Process and outcome differences in the care of patients undergoing elective and emergency right hemicolectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 30% of patients with colorectal cancer present as an emergency and have worse outcomes than elective patients. Compared with left-sided cancers, malignancies arising in the right colon are significantly under-researched. We sought to compare cancer care quality and clinical outcomes between emergency and elective presentations of right-sided colon cancer (RCC). METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective study included all patients who underwent operative management for a RCC, from 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2022. Data were collected from electronic patient records, and host and tumour factors as well as outcomes between emergency and elective cohorts were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 806 patients (median age 72 years) were included. Some 175 patients (22%) presented as an emergency: 140 in obstruction and 35 with tumour perforation, compared with 1 patient with tumour perforation in the elective group (p < 0.001). The emergency group had higher rates of postoperative complications (59.1% vs 20.0%, p < 0.001), increased 90-day mortality (13.7% vs 1.3%, p < 0.001) and a longer hospital stay (5 vs 10 days, p < 0.001). From the emergency cohort only 29.2% of eligible patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and in multivariate regression analysis emergency presentation was associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio 0.26 [0.14-0.47], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both short- and long-term outcomes after emergency presentation of RCC are poor, with inadequate access to subsequent chemotherapy. Strategies addressing emergency presentations of left-sided tumours have moved towards temporisation and elective surgery. Delaying major resectional surgery for optimisation may improve outcomes and access to adjuvant therapies for RCC.

Management of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction: opportunities to improve care?

BACKGROUND: Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is a functional bowel obstruction characterised by colonic dilatation in the absence of mechanical obstruction on imaging. Complications include bowel ischaemia, perforation and death. The aim of this study was to explore outcomes for patients treated for ACPO and to assess adherence to current ACPO treatment guidelines. METHODS: This is a retrospective service evaluation and included patients with a diagnosis of ACPO between 1 March 2018 and 31 March 2023. Process measures were identified following discussion with the clinical team from published guidance. Patients were identified using clinical coding and radiological text reports. Cases were eligible for inclusion if they had radiologically confirmed ACPO. Data were collected following review of patient notes into Microsoft Excel. Descriptive analysis was performed with no formal statistical assessment. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were identified, of whom 13 were admitted under general surgery. All patients received admission bloods (n=45). Nearly all patients had computed tomography imaging (43/45, 96%). Only 3/45 (6.7%) of the patients received optimal conservative management (intravenous infusion, nil by mouth, flatus tube, treatment of reversible causes). In all, 11/45 (24%) required further treatment, of whom 7 received this within 72 h. The leading (11/45) complication following diagnosis of ACPO was hospital-acquired pneumonia. Mortality was seen in 9/45. CONCLUSIONS: ACPO is often managed remotely by general surgeons. This may impact on the quality of conservative management, and timeliness of endoscopic or pharmacological intervention. Further work is needed to optimise management.

A survey of patient informational preferences when choosing between medical and surgical therapy for ulcerative colitis: a sub-study from the DISCUSS project.

AIM: People living with ulcerative colitis (UC) have two broad treatment avenues, namely medical or surgical therapy. The choice between these can depend on patient preference as well as the receipt of relevant information. The aim of this study was to define the informational needs of patients with UC. METHOD: A postal survey was designed to capture respondent demographics, treatment experienced within the previous 12 months and informational preferences by rating a long list of items. It was delivered through two hospitals that provide tertiary inflammatory bowel disease services. Descriptive analyses were performed to describe demographics and experiences. Principal component analysis was carried out using a varimax rotation to investigate informational needs. RESULTS: A total of 101 responses were returned (20.1% response rate). The median age of respondents was 45 years and the median time since diagnosis was 10 years. Control preferences skewed towards shared (42.6%) or patient-led but clinician-informed (35.6%). Decision regret was low for the population (median 12.5/100, range 0-100). Key informational needs related to medical therapy were benefits and risks of long-term therapy, burden of hospital attendance, reproductive health, need for steroid treatment and impact on personal life. For surgery, these were stoma information, effect on daily life, effect on sexual and reproductive health, risks and benefits and disruption of life due to surgery. CONCLUSION: This study has identified key areas for discussion when counselling patients about treatment decisions around medical therapy and surgery for UC.

Biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: rationalisation of the approach to imaging.

AIM: To assess the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in addition to the additive benefit of the conventional imaging techniques, computed tomography (CT) and nuclear medicine (NM) bone scintigraphy, for investigation of biochemical recurrence (BCR) post-prostatectomy where access to prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron-emission tomography (PET)-CT is challenging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant imaging over a 5-year period was reviewed. Ethical approval was granted by the internal review board. All patients with suspected BCR, defined as a PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml on two separate occasions, underwent a retrospective imaging review. This was performed on PACS archive search database in a single centre using search terms "PSA" and "prostatectomy" in the three imaging methods; MRI, CT, and NM bone scintigraphy. All PSMA PET CT performed were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-five patients were identified. Patients with an MRI pelvis that demonstrated distant metastases (i.e., pelvic bone metastases or lymph node involvement more cranial to the bifurcation of the common iliac arteries) were more likely to have a positive CT and/or NM bone scintigraphy. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the findings of M1 disease at MRI pelvis and the presence of distant metastases at CT thorax, abdomen, pelvis and NM bone scintigraphy was calculated at 0.81 (p<0.01) and 0.91 (p<0.01) respectively. CONCLUSION: An imaging strategy based on risk stratification and technique-specific selection criteria leads to more appropriate use of resources, and in turn, increases the yield of conventional imaging methods. MRI prostate findings can be used to predict the additive value of CT/NM bone scintigraphy allowing a more streamlined approach to their use.

Clinician preferences in the treatment of acutely symptomatic hernia: the 'MASH' survey.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited high-quality evidence to guide the management of acute hernia presentation. The aim of this study was to survey surgeons to assess current trends in assessment, treatment strategy and operative decisions in the management of acutely symptomatic hernia. METHODS: A survey was developed with reference to current guidelines, and reported according to Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys guidelines. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Sheffield (UREC:034047). The survey explored practice in groin, umbilical/paraumbilical and incisional hernia presenting acutely. It captured respondent demographics, and preferences for investigations, treatment strategies and repair techniques for each hernia type, using a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Some 145 responses were received, of which 39 declared a specialist hernia practice. Essential investigations included urea and electrolytes (58.6%) and inflammatory markers (55.6%). Computed tomography scan of the abdomen was essential for assessment of incisional hernia (90.9%), but not for other hernia types. Bowel compromise drives early surgery, and increasing American Society of Anesthesiology score pushes towards non-operative management. Type of repair was driven by hernia contents, with increasing contamination associated with increased rates of suture repair. Where mesh was proposed in contaminated settings, biological types were preferred. There was variation in the potential use of laparoscopy for groin hernia. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides a snapshot of current trends in the management of acutely symptomatic hernia. It demonstrates variation across aspects of assessment and repair technique. Additional data are required to inform practice in these areas.

Protocol for the ORION trial (RadiO fRequency ablatION for haemorrhoids): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhoids are common and can significantly impact the personal and working lives of individuals. Those with more severe symptoms and those not responding to conservative management may require surgery. Current surgical techniques are associated with a degree of postoperative discomfort which may delay return to normal activity. Recurrence is lower in more radical procedures but resulting pain is higher. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a new technique that is gaining popularity and has several hypothesised benefits, including reduced pain and recurrence. However, available evidence is limited. A recent overview from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommended more research, in the form of randomised controlled trials, be carried out before further investment is made by national health services. Our aim is to assess whether RFA is at least as good in terms of recurrence as existing surgical interventions, but superior in terms of pain, for patients with symptomatic grade II and III haemorrhoids. METHODS: The RadiO fRequency ablatION for haemorrhoids (ORION) trial will be a pragmatic multicentre patient/assessor-blind parallel group-controlled trial with economic evaluation. The target sample size is 376 participants (188 per arm) and is based on two co-primary endpoints: (i) a non-inferiority design for recurrence and (ii) superiority design for pain at seven days. Participants with grade II or III haemorrhoids will be recruited in 16 National Health Service hospitals and randomised (1:1) to either RFA or surgeon's choice of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Results will inform future practice for the treatment of grade II-III haemorrhoids and provide evidence for national health services on future investments in RFA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14474552.

A mapping review of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease.

BACKGROUND: Pilonidal sinus is a hole in the natal cleft which may cause severe pain and become infected. The evidence base for management of pilonidal sinus is said to be poor quality, poorly focused and rapidly proliferating. We undertook a systematic mapping review to provide a broad overview of the field and support the identification of research priorities. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE from inception to 22nd Nov 2020 for primary research studies focused on the management of pilonidal sinus. We extracted data on study design and categorised studies under five major headings ('non-surgical treatment', 'surgical treatment', 'aftercare' and 'other'), producing frequency counts for different study designs. Gaps in research were identified from published systematic reviews and tabulated. RESULTS: We identified 983 eligible studies, of which 36 were systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses; 121 were randomised controlled trials), and 826 observational studies of various design. The majority of studies evaluated surgical techniques (n = 665), or adjuvant medical interventions (n = 98). The literature on wound care has developed most recently, and the evidence base includes 30% randomised controlled trials. Gaps analysis highlighted comparison of surgical techniques including flaps, laser depilation, and wound care interventions as potential areas for randomised controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: This mapping review summarises eight decades of research on the management of pilonidal sinus. Further research is needed to identify front-running interventions, understand variation in practice and patient values, and to prioritise future research.

A systematic review of the quality of reporting of interventions in the surgical treatment of Crohn's anal fistula: an assessment using the TIDiER and Blencowe frameworks.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's anal fistula is a challenging condition, and may require multiple surgical procedures. To replicate successful procedures, these must be adequately reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to review the quality of reporting of components of surgical interventions for Crohn's anal fistula. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. It was registered with PROSPERO (CRD:42019135157). The Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for studies reporting interventions intended to close fistula in patients with Crohn's disease, published between 1999 and August 2019. Abstracts and full texts were screened for inclusion by two reviewers. Dual extraction of data was performed to compare reporting to the TIDiER and Blencowe frameworks for reporting of interventions. RESULTS: Initial searches identified 207 unique studies; 38 full texts were screened for inclusion and 33 were included. The most common study design was retrospective cohort (17/33), and the most frequently reported interventions were anal fistula plug (n = 8) and fibrin glue (n = 6). No studies showed coverage of all domains of TIDieR. Reporting was poor among domains related to who provided an intervention, where it was provided, and how it was tailored. Reporting of domains in the Blencowe framework was poor; the majority of studies did not report the component steps of procedures or efforts to standardise them. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that reporting on technical aspects of interventions for Crohn's anal fistula is poor. Surgeons should aim to improve reporting to allow accurate reproduction of techniques both in clinical practice and in clinical trials.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after elective surgery for ulcerative colitis.

AIM: Approximately 20%-30% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) will undergo surgery during their disease course, the vast majority being elective due to chronic refractory disease. The risks of elective surgery are reported variably. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize the outcomes after elective surgery for UC. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted that analysed studies reporting outcomes for elective surgery in the modern era (>2002). It was prospectively registered on the PROSPERO database (ref: CRD42018115513). Searches were performed of Embase and MEDLINE on 15 January 2019. Outcomes were split by operation performed. Primary outcome was quality of life; secondary outcomes were early, late and functional outcomes after surgery. Outcomes reported in five or more studies underwent a meta-analysis of incidence using random effects. Heterogeneity is reported with I2 , and publication bias was assessed using Doi plots and the Luis Furuya-Kanamori index. RESULTS: A total of 34 studies were included (11 774 patients). Quality of life was reported in 12 studies, with variable and contrasting results. Thirteen outcomes (eight early surgical complications, five functional outcomes) were included in the formal meta-analysis, all of which were outcomes for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). A further 71 outcomes were reported (50 IPAA, 21 end ileostomy). Only 14 of 84 outcomes received formal definitions, with high inter-study variation of definitions. CONCLUSION: Outcomes after elective surgery for UC are variably defined. This systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the range of reported incidences and provides practical information that facilitates shared decision making in clinical practice.

It's not just an ileus: disparities associated with ileus following ventral hernia repair.

PURPOSE: We sought to identify risk factors associated with postoperative ileus following ventral hernia repair. METHODS: Utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2008 to 2012, we identified adult patients that underwent either open or laparoscopic hernia repair for umbilical and ventral hernias with a diagnosis of umbilical/ventral hernia. We excluded cases with diagnosis of obstruction and bowel gangrene that underwent bowel resection, or with missing data. Risk variables of interest were age, sex, race, income status, insurance status, elective admission, comorbidity status (using the validated van Walraven Score), complications (mechanical, respiratory, postoperative infection, cardiovascular, intraoperative), morbid obesity, procedure type, conversion to open, mesh use, hospital type (rural, urban non-teaching, urban teaching), bed size, and region (northeast, midwest, south, west). Univariate analysis comparing patients with ileus vs control was performed. We then performed multivariable analysis using logistic regression, adjusting for all the risk variables, with ileus as the dependent variable. RESULTS: 30,912 patients were identified that met criteria. Of these, 2660 (8.61%) had postoperative ileus during their stay at the hospital. Univariate analysis showed all risk variables were associated with development of ileus with the exception of income status (p = 0.2903), elective admission (p = 0.7989), mesh use (p = 0.3620), and hospital bed size (p = 0.08351). Median length of stay was 7 days in the ileus cohort vs 3 days in control (p < 0.0001). Median total charges (adjusted to 2012 dollars) was $54,819 vs $35,058 (p < 0.0001). We then performed logistic regression adjusting for all risk variables and found that age (OR 1.66, p < 0.0001), male sex (OR 1.51, p < 0.0001), Black race (OR 1.49, p < 0.0001), comorbidity status (OR 1.12, p < 0.0001), laparoscopic cases converted to open (OR 1.55, p < 0.0001), postoperative complications (mechanical: OR 2.32, p < 0.0001, respiratory: OR 1.54, p < 0.0001, postoperative infection: OR 2.12, p < 0.0001, cardiovascular: OR 1.57, p = 0.0006, intraoperative: OR 1.29, p = 0.0200) were independently associated with increased risk of ileus. However, laparoscopic vs open (OR 0.76, p < 0.0001), elective admission (OR 0.91, p = 0.0378), and northeast vs south hospital region (OR 0.74, p < 0.0001) were independently associated with decreased risk of ileus. CONCLUSION: We performed a large observational study looking for risk factors associated with ileus following ventral hernia repair. Race and region of treatment are independent risk factors associated with ileus following ventral hernia repair, and a potential source of disparities in care and increased admission length and higher cost of care. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Atrial fibrillation after resection: a PROGRESS III study.

AIM: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia, and is associated with worsening quality of life and complications such as stroke. Previous work showed that 8% of patients develop new-onset AF following colonic resection and highlighted factors that might predict the development of postoperative AF. The development of a new arrhythmia may have a negative effect on longer-term quality of life as well as cancer survivorship. The aim of this study is to accurately quantify the incidence of AF following colorectal cancer surgery and to validate a model to predict its development. METHOD: The Atrial Fibrillation After Resection (AFAR) study will recruit 720 patients aged 65 or over undergoing resection of colorectal cancer with curative intent. The primary outcome is development of AF within 90 days of surgery. Assessment of cardiac rhythm will be performed using 24-h Holter monitors at baseline, 30 and 90 days after surgery. An electrocardiogram (ECG) will be performed on the day of discharge. Baseline descriptors including model variables and quality of life will be recorded using EQ-5D-5L. The occurrence of complications and other key surgical outcomes will be recorded. An additional blood test for N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) will be performed prior to surgery. Statistical analysis will validate a previously derived model and will test the incremental value of added variables such as NT-proBNP. Finally, an exploratory analysis will assess whether changes in ECG measures between baseline and postoperative ECG can predict subsequent new-onset AF. CONCLUSION: This study will provide data that may allow us to stratify the risk of developing AF following colorectal cancer surgery. This may inform screening or prophylactic approaches.

Prehabilitation in elective abdominal cancer surgery in older patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation has emerged as a strategy to prepare patients for elective abdominal cancer surgery with documented improvements in postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the evidence for prehabilitation interventions of relevance to the older adult. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted using MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and PsychINFO. Studies of preoperative intervention (prehabilitation) in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery reporting postoperative outcomes were included. Age limits were not set as preliminary searches revealed this would be too restrictive. Articles were screened and selected based on PRISMA guidelines, and assessment of bias was performed. Qualitative, quantitative and meta-analyses of data were conducted as appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies (3962 patients) were included. Interventions included exercise, nutrition, psychological input, comprehensive geriatric assessment and optimization, smoking cessation and multimodal (two or more interventions). Nine studies purposely selected high-risk, frail or older patients. Thirty studies were at moderate or high risk of bias. Ten studies individually reported benefits in complication rates, with meta-analyses for overall complications demonstrating significant benefit: multimodal (risk difference -0·1 (95 per cent c.i. -0·18 to -0·02); P = 0·01, I2  = 18 per cent) and nutrition (risk difference -0·18 (-0·26 to -0·10); P < 0·001, I2  = 0 per cent). Seven studies reported reductions in length of hospital stay, with no differences on meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: The conclusions of this review are limited by the quality of the included studies, and the heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures reported. Exercise, nutritional and multimodal prehabilitation may reduce morbidity after abdominal surgery, but data specific to older patients are sparse.

ANTECEDENTES: La pre-habilitación ha surgido como una estrategia para preparar a los pacientes para la cirugía electiva del cáncer abdominal con mejoras documentadas en los resultados postoperatorios. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la evidencia sobre las intervenciones de pre-habilitación relevantes en adultos de edad avanzada. MÉTODOS: Se realizaron búsquedas sistemáticas utilizando MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL y PsychINFO. Registro PROSPERO: CRD42019120381. Se incluyeron estudios de intervención preoperatoria (pre-habilitación) en pacientes sometidos a cirugía oncológica abdominal que describiesen resultados postoperatorios. No se fijaron límites en la edad dado que las búsquedas preliminares revelaron que ello sería demasiado restrictivo. Los artículos fueron examinados y seleccionados en base a las guías PRISMA y se realizó una evaluación del sesgo. Se llevó a cabo un análisis cualitativo, cuantitativo y metaanálisis de los datos según fuese apropiado. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 33 estudios (3.962 patients). Las intervenciones incluyeron ejercicio, nutrición, intervención psicológica, evaluación geriátrica global y optimización, abandono del tabaquismo y multimodal (dos o más intervenciones). Nueve estudios seleccionaron expresamente una población de pacientes de elevado riesgo, frágiles o de edad avanzada. Treinta estudios presentaban un riesgo moderado/alto de sesgo. Diez estudios describieron de forma individual beneficios en las tasas de complicaciones con metaanálisis para las complicaciones globales demostrando un beneficio significativo: multimodal (diferencia de riesgo -0,1 (i.c. del 95% −0,18 a −0,02); P = 0,01, I2 = 18%) e intervención nutricional (diferencia de riesgo −0,18 (i.c. del 95% −0,26 a −0,10); P < 0,001, I2 = 0%). Siete estudios describieron reducciones en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria, sin diferencias en el metaanálisis. CONCLUSIÓN: Las conclusiones de esta revisión están limitadas por la calidad de los estudios incluidos, heterogeneidad de las intervenciones y descripción de las medidas de resultados. Las intervenciones de pre-habilitación de ejercicio, nutricionales y multimodales puede reducir la morbilidad tras cirugía abdominal, pero los datos concretos en pacientes de edad avanzada son escasos.

Non-randomized studies should be considered for assessing surgical techniques in rectal prolapse: prospective cohort study.

AIM: Randomized trials comparing surgical techniques for rectal prolapse are not always feasible. We assessed whether non-randomized comparisons of those who have had surgery with those still waiting would be confounding baseline health status. METHOD: This was a prospective cohort study in seven UK hospitals. Participants were ≥ 18 years and listed for surgical interventions of equivalent intensity for rectal prolapse. They were defined as short or long waiters (≤ 18 or > 18 weeks, respectively). Time on the waiting list was compared with baseline comorbidity (Charlson comorbidity index) and change from baseline in health status (EQ-5D-5L) at the time of surgery. RESULTS: In all, 203 patients were analysed. Median (interquartile range) waiting time was 13.7 weeks (8.1, 20.4) varying across sites. Baseline comorbidity was not an important predictor of waiting time. Median Charlson comorbidity index was 2 (0, 3) for short and 1 (0, 3) for long waiters. A change in waiting time by a week was associated with negligible improvement in the EQ-5D-5L index of 0.001 (95% CI -0.000 to 0.003, P = 0.106). CONCLUSION: Negligible change in patient reported health status while on the waiting list and lack of effect of comorbidities in influencing waiting time support the use of non-randomized pre-/post-studies to compare the effects of surgical interventions for rectal prolapse.

Variation in descriptors of patient characteristics in randomized clinical trials of peptic ulcer repair: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The ability to compare findings across surgical research is important. Inadequate description of participants, interventions or outcomes could lead to bias and inaccurate assessment of findings. The aim of this study was to assess consistency of description of participants using studies comparing laparoscopic and open repair of peptic ulcer as an example. METHODS: This systematic review is reported in line with the PRISMA checklist. Searches of MEDLINE and Embase databases were performed to identify studies comparing laparoscopic and open repair of perforated peptic ulcer in adults, published in the English language. Manuscripts were dual-screened for eligibility. Full texts were retrieved and dual-screened for inclusion. Data extracted from studies included descriptors of participants in studies from tables and text. Descriptors were categorized into conceptual domains by the research team, and coverage of each domain by study was tabulated. RESULTS: Searches identified 2018 studies. After screening, 37 full texts were retrieved and 23 studies were included in the final synthesis. A total of 76 unique descriptors were identified. These were classified into demographics (11 descriptors), vital signs (9 descriptors), disease-specific characteristics (10 descriptors), presentation and pathway factors (4 descriptors), risk factors (8 descriptors), laboratory tests (14 descriptors) and baseline health (28 descriptors). The number of descriptors in a single study ranged from three to 31. All studies reported at least one demographic descriptor. Laboratory tests was the least frequently described domain. CONCLUSION: Study participants are described inconsistently in studies of a single example surgical condition.

ANTECEDENTES: La capacidad de comparar los hallazgos en la investigación quirúrgica es importante. Una descripción inadecuada de los participantes, las intervenciones o los resultados podría conllevar sesgos y una evaluación incorrecta de los hallazgos. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la consistencia en la descripción de los participantes utilizando los estudios comparativos de la cirugía laparoscópica con la cirugía abierta en el tratamiento de la úlcera péptica, como modelo. MÉTODOS: Esta revisión sistemática se presenta de acuerdo con la lista de verificación PRISMA. Se realizaron búsquedas en las bases de datos MEDLINE y EMBASE para identificar estudios, publicados en inglés, que compararan el tratamiento quirúrgico laparoscópico y abierto de la úlcera péptica perforada en adultos. Los artículos elegibles fueron sometidos a un doble cribaje para su selección. Se recuperaron los textos completos de los artículos y se evaluaron por partida doble para su inclusión. Los datos extraídos correspondían a los términos que describían las poblaciones de estudio en el texto y en las tablas de los artículos. Dichos términos descriptores fueron clasificados por el equipo de investigación en dominios conceptuales, registrándose la cobertura de cada dominio en cada estudio. RESULTADOS: Las búsquedas bibliográficas identificaron 2.018 estudios. Después de la selección, se recuperaron 37 artículos de texto completo y se incluyeron 23 estudios en la síntesis final. Se identificaron un total de 76 descriptores únicos. Dichos descriptores se clasificaron en demográficos (11 variables), signos vitales (9 variables), características específicas de la enfermedad (10 variables), factores de presentación y del proceso (4 variables), factores de riesgo (8 variables), pruebas de laboratorio (14 variables) y estado de salud basal (28 variables). El número de descriptores en un solo estudio varió de 3 a 31. Todos los estudios presentaron al menos un descriptor demográfico. Las pruebas de laboratorio fueron el dominio descrito con menor frecuencia. CONCLUSIÓN: Esta revisión demuestra que los participantes en los estudios se describen de manera inconsistente, tras haber tomado como modelo los estudios de una sola patología quirúrgica.

Association of low skeletal muscle mass with the presence of advanced colorectal neoplasm: integrative analysis using three skeletal muscle mass indices.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate an association between colorectal neoplasm (CRN) and skeletal muscle mass using three widely accepted skeletal muscle mass indices (SMIs) in a large population at average risk. METHOD: We performed a cross-sectional study using a screening colonoscopy database of 33 958 asymptomatic subjects aged 40-75 years. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyser. ASM adjusted for height squared (ASM/ht2 ), weight (ASM/wt) and body mass index (ASM/BMI) were used as indices for muscle mass. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between SMIs and CRN. RESULTS: In a multivariable-adjusted model, the risk of an advanced CRN increased linearly with decreasing quartiles for all three SMIs. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for advanced CRN in quartiles 1, 2 and 3 of ASM/wt compared with that in quartile 4 were 1.279, 1.196 and 1.179, respectively (Ptrend  = 0.017); for ASM/BMI, ORs were 1.307, 1.144 and 1.091, respectively (Ptrend  = 0.002); and for ASM/ht2 , ORs were 1.342, 1.169 and 1.062, respectively (Ptrend  = 0.002). The risk of distally located advanced CRN was higher in quartile 1 than in quartile 4 for all three SMIs (ASM/wt, OR = 1.356; ASM/BMI, OR = 1.383; ASM/ht2 , OR = 1.430). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that low skeletal muscle mass was consistently associated with the presence of advanced CRN in a population at average risk regardless of the operational definition of the SMI, and it was particularly associated with distal advanced CRN.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of baseline risk factors for the development of postoperative ileus in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative ileus occurs frequently following abdominal surgery. Identification of groups at high risk of developing ileus before surgery may allow targeted interventions. This review aimed to identify baseline risk factors for ileus. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted with reference to PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. It was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017068697). Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were undertaken. Studies reporting baseline risk factors for the development of postoperative ileus based on cohort or trial data and published in English were eligible for inclusion. Dual screening of abstracts and full texts was undertaken. Independent dual extraction was performed. Bias assessment was undertaken using the quality in prognostic studies tool. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was undertaken where two or more studies assessed the same variable. FINDINGS: Searches identified 2,430 papers, of which 28 were included in qualitative analysis and 12 in quantitative analysis. Definitions and incidence of ileus varied between studies. No consistent significant effect was found for association between prior abdominal surgery, age, body mass index, medical comorbidities or smoking status. Male sex was associated with ileus on meta-analysis (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.23), although this may reflect unmeasured factors. The literature shows inconsistent effects of baseline factors on the development of postoperative ileus. A large cohort study using consistent definitions of ileus and factors should be undertaken.

The informational and decisional preferences of patients undergoing surgery for Crohn's anal fistula: a qualitative study.

AIM: One in three patients with Crohn's disease will develop a perianal fistula, but only a few achieve long-term healing. Treatment is both medical and surgical. Since there is no 'best' surgical procedure, patient preference is important in selecting the appropriate treatment for this condition. The aim of this study was to investigate the informational and decisional preferences of patients when surgical treatment is being considered. METHOD: Patients who had undergone surgery for Crohn's anal fistula underwent face-to-face semi-structured interviews. These explored the experience of treatments for fistula, of receiving information and of participation in decision-making. Transcripts were analysed by two investigators through inductive thematic analysis. Saturation was assessed for at 12 interviews and then after each subsequent interview. RESULTS: Seventeen patients completed interviews, and saturation was achieved. Five themes were identified, of which two (desired information and decision-making) were relevant to this study. Other themes included experience of Crohn's disease, experience of receiving information and procedure-specific comments. Participants wanted to have information on any risks, high-level outcomes (e.g. success), impact on day-to-day life and aftercare. Participants felt they did not always receive the information they needed to select the best treatment option. Participants felt uninvolved in treatment decisions and would have liked to trade off operations to reach their treatment goal. CONCLUSION: Information provided to patients about surgical treatment of Crohn's perianal fistula does not meet their needs. Clinicians should address aftercare, impact on quality of life and the risks and benefits of the any proposed procedure.

National prospective cohort study of the burden of acute small bowel obstruction.

Background: Small bowel obstruction is a common surgical emergency, and is associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality across the world. The literature provides little information on the conservatively managed group. The aim of this study was to describe the burden of small bowel obstruction in the UK. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in 131 acute hospitals in the UK between January and April 2017, delivered by trainee research collaboratives. Adult patients with a diagnosis of mechanical small bowel obstruction were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included complications, unplanned intensive care admission and readmission within 30 days of discharge. Practice measures, including use of radiological investigations, water soluble contrast, operative and nutritional interventions, were collected. Results: Of 2341 patients identified, 693 (29·6 per cent) underwent immediate surgery (within 24 h of admission), 500 (21·4 per cent) had delayed surgery after initial conservative management, and 1148 (49·0 per cent) were managed non-operatively. The mortality rate was 6·6 per cent (6·4 per cent for non-operative management, 6·8 per cent for immediate surgery, 6·8 per cent for delayed surgery; P = 0·911). The major complication rate was 14·4 per cent overall, affecting 19·0 per cent in the immediate surgery, 23·6 per cent in the delayed surgery and 7·7 per cent in the non-operative management groups (P < 0·001). Cox regression found hernia or malignant aetiology and malnutrition to be associated with higher rates of death. Malignant aetiology, operative intervention, acute kidney injury and malnutrition were associated with increased risk of major complication. Conclusion: Small bowel obstruction represents a significant healthcare burden. Patient-level factors such as timing of surgery, acute kidney injury and nutritional status are factors that might be modified to improve outcomes.