Adjuvant treatment for renal cell carcinoma: current status and future.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is resistant to chemotherapy. Adjuvant interferon and tyrosine kinase inhibitors were ineffective. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), however, have shed new hope in this setting. In the current review, updated evidence of adjuvant therapy in RCC is summarized. RECENT FINDINGS: KEYNOTE-564 demonstrated survival benefits of adjuvant Pembrolizumab in RCC. EAU guidelines now recommend adjuvant pembrolizumab to ccRCC patients at an increased risk of recurrence, as defined in the study. At a median follow-up of 24 months, the disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly longer for the Pembrolizumab group than placebo group [DFS 77.3 vs. 68.1%; hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.68; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.53-0.87; P = 0.002]. From its updated analysis, at median follow up of 57.2 months, overall survival (OS) benefit of Pembrolizumab was demonstrated (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.87; P = 0.005). A number of other adjuvant ICI trials have though been negative. SUMMARY: Pembrolizumab is currently the only adjuvant therapy for RCC showing survival benefits, amid a number of negative trials on adjuvant immunotherapy. Currently, there is no role for adjuvant tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and radiotherapy for RCC. Meanwhile, a multidisciplinary approach and shared decision-making should be adopted.

The Role of Surgery in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in 2024.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common solid tumour of the kidney and accounts for 3% of all cancers. While immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies have emerged as the first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the role of surgery has become more controversial. This review summarizes the evidence, current role and future directions for surgery in mRCC management. The survival benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) shown in the interferon era have encountered increasing disputes in the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) and ICI eras. Undoubtedly, several systematic reviews based on retrospective data have supported the survival benefits of CN. Nevertheless, 2 prospective trials, CARMENA and SURTIME, proved that sunitinib as the upfront therapy resulted in noninferior survival outcomes compared with immediate CN. The safety of CN does have solid ground in the current literature. Several studies suggested that preoperative systemic therapy did not seem to aggravate perioperative complications or mortality rates, in experienced centres. Meticulous patient selection is the rule of thumb in the modern management of mRCC patients. The limitations of the existing prognostication models, however, must be acknowledged. Clinicians should adopt a multidisciplinary and holistic approach and contemplate all patient, disease, surgeon and socio-economical factors, before deciding who should go for surgery. The advent of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) and survival benefits of adjuvant pembrolizumab shown in the oligometastatic subgroup, where complete metastasectomy could be achieved (M1 NED), calls for more comparative studies against upfront ICI combinations. In summary, CN brings survival benefits to well-selected good-to-intermediate-risk mRCC patients. Individualized and multidisciplinary care is pivotal.

Associations between glucocorticoid use and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with prostate cancer receiving antiandrogen: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Prednisolone/prednisone coadministration with abiraterone may explain abiraterone-related increase in cardiovascular risk. We explored this postulation and glucocorticoid's association with cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Patients with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy and enzalutamide, or abiraterone with 5 mg (ABI + P5) or 10 mg (ABI + P10) daily total prednisolone/prednisone were followed up for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS: We analyzed 933 patients. ABI + P10, but not enzalutamide, had higher risk of MACE than ABI + P5. Cumulative glucocorticoid dose before enzalutamide/abiraterone initiation was associated with MACE. CONCLUSIONS: Prednisolone/prednisone coadministration with abiraterone likely contributed to abiraterone-related increased cardiovascular risk. Prevalent cumulative glucocorticoid dose was associated with cardiovascular risk.

Feasibility of Biology-guided Radiotherapy (BgRT) Targeting Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avid liver metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) is a novel radiation delivery approach utilizing fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) activity on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging performed in real-time to track and direct RT. Our institution recently acquired the RefleXion X1 BgRT system and sought to assess the feasibility of targeting metastatic sites in various organs, including the liver. However, in order for BgRT to function appropriate, adequate contrast in FDG activity between the tumor and the background tissue, referred to as the normalized SUV (NSUV), is necessary for optimal functioning of BgRT. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 50 lung adenocarcinoma patients with liver metastases. The following variables were collected: SUVmax and SUVmean for each liver metastasis, SUVmean and SUVmax at 5 and 10 mm radially from the lesion, and NSUV at 5 mm and 10 mm (SUVmax of the liver metastasis divided by SUV mean at 5 mm at 10 mm respectively). RESULTS: 82 measurable liver metastases were included in the final analysis. The average SUVbackground of liver was 2.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-2.35); average SUVmean for liver metastases was 5.31 (95% CI 4.87-5.75), and average SUVmax of liver metastases was 9.19 (95% CI 7.59-10.78). The average SUVmean at 5 mm and 10 mm radially from each lesion were 3.08 (95% CI 3.00-2.16) and 2.60 (95% CI 2.52-2.68), respectively. The mean NSUV at 5 mm and 10 mm were 3.13 (95% CI 2.53-3.73) and 3.69 (95% CI 3.00-4.41) respectively. Furthermore, 90% of lesions had NSUV greater than 1.45 at 5 mm and greater than 1.77 at 10 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to comprehensively characterize FDG contrast between the liver tumor and background, referred to as NSUV. Due to the high background SUV normally found in the liver, this work will be valuable for guiding optimization of BgRT for treating liver metastases in the future using the RefleXion® X1 and potentially other similar BgRT platforms.

Deep PSA response and extended time-to-nadir as robust predictors of survival in Asian patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer receiving upfront intensified treatment.

INTRODUCTION: In de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treated with upfront intensification using androgen receptor signaling inhibitor or chemotherapy (Docetaxel), achieving a PSA nadir less than 0.2 ng/mL, indicative of superior survival in trials, may often be unattainable in real-world settings. We explored the predictive value of the degree of PSA decline and time to PSA nadir (TTPN) on oncological outcomes. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of consecutive prostate cancer cases in Hong Kong was accessed. Patients diagnosed with de novo mHSPC from 2016 to 2022 and treated with upfront intensification were included in this analysis. Landmark analysis on PSA kinetics at 6-months following treatment intensification was performed. They were classified based on 1) TTPN (≥6 months vs. <6 months), and 2) a combined response (deep responders achieving both ≥95% PSA decline and TTPN ≥ 6 months vs. shallow responders). Multivariable regression analysis was employed to identify the effects of confounders. FINDINGS: A total of 131 patients were included in this analysis. Classifying patients by combined response best predicted survival outcomes. Deep responders had better progression-free survival (HR = 0.56; 95%CI = 0.34-0.91; p = 0.019), overall survival (HR = 0.50; 95%CI = 0.26-0.97; p = 0.036), and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.43; 95%CI = 0.19-0.99; p = 0.042). Difference in overall survival remained significant after adjustment in multivariable regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrates that alternative PSA targets can predict treatment response and survival outcomes in de novo mHSPC patients in a real-world setting, providing valuable information for patient counselling and potentially guiding future trial design.

Impact of Pre-Operative Ureteroscopy on Bladder Recurrence Following Nephroureterectomy for UTUC.

(1) Introduction: Diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) is an important component in the workup of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Whether URS was associated with increased recurrence in the bladder was not fully concluded. The current study aimed to evaluate the implication of URS on the incidences of intravesical recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in non-metastatic UTUC patients without prior history of bladder cancer via multi-institutional data. (2) Patients and Methods: Data were obtained from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract (CROES-UTUC) registry, a prospective, multicentre database. Patients with non-metastatic UTUC treated with RNU were divided into two groups: those undergoing upfront RNU and those having diagnostic URS prior to RNU. Intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRS) was the primary endpoint, evaluated through Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression. Cases with adequate follow-up data were included. (3) Results: The analysis included 269 patients. Of these, 137 (50.9%) received upfront RNU and 132 (49.1%) received pre-RNU URS. The URS group exhibited an inferior 24-month IVRS compared to the upfront RNU group (HR = 1.705, 95% CI = 1.082-2.688; p = 0.020). Multivariate analysis confirmed URS as the only significant predictor of IVR (p = 0.019). Ureteric access sheath usage, flexible ureteroscopy, ureteric biopsy, retrograde contrast studies, and the duration of URS did not significantly affect IVRS. (4) Conclusions: Diagnostic URS prior to RNU was found to be associated with an increased risk of IVR in patients with UTUC. The risk was not significantly influenced by auxiliary procedures during URS. Physicians were advised to meticulously evaluate the necessity of diagnostic URS.

Monopolar versus bipolar transurethral resection of bladder Tumour: post-hoc analysis of a prospective trial.

INTRODUCTION: Previously, in a randomised trial we demonstrated bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) could achieve a higher detrusor sampling rate than monopolar TURBT. We hereby report the long-term oncological outcomes following study intervention. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of a randomized phase III trial comparing monopolar and bipolar TURBT. Only patients with pathology of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) were included in the analysis. Per-patient analysis was performed. Primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: From the initial trial, 160 cases were randomised to receive monopolar or bipolar TURBT. 24 cases of non-urothelial carcinoma, 22 cases of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and 9 cases of recurrences were excluded. A total of 97 patients were included in the analysis, with 46 in the monopolar and 51 in the bipolar group. The median follow-up was 97.1 months. Loss-to-follow-up rate was 7.2%. Regarding the primary outcome of RFS, there was no significant difference (HR = 0.731; 95%CI = 0.433-1.236; P = 0.242) between the two groups. PFS (HR = 1.014; 95%CI = 0.511-2.012; P = 0.969), CSS (HR = 0.718; 95%CI = 0.219-2.352; P = 0.584) and OS (HR = 1.135; 95%CI = 0.564-2.283; P = 0.722) were also similar between the two groups. Multifocal tumours were the only factor that was associated with worse RFS. CONCLUSION: Despite the superiority in detrusor sampling rate, bipolar TURBT was unable to confer long-term oncological benefits over monopolar TURBT.

Pre-Op Hydronephrosis Predicts Outcomes in Patients Receiving Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has gained momentum in the management of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Predictors of RARC outcomes are not thoroughly studied. We aim to investigate the implications of preoperative hydronephrosis on oncological outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study analysed data from the Asian RARC consortium, a multicentre registry involving nine Asian centres. Cases were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of pre-operative hydronephrosis. Background characteristics, operative details, perioperative outcomes, and oncological results were reviewed. Outcomes were (1) survival outcomes, including 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), and (2) perioperative and pathological results. Multivariate regression analyses were performed on survival outcomes. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2020, 536 non-metastatic MIBC patients receiving RARC were analysed. 429 had no hydronephrosis (80.0%), and 107 (20.0%) had hydronephrosis. Hydronephrosis was found to be predictive of inferior DFS (HR = 1.701, p = 0.003, 95% CI = 1.196-2.418) and OS (HR = 1.834, p = 0.008, 95% CI = 1.173-2.866). Subgroup analysis demonstrated differences in the T2-or-above subgroup (HR = 1.65; p = 0.004 in DFS and HR = 1.888; p = 0.008 in OS) and the T3-or-above subgroup (HR = 1.757; p = 0.017 in DFS and HR = 1.807; p = 0.034 in OS). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of preoperative hydronephrosis among MIBC patients carries additional prognostic implications on top of tumour staging. Its importance in case selection needs to be highlighted.

Comparison of infection risk between enzalutamide and abiraterone in patients with prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Enzalutamide and abiraterone may differ in their immunomodulatory effects, and the prednisone coadministered with abiraterone can be immunosuppressive. This study aimed to compare the risk of different types of infection in patients with prostate cancer receiving enzalutamide or abiraterone in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. METHODS: Patients with prostate cancer receiving enzalutamide or abiraterone in addition to androgen deprivation therapy in Hong Kong between December 1999 to March 2021 were identified in this retrospective cohort study and followed up until September 2021, death, or crossover. Outcomes, including any sepsis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, cellulitis or skin abscess, central nervous system infections, and tuberculosis, were analyzed as both time-to-event outcomes (multivariable Fine-Gray regression, with mortality considered a competing event) and recurrent-event outcomes (multivariable negative binomial regression). RESULTS: Altogether, 1582 patients were analyzed (923 abiraterone users; 659 enzalutamide users) with a median follow-up of 10.6 months (interquartile range: 5.3-19.9 months). Compared to abiraterone users, enzalutamide users had lower cumulative incidences of sepsis (adjusted subhazard ratio [SHR] 0.70 [0.53-0.93], p = .014), pneumonia (adjusted SHR 0.76 [0.59-0.99], p = .040), and cellulitis or skin abscess (adjusted SHR 0.55 [0.39-0.79], p = .001), but not urinary tract infection (adjusted SHR 0.91 [0.62-1.35], p = .643). Associations between exposure and central nervous system infections and tuberculosis were not assessed because of low event rates. Analyzing the outcomes as recurrent events gave similar results. Enzalutamide use may be associated with a lower risk of urinary tract infection in patients with diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to abiraterone users, enzalutamide users have significantly lower risks of sepsis, pneumonia, cellulitis, or skin abscess.

Safety and Efficacy of Immediate Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy Following Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour (I-HIVEC).

The recurrence rate following endoscopic treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains high. Standard treatment includes intravesical instillation of chemotoxic agents such as mitomycin C (MMC) to reduce recurrence. It is postulated that upfront administration of hyperthermic intravesical MMC (HIVEC) immediately after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) may enhance its efficacy, but evidence from human trials is scant. This pilot study explored the safety of immediate intravesical MMC instillation following TURBT using a conductive HIVEC system (Combat BRS). Patients diagnosed with papillary bladder tumours scheduled for TURBT were recruited. Among 29 patients treated with HIVEC, there was minimal additional postoperative morbidity. The majority (79.3%) were discharged after a hospital stay of 1 d, and no patient required bladder irrigation. There were six grade I-II adverse events (20.7%) and one grade III event (3.4%). No recurrences were observed within 3 mo, and the 12-mo recurrence rate was 4.5%. The study findings demonstrate that immediate HIVEC MMC instillation following TURBT is safe. Further research is needed to assess long-term efficacy in comparison to standard cold MMC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is treated with tumour removal via a telescope inserted into the bladder through the urethra (called TURBT). We tested the safety of treating the bladder with a warm solution of a chemotherapy drug (mitomycin C) immediately after TURBT, as this may prevent tumour recurrence. The treatment was safe and well tolerated. Further trials are needed with more patients and longer follow-up to confirm the results.

The Oncological and Functional Prognostic Value of Unconventional Histology of Prostate Cancer in Localized Disease Treated with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: An International Multicenter 5-Year Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The impact of prostate cancer of unconventional histology (UH) on oncological and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) receipt is unclear. We compared the impact of cribriform pattern (CP), ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC), and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) in comparison to pure adenocarcinoma (AC) on short- to mid-term oncological and functional results and receipt of aRT after RARP. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data for a large international cohort of men with localized prostate cancer treated with RARP between 2016 and 2020. The primary outcomes were biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, erectile and continence function. aRT receipt was a secondary outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were performed. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 3935 patients were included. At median follow-up of 2.8 yr, the rates for BCR incidence (AC 10.7% vs IDC 17%; p < 0.001) and aRT receipt (AC 4.5% vs DAC 6.3% [p = 0.003] vs IDC 11.2% [p < 0.001]) were higher with UH. The 5-yr BCR-free survival rate was significantly poorer for UH groups, with hazard ratios of 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-2.40; p = 0.005) for DAC, 5.22 (95% CI 3.41-8.01; p < 0.001) for IDC, and 3.45 (95% CI 2.29-5.20; p < 0.001) for CP in comparison to AC. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of UH doubled the risk of new-onset erectile dysfunction at 1 yr, in comparison to AC (grade group 1-3), with hazard ratios of 2.13 (p < 0.001) for DAC, 2.14 (p < 0.001) for IDC, and 2.01 (p = 0.011) for CP. Moreover, CP, but not IDC or DAC, was associated with a significantly higher risk of incontinence (odds ratio 1.97; p < 0.001). The study is limited by the lack of central histopathological review and relatively short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In a large cohort, UH presence was associated with worse short- to mid-term oncological outcomes after RARP. IDC independently predicted a higher rate of aRT receipt. At 1-yr follow-up after RP, patients with UH had three times higher risk of erectile dysfunction post RARP; CP was associated with a twofold higher incontinence rate. PATIENT SUMMARY: Among patients with prostate cancer who undergo robot-assisted surgery to remove the prostate, those with less common types of prostate cancer have worse results for cancer control, erection, and urinary continence and a higher probability of receiving additional radiotherapy after surgery.

Evaluation of repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features produced by the fan-beam kV-CT on a novel ring gantry-based PET/CT linear accelerator.

BACKGROUND: The RefleXion X1 is a novel radiotherapy delivery system on a ring gantry equipped with fan-beam kV-CT and PET imaging subsystems. The day-to-day scanning variability of radiomics features must be evaluated before any attempt to utilize radiomics features. PURPOSE: This study aims to characterize the repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features produced by the RefleXion X1 kV-CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Credence Cartridge Radiomics (CCR) phantom includes six cartridges of varied materials. It was scanned 10 times on the RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem over a 3-month period using the two most frequently used scanning protocols (BMS and BMF). Fifty-five radiomic features were extracted for each ROI on each CT scan and analyzed using LifeX software. The coefficient of variation (COV) was computed to evaluate the repeatability. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were used to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the scanned images using 0.9 as the threshold. This process is repeated on a GE PET-CT scanner using several built-in protocols as a comparison. RESULTS: On average, 87% of the features on both scan protocols on the RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem can be considered repeatable as they met COV < 10% criteria. On GE PET-CT, this number is similar at 86%. When we tighten the criteria to COV <5%, the RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem showed much better repeatability with 81% of features on average whereas GE PET-CT showed only 73.5% on average. About 91% and 89% of the features with ICC > 0.9 respectively for BMS and BMF protocols on RefleXion X1. On the other hand, the percentage of features with ICC > 0.9 on GE PET-CT ranges from 67% to 82%. The RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem showed excellent intra-scanner reproducibility between the scanning protocols much better than the GE PET CT scanner. For the inter-scanner reproducibility, the percentage of features with CCC > 0.9 ranged from 49% to 80%. between X1 and GE PET-CT scanning protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically useful CT radiomic features produced by the RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem are reproducible and stable over time, demonstrating its utility as a quantitative imaging platform.

Harnessing imaging tools to guide immunotherapy trials: summary from the National Cancer Institute Cancer Imaging Steering Committee workshop.

As the immuno-oncology field continues the rapid growth witnessed over the past decade, optimising patient outcomes requires an evolution in the current response-assessment guidelines for phase 2 and 3 immunotherapy clinical trials and clinical care. Additionally, investigational tools-including image analysis of standard-of-care scans (such as CT, magnetic resonance, and PET) with analytics, such as radiomics, functional magnetic resonance agents, and novel molecular-imaging PET agents-offer promising advancements for assessment of immunotherapy. To document current challenges and opportunities and identify next steps in immunotherapy diagnostic imaging, the National Cancer Institute Clinical Imaging Steering Committee convened a meeting with diverse representation among imaging experts and oncologists to generate a comprehensive review of the state of the field.

Baseline Radiomic Signature to Estimate Overall Survival in Patients With NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to define a baseline radiomic signature associated with overall survival (OS) using baseline computed tomography (CT) images obtained from patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab or chemotherapy. METHODS: The radiomic signature was developed in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab in CheckMate-017, -026, and -063. Nivolumab-treated patients were pooled and randomized to training, calibration, or validation sets using a 2:1:1 ratio. From baseline CT images, volume of tumor lesions was semiautomatically segmented, and 38 radiomic variables depicting tumor phenotype were extracted. Association between the radiomic signature and OS was assessed in the nivolumab-treated (validation set) and chemotherapy-treated (test set) patients in these studies. RESULTS: A baseline radiomic signature was identified using CT images obtained from 758 patients. The radiomic signature used a combination of imaging variables (spatial correlation, tumor volume in the liver, and tumor volume in the mediastinal lymph nodes) to output a continuous value, ranging from 0 to 1 (from most to least favorable estimated OS). Given a threshold of 0.55, the sensitivity and specificity of the radiomic signature for predicting 3-month OS were 86% and 77.8%, respectively. The signature was identified in the training set of patients treated with nivolumab and was significantly associated (p < 0.0001) with OS in patients treated with nivolumab or chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The radiomic signature provides an early readout of the anticipated OS in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab or chemotherapy. This could provide important prognostic information and may support risk stratification in clinical trials.

Phase III trial of chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide plus nivolumab or placebo for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter.

BACKGROUND: Nearly all patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma experience recurrence following standard-of-care radiotherapy (RT) + temozolomide (TMZ). The purpose of the phase III randomized CheckMate 548 study was to evaluate RT + TMZ combined with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab (NIVO) or placebo (PBO) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (NCT02667587). METHODS: Patients (N = 716) were randomized 1:1 to NIVO [(240 mg every 2 weeks × 8, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) + RT (60 Gy over 6 weeks) + TMZ (75 mg/m2 once daily during RT, then 150-200 mg/m2 once daily on days 1-5 of every 28-day cycle × 6)] or PBO + RT + TMZ following the same regimen. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients without baseline corticosteroids and in all randomized patients. RESULTS: As of December 22, 2020, median (m)PFS (blinded independent central review) was 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.9-11.8) with NIVO + RT + TMZ vs 10.3 months (95% CI, 9.7-12.5) with PBO + RT + TMZ (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.3) and mOS was 28.9 months (95% CI, 24.4-31.6) vs 32.1 months (95% CI, 29.4-33.8), respectively (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.3). In patients without baseline corticosteroids, mOS was 31.3 months (95% CI, 28.6-34.8) with NIVO + RT + TMZ vs 33.0 months (95% CI, 31.0-35.1) with PBO + RT + TMZ (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.4). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event rates were 52.4% vs 33.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NIVO added to RT + TMZ did not improve survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated or indeterminate MGMT promoter. No new safety signals were observed.

Hypothetical generalized framework for a new imaging endpoint of therapeutic activity in early phase clinical trials in brain tumors.

Imaging response assessment is a cornerstone of patient care and drug development in oncology. Clinicians/clinical researchers rely on tumor imaging to estimate the impact of new treatments and guide decision making for patients and candidate therapies. This is important in brain cancer, where associations between tumor size/growth and emerging neurological deficits are strong. Accurately measuring the impact of a new therapy on tumor growth early in clinical development, where patient numbers are small, would be valuable for decision making regarding late-stage development activation. Current attempts to measure the impact of a new therapy have limited influence on clinical development, as determination of progression, stability or response does not currently account for individual tumor growth kinetics prior to the initiation of experimental therapies. Therefore, we posit that imaging-based response assessment, often used as a tool for estimating clinical effect, is incomplete as it does not adequately account for growth trajectories or biological characteristics of tumors prior to the introduction of an investigational agent. Here, we propose modifications to the existing framework for evaluating imaging assessment in primary brain tumors that will provide a more reliable understanding of treatment effects. Measuring tumor growth trajectories prior to a given intervention may allow us to more confidently conclude whether there is an anti-tumor effect. This updated approach to imaging-based tumor response assessment is intended to improve our ability to select candidate therapies for later-stage development, including those that may not meet currently sought thresholds for "response" and ultimately lead to identification of effective treatments.

18F-BMS986192 PET Imaging of PD-L1 in Metastatic Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Pilot Study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) frequently induces tumor response in metastatic melanoma patients. However, tumor response often takes months and may be heterogeneous. Consequently, additional local treatment for nonresponsive metastases may be needed, especially in the case of brain metastases. Noninvasive imaging may allow the characterization of (brain) metastases to predict response. This pilot study uses 18F-BMS986192 PET for PD-L1 expression to explore the variability in metastatic tracer uptake and its relation to tumor response, with a special focus on brain metastases. Methods: Metastatic melanoma patients underwent whole-body 18F-BMS986192 PET/CT scanning before and 6 wk after starting ICI therapy. 18F-BMS986192 uptake was measured in healthy tissues, organs, and tumor lesions. Tumor response was evaluated at 12 wk using CT of the thorax/abdomen and MRI of the brain. RECIST, version 1.1, was used to define therapy response per patient. Response per lesion was measured by the percentage change in lesion diameter. Toxicity was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Results: Baseline 18F-BMS986192 PET/CT was performed in 8 patients, with follow-up scans in 4 patients. The highest tracer uptake was observed in the spleen, bone marrow, kidneys, and liver. Tracer uptake in tumor lesions was heterogeneous. In total, 42 tumor lesions were identified at baseline, with most lesions in the lungs (n = 21) and brain (n = 14). Tracer uptake was similar between tumor locations. 18F-BMS986192 uptake in lesions at baseline, corrected for blood-pool activity, was negatively correlated with the change lesion diameter at response evaluation (r = -0.49, P = 0.005), both in intra- and extracerebral lesions. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis demonstrated that 18F-BMS986192 uptake can discriminate between responding and nonresponding lesions with an area under the curve of 0.82. At the follow-up scan, an increased 18F-BMS986192 uptake compared with baseline scan was correlated with an increased lesion diameter at response evaluation. In the follow-up 18F-BMS986192 PET scan of 2 patients, ICI-related toxicity (thyroiditis and colitis) was detected. Conclusion: In this pilot study, 18F-BMS986192 PET showed heterogeneous uptake in intra- and extracerebral metastatic lesions in melanoma patients. Baseline 18F-BMS986192 uptake was able to predict an ICI treatment-induced reduction in lesion volume, whereas the follow-up PET scan allowed the detection of treatment-induced toxicity.

First-line Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab Versus Sunitinib in Patients Without Nephrectomy and With an Evaluable Primary Renal Tumor in the CheckMate 214 Trial.

We present an exploratory post hoc analysis from the phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) versus sunitinib in a subgroup of 108 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) without prior nephrectomy and with an evaluable primary tumor, a population under-represented in clinical trials. Patients with clear cell aRCC were randomized to NIVO+IPI every 3 wk for four doses followed by NIVO monotherapy, or sunitinib every day for 4 wk (6-wk cycle). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and primary tumor shrinkage were assessed. PFS and ORR were assessed per independent radiology review committee using RECIST version 1.1. With minimum study follow-up of 4 yr for intent-to-treat patients, OS favored NIVO+IPI (n = 53) over sunitinib (n = 55; hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.40-1.0) among patients without prior nephrectomy. ORR was higher (34% vs 15%; p = 0.0041) and median duration of response was longer with NIVO+IPI versus sunitinib (20.5 vs 14.1 mo); the best overall response was partial response in either arm. A ≥30% reduction in the diameter of intact target renal tumors was achieved in 35% of patients with NIVO+IPI versus 20% with sunitinib. Safety was consistent with the global study population. In conclusion, in patients with aRCC without prior nephrectomy and with an evaluable primary tumor, NIVO+IPI showed survival benefits and renal tumor reduction versus sunitinib. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02231749. PATIENT SUMMARY: In an exploratory analysis of a large global trial (CheckMate 214), we observed positive outcomes (both survival and tumor response to treatment) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab over sunitinib in a subgroup of patients with advanced kidney cancer who did not undergo removal of their primary kidney tumor. This subset of patients represents a population that has not been studied in clinical trials and for whom outcomes with new immunotherapy combination regimens are not yet known. We conclude that treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab offers these patients a survival benefit versus sunitinib, consistent with that observed in the overall study, as well as a notable kidney tumor reduction.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with brain metastases: CheckMate 920.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) has demonstrated long-term efficacy and safety in patients with previously untreated, advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Although most phase 3 clinical trials exclude patients with brain metastases, the ongoing, multicohort phase 3b/4 CheckMate 920 trial (ClincalTrials.gov identifier NCT02982954) evaluated the safety and efficacy of NIVO + IPI in a cohort that included patients with aRCC and brain metastases, as reported here. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated aRCC and asymptomatic brain metastases received NIVO 3 mg/kg plus IPI 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks × 4 followed by NIVO 480 mg every 4 weeks. The primary end point was the incidence of grade ≥3 immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) within 100 days of the last dose of study drug. Key secondary end points were progression-free survival and the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (both determined by the investigator). Exploratory end points included overall survival, among others. RESULTS: After a minimum follow-up of 24.5 months (N = 28), no grade 5 imAEs occurred. The most common grade 3 and 4 imAEs were diarrhea/colitis (n = 2; 7%) and hypophysitis, rash, hepatitis, and diabetes mellitus (n = 1 each; 4%). The objective response rate was 32% (95% CI, 14.9%-53.5%) with a median duration of response of 24.0 months; 4 of 8 responders remained without reported progression. Seven patients (25%) had intracranial progression. The median progression-free survival was 9.0 months (95% CI, 2.9-12.0 months), and the median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 14.1 months to not estimable). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who had previously untreated aRCC and brain metastases-a population with a high unmet medical need that often is underrepresented in clinical trials-the approved regimen of NIVO + IPI followed by NIVO showed encouraging antitumor activity and no new safety signals.