Interstitial fibrosis evolution on early sequential screening renal allograft biopsies using quantitative image analysis.

Screening renal biopsies (RB) may assess early changes of interstitial fibrosis (IF) after transplantation. The aim of this study was to quantify IF by automatic color image analysis on sequential RB. We analyzed RB performed at day (D) 0, month (M) 3 and M12 from 140 renal transplant recipients with a program of color segmentation imaging. The mean IF score was 19 ± 9% at D0, 27 ± 11% at M3 and 32 ± 11% at M12 with a 8% progression during the first 3 months and 5% between M3 and M12. IF at M3 was correlated with estimated glomerular rate (eGFR) at M3, 12 and 24 (p < 0.02) and IF at M12 with eGFR at M12 and 48 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, IF evolution between D0 and M3 (ΔIFM3-D0) was correlated with eGFR at M24, 36 and 48 (p < 0.03). IF at M12 was significantly associated with male donor gender and tacrolimus dose (p = 0.03). ΔIFM3-D0 was significantly associated with male donor gender, acute rejection episodes (p = 0.04) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.02). Thus, significant IF is already present before transplantation. IF evolution is more important during the first 3 months and has some predictive ability for change in GFR. Intervention to decrease IF should be applied early, i.e. before 3 months, after transplantation.

The ORION study: comparison of two sirolimus-based regimens versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients.

Safety and efficacy of two sirolimus (SRL)-based regimens were compared with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Renal transplantation recipients were randomized to Group 1 (SRL+TAC; week 13 TAC elimination [n = 152]), Group 2 (SRL + MMF [n = 152]) or Group 3 (TAC + MMF [n = 139]). Group 2, with higher-than-expected biopsy-confirmed acute rejections (BCARs), was sponsor-terminated; therefore, Group 2 two-year data were limited. At 1 and 2 years, respectively, graft (Group 1: 92.8%, 88.5%; Group 2: 90.6%, 89.9%; Group 3: 96.2%, 95.4%) and patient (Group 1: 97.3%, 94.4%; Group 2: 95.2%, 94.5%; Group 3: 97.0%, 97.0%) survival rates were similar. One- and 2-year BCAR incidence was: Group 1, 15.2%, 17.4%; Group 2, 31.3%, 32.8%; Group 3, 8.2%, 12.3% (Group 2 vs. 3, p < 0.001). Mean 1- and 2-year modified intent-to-treat glomerular filtration rates (mL/min) were similar. Primary reason for discontinuation was adverse events (Group 1, 34.2%; Group 2, 33.6%; Group 3, 22.3%; p < 0.05). In Groups 1 and 2, delayed wound healing and hyperlipidemia were more frequent. One-year post hoc analysis of new-onset diabetes posttransplantation was greater in TAC recipients (Groups 1 and 3 vs. 2, 17% vs. 6%; p = 0.004). Between-group malignancy rates were similar. The SRL-based regimens were not associated with improved outcomes for kidney transplantation patients.

A tribute to Jean Hamburger's contribution to organ transplantation.

Jean Hamburger, one of the pioneers of scientific medicine in the mid-20th century, who was involved in the inception of intensive care, nephrology, hemodialysis and scientific clinical research, has also been one of the very few fathers of human organ transplantation. He was involved in the primary French kidney transplantations in 1950, and in 1952, he realized the first allotransplantation in the world of a kidney removed from a voluntary living donor. At the same time, he was the first to describe the various clinical and pathological aspects of acute rejection. He suggested the use of cortisone for the treatment of rejection as early as 1950 and promoted nonlethal body irradiation, which was successfully used in 1959 both by John Merrill in Boston and by himself in Paris, to prevent allograft rejection. In October 1962, in collaboration with Maurice Goulon, he was the first to use a kidney removed from an individual in 'coma dépassé'. He and his group contributed to transplant immunosuppression, to transplant immunology, to organ preservation, to acute and chronic rejection pathology and so on. As early as 1956-1957, he understood the potential importance of Jean Dausset's discovery for transplantation.

Kidney transplantation at Necker Hospital: the most recent 5-year period (2004-2009).

The results of our last 5 years activity in kidney transplantation clearly show that it is possible to perform high-risk transplantations with very acceptable results: ECD kidneys, dual transplantation, recipients with DSAs. In depth statistical analysis of these data should allow a clearer definition of the best strategies to use in these situations.

The impact of preexisting or acquired Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus infection in kidney transplant recipients on morbidity and survival.

The impact of preexisting or acquired Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV) infection in kidney transplant recipients was evaluated in a prospective study. Serum collected from kidney donors and recipients before transplantation were tested for antibodies against KSHV latent nuclear antigen. Three groups of recipients were defined: group A (KSHV+), group B (KSHV-, KSHV+ donor) and group C (donor and recipient KSHV-). Blood was collected from recipients, every 3 months for 3 years, for KSHV viremia (groups A and B), quantitative (group A) and qualitative serology (group B). Data of group C recipients were extracted from a French database. The prevalence of KSHV antibodies was 1.1% in donors and 3.2% in recipients. There were respectively 161, 64 and 4744 recipients in groups A, B and C. In group A, 13% developed Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). Age >53.5 years (p = 0.025) and black skin (p = 0.0054) were associated with KS development. In group B, three recipients developed clinical manifestations related to KSHV infection. There was no difference in terms of survival and graft loss between the three groups. In conclusion, although kidney recipients should be aware of the additional risk of KSHV morbidity, KSHV+ recipients should not be systematically excluded from kidney transplantation.