Alignment of the Cervix with the Vagina in Uterine Retroversion: A Possible Risk Factor in Uterine Prolapse.

Multiple observational studies have found an association of uterine prolapse with uterine retroversion. Mechanisms proposed to explain this apparent association assume that the cervix of a retroverted uterus will usually insert at the apex of the vagina, with resultant alignment of the cervix with the vagina. The angle of the axis of the cervix with the axis of the vagina was measured by two readers on 323 sagittal pelvic MRI scans and sagittal reconstructions of pelvic CT scans performed for clinical purposes. One reader observed and recorded the anatomic relations of the uterus that differed by insertion site and version: 44 of 49 retroverted uteri (89.8%) inserted at the vaginal apex, and 13 of 274 anteverted uteri (4.7%) inserted at the vaginal apex. This difference was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05) by the Chi square test. The urinary bladder, vaginal walls, and rectum were inferiorly related to anteriorly inserted anteverted uteri. Only the vaginal lumen and the rectum at a shallow oblique angle were inferiorly related to apically inserted retroverted uteri. Most retroverted uteri insert at the apex of the vagina. Apically inserted retroverted uteri appear to receive less support from adjacent structures than anteriorly inserted anteverted uteri.

Relevance of Uterine Subseptations: What Length Should Warrant Hysteroscopic Resection?

OBJECTIVES: Existing recommendations warrant correction of uterine subseptations longer than 10 mm. We assessed whether a different subseptation length is indicated for intervention by evaluating the postoperative decrease in cavity width. METHODS: We conducted a prospective controlled cohort study at a university center. Healthy women and women with subseptations were evaluated with three-dimensional ultrasound before and after undergoing surgical resection of uterine subseptations by hysteroscopy. Measurement of the subseptum's length and width, and total cavity width, were obtained in both groups of women. We created a receiver operating characteristic curve using 7-mm cavity postoperative width change as the reference variable, and subseptation length as the outcome variable. Identifying a new subseptation length that warrants surgical intervention. RESULTS: Seventy-six women with subseptations and 77 with healthy uteri were included in the study. In the subseptate group, 50 had a subseptum less than 10 mm, and 26 were greater than 10 mm. Uterine and uterine cavity widths were significantly greater than in healthy women. The postoperative cavity width (28 ± 0.9 mm) was correlated with the preoperative subseptum length (R = 0.42; P = .016) and width (R = 0.54; P = .001) and was similar to healthy uteri. The receiver operator characteristic curve identified 5.9 mm (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 41.4%) as a new threshold length of subseptation, which shows a postoperative cavity adjustment comparable to a subseptation greater than 10 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The relevance of subseptations shorter than 10 mm is currently undetermined and underestimated. Our data indicate a new subseptation cutoff length with postoperative remodeling and statistical relevance similar to longer subseptations. We propose a revision of the recommendations for surgical correction to include the objectively obtained subseptation length greater than or equal to 5.9 mm.