Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin in adult non-neutropenic cancer patients with suspected infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin (PCT) has garnered attention as a potential diagnostic biomarker for infection in cancer patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) and to compare it with C-reactive protein (CRP) in adult non-neutropenic cancer patients with suspected infection. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify all relevant diagnostic accuracy studies. Original articles reporting the diagnostic accuracy of PCT for infection detection in adult patients with solid or hematological malignancies were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, area under the hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristic (HSROC) curve, and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PCT were 60% (95% CI [45-74%]) and 78% (95% CI [69-86%]). The diagnostic odds ratio was estimated at 5.47 (95% CI [2.86-10.46]). Three studies compared the diagnostic accuracies of PCT and CRP. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values for PCT were 57% (95% CI [26-83%]) and 75% (95% CI [68-82%]), and those for CRP were 67% (95% CI [35-88%]) and 73% (95% CI [69-77%]). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PCT and CRP did not differ significantly (p = 0.61 and p = 0.63). The diagnostic accuracy of PCT was similar to that of CRP as measured by the area under the HSROC curve (0.73, CI = 0.61-0.91 vs. 0.74, CI = 0.61-0.95, p = 0.93). CONCLUSION: While elevated PCT levels can be indicative of potential infection, they should not be solely relied upon to exclude infection. We recommend not using the PCT test in isolation; Instead, it should be carefully interpreted in the context of clinical findings.

Novel Prediction Score for Arterial-Esophageal Fistula in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Bleeding: A Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: To develop and internally validate a novel prediction score to predict the occurrence of arterial-esophageal fistula (AEF) in esophageal cancer bleeding. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with esophageal cancer bleeding in the emergency department. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of AEF. The patients were randomly divided into a derivation group and a validation group. In the derivation stage, a predictive model was developed using logistic regression analysis. Subsequently, internal validation of the model was conducted in the validation cohort during the validation stage to assess its discrimination ability. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients were enrolled in this study. All participants were randomized to a derivation cohort (n = 155) and a validation cohort (n = 102). AEF occurred in 22 patients (14.2%) in the derivation group and 14 patients (13.7%) in the validation group. A predictive model (HEARTS-Score) comprising five variables (hematemesis, active bleeding, serum creatinine level >1.2 mg/dL, prothrombin time >13 s, and previous stent implantation) was established. The HEARTS-Score demonstrated a high discriminative ability in both the derivation and validation cohorts, with c-statistics of 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.98) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.92), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: By employing this novel prediction score, clinicians can make more objective risk assessments, optimizing diagnostic strategies and tailoring treatment approaches.

Roux-en-Y and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Surgery Are Superior to Sleeve Gastrectomy in Lowering Glucose and Cholesterol Levels Independent of Weight Loss: a Propensity-Score Weighting Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The superior effects of gastric bypass surgery in preventing cardiovascular diseases compared with sleeve gastrectomy are well-established. However, whether these effects are independent of weight loss is not known. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we compared the change in cardiometabolic risks of 1073 diabetic patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n = 265), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) (n = 619), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (n = 189) with equivalent weight loss from the Min-Shen General Hospital. Propensity score-weighting, multivariate regression, and matching were performed to adjust for baseline differences. RESULTS: After 12 months, OAGB and, to a lesser extent, RYGB exhibited superior effects on glycemic control compared with SG in patients with equivalent weight loss. The effect was significant in patients with mild-to-modest BMI reduction but diminished in patients with severe BMI reduction. RYGB and OAGB had significantly greater effects in lowering total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol than SG, regardless of weight loss. The results of matching patients with equivalent weight loss yielded similar results. The longer length of bypassed biliopancreatic (BP) limbs was correlated with a greater decrease in glycemic levels, insulin resistance index, lipids, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and creatinine levels in patients receiving RYBG. It was correlated with greater decreases in BMI, fasting insulin, insulin resistance index, and C-reactive protein levels in patients receiving OAGB. CONCLUSION: Diabetic patients receiving OAGB and RYGB had lower glucose and cholesterol levels compared with SG independent of weight loss. Our results suggest diabetic patients with cardiovascular risk factors such as hypercholesterolemia to receive bypass surgery.

Change of cardiovascular risk associated serologic biomarkers after gastric bypass: A comparison of diabetic and non-diabetic Asian patients.

BACKGROUND: While clinical findings demonstrate a superior benefit of cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) receiving bariatric surgery over non-T2D patients, the mechanism is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the changes in the CV risk score and five CV-associated biomarkers after gastric bypass surgery. METHOD: We enrolled 80 obese subjects who underwent gastric bypass (40 T2D and 40 non-T2D). CV risks were assessed using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) engine before and after surgery. Levels of five biomarkers -fasting serum fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-19, FGF-21, corin, oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL), and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE)-were measured before surgery and one year after surgery. RESULTS: The T2D group was significantly older and had a higher CV risk score than the non-T2D group, but body mass index (BMI) was similar between the groups. Preoperative biomarker levels were similar in both the T2D and the non-T2D groups. One year after surgery, the percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) was similar between the two groups (32.2 ± 19.5% versus 34.1% ± 8.8%, p = 0.611). Complete T2D remission (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) < 6.0%) was achieved in 29 patients (72.5%). The 10-year CV risk scores by the UKPDS risk engine reduced significantly in both the T2D and the non-T2D groups, but more in the T2D group. Three of five biomarkers changed significantly after surgery: the FGF-19 increased from 195.6 ± 249.1 pg/mL to 283.2 ± 211.8 pg/mL, corin increased from 3.3 ± 2.3 ng/mL to 4.6 ± 3.7 ng/mL, and ox-LDL decreased from 148.5 ± 71.7-107.9 U/L; the P values were 0.002, 0.002 and < 0.001, respectively. The T2D group showed a significantly different change in FGF-19 increase and FGF-21 decrease compared to the non-T2D group. The changes in corin and ox-LDL levels were not different between the T2D and non-T2D groups. CONCLUSION: Gastric bypass surgery resulted in a higher UKPDS CV risk score reduction in obese T2D Asians than in those without. FGF-19 and FGF-21 may be associated with the underlying mechanism of this difference.

Twenty years' experience of laparoscopic 1-anastomosis gastric bypass: surgical risk and long-term results.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic 1- (single-) anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) was developed as a simplified technique of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), but super long-term data are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risks and long-term results of OAGB over a period of 20 years. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: A total of 2223 patients underwent OAGB from 2001 to 2020; the mean age was 35.3 ± 11.4 years (range, 14-71 yr), 70.2% were female, and the mean body mass index was 40.2 ± 11.9 kg/m2. All data were kept in a prospective bariatric database. Patients were divided into 4 groups, based on the 5-year period in which their surgery was performed, and a retrospective analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The means for operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay after OAGB were 131.9 ± 40.1 minutes, 38.5 ± 30.7 mL, and 4.5 ± 4.0 days, respectively. There were 27 patients (1.2%) with 30-day postoperative major complications overall, but the group rate decreased to .4% in the last 5-year period. At postoperative years 5, 10, and 15, the percentages of total weight loss were 31.9%, 29.6%, and 29.5%, respectively, and the percentages of excess weight loss were 77.2%, 68.4%, and 65.5%, respectively. Among 739 patients (33.2%) with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the rates of complete remission (glycated hemoglobin < 60%) at 5, 10, and 15 years were 67.3%, 73.8%, and 66.7%, respectively. The weight loss and antimetabolic effects were similar in each 5-year period, but a significant malnutrition effect was observed. A total of 113 (5.1%) patients needed revision surgery at follow-up, due to malnutrition (n = 51), weight regain (n = 24), acid or bile reflux (n = 22), marginal ulcer (n = 8), ileus (n = 3), and other causes (n = 5). At 15 years, the overall revision rate was 11.9% (27/226), and 80% of the patients were very satisfied with their procedures. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that OAGB is a safe and durable primary bariatric procedure, with sustained weight loss and a high resolution of T2D up to 20 years post surgery in Taiwan, although malnutrition is a major side effect.

Variation in Small Bowel Length and Its Influence on the Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy.

PURPOSE: Small bowel length is drawing attention in the development of gastrointestinal bariatric/metabolic surgery, but the importance of the length of the small bowel in bariatric/metabolic is not clear. The present study was conducted to investigate variations in small bowel length and their clinical significance in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Small bowel length was measured in 620 patients diagnosed with obesity who underwent LSG between March 2014 and August 2018. Prospectively obtained demographic and clinical data were investigated, focusing on the association between small bowel length and weight loss. RESULTS: Small bowel length varied widely among patients (mean 739.8 + 115.7 cm, range 380-1050 cm). Linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between small bowel length and body height, body weight, waist circumference, and serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hemoglobin, C-peptide, glycated hemoglobin (A1C), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (r-GT). Multivariate analysis confirmed that body height and serum A1C% levels independently predicted small bowel length in bariatric patients, strongly with body height (p < 0.001) but weakly with A1C%(p = 0.021). One-year follow-up rate was 75.3% (467/620), and small bowel length did not influence weight loss or the reduction of obesity related cardiovascular risk factors after LSG. CONCLUSION: In this study, small bowel length varied widely among bariatric patients and was strongly associated with body height and weakly with serum A1C levels. Small bowel length has no significant role in weight loss or the resolution of cardiovascular risk factors after LSG.

The Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Renal, Neurological, and Ophthalmic Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: the Taiwan Diabesity Study.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery has been shown to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, less is known whether it can also reduce diabetic renal, neurological, and ophthalmic complications. METHODS: This prospective multicenter cohort study compared renal, ophthalmic, and neurological complications between 49 patients with obesity/overweight receiving bariatric surgery and 338 patients receiving standard medical treatment after follow-up for 2 years. Patients received neurological examinations including toe tuning fork vibration test, ankle tendon reflex test, 10-g monofilament test, and ophthalmic examinations including visual acuity measurement and fundus examinations. Multiple regressions, propensity score weighting, and matching were employed to adjust for baseline differences. RESULTS: After 2 years of follow-up, patients with type 2 diabetes receiving bariatric surgery had greater reduction in BMI, HbA1c, and urine albumin-creatinine ratio, greater improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate, and greater increase in tuning fork test score of right and left toes compared with the medical group. However, there is no improvement in 10 g-monofilament test, visual acuity, diabetic non-proliferative retinopathy, and proliferative retinopathy. Similar results were obtained using multiple regression adjustment, propensity-score weighting, or comparing age-, sex-, and BMI-matched subjects. CONCLUSIONS: After 2-year follow-up, patients with obesity/overweight and type 2 diabetes receiving bariatric surgery have increased glomerular filtration rate, reduced albuminuria, and improved tuning folk vibration sensation.

Shared Decision Making and Choice for Bariatric Surgery.

: The number of people undergoing bariatric surgery is increasing every year, and their expectations for surgery often differ greatly. The purpose of this study was to develop a patient-centered decision-making aid to help people define their weight loss goals and assist them in discussing their surgical treatment with surgeons. Before the operation, the patients were asked to read the shared decision-making text and conduct a self-assessment. After the operation, we evaluated the program using survey questionnaires. A total of 103 patients were formally included in this study. The results show that patients were very satisfied with the use of patient decision aids (PDAs), with a score of 4.3 points (±0.6), and the postoperative decision-making satisfaction was also very high, at 4.4 points (±0.5), while the postoperative regret score was low, at 1.6 points (±0.6). Their satisfaction with surgical decision making and decision regret were statistically significantly negatively correlated (r = -0.711, p < 0.001). The experience of using PDAs was statistically significantly negatively correlated with decision regret (r = -0.451, p < 0.001); the experience of PDA use was statistically positively correlated with decision satisfaction (r = 0.522, p < 0.001). Patient decision aids are a means of helping patients make informed choices before they seek to undergo bariatric surgery.

Randomized Controlled Trial of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: Comparison of the YOMEGA and Taiwan Studies.

BACKGROUND: The YOMEGA study (Y-study) was a randomized trial comparing one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Here, we aim to compare the Y-study and our pioneer trial from Taiwan (T-study). METHODS: Data from the Y-study and the T-study were collected and compared. RESULTS: The Y-study recruited 234 patients with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 43.9 and age of 43.5 years. The T-study recruited 80 patients with a similar mean BMI of 44.3 and mean age of 31.4 years. The studies had similar findings including (1) OAGB is easier and possibly safer procedure than RYGB. Both studies showed that OAGB had a shorter operation time than RYGB, but a lower surgical complication rate was only demonstrated in T-study. (2) Both procedures have similar weight loss but OAGB features better glycemic control than RYGB. Weight loss at 2 years after surgery was similar between two procedures, but OAGB reduced HbA1c to a greater degree than RYGB at 2 years in Y-study (- 2.3% vs. - 1.3%; p = 0.025). The resolution of the metabolic syndrome was 100% for both groups in the T-study. (3) OAGB carried a higher risk of malnutrition. OAGB had more malabsorptive problems with a lower hemoglobin level than RYGB at 2 years after surgery. Adverse malnutrition events occurred in nine (7.8%) OAGB patients in the Y-study. Four (3.4%) patients of OAGB received revision surgery in Y-study but none in T-study. (4) Bile reflux was noted in OAGB patients but did not influence quality of life or revision rate. Y-study found that bile in the gastric pouch was present in 16% of patients in the OAGB group versus none in the RYGB, but no inter-group difference in quality of life was detected. There was a trend for RYGB patients to experience more abdominal pain than OAGB. CONCLUSIONS: Both studies showed that OAGB is a technically easier procedure and features better glycemic control than RYGB, but has a mal-absorptive effect. However, the bile reflux and abdominal pain controversies persisted.

Protein deficiency after gastric bypass: The role of common limb length in revision surgery.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery, especially the gastric bypass procedure, is an effective therapy for morbid obesity, but may reduce protein absorption and induce protein deficiency (PD). A recent study reported an issue about common limb length for PD. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the prevalence of PD after gastric bypass surgery and investigate the role of common limb length in PD-related revision surgery. SETTING: Hospital-based bariatric center. METHODS: From 2001 to 2016, 2397 patients with morbid obesity who underwent bariatric/metabolic surgery with 1-year follow-up were recruited. Serum albumin and total protein were measured before and 1 year after surgery. Medical records of patients who underwent revision surgery due to PD were reviewed. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of PD was .5% preoperatively. The prevalence of PD increased to 2.0% at 1 year after surgery. The incidence was highest in one-anastomosis gastric bypass (2.8%) followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (1.8%). Until the end of follow-up, all 19 patients who underwent revision surgery for intractable PD had a relatively short common limb length of <400 cm. After elongation of the common limb length to >400 cm in revision surgery, PD improved in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients can develop PD after gastric bypass surgery when the common limb length is <400 cm. In patients with intractable PD after gastric bypass surgery, revision surgery for elongation of common limb length to >400 cm is mandatory to avoid PD-related complications.

Laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG): Surgical risk and long-term results.

BACKGROUND: Single-anastomosis duodeno-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG) was developed as a simplified technique of DJB-SG, but long-term data are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To report the long-term data of SADJB-SG. SETTING: Tertiary Teaching Hospital. METHODS: A total of 148 SADJB-SG was performed from 2011 to 2016 with mean age of 42.0 ± 10.9-years old (14-71), female 64.9%, and mean body mass index 34.2 ± 5.9 kg/m2. All patients were evaluated and managed under a strict multidisciplinary team approach. A retrospective analysis of a prospective bariatric database and telephone interview of patients who defaulted clinic follow-up at 5-year was conducted. RESULTS: The mean operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay of SADJB-SG were 189.6 ± 32.1 minutes, 43.5 ± 17.9 mL, and 5.0 ± 5.1 days, respectively. The 30-days postoperative major complication occurred in 7(4.7%) patients, all in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). At postoperative 1, 2, and 5 years, the mean percentage of total weight loss and excess weight loss of SADJB-SG patients were 25.5%, 22.8%, 22.5%, and 83.9%, 76.1%, 58.6%, respectively. Among 118 patients with T2D, 62 (52.5%) achieved complete remission (hemoglobin A1C <60%) at 1 year and 36.5% at 5 years after surgery. A total of 15 patients needed reoperation at follow-up, due to reflux disease (n = 11), weight regain, and recurrent of T2D (n = 2), ileus (n = 1), and peritonitis (n = 1). Among them, 8 were converted to RYGB and the others remained in same anatomy. At 5 years, the overall revision rate was 12.9% (8/62) and 24.5% (14/57) of the remaining required proton pump inhibitor for reflux symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our results show that primary SADJB-SG is a durable primary bariatric procedure with sustained weight loss and a high resolution of T2D at 5 years, but de novo GERD is the major side effect.

Study design and recruitment for a prospective controlled study of diabesity: Taiwan Diabesity Study.

BACKGROUND: Strong evidence has shown that metabolic surgery is more effective than medical treatment in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients. However, no study demonstrated a survival benefit and reduction of diabetes-related end-organ damage. Here, we describe the study design of a large prospective cohort study, the Taiwan Diabesity Study (TDS) which would compare the long-term survival rate and end-organ damage between overweight/obese type 2 diabetic patients receiving metabolic surgery and medical treatment. METHODS: Eligibility criteria include type 2 diabetic patients with duration > 6 months, body mass index (BMI) over 25 kg/m2 and age between 20 and 67 years. Exclusion criteria are serum creatinine over 2.0 mg/dL, C-peptide below 1.0 ng/ml, recent history of cancer, and major diabetic complications. Eligible participants were recruited from six medical centers in Taiwan. The survival rate and diabetes-related end organ damage will be compared between the metabolic surgery group and medical group after follow-up for 10 years. RESULTS: In 3 years, 1016 participants were identified from 38,751 patients. The average BMI of patients was 30.6 (±2.6) kg/m2 and the average hemoglobin A1c was 8.2% (±1.5%) with 18% of them receiving insulin treatment. Among them, 126 patients received metabolic surgery and 890 patients received conventional medical treatment. The metabolic surgery group are younger, have a higher proportion of females, higher BMI and blood lipids as compared to the medical group. CONCLUSION: The TDS recruited 1016 overweight/obese type 2 diabetic patients including 126 patients receiving metabolic surgery and 890 patients receiving medical treatment.

HSCRP as surrogate marker in predicting long term effect of bariatric surgery on resolution of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is closely associated with obesity and is one of the important etiologies of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC and liver failure. Bariatric surgery is proven to be effective in causing weight loss and improvement of NASH) but there is limited long term data. OBJECTIVES: To identify the predictors of NASH in morbidly obese patients and evaluate long term data of bariatric surgery effects on NASH. METHODS: 308 bariatric patients (mean age 30.2 years old, body mass index (BMI) 45.0 kg/m2) with concurrent liver biopsy form 2003 to 2008 were included. We compared the clinical data between the NASH and non-NASH group and identify predictors of NASH in this cohort of patients. Remission of NASH was evaluated using the predictor of NASH. RESULTS: Prevalence of NASH was 43.8%. At baseline, the NASH and non-NASH groups both had similar age, BMI and sex ratio but the NASH group had significantly worse glycemic control, liver enzymes, triglycerides and uric acid. Highly sensitive-C Reactive Protein (HSCRP) level was identified as the only independent predictor of NASH. Ten years follow up (60.4% loss to follow up) showed good weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities and reduction of HSCRP. Patients with bypass surgery had better weight loss and lower levels of HSCRP. (HSCRP 0.2 ± 0.1 mg/dL vs. 0.8 ± 0.7 mg/dL, p = 0.009). than non-bypass group. CONCLUSION: NASH is common in bariatric patients. HSCRP is the only independent predictor of NASH and can be used as a surrogate marker in predicting long term effect of Bariatric Surgery on resolution of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis Bypass procedure was better in resolution of NASH than non-bypass procedure.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Morbidly Obese Bariatric Patients with Concurrent Hepatitis C Viral Infection.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an important cause of liver cirrhosis and its complications. The safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in patients with HCV infection is not clear. METHODS: Charts were reviewed to identify patients with HCV infection before bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgical patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and without NASH (non-NASH) were recruited as comparative groups. Demographic variables, perioperative data, follow-up, and HCV-related parameters were extracted and compared. RESULTS: Forty-seven bariatric patients between 2000 and 2016 that suffered from HCV infection were identified. The mean age and body mass index (BMI) at baseline were 34.5 ± 9.9 years and 40.4 ± 7.7 kg/m2, respectively. The HCV(+) group was associated with female sex, older age, lower BMI, and waist circumference than both NASH and non-NASH groups. Both HCV(+) and NASH groups had higher liver function tests and incidence of metabolic syndrome than non-NASH group. The HCV(+) group had lower uric acid and albumin level than the NASH group. Early major postoperative complication occurred in 1 (2.1%) patient of the HCV(+) group. At follow-up, the mean BMI decreased to 29.1 ± 7.1 kg/m2 and total weight loss was 25% for the HCV(+) group at 5 years after surgery. The weight loss curves were similar between the HCV(+) group and NASH group. During follow-up, no patients died but one patient with HCV(+) developed flare up of hepatitis after gastric bypass. The mean liver transaminase level remained in normal range for the HCV(+) group. CONCLUSION: Co-existence of HCV infection does not influence the outcome of bariatric surgery but continued monitoring of the liver function is indicated.

Long-term effect of bariatric surgery on resolution of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): An external validation and application of a clinical NASH score.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an important etiology of end-stage liver disease. Long-term effect of bariatric surgery in improvement of NASH is not clear. OBJECTIVES: To validate a scoring system for predicting NASH in morbidly obese patients and using it to evaluate the long-term effect of bariatric surgery on NASH. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital, Taiwan. METHODS: A new 5-point clinical NASH (C-NASH) score incorporating body mass index, alanine aminotransferase, and triglyceride was validated in a group of 307 bariatric patients (mean age 30.2 years, incorporating body mass index 45.0 kg/m2) with concurrent liver biopsy from 2003 to 2008. Remission of NASH in 5741 obese patients undergoing bariatric/metabolic surgery with long-term follow-up was then evaluated using the C-NASH score. RESULTS: Among 307 patients with liver biopsy, the prevalence of NASH was 44.0%. At baseline, the NASH group had significantly worse fasting glucose levels, triglycerides, uric acid, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma glutamyl transferase, and glycated hemoglobin. The diagnostic sensitivity of C-NASH score was 84.4%, and the accuracy was 68.4%. Among 5741 bariatric patients, the prevalence of high risk for NASH evaluated by C-NASH score was 40.9%. Postoperative follow-up showed good weight loss and almost complete remission of high risk for NASH up to 10 years. Patients with gastric banding had less weight loss, higher mean level of C-NASH score, and a higher incidence of high risk for NASH compared with other procedures at follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that improvement in C-NASH score suggesting remission of NASH is durable up to 10 years in all kinds of bariatric procedures.

Thirteen-Year Experience of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Surgical Risk, Weight Loss, and Revision Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been validated as a safe and effective treatment for morbid obesity. However, data of the long-term outcome remains lacking. METHODS: A total of 1759 LSG was performed as primary bariatric procedure from 2005 to 2017 with mean age of 35.2 ± 10.3 years old (14-71), female 69.7%, mean body mass index (BMI) 37.9 ± 7.7 kg/m2, and mean waist width 113.7 ± 17.9 cm. All patients were evaluated and managed under a strict multidisciplinary team approach. A retrospective analysis of a prospective bariatric database and telephone interview of patients who defaulted clinic follow-up at 10 years was conducted. RESULTS: The mean operating time, intraoperative blood, and hospital stay of LSG were 121.5 ± 36.5 min, 40.8 ± 69.7 ml, and 2.8 ± 2.7 days, respectively. The 30-day postoperative major complication occurred in 25 (1.4%) patients. The major complication rate was 15% at first year and 0% at the last year. The follow-up rate at 1, 5 and 10 years were 89.3%, 52.1 and 64.4%. At postoperative 1, 5, and 10 years, the mean percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) and excess weight loss (EWL%) of LSG patients were 33.4, 28.3, and 26.6% and 92.2, 80.1, and 70.5%, respectively. The mean BMI became 27, 26.2, and 27.1 kg/m2 at postoperative 1, 5, and 10 years. At follow-up, a total 69 patients needed surgical revision due to reflux disease (n = 45), weight regain (n = 19), persistent diabetes (n = 2), and chronic fistula (n = 3). The type of revision procedures were hiatal repair and gastropexy (n = 29), Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n = 23), and single anastomosis bypass (n = 17) with median time to revision 33 months (range 3-62). At 10 years, the overall revision rate was 21.5% (14/65) and 11(16.9%) of 65 patients were converted to RYGB. The other 54 patients remained at LSG anatomy, but 45% of them required proton pump inhibitor for reflux symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that primary LSG is a durable primary bariatric procedure with sustained weight loss and a high resolution of comorbidities at 10 years, but about half the patients had de novo GERD. The need for conversion to RYGB was 16.9% at 10 years.

Laparoscopic gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a comparison of Roux-en-Y versus single anastomosis gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, gastric bypass surgery has been found to have therapeutic potential for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the difference between 2 bypass procedures, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and another single anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB), is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences between SAGB and RYGB in the efficacy of T2D remission in obese patients. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: Outcomes of 406 (259 women and 147 male) patients who had undergone RYGB (157) or SAGB (249) for the treatment of T2D with 1-year follow-up were assessed. The remission of T2D after surgery was evaluated in matched groups, including body mass index (BMI) and the ABCD scoring system, which comprises patient age, BMI, C-peptide levels, and duration of T2D (yr). RESULTS: The weight loss of the SAGB patients at 1 year after surgery was better than the RYGB patients (24.1% [8.4%] versus 30.7% [8.7%]; P<.001). The mean BMI decreased from 39.9 (8.0) to 27.4 (4.6) kg/m2 in SAGB patients at 1 year after surgery and decreased from 34.5 (6.6) to 26.2 (4.2) kg/m2 in the RYGB patients. The mean glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) decreased from 8.6% to 6.2% of the RYGB group and from 8.6% to 5.5% of the SAGB group. Eighty-seven (55.4%) patients of the RYGB group and 204 (81.9%) of the SAGB group achieved complete remission of T2D (HbA1C<6.0%) at 1 year after surgery (P<.001). SAGB exhibited significantly better glycemic control than RYGB surgery in selected groups stratified by different BMI and ABCD score. At 5 years after surgery, SAGB still had a better remission of T2D than RYGB (70.5% versus 39.4%; P = .002). Multivariate analysis confirms that both SAGB and ABCD score are independent predictors of T2D remission after bypass surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Both RYGB and SAGB are effective metabolic surgery. SAGB carries a higher power on T2D remission than RYGB in a small group of patients. ABCD score is useful in T2D patient classification and selection for different procedures.

Prediction of type 2 diabetes remission after metabolic surgery: a comparison of the individualized metabolic surgery score and the ABCD score.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic surgery has become increasingly accepted for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal candidate and surgical procedure. Although a new individualized metabolic surgery (IMS) score was recently proposed for procedure selection, it has yet to be validated. OBJECTIVE: To validate the IMS score with regard to remission of T2D after metabolic surgery and compare it with the age, body mass index, C-peptide level, and duration of T2D (ABCD) score. SETTING: Hospital-based bariatric center. METHODS: A total of 310 T2D patients who underwent gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy at an academic center in Taiwan and had a minimum 5-year follow-up (2004-2012) were examined for the predictive power of complete remission using the IMS and the ABCD scoring systems. RESULTS: At the 5-year follow-up, weight loss was 27.5%, with mean body mass index decreasing from 37.8 to 27.9 kg/m2, mean glycated hemoglobin decreased from 8.6% to 6.1%, and prolonged remission of T2D achieved in 224 (72.3%) T2D patients. Remission rates were higher in patients who underwent gastric bypass than in those who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (73.6% versus 66.1%; P = .04), regardless of T2D severity, and were 96%, 68%, and 16% in patients with IMS mild, moderate, and severe scores, respectively. Although both scores predicted the success of surgery, the ABCD was better in patients with IMS moderate scores. CONCLUSION: Metabolic surgery is an option for T2D patients with obesity. The ABCD score may be better at predicting T2D remission after metabolic surgery compared with the IMS score.

High Incidence of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Bariatric Patients: Comparing Different Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is an effective therapy for morbid obesity but may reduce calcium absorption and significantly decrease the bone mineral density. This study examined the prevalence of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in obese subjects during follow-up after different bariatric surgeries. We investigated predictors of SHPT. METHODS: We enrolled 1470 obese subjects undergoing bariatric/metabolic surgery with at least 1-year follow-up, including 322 patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), 695 undergoing single anastomosis (mini-) gastric bypass (SAGB), 93 undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), and 360 undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Five years of data were available for 215 patients. Patients were instructed to supplement their diet according to the guideline. Calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and vitamin D levels were measured before surgery and at 1 and 5 years after surgery. SHPT was defined as PTH > 69 pg/mL. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of SHPT was high, 21.0% before surgery and was not different between patients with different bariatric procedures. Pre-operative PTH correlated with age, BMI, and vitamin D levels. Multi-variate analysis confirmed that vitamin D level was the only independent predictor of SHPT before surgery. The prevalence of SHPT increased to 35.4% at 1 year after surgery and 63.3% at 5 years after surgery. SAGB had the highest prevalence of SHPT (50.6%) followed by RYGB (33.2%), LAGB (25.8%), and SG (17.8%) at 1 year after surgery. At 5 years after surgery, SAGB still had the highest prevalence of SHPT (73.6%), followed by RYGB (56.6%), LAGB (38.5%), and SG (41.7%). Serum PTH at 1 year after surgery correlated with decreased BMI and weight loss. Multi-variate analysis confirmed that age, sex, calcium level, and bypass procedure were independent predictor of SHPT after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of SHPT is high in morbidly obese patients before bariatric surgery which is related to vitamin D deficiency. The prevalence of SHPT increased continually along with the time after bariatric surgery, especially in patients receiving SAGB, followed by RYGB. The supplementation of vitamin D and calcium have to be higher in bypass procedure, especially in malabsorptive procedure.

Revisional Gastric Bypass for Failed Restrictive Procedures: Comparison of Single-Anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Ten to 50% of patients who received restrictive bariatric operations may require reoperation for unsatisfactory weight loss or weight regain. Failed restrictive procedures are usually managed with conversion to another bariatric procedure with a favor of conversion to laparoscopic gastric bypass. Our aim is to evaluate two different bypass techniques, laparoscopic RY gastric bypass (RYGB) versus single-anastomosis (mini-) gastric bypass (SAGB) as a revision option (R-RYGB and R-SAGB) for failed restrictive bariatric operations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From May 2001 to December 2015, a total of 116 patients with failed restrictive bariatric operations underwent laparoscopic revisional bypass surgery (81 R-SAGB and 35 R-RYGB). Among them, 81 were failed after vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and 35 were after adjustable gastric band (AGB). The demographic data, surgical parameters, and outcomes were studied. RESULTS: The average age at revision surgery was 35.7 years (range 22-56), and the average body mass index (BMI) before reoperation was 37.2 kg/m2 (29.0-51.8). Revision surgery was performed after 58.8 months from the primary surgery on average (14-180 months). The main reasons for the revisions were weight regain (50.9%), inadequate weight loss (31%), and intolerance (18.1%). All of the procedures were completed laparoscopically as one-stage procedure. R-RYGB had significantly longer operative times than R-SAGB. Major complication occurred in 12 (10%) patients without significant difference between R-SAGB group and R-RYGB group. At 1 year follow-up, weight loss was better in R-SAGB than R-RYGB (76.8 vs. 32.9% EWL; p = 0.001). At 5 year follow-up, a significantly lower hemoglobin level was found in R-SAGB group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Both SAGB and RYGB are acceptable options for revising a restrictive type of bariatric procedures with equal safety profile. R-SAGB was shown to be a simpler procedure with better weight reduction than R-RYGB but anemia is a considerable complication at long-term follow-up.