Central versus peripheral cannulation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support during double lung transplant for pulmonary hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has become the standard of cardiopulmonary support during a sequential double lung transplant for pulmonary hypertension. Whether central or peripheral cannulation is the best strategy for these patients remains unknown. Our goal was to determine which is the best strategy by comparing 2 populations of patients. METHODS: We performed a single-centre retrospective study based on an institutional prospective lung transplant database. RESULTS: Between January 2011 and November 2016, 103 patients underwent double lung transplant for pulmonary hypertension. We compared 54 patients who had central ECMO (cECMO group) to 49 patients who had peripheral ECMO (pECMO group). The pECMO group had significantly more bridged patients who received emergency transplants (31% vs 6%, P = 0.001). The incidence of Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction requiring ECMO (14% vs 11%, P = not significant) and of in-hospital mortality (11% vs 14%, P = not significant) was similar between the groups. Groin infections (16% vs 4%, P = 0.031), deep vein thrombosis (27% vs 11%, P = 0.044) and lower limb ischaemia (12% vs 2%, P = 0.031) occurred significantly more often in the pECMO group. The number of chest reopenings for bleeding or infection was similar between the groups. The 3-month, 1-year and 5-year survival rates did not differ between the groups (P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Central or peripheral ECMO produced similar results during double lung transplant for pulmonary hypertension in terms of in-hospital deaths and long-term survival rates. Central ECMO provided satisfactory results without major bleeding provided the patient was weaned from ECMO at the end of the procedure. Despite the rate of groin and lower limb complications, peripheral cannulation remained the preferred solution to bridge the patient to transplant or for postoperative support.

[Surgical treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension]. / Traitement chirurgical de l'hypertension pulmonaire post-embolique.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is a rare but underdiagnosed disease. The development of imaging played a crucial role for the screening and the decision of operability over the past few years. Indeed, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is the only type of pulmonary hypertension with a potential curative treatment: pulmonary endarterectomy. It is a complexe surgical procedure performed under cardiopulmonary bypass with deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest. The aim of the procedure is to completely remove the scar tissue inside the pulmonary arteries down to the segmental and sub-segmental levels. Compared to lung transplantation, which carries a postoperative mortality of 15-20% and a 5-year survival of 50%, pulmonary endarterectomy is a curative treatment with a postoperative mortality of less than 3%. However, lung transplantation remains an option for young patients with inoperable distal disease or after pulmonary endarterectomy failure. Considering that medical history of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism is lacking in 25 to 50%, the diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension remains challenging. The lung V/Q scan is useful for the diagnosis showing ventilation and perfusion mismatches. Lesions located at the level of the pulmonary artery, the lobar or segmental arteries may be accessible to surgical removal. The pulmonary angiogram with the lateral view and the pulmonary CT scan help to determine the level of the intravascular lesions. If there is a correlation between the vascular obstruction assessed by imaging and the pulmonary resistance, pulmonary endarterectomy carries a postoperative mortality of less than 3% and has a high rate of success. If the surgery is performed at a later stage of the disease, pulmonary arteriolitis developed mainly in unobstructed territories and participated in the elevated vascular resistance. At this stage, postoperative risk is higher.