of 117,744 person-years of follow-up, 1,514 serious infections occurred with a crude incidence of 1.29 per 100 person-years. After propensity score fine stratification and weighting, the incidence rates of serious infection among ustekinumab initiators ranged from 0.59 to 0.95 per 100 person-years. Compared with ustekinumab, the combined weighted HRs (95% confidence interval [95% CI]) for serious infections were 1.66 (95% CI 1.34-2.06) for adalimumab, 1.42 (95% CI 1.02-1.96) for apremilast, 1.09 (95% CI 0.68-1.75) for certolizumab, 1.39 (95% CI 1.01-1.90) for etanercept, 1.74 (95% CI 1.00-3.03) for golimumab, 2.92 (95% CI 1.80-4.72) for infliximab, 2.98 (95% CI 1.20-7.41) for ixekizumab, and 1.84 (95% CI 1.24-2.72) for secukinumab. CONCLUSION: Other biologics and apremilast were associated with a 1.4- to 3-times higher risk of hospitalization for serious infections in PsO/PsA patients when compared to ustekinumab; this finding should be considered in the safety profile of these therapies when selecting appropriate treatment regimens in patients with PsO/PsA.

Patient characteristics associated with use of TNF vs interleukin inhibitors as first-line biologic treatment for psoriatic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined treatment patterns among patients who use tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, little data exist for a comparison between the TNF inhibitor treatment pattern and that of newly available biologics such as interleukin (IL)-12/23 or 17 inhibitors in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To (a) examine patient characteristics and their association with initiation of TNF inhibitors vs IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors among PsA patients and (2) compare treatment persistence of PsA patients who initiated TNF inhibitors vs IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors as first-line biologic treatment in a real-world setting in the United States. METHODS: Using claims data from MarketScan (2013-2017), we identified a cohort of PsA patients who initiated TNF inhibitors or IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors. The primary outcome was treatment persistence, defined as continuous use of the index drug at 1 year, regardless of refill gaps. The secondary outcome was treatment persistence with high adherence at 1 year (ie, refill gaps ≤ 30 days). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between patient characteristics and treatment initiation and persistent use of TNF inhibitors vs IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors. RESULTS: We identified 3,180 TNF inhibitor initiators and 214 IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitor initiators. Initiators of IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors had more comorbidities than TNF inhibitor initiators. The proportion of patients with treatment persistence was 53.0% in TNF inhibitor initiators and 53.7% in IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitor initiators; 37.1% of TNF inhibitor users and 24.8% of IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitor users were treatment persistent with high adherence. There was no difference in 1-year treatment persistence between the 2 groups after adjusting for baseline characteristics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for TNF inhibitors vs IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors: 0.86, 95% CI = 0.63-1.15). However, use of TNF inhibitors was associated with a greater treatment persistence with high adherence compared with use of IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors (aOR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.15-2.26). CONCLUSIONS: PsA patients who initiated an IL 12/23 or 17 inhibitor had a greater comorbidity burden compared with those who initiated TNF inhibitors. Treatment persistence was similar between the 2 groups, whereas medication adherence was higher with TNF inhibitors than with IL 12/23 or 17 inhibitors during the first year of treatment. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by an investigator-initiated research grant from Pfizer, Inc (grant number: WI235988). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors. The sponsor was given the opportunity to make nonbinding comments on a draft of the manuscript. Publication of the manuscript was not contingent on approval by the sponsor. Kim has received research grants to the Brigham and Women's Hospital from Roche, AbbVie, and Bristol-Myers Squibb for unrelated topics. Merola is a consultant and/or investigator for BMS, AbbVie, Dermavant, Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, UCB, Sun Pharma, and Pfizer. Jin, Chen, Lee, and Landon have nothing to disclose.

Validation of claims-based algorithms to identify interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate claims-based algorithms to identify interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) METHODS: Using Medicare claims data linked with the electronic medical records (2012-2014), we first selected RA patients based on ≥2 diagnostic codes for RA and ≥1 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.Then, to identify ILD in RA, we developed eight claims-based algorithms using a combination of ICD-9 diagnosis codes and procedure codes related to the diagnosis or management of ILD. We assessed the positive predictive value (PPV) for each of the eight algorithms relative to confirmed ILD cases using chest computerized tomography or lung biopsy as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 5,214 RA patients were included in the study, and the ILD cases identified by each algorithm ranged from 181 to 993. The PPV of the diagnosis code-based algorithms ranged from 43.4% (≥1 diagnosis code by any physician) to 52.0% (≥2 diagnosis codes by any physician). When the algorithms further required ≥1 procedure code (e.g., imaging, bronchoscopy), the PPV did not improve. However, the algorithms that required ILD diagnosis codes by specialists (i.e., pulmonologist or rheumatologist) had PPVs of 61.5% with ≥1 code; 72.4% with ≥2 codes. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of RA patients, our algorithm that required ≥2 ILD diagnosis codes by specialists demonstrated a PPV of 72.4% in ascertaining ILD. Our results support the utility of the claims-based algorithm to identify a population-based cohort of RA patients with ILD using large administrative claims data.

Risk of Cataract Surgery and Age-Related Macular Degeneration After Initiation of Denosumab vs Zoledronic Acid for Osteoporosis: A Multi-Database Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is a relative lack of head-to-head comparisons of denosumab against other osteoporosis drugs on safety. We aimed to explore ocular outcomes in patients with osteoporosis initiating denosumab vs zoledronic acid. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using claims data (2010-15) from two large US commercial insurance databases including patients with osteoporosis who were aged 50 years or older and initiators of denosumab or zoledronic acid. The primary outcomes were (1) receipt of cataract surgery and development of (2) wet age-related macular degeneration and (3) dry age-related macular degeneration within 365 days after initiation of denosumab vs zoledronic acid. Propensity score fine stratification and weighting were used to control for potential confounding, and we calculated the incidence rate and hazard ratio for each outcome in the cohorts. The estimates from the two databases were combined with a fixed-effects model meta-analysis. RESULTS: The study cohort included 50,821 denosumab and 67,471 zoledronic acid initiators. In the propensity score-weighted analysis, compared to zoledronic acid use, denosumab was associated with a modestly decreased risk of undergoing cataract surgery (hazard ratio 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.85-0.98) but not with the risk of wet age-related macular degeneration (hazard ratio 1.29; 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.70) or dry age-related macular degeneration (hazard ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval 0.98-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: In this large population-based cohort study of 118,292 patients with osteoporosis, initiation of denosumab was associated with a modestly decreased risk of cataract surgery vs zoledronic acid. The risk of age-related macular degeneration was similar between the two drugs.

Validation of claims-based algorithms for psoriatic arthritis.

PURPOSE: An increasing number of new medications are being developed and approved for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). To generate real-world evidence on comparative safety and effectiveness of these drugs, a claims-based algorithm that can accurately identify PsA is greatly needed. METHODS: To identify patients with PsA, we developed seven claims-based algorithms based on a combination of diagnosis codes and medication dispensing using the claims data from Medicare parts A/B/D linked to electronic medical records (2012-2014). Two physicians independently conducted a chart review using the treating physician's diagnosis of PsA as the gold standard. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) and 95% confidence intervals of each algorithm. RESULTS: Of the total 2157 records identified by the seven algorithms, 45% of the records had relevant clinical data to determine the presence of PsA. The PPV of the algorithms ranged from 75.2% (algorithm 1: ≥2 diagnosis codes for PsA and ≥1 diagnosis code for psoriasis) to 88.6% (algorithm 7: ≥2 diagnosis codes for PsA with ≥1 code by rheumatologist and ≥1 dispensing for PsA medication). Having ≥2 diagnosis codes and ≥1 dispensing for PsA medications (algorithm 6) also had PPV of 82.4%. CONCLUSIONS: All seven claims-based algorithms demonstrated a moderately high PPV of 75% to 89% in identifying PsA. The use of ≥2 diagnosis codes plus ≥1 prescription claim for PsA appears to be a valid and efficient tool in identifying PsA patients in the claims data, while broader algorithms based on diagnoses without a prescription claim also have reasonably good PPVs.

A Retrospective Study of Methylprednisolone Mini-Pulse Therapy Combined with Narrow-Band UVB in Non-Segmental Vitiligo.

BACKGROUND: Systemic corticosteroids have been used to arrest the progression of vitiligo. However, side effects have been a constant issue. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the clinical efficacy and side effect of oral methylprednisolone (MPD) mini-pulse therapy combined with narrow-band UVB (NBUVB) for adults with non-segmental vitiligo retrospectively. METHODS: 32 patients with extensive and/or spreading vitiligo received 0.5 mg/kg MPD on 2 consecutive days per week with NBUVB therapy for at least 3 months. RESULTS: All of the 32 patients (100%) showed progression arrest within 12 weeks. Nineteen out of 32 patients (59.4%) presented repigmentation on more than 25% of lesions. Thirteen patients (40.6%) achieved satisfactory repigmentation in more than 50% of lesions. Only 2 patients discontinued the medication due to gastrointestinal trouble. CONCLUSION: Oral MPD mini-pulse therapy combined with NBUVB appears effective in arresting vitiligo progression and rapidly inducing repigmentation with minimal side effects.

The Asian atopic dermatitis phenotype combines features of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis with increased TH17 polarization.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) shows very high prevalence in Asia, with a large unmet need for effective therapeutics. Direct comparisons between European American (EA) and Asian patients with AD are unavailable, but earlier blood studies detected increased IL-17(+)-producing cell counts in Asian patients with AD. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the Asian AD skin phenotype and compare it with the EA AD skin phenotype. METHODS: We performed genomic profiling (real-time PCR) and immunohistochemistry on lesional and nonlesional biopsy specimens from 52 patients with AD (25 EAs and 27 Asians), 10 patients with psoriasis (all EAs), and 27 healthy subjects (12 EAs and 15 Asians). RESULTS: Although disease severity/SCORAD scores were similar between the AD groups (58.0 vs 56.7, P = .77), greater acanthosis, higher Ki67 counts, and frequent parakeratosis were characteristics of lesional epidermis from Asian patients with AD (P < .05). Most (24/27) Asian patients had high IgE levels. A principal component analysis using real-time PCR data clustered the Asian AD phenotype between the EA AD and psoriasis phenotypes. TH2 skewing characterized both Asian and EA patients with AD but not patients with psoriasis. Significantly higher TH17 and TH22 (IL17A, IL19, and S100A12 in lesional and IL-22 in nonlesional skin; P < .05) and lower TH1/interferon (CXCL9, CXCL10, MX1, and IFNG in nonlesional skin; P < .05) gene induction typified AD skin in Asian patients. CONCLUSION: The Asian AD phenotype presents (even in the presence of increased IgE levels) a blended phenotype between that of EA patients with AD and those with psoriasis, including increased hyperplasia, parakeratosis, higher TH17 activation, and a strong TH2 component. The relative pathogenic contributions of the TH17 and TH2 axes in creating the Asian AD phenotype need to be tested in future clinical trials with appropriate targeted therapeutics.

Positive reactions to nickel on a patch test do not predict clinical outcome of nickel alloy-based atrial septal defect occluder implantation.

BACKGROUND: Patch testing is thought to be necessary prior to metal device implantation to rule out metal allergy-related complications; however, there are controversies over the effects of nickel allergy on the outcome of nickel alloy-based device implantation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the adverse events in a Korean population of nickel allergy patients who underwent atrial septal defect (ASD) closure with a nickel-titanium alloy-based device. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent ASD closure with a nitinol device. RESULTS: Among 38 patients who had ASD closure, 4 of 5 nickel-allergic patients and 10 of the 33 non-nickel-allergic patients had post-closure complications. All patients fared well, without device failure culminating in device removal. CONCLUSION: In this study, positive reactions to nickel in a patch test were not associated with adverse early or late outcomes following ASD closure with a nickel alloy-based device.