Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 56(6)2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29643194

RESUMO

Clostridium difficile colonizes the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, resulting in either asymptomatic carriage or a spectrum of diarrheal illness. If clinical suspicion for C. difficile is low, stool samples are often submitted for analysis by multiplex molecular assays capable of detecting multiple GI pathogens, and some institutions do not report this organism due to concerns for high false-positive rates. Since clinical disease correlates with organism burden and molecular assays yield quantitative data, we hypothesized that numerical cutoffs could be utilized to improve the specificity of the Luminex xTAG GI pathogen panel (GPP) for C. difficile infection. Analysis of cotested liquid stool samples (n = 1,105) identified a GPP median fluorescence intensity (MFI) value cutoff of ≥1,200 to be predictive of two-step algorithm (2-SA; 96.4% concordance) and toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) positivity. Application of this cutoff to a second cotested data set (n = 1,428) yielded 96.5% concordance. To determine test performance characteristics, concordant results were deemed positive or negative, and discordant results were adjudicated via chart review. Test performance characteristics for the MFI cutoff of ≥150 (standard), MFI cutoff of ≥1,200, and 2-SA were as follows (respectively): concordance, 95, 96, and 97%; sensitivity, 93, 78, and 90%; specificity, 95, 98, and 98%; positive predictive value, 67, 82, and 81%;, and negative predictive value, 99, 98, and 99%. To capture the high sensitivity for organism detection (MFI of ≥150) and high specificity for active infection (MFI of ≥1,200), we developed and applied a reporting algorithm to interpret GPP data from patients (n = 563) with clinician orders only for syndromic panel testing, thus enabling accurate reporting of C. difficile for 95% of samples (514 negative and 5 true positives) irrespective of initial clinical suspicion and without the need for additional testing.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/estatística & dados numéricos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Toxinas Bacterianas/análise , Criança , Enterotoxinas/análise , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Fluorescência , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Immunol Methods ; 422: 111-7, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25865265

RESUMO

We have produced and characterized two chimeric human IgG1 monoclonal antibodies that bind different immunodominant epitopes on Vibrio cholerae lipopolysaccharide (LPS). MAb 2D6 IgG1 recognizes Ogawa O-polysaccharide antigen, while mAb ZAC-3 IgG1 recognizes core/lipid A moiety of Ogawa and Inaba LPS. Both antibodies were expressed using a Nicotiana benthamiana-based rapid antibody-manufacturing platform (RAMP) and evaluated in vitro for activities associated with immunity to V. cholerae, including vibriocidal activity, bacterial agglutination and motility arrest.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/imunologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Epitopos Imunodominantes/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Vibrio cholerae/imunologia , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/biossíntese , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/genética , Anticorpos Monoclonais/biossíntese , Anticorpos Monoclonais/genética , Antígenos de Bactérias/imunologia , Quimera/imunologia , Clonagem Molecular , Epitopos/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/biossíntese , Imunoglobulina G/genética , Lipopolissacarídeos/imunologia , Antígenos O/imunologia , Nicotiana/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA