Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Med Radiat Sci ; 71(1): 35-43, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37602665

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are typical dose levels for medical imaging examinations for groups of standard-sized patients or standard phantoms for broadly defined types of equipment used as a tool to aid optimisation of protection for medical exposures. Currently, there are no paediatric DRLs for conventional radiography (i.e. general X-rays) published in Australia. The aim of this study was to establish typical radiation doses and risks that are representative of those delivered for commonly performed X-ray projections for a 5-year-old/20 kg child using a 5-year-old anthropomorphic 'bone fracture' phantom in three dedicated paediatric radiology departments in Victoria. METHODS: A total of 20 projection images were acquired for a standard 5-year-old/20 kg phantom using digital radiography X-ray equipment. The air kerma-area product (KAP) measured at each centre by a KAP metre, which was calibrated to a national primary standard, was considered to represent the median value for that centre for each X-ray projection. Organ doses and effective dose were estimated using PCXMC software, and risks of radiation-induced cancer and radiation-induced death were calculated based on the BEIR VII report. RESULTS: The typical doses for the individual X-ray projections ranged from 3 mGy•cm2 to 86 mGy•cm2 , whilst the effective doses ranged from 0.00004 to 0.07 mSv. The radiation risks were 'minimal' to 'negligible'. CONCLUSION: The estimation of typical radiation doses and associated risks for a 5-year-old/20 kg phantom study provides reference values for guidance and is a first step in assisting optimisation at other institutions until national DRLs, based on patient data from the clinical setting, are published.


Assuntos
Software , Humanos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Raios X , Doses de Radiação , Radiografia , Imagens de Fantasmas
2.
Pediatr Radiol ; 53(1): 57-68, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35994063

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A series of 31 radiographs is recommended by the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) when investigating suspected physical abuse (SPA). OBJECTIVE: To determine the radiation dose delivered for skeletal surveys performed for SPA in Victorian radiology departments based on their local protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 5-year-old paediatric bone fracture phantom was radiographed at five radiology sites using both the RCR recommended protocol and, where applicable, the local departmental SPA protocol. The radiation doses were measured and recorded. These were scaled down to estimate the effective radiation doses for a 2-year-old child at each site and the associated radiation risks estimated. RESULTS: The median effective dose for all radiographic projections in the RCR skeletal survey radiographic series was 0.09 mSv. The estimated risk of radiation-induced cancer and radiation-induced death from cancer for 2-year-old children is classified as "very low," with girls having a higher risk than boys. CONCLUSION: The median effective radiation dose for the RCR skeletal survey for imaging in SPA was 0.09 mSv resulting in a "very low" additional risk of radiation-induced cancer. The authors will now aim to ascertain whether whole-body CT skeletal survey can replace the radiographic series for imaging in SPA while maintaining a comparable radiation dose.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Fraturas Ósseas , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Abuso Físico , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doses de Radiação
3.
J Med Radiat Sci ; 67(1): 5-15, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32040878

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, ARPANSA published updated national DRLs for adult CT, which were first published in 2012, and augmented the national DRL categories. This paper presents the updated national DRLs and describes the process by which they were produced. METHODS: Examine patient survey data submitted to the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) National Diagnostic Reference Level Service (NDRLS). Determine the quartiles of the distributions of median survey dose metrics with categorisation by procedure type. Engage a liaison panel representing the radiology professions to review procedure categories and recommend revised national DRLs. The revised NDRL procedure categories are: head (non-contrast brain (trauma/headache)), cervical spine (Non-contrast (trauma)), soft-tissue neck (post-contrast (oncology)), chest (post-contrast (oncology)), abdomen-pelvis (post-contrast (oncology)), kidney-ureter-bladder (non-contrast (suspected renal colic)), chest-abdomen-pelvis (post-contrast (oncology)) and lumbar spine (non-contrast (degenerative pain)). RESULTS: The existing six procedure categories were revised and refined. Updated Australian national diagnostic reference levels for adult CT were recommended and endorsed for eight procedure categories: head (52 mGy/880 mGycm), cervical spine (23 mGy/470 mGycm),soft-tissue neck (17 mGy/450 mGycm), chest (10 mGy/390 mGycm), abdomen-pelvis (13 mGy/600 mGycm), kidney-ureter-bladder (13 mGy/600 mGycm), chest-abdomen-pelvis (11 mGy/940 mGycm) and lumbar spine (26 mGy/670 mGycm). The updated national DRLs are between 12 and 26% lower than the previous DRLs for dose-length product and between 13 and 63% lower for volume computed tomography dose index. CONCLUSIONS: Australian national DRLs for adult CT have been reviewed and revised. The revised national DRLs are lower, better reflecting current practice among imaging facilities in Australia. The revised Australian national DRLs are similar to those in other developed countries.


Assuntos
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doses de Radiação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normas , Adulto , Austrália , Humanos , Radiologia/organização & administração , Padrões de Referência , Sociedades Médicas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/classificação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA