Risk Factors of Mortality After Liver Transplantation in Uruguay.

INTRODUCTION: Identification of predictive factors of mortality in a liver transplant (LT) program optimizes patient selection and allocation of organs. OBJECTIVE: To determine survival rates and predictive factors of mortality after LT in the National Liver Transplant Program of Uruguay. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted analyzing data prospectively collected into a multidisciplinary database. All patients transplanted since the beginning of the program on July 2009 to April 2017 were included (n = 148). Twenty-nine factors were analyzed through the univariate Kaplan-Meier model. A Cox regression model was used in the multivariate analysis to identify the independent prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: Overall survival was 92%, 87%, and 78% at discharge, 1 year, and 3 years, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were significantly lower in: recipients aged >60 years, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score >21, LT due to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and acute liver failure (ALF), donors with comorbidities, intraoperative blood loss beyond the median (>2350 mL), red blood cell transfusion requirement beyond the median (>1254 mL), intraoperative complications, delay of extubation, invasive bacterial, and fungal infection after LT and stay in critical care unit >4 days. The Cox regression model (likelihood ratio test, P = 1.976 e-06) identified the following independent prognostic factors for survival: LT for HCC (hazard ratio [HR] 4.511; P = .001) and ALF (HR 6.346; P = .004), donors with comorbidities (HR 2.354; P = .041), intraoperative complications (HR 2.707; P = .027), and invasive fungal infections (HR 3.281; P = .025). CONCLUSION: The survival rates of LT patients as well as the mortality-associated factors are similar to those reported in the international literature.

Impact of a Multimodal Approach in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Hepatic Transplant Recipients.

INTRODUCTION: In liver transplant (LT) recipients, surgical site infection (SSI) represents an important cause of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: This study measures the impact of a multimodal approach to the incidence of surgical site infection in LT recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All of the LT recipients in our department were registered on the national database in solid organ transplant. A study was performed in two analytical-interventional phases. Phase 1 took place between July 14, 2009, and February 20, 2014. Phase 2 took place between February 21, 2014, and July 15, 2015. The multimodal change implemented during phase 1 was that 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine and ether were applied to the surgical field; surgical prophylaxis was primarily with ampicillin/sulbactam plus cefazolin. In phase 2, 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine alone was applied to the surgical field. The prior standard prophylaxis was changed to piperacillin tazobactam administered during surgery as a continuous infusion of 13.5 g over 8 hours with a pre-incision loading dose of 4.5 g. The loading dose of piperacillin tazobactam was combined with a single dose of gentamicin of 5 mg/kg. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients have received transplants since the start of the program: 82 patients during phase one and 26 patients during phase two. During phase 1, 13 cases of SSI were recorded, representing a rate of 15.85 per 100 transplants. Sixteen micro-organisms were isolated during phase 1, of which 12 corresponded to gram-negative bacilli. With regard to resistance profiles, 13 showed multidrug resistant and extensively drug resistant profiles. During phase 2, no cases of SSI were recorded (relative risk = 0.158 [95% confidence interval 0.0873-0.255], P = .0352]. CONCLUSION: A multimodal approach allowed for the reduction of the incidence of SSI in LTs and offered a protective strategy.